SpringerLink
Log in

CLPB: chaotic learner performance based behaviour

  • Original Research
  • Published:
International Journal of Information Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents an enhanced version of the Learner Performance-based Behavior (LPB), a novel metaheuristic algorithm inspired by the process of accepting high-school students into various departments at the university. The performance of the LPB is not according to the required level. This paper aims to improve the performance of a single objective LPB by embedding ten chaotic maps within LPB to propose Chaotic LPB (CLPB). The proposed algorithm helps in reducing the Processing Time (PT), getting closer to the global optima, and bypassing the local optima with the best convergence speed. Another improvement that has been made in CLPB is that the best individuals of a sub-population are forced into the interior crossover to improve the quality of solutions. CLPB is evaluated against multiple well-known test functions such as classical (TF1_TF19) and (CEC_C06 2019). Additionally, the results have been compared to the standard LPB and several well-known metaheuristic algorithms such as Dragon Fly Algorithm (DA), Genetic Algorithm (GA), and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). Finally, the numerical results show that CLPB has been improved with chaotic maps. Furthermore, it is verified that CLPB has a great ability to deal with large optimization problems compared to LPB, GA, DA, and PSO. Overall, Gauss and Tent maps both have a great impact on improving CLPB.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Du K-L, Swamy MNS (2016) Search and optimization by metaheuristics. Springer International Publishing, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41192-7

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Rahman CM, Rashid TA (2021) A new evolutionary algorithm: learner performance based behavior algorithm. Egypt Inform J 22(2):213–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eij.2020.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bezdek JC (1992) On the relationship between neural networks, pattern recognition and intelligence. Int J Approx Reason 6(2):85–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/0888-613x(92)90013-p

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lu H, Wang X, Fei Z, Qiu M (2014) The effects of using chaotic map on improving the performance of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms. Math Probl Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/924652

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Javidi M, Hosseinpourfard R (2015) Chaos genetic algorithm instead genetic algorithm. Int Arab J Inf Technol 12(2):163–168

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jain M, Kumar I (2023) Genetic algorithm in the single server inventory retrial queueing system with time and stock level dependent customer arrival rate. Int J Inf Technol 15(8):4537–4549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-023-01440-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gandomi AH, Yang X-S (2014) Chaotic bat algorithm. J Comput Sci 5(2):224–232

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Kohli M, Arora S (2017) Chaotic grey wolf optimization algorithm for constrained optimization problems. J Comput Des Eng 5(4):458–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcde.2017.02.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaur G, Arora S (2018) Chaotic whale optimization algorithm. J Comput Des Eng 5(3):275–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcde.2017.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mohammed HM, Rashid TA (2021) Chaotic fitness-dependent optimizer for planning and engineering design. Soft Comput 25(22):14281–14295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-06135-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Verma A, Dhanda N, Yadav V (2022) Binary particle swarm optimization based edge detection under weighted image sharpening filter. Int J Inf Technol 15(1):289–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-022-01127-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chhikara R, Sharma P, Chandra B, Malik N (2023) Modified Bird Swarm Algorithm for blind image steganalysis. Int J Inf Technol 15(6):2877–2888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-023-01355-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Attuluri S, Ramesh M (2023) Multi-objective discrete harmony search algorithm for privacy preservation in cloud data centers. Int J Inf Technol 15(8):3983–3997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-023-01462-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nakra A, Duhan M (2022) Deep neural network with harmony search based optimal feature selection of EEG signals for motor imagery classification. Int J Inf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-021-00857-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Biswas HR, Hasan MM, Bala SK (2018) Chaos theory and its applications in our real life. Barishal Univ J Part 1 1(5):123–140

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mirjalili S (2015) Dragonfly algorithm: a new meta-heuristic optimization technique for solving single-objective, discrete, and multi-objective problems. Neural Comput Appl 27(4):1053–1073. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-015-1920-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Price KV, Awad NH, Ali MZ, Suganthan PN (2018) The 100-digit challenge: problem definitions and evaluation criteria for the 100-digit challenge special session and competition on single objective numerical optimization, Nanyang Technological University, Technical Report, Singapore

  18. Liang JJ, Suganthan PN, Deb K (2005) Novel composition test functions for numerical global optimization, in Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposium, 2005. SIS 2005, pp 68–75 [online] (Proceedings of 2005 IEEE), pp 68–75. Available at: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1501604. Accessed 10 June 2005

  19. Hamad RK, Rashid TA (2024) GOOSE algorithm: a powerful optimization tool for real-world engineering challenges and beyond. EvolvingSystems. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12530-023-09553-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Abdullah JM, Ahmed T (2019) Fitness dependent optimizer: inspired by the bee swarming reproductive process. IEEE Access 7:43473–43486. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2907012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hama Rashid DN, Rashid TA, Mirjalili S (2021) ANA: ant nesting algorithm for optimizing real-world problems. Mathematics 9:3111. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9233111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mohammed H, Rashid T (2023) FOX: a FOX-inspired optimization algorithm. Appl Intell 53:1030–1050. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-03533-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ahmed S et al (2019) Donkey and smuggler optimization algorithm: a collaborative working approach to path finding. J Comput Des Eng 6(4):562–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcde.2019.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Abdulhameed S, Rashid TA (2022) Child drawing development optimization algorithm based on child’s cognitive development. Arab J Sci Eng 47:1337–1351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-05928-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the University of Kurdistan-Hewler for providing facilities for this research work.

Funding

This study was not funded.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of CS, College of Computer Science and Information Technology, Catholic University in Erbil, Erbil, KR, Iraq

    Dona A. Franci

  2. Computer Science and Engineering, University of Kurdistan Hewler, Erbil, KR, Iraq

    Dona A. Franci & Tarik A. Rashid

Authors
  1. Dona A. Franci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tarik A. Rashid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tarik A. Rashid.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Franci, D.A., Rashid, T.A. CLPB: chaotic learner performance based behaviour. Int. j. inf. tecnol. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-024-01875-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-024-01875-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation