Abstract
Teachers play a key role in supporting students with self-regulated learning (SRL) at all school levels. Yet, research shows that teachers, like students, struggle with SRL and its implementation. Moreover there are differences in how students regulate their learning at different ages. Due to this development of SRL by age and the crucial role of the teachers in this development, the present study focuses on teachers’ professional competencies regarding SRL implementation and on differences across educational levels. The study provides more in-depth insight into (a) how teachers’ professional competencies (i.e., teachers’ content and pedagogical content knowledge, beliefs consistent or inconsistent with SRL theory, and self-efficacy beliefs regarding SRL implementation) and their self-reported SRL implementation are interrelated and (b) whether and how these relationships vary for teachers of preschool and primary education on the one hand and secondary education on the other hand. In total, 549 teachers completed self-report questionnaires (206 from preschool and primary education, 343 from secondary education). Multigroup path analysis was used to test the hypothesized relationships. The results show that beliefs consistent with SRL theory are positively related to pedagogical content knowledge and feelings of self-efficacy regarding SRL implementation, while a negative relation between beliefs inconsistent with SRL theory and content and pedagogical content knowledge is found. Further, a significant positive relation between self-efficacy and SRL implementation is established, whereas pedagogical content knowledge appeared to be negatively related to SRL implementation. No different relations were found across educational levels.
Zusammenfassung
Lehrkräfte spielen eine Schlüsselrolle bei der Unterstützung von Schüler*innen mit selbstreguliertem Lernen (SRL) in allen Schulstufen. Die Forschung zeigt jedoch, dass Lehrkräfte ebenso wie Schüler*innen Schwierigkeiten mit SRL und dessen Umsetzung haben. Außerdem gibt es Unterschiede in der Art und Weise, wie Schüler*innen ihr Lernen in verschiedenen Altersstufen regulieren. Aufgrund dieser altersabhängigen Entwicklung von SRL und der entscheidenden Rolle der Lehrkräfte bei dieser Entwicklung bietet die vorliegende Studie einen tieferen Einblick in (a) die Zusammenhänge zwischen den professionellen Kompetenzen der Lehrkräfte (d. h. inhaltliches und pädagogisches Wissen, Überzeugungen, die mit der SRL-Theorie übereinstimmen oder nicht, und Selbstwirksamkeitsüberzeugungen in Bezug auf die Umsetzung von SRL) und ihrer selbstberichteten Umsetzung von SRL und (b) die Frage, ob und wie diese Zusammenhänge bei Lehrkräften im Bereich Kindergarten und Grundschule einerseits und des Sekundarbereichs andererseits variieren. Insgesamt füllten 549 Lehrkräfte Selbstauskunftsfragebögen aus. Die hypothetischen Zusammenhänge wurden mit Hilfe einer Mehrgruppen-Pfadanalyse überprüft. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass Überzeugungen, die mit der SRL-Theorie übereinstimmen, positiv mit dem Wissen über pädagogische Inhalte und dem Selbstwirksamkeitsgefühl in Bezug auf die Umsetzung von SRL verbunden sind. Es wurde auch ein negativer Zusammenhang zwischen Überzeugungen, die nicht mit der SRL-Theorie übereinstimmen, und dem Wissen über Inhalte und pädagogische Inhalte festgestellt. Darüber hinaus wurde ein signifikanter positiver Zusammenhang zwischen Selbstwirksamkeit und der Umsetzung von SRL festgestellt, wohingegen das Wissen über pädagogische Inhalte in einem negativen Zusammenhang mit der Umsetzung von SRL zu stehen schien. Alle Beziehungen werden in ähnlicher Weise für jede Schulform bestätigt.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191.
Barr, S., & Askell-Williams, H. (2019). Changes in teachers’ epistemic cognition about self-regulated learning as they engaged in a researcher-facilitated professional learning community. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 48(2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2019.1599098.
Bellhäuser, H., Liborius, P., & Schmitz, B. (2022). Fostering self-regulated learning in online environments : positive effects of a web-based training with peer feedback on learning behavior. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.813381.
