Log in

Noise cancellation of polycystic ovarian syndrome ultrasound images using robust two-dimensional fractional fourier transform filter and VGG-16 model

  • Original Research
  • Published:
International Journal of Information Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The occurrence of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS) among women of reproductive age is increasing worldwide. PCOS is recognized as a critical health issue that can harm physical and mental health of women. This motivates clinicians and radiologists to identify PCOS at initial stages avoiding further complications. Conditions such as hirsutism and gynecomastia are analysed to detect PCOS through ultrasound imaging to obtain position, size and number of follicles. However, noise in ultrasound imaging is a serious problem since it can lead to inaccurate disease diagnosis. It is critical to restore image quality by lowering noise levels in order to extract information from medical images. The proposed work develops a denoising filter by using Two-Dimensional Fractional Fourier Transform (2D-FrFT) to remove artifacts from PCOS ultrasound images in time–frequency plane. The optimal value of a critical parameter of 2D-FrFT—fractional operator (a), used for efficient denoising at different angles, is evaluated by a VGG-16 deep learning model after synthetically corrupting the images with speckle noise of various levels. Experimental results uphold the pre-eminence of suggested method over available denoising methods by attaining Root-Mean-Square Error (RMSE) of 0.2309, Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR) of 72.9689 and Structural Similarity (SSIM) of 0.99. The proposed method filters the high frequency noises from the PCOS Ultrasound dataset to yield better quality images for enhanced segmentation and classification models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The dataset used in proposed work is publicly accessible at https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/anaghachoudhari/pcos-detection-using-ultrasound-images/

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Palomba S (2018) Infertility in women with polycystic ovary syndrome, 1st edn. Springer, Cham (ISBN: 978-3-319-45534)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Denny A, Raj A, Ram C and George R. i-HOPE: Detection and prediction system for polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) using machine learning techniques. IEEE Region 10 International Conference TENCON. 2019. 673–678.

  3. Vassalou H, Sotiraki M, Michala L (2019) PCOS diagnosis in adolescents: the timeline of a controversy in a systematic review. J Paediatr ndocrinol Metab 32(6):549–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jha M, Gupta R and Saxena R. Cervical cancer risk prediction using XGboost classifier. 2021 7th International conference on signal processing and communication (ICSC), 2021:133–136.

  5. Mishra AK, Roy P, Bandyopadhyay S et al (2022) Achieving highly efficient breast ultrasound tumor classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Int J Inf Technol 14:3311–3320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-022-00901-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Copp T, Cvejic E, Mccaffery K, Hersch J, Doust J, Mol B (2020) Impact of a diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome on diet physical activity and contraceptive use in young women: findings from the Australian longitudinal study of women’s health. Hum Reprod 35(2):394–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Patel S (2018) Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), an inflammatory, systemic, lifestyle endocrinopathy. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 82:27–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kiruthika V, Sathiya S, Ramya MM (2020) Machine learning based ovarian detection in ultrasound images. Int J Adv Mechatr Syst 8(3):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  9. **e NN, Wang FF, Zhou J, Chang L (2020) Establishment and analysis of a combined diagnostic model of polycystic ovary syndrome with random forest and artificial neural network. BioMed Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2613091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheng JJ, Mahalingaiah S (2018) Data mining and classification of polycystic ovaries in pelvic ultrasound reports. BioRxiv 37:141

    Google Scholar 

  11. Thomas N (2020) Prediction of polycystic ovarian syndrome with clinical dataset using a novel hybrid data mining classification technique. Int J Adv Res Eng Technol 11:1872–1881

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vasavi G, Jyothi S (2020) Noise reduction using OBNLM filter and deep learning for polycystic ovary syndrome ultrasound images. In: Jyothi S, Mamatha D, Satapathy S, Raju K, Favorskaya M (eds) Advances in computational and bio-engineering CBE 2019 learning and analytics in intelligent systems. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  13. Choubey SB, Choubey A, Nandan D, Mahajan A (2021) Polycystic ovarian syndrome detection by using two-stage image denoising. Traitement du Signal 38(4):1217–1227. https://doi.org/10.18280/ts.380433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hdaib, Dana & Jo, Wan & Mustafa, Wan & al-azzawi, Waleed & Alkhayyat, Ahmed & Alquran, Hiam. (2022). Detection of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) Using Machine Learning Algorithms.

  15. Suha SA, Islam MN (2022) An extended machine learning technique for polycystic ovary syndrome detection using ovary ultrasound image. Sci Rep 12:17123. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21724-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Duarte-salazar CA, Castro-ospina AE, Becerra MA, Delgado-Trejos E (2020) Speckle noise reduction in ultrasound images for improving the metrological evaluation of biomedical applications: an overview. IEEE Access 8:15983–15999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shekar BH, Raveeshwara S (2022) Contour feature learning for locating text in natural scene images. Int j inf tecnol 14:1719–1724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-021-00851-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang X. Lee Filter for Multiscale Image Denoising. 2006 8th international Conference on Signal Processing. 2006.

  19. Banerjee S, Chaudhuri S, Mehra R and Misra A. A comprehensive survey on frost filter and its proposed variants. 2020 5th International Conference on Communication and Electronics Systems (ICCES), 2020:109–114.

  20. Akl A, Tabbara K and Yaacoub C. An enhanced Kuan filter for suboptimal speckle reduction. 2012 2nd International Conference on Advances in Computational Tools for Engineering Applications (ACTEA). 2012:91–95.

  21. Lavanya, K.G., Dhanalakshmi, P. & Nandhini, M. Computerized segmentation of MR brain tumor: an integrated approach of multi-modal fusion and unsupervised clustering. Int. j. inf. tecnol. (2023).

  22. Djurovi I (2016) BM3D filter in salt-and-pepper noise removal. J Image Video Process 10(1):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  23. Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) Dataset, Kaggle [online]. Available at: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/abhiramir/pcos-ultrasound

  24. Huating, T., Jie, Y. & **, T. A fractional Fourier transform stepwise simplification algorithm for wireless signal detection. Int. j. inf. tecnol. (2023).

  25. Liu S. and Deng W. Very deep convolutional neural network based image classification using small training sample size. 2015 3rd IAPR Asian Conference on pattern recognition (ACPR), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 730–734 (2015).

  26. Ghosh C, Verma A, Verma P (2022) Real time fault detection in railway tracks using Fast fourier transformation and discrete wavelet transformation. Int j inf tecnol 14:31–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jha M, Gupta R, Saxena R (2023) Fast and precise prediction of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) using sequence alignment and k-mer counting. Int j inf tecnol 15:577–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MJ went through the literature survey, data collection and worked on designing the denoising model. RG and RS worked on the pre-processing steps and supervised the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manika Jha.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jha, M., Gupta, R. & Saxena, R. Noise cancellation of polycystic ovarian syndrome ultrasound images using robust two-dimensional fractional fourier transform filter and VGG-16 model. Int. j. inf. tecnol. 16, 2497–2504 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-024-01773-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-024-01773-6

Keywords

Navigation