Log in

Soil classification using active contour model for efficient texture feature extraction

  • Original Research
  • Published:
International Journal of Information Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Precision farming is a systematic approach in agriculture that aims in improving economic and environment status of the farmers. It is achieved by having prior knowledge on soil texture, nutrient, pH and other climatic conditions. Hence this paper proposes a soil classification for crop prediction approach that uses an active contour algorithm for band estimation in Fourier domain for efficient texture feature extraction. This approach initially segments the soil sample and extracts into the color and texture features. The approach proposes a texture feature extraction where the image is initially transformed to Fourier domain of a 2D-discrete Fourier transform. The image in the Fourier domain is classified into high and low-frequency bands. The cut off frequency is decided by final contour of active contour method, where initial circular contour is used for estimating final contours on Fourier coefficients. This leads to the estimation of an irregular-shaped cut off frequency along with the 2D Fourier coefficients, instead of using a circular-shaped cut off frequency. A local binary pattern (LBP) from the high-frequency band image extracts texture feature. The extracted texture and color features are trained using a fully connected network. Active contour-based proposed model was evaluated by metrics F1-score, accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, and precision on soil datasets of Kaggle and IRSID. The accuracy, F1-score, specificity, precision, and sensitivity of proposed approach active contour-based were estimated as 97.89%, 97.87%, 99.46%, 98.11 and 97.94% respectively when evaluated in the Kaggle dataset. The evaluation results of proposed active contour model based soil classification outperform other traditional approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Dataset supporting this study will be available https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/soil-types-classification-2020.

References

  1. Srivastava P, Shukla A, Bansal A (2021) A comprehensive review on soil classification using deep learning and computer vision techniques. Multimedia Tools App 80(10):14887–14914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Romen Singh T, Roy S, Imocha Singh O, Sinam T, Singh Kh (2012) A new local adaptive thresholding technique in binarization. ar**v preprint ar**v:1201.5227

  3. Gould S, T Gao, D Koller (2009) Region-based segmentation and object detection. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 22

  4. Uddin M, Hassan Md (2022) A novel feature based algorithm for soil type classification. Complex Intell Syst 1–17

  5. Das S, Kharbanda K, Suchetha M, Raman R, Dhas E (2021) Deep learning architecture based on segmented fundus image features for classification of diabetic retinopathy. Biomed Signal Process Control 68:102600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Suchetha M, Sai Ganesh N, Raman R, Edwin Dhas D (2021) Region of interest-based predictive algorithm for subretinal hemorrhage detection using faster R-CNN. Soft Comput 25(24):15255–15268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Suchithra MS, Pai ML (2020) Improving the prediction accuracy of soil nutrient classification by optimizing extreme learning machine parameters. Inf Process Agric 7(1):72–82

    Google Scholar 

  8. Barman U, Choudhury RD (2020) Soil texture classification using multi class support vector machine. Inf Process Agric 7(2):318–332

    Google Scholar 

  9. Inazumi S, Intui S, Jotisankasa A, Chaiprakaikeow S, Kojima K (2020) Artificial intelligence system for supporting soil classification. Results Eng 8:100188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yu Y, Xu T, Shen Z, Zhang Y, Wang X (2019) Compressive spectral imaging system for soil classification with three-dimensional convolutional neural network. Opt Exp 27(16):23029–23048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Barman U, Choudhury RD, Talukdar N, Deka P, Kalita I, Rahman N (2018) Predication of soil pH using HSI colour image processing and regression over Guwahati, Assam, India. J Appl Nat Sci 10(2):805–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dornik A, Drăguţ L, Urdea P (2018) Classification of soil types using geographic object-based image analysis and random forests. Pedosphere 28(6):913–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Abraham S, Huynh C, Vu H (2019) Classification of soils into hydrologic groups using machine learning. Data 5(1):2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rahman SAZ, Mitra KC, Mohidul Islam SM (2018) Soil classification using machine learning methods and crop suggestion based on soil series. In: 2018 21st international conference of computer and information technology (ICCIT), pp 1–4. IEEE

  15. Shukla G, Garg RD, Srivastava HS, Garg PK (2018) An effective implementation and assessment of a random forest classifier as a soil spatial predictive model. Int J Remote Sens 39(8):2637–2669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wu W, Li A-D, He X-H, Ma R, Liu H-B, Lv J-K (2018) A comparison of support vector machines, artificial neural network and classification tree for identifying soil texture classes in southwest China. Comput Electron Agric 144:86–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chernov V, Alander J, Bochko V (2015) Integer-based accurate conversion between RGB and HSV color spaces. Comput Electr Eng 46:328–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tian Y, Duan F, Zhou M, Wu Z (2013) Active contour model combining region and edge information. Mach Vis Appl 24(1):47–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rosten E, Drummond T (2005) Fusing points and lines for high performance tracking. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, vol 2, October, pp 1508–1511

  20. Liu K, Kang G, Zhang N, Hou B (2018) Breast cancer classification based on fully-connected layer first convolutional neural networks. IEEE Access 6:23722–23732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kiran Pandiri DN, Murugan R, Goel T (2021) Indian regions soil image database (IRSID): a dataset for classification of Indian soils. IEEE Dataport. https://doi.org/10.21227/2zz3-f173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kaggle dataset: https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/soil-types-classification-2020

  23. Albawi S, Mohammed TA, Al-Zawi S (2017) Understanding of a convolutional neural network. In: 2017 international conference on engineering and technology (ICET), pp 1–6. IEEE

  24. Pegalajar MC, Baca Ruíz LG, Sánchez-Marañón M, Mansilla L (2020) A Munsell colour-based approach for soil classification using fuzzy logic and artificial neural networks. FUZZY Sets Syst 401:38–54

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Zamani V, Taghaddos H, Gholipour Y, Pourreza H (2022) Deep semantic segmentation for visual scene understanding of soil types. Autom Constr 140:104342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lanjewar MG, Gurav OL (2022) Convolutional neural networks based classifications of soil images. Multimedia Tools Appl 81(7):10313–10336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Afshin A, Huat Bujang BK, Hossein M, Nader S, Alireza P (2011) Changes of hydraulic conductivity of silty clayey sand soil under the effects of municipal solid waste leachate. Int J Phys Sci 6(12):2869–2874

    Google Scholar 

  28. Guo Z, Zhang L, Zhang D (2010) A completed modeling of local binary pattern operator for texture classification. IEEE Trans Image Process 19(6):1657–1663

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sharmila G.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

G, S., Rajamohan, K. Soil classification using active contour model for efficient texture feature extraction. Int. j. inf. tecnol. 15, 3791–3805 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-023-01404-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-023-01404-6

Keywords

Navigation