Bentler, P. M. (2009). Alpha, dimension-free, and model-based internal consistency reliability. Psychometrika, 74(1), 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9100-1.
Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: where we are today. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 445–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00014-2.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005.
Burger, J., Bellhäuser, H., & Imhof, M. (2021). Mentoring styles and novice teachers’ well-being : the role of basic need satisfaction. Teaching and Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103345.
Darmawan, I. G. N., Vosniadou, S., Lawson, M. J., Van Deur, P., & Wyra, M. (2020). The development of an instrument to test pre-service teachers’ beliefs consistent and inconsistent with self-regulation theory. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 1039–1061. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12345.
De Smul, M., Heirweg, S., Van Keer, H., Devos, G., & Vandevelde, S. (2018). How competent do teachers feel instructing self-regulated learning strategies? Development a validation of the teacher self-efficacy scale to implement self-regulated learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 71, 214–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.01.001.
De Smul, M., Heirweg, S., Devos, G., & Van Keer, H. (2020). It’s not only about the teacher! A qualitative study into the role of school climate in primary schools’ implementation of self-regulated learning. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 31(3), 381–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2019.1672758.
Dent, A. L., & Koenka, A. C. (2016). The relation between self-regulated learning and academic achievement across childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 28(3), 425–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9320-8.
Dignath, C., & Büttner, G. (2018). Teachers’ direct and indirect promotion of self-regulated learning in primary and secondary school mathematics classes—insights from video-based classroom observations and teacher interviews. Metacognition and Learning, 13(2), 127–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-018-9181-x.
Dignath, C., & Sprenger, L. (2020). Can you only diagnose what you know? The relation between teachers’ self-regulation of learning concepts and their assessment of students’ self-regulation. Frontiers in Education, 5, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.585683.
Dignath, C., & Veenman, M. V. J. (2020). The role of direct strategy instruction and indirect activation of self-regulated learning—Evidence from classroom observation studies. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09534-0.
Dignath-van Ewijk, C. (2016). Which components of teacher competence determine whether teachers enhance self-regulated learning ? Predicting teachers’ self-reported promotion of self-regulated learning by means of teacher beliefs , knowledge , and self-efficacy. Frontline Learning Research, 4(5), 83–105. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v4i5.247.
Dignath-van Ewijk, C., & van der Werf, G. (2012). What teachers think about self-regulated learning: Investigating teacher beliefs and teacher behavior of enhancing students’ self-regulation. Education Research International. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/741713.
Dignath-van Ewijk, C., Dickhäuser, O., & Büttner, G. (2013). Assessing how teachers enhance self-regulated learning: a multiperspective approach. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 12(3), 338–359. https://doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.12.3.338.
Donker, A. S., de Boer, H., Kostons, D., Dignath-van Ewijk, C., & van der Werf, M. P. C. (2014). Effectiveness of learning strategy instruction on academic performance: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 11, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.11.002.
Glogger-Frey, I., Ampatziadis, Y., Ohst, A., & Renkl, A. (2018). Future teachers’ knowledge about learning strategies: misconcepts and knowledge-in-pieces. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 28, 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.02.001.
Greene, J. A. (2021). Teacher support for metacognition and self-regulated learning: a compelling story and a prototypical model. Metacognition and Learning, 16(3), 651–666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-021-09283-7.
Heirweg, S., De Smul, M., Merchie, E., Devos, G., & Van Keer, H. (2020). Do you reap what you sow? The relationship between primary school students’ self-regulated learning and student, teacher, and school determinants. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 32(1), 118–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2020.1797829.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.
Karlen, Y., Hertel, S., & Hirt, C. N. (2020). Teachers’ professional competences in self-regulated learning: An approach to integrate teachers’ competences as self-regulated learners and as agents of self-regulated learning in a holistic manner. Frontiers in Education, 5, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00159.
Kistner, S., Rakoczy, K., Otto, B., Dignath-van Ewijk, C., Büttner, G., & Klieme, E. (2010). Promotion of self-regulated learning in classrooms: Investigating frequency, quality, and consequences for student performance. Metacognition and Learning, 5(2), 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-010-9055-3.
Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A. (2013). Professional competence of teachers: effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 805–820. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032583.
Lawson, M. J., Vosniadou, S., Van Deur, P., Wyra, M., & Jeffries, D. (2019). Teachers’ and students’ belief systems about the self-regulation of learning. Educational Psychology Review, 31(1), 223–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9453-7.
Lombaerts, K., Engels, N., & Athanasou, J. (2007). Development and validation of the Self-Regulated Learning’ Inventory for Teachers. Perspectives in Education, 25(4), 29–47.
Lombaerts, K., De Backer, F., Engels, N., Van Braak, J., & Athanasou, J. (2009a). Development of the self-regulated learning teacher belief scale. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 24(1), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173476.
Lombaerts, K., Engels, N., & Van Braak, J. (2009b). Determinants of teachers’ recognitions of self-regulated learning practices in elementary education. Journal of Educational Research, 102(3), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.102.3.163-174.
Michalsky, T., & Schechter, C. (2013). Preservice teachers’ capacity to teach self-regulated learning: Integrating learning from problems and learning from successes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 30, 60–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.10.009.
Oates, S. (2019). The importance of autonomous , self-regulated learning in primary initial teacher training. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00102.
Peeters, J., De Backer, F., Reina, V. R., Kindekens, A., Buffel, T., & Lombaerts, K. (2014). The role of teachers’ self-regulatory capacities in the implementation of self-regulated learning practices. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1963–1970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.504.
Perry, N., Phillips, L., & Dowler, J. (2004). Examining features of tasks and their potential to promote self-regulated learning. Teachers College Record, 106(9), 1854–1878. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00408.x.
R Core Team (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/
Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02.
Savelei, V., Brace, J. C., & Fouladi, R. T. (2023). We need to change how we compute RMSEA for nested model comparisons in structural equation modeling. Psychological Methods. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000537.
Schreiber, J. B., Stage, F. K., King, J., Nora, A., & Barlow, E. A. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411.
Spruce, R., & Bol, L. (2015). Teacher beliefs, knowledge, and practice of self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 10(2), 245–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-014-9124-0.
Steinbach, J., & Stoeger, H. (2016). How primary school teachers’ attitudes towards self-regulated learning (SRL) influence instructional behavior and training implementation in classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 256–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.08.017.
Vandevelde, S., Vandenbussche, L., & Van Keer, H. (2012). Stimulating self-regulated learning in primary education: Encouraging versus hampering factors for teachers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 1562–1571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.099.
Vosniadou, S., Lawson, M. J., Wyra, M., Van Deur, P., Jeffries, D., & Darmawan, I. G. N. (2020). Pre-service teachers’ beliefs about learning and teaching and about the self-regulation of learning: A conceptual change perspective. International Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.101495.
Vosniadou, S., Darmawan, I. G. N., Lawson, M. J., Van Deur, P., Jeffries, D., & Wyra, M. (2021). Beliefs about the self-regulation of learning predict cognitive and metacognitive strategies and academic performance in pre-service teachers. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09258-0.
Whitebread, D., Coltman, P., Pasternak, D. P., Sangster, C., Grau, V., Bingham, S., Almeqdad, Q., & Demetriou, D. (2009). The development of two observational tools for assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning in young children. Metacognition and Learning, 4(1), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9033-1.
Yuan, K.-H., & Chan, W. (2016). Measurement invariance via multigroup SEM: Issues and solutions with chi-square-fifference tests. Psychological Methods, 21(3), 405–426. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000080.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Yves Rosseel and Dries Debeer for their statistical advice.
Funding
No funding was received for conducting this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
L. Backers, F. De Smedt and H. Van Keer declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Backers, L., De Smedt, F. & Van Keer, H. Teachers as agents of self-regulated learning (SRL): Studying the relations between teachers’ knowledge, beliefs, and SRL implementation across educational levels. Unterrichtswiss 52, 15–38 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42010-023-00190-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42010-023-00190-1
Keywords
- Self-regulated learning
- Teacher competence
- Pedagogical content knowledge
- Content knowledge
- Teacher beliefs
- Self-efficacy
- Path analysis