Log in

An approach based on modified multiple attribute decision making for optimal node deployment in wireless sensor networks

  • Original Research
  • Published:
International Journal of Information Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The importance of Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) research is enhanced by the digital era. Many authors propose various issues, each with its own set of remedies. The real world deployment of WSN with cost, area coverage, Cluster Head (CH) coverage, and sink connectivity constraints necessitates an assessment of total sensor count for deployment with CH coverage and sink connectivity circumstances. The amount of total area sensed by deployed sensor nodes is referred to as area coverage. Sink connectivity indicates that the CHs are connected to the sink and can convey the data directly without amplification. CH coverage means that the sensor node can transfer the sensed data to its CH without amplification. AHP-M-TOPSIS is a hybrid Multi Attribute Decision Making (MADM) method for selecting the best option with the least cost and the most efficient coverage and connectivity. In the selected AHP-M-TOPSIS we pass relevant parameters values to choose appropriate solution. The numbers of dead nodes, residual energy are all included in a comparison of the AHP-M-TOPSIS, LEACH, SNPCM, BASE, and SAW with three parameters protocols. The results reveal that the AHP-M-TOPSIS protocol outperforms the other existing protocols.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Heinzelman WB, Chandrakasan BH (2002) An-application-specific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 1(4):660–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Thakur A, Prasad D, Verma A (2017) Deployment scheme in wireless sensor network: a review. Int J Comput Appl 163(5):12–15

    Google Scholar 

  3. Singh A, Kumar A, Kumar A (2020) Multi-parameter based load balanced clustering in WSN using MADM technique. In: 4th International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology (ICECA) IEEE, pp 814–820

  4. Singh SH, Verma KR, Rajpoot P (2018) Partition based strategic node placement and efficient communication method for WSN. In: 3rd IEEE International Conference on Recent Trends in Electronics, Information & Communication Technology (RTEICT) IEEE, pp 1807–1812

  5. Rajpoot P, Dwivedi P (2021) MADM based optimal nodes deployment for WSN with optimal coverage and connectivity. IOP Conf Ser 1020(1):012003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Farahzadi HR, Langarizadeh M, Mirhosseini M, Aghda SAF (2021) An improved cluster formation process in wireless sensor network to decrease energy consumption. Wirel Netw 27(2):1077–1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Aslam M, Munir EU, Bilal M, Asad M, Ali A, Shah T, Bilal S (2014) HADCC: hybrid advanced distributed and centralized clustering path planning algorithm for WSNs. In: 28th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications IEEE, pp 657–664

  8. Chen C, Liu X, Qi H, Zhao L, Ren Z (2015) A security enhancement and energy saving clustering scheme in smart grid sensor network, IEEE. In: 16th International Conference on Communication Technology (ICCT), pp 848–855

  9. Cheng BC, Yeh HH, Hsu PH (2011) Schedulability analysis for hard network lifetime wireless sensor networks with high energy _rst clustering. IEEE Trans Reliab 60(3):675–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Halder S, Ghosal A (2015) Lifetime maximizing clustering structure using archimedes spiral based deployment in WSNs. In: IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management (IM).

  11. Guzman Medina CA, Rivero Angeles ME, Orea Flores IY (2015) ON/OFF protocol for the life extension of low energy level nodes in wireless sensor networks. In: International Conference on Computing Systems and Telematics (ICCSAT) IEEE, pp 1–5

  12. Lee JS, Kao TY (2016) An improved three-layer low-energy adaptive clustering hierarchy for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Internet Things J 3(6):951–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zaman N, Low TJ, Alghamdi T (2015) Enhancing routing energy efficiency of wireless sensor networks. In: 17th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT) IEEE, pp 587–595

  14. Krishna RK, Ramanjaneyulu BS (2018) A strategic node placement and communication method for energy efficient wireless sensor network. Proceedings of 2nd international conference on micro- electronics electromagnetics and telecommunications. Springer, Singapore, pp 95–103

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Yaqoob MM, Israr I, Javaid N, Khan MA, Qasim U, Khan ZA (2012) Transmission delay of multi-hop heterogeneous networks for medical applications. In: Seventh International Conference on Broadband, Wireless Computing, Communication and Applications IEEE, pp 428–433

  16. Javaid N, Qasim U, Khan ZA, Khan MA, Latif K, Javaid A (2013) On energy efficiency and delay minimization in reactive protocols in Wireless Multi-hop networks. In: Saudi International Electronics, Communications and Photonics Conference IEEE, pp 1–4

  17. De Freitas EP, Heimfarth T, Pereira CE, Ferreira AM, Wagner FR, Larsson T (2009) Evaluation of coordination strategies for heterogeneous sensor networks aiming at surveillance applications. In: SENSORS IEEE, pp 591–596

  18. Rajpoot P, Dwivedi P (2018) Matrix method for non-dominated sorting and population selection for next generation in multi-objective problem solution. In: 8th International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science and Engineering (Conuence) IEEE, pp 670–676

  19. Rajpoot P, Dwivedi P (2020) Optimized and load balanced clustering for wireless sensor networks to increase the lifetime of WSN using MADM approaches. Wirel Netw 26(1):215–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rajpoot P, Dwivedi P (2019) Multiple parameter based energy balanced and optimized clustering for WSN to enhance the lifetime using MADM approaches. Wirel Pers Commun 106(2):829–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Banaeizadeh F, Haghighat AT (2020) An energy-efficient data gathering scheme in underwater wireless sensor networks using a mobile sink. Int J Inf Technol 12(2):513–522

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kumar SS, Palanichamy Y, Selvi M, Ganapathy S, Kannan A, Perumal SP (2021) Energy efficient secured K means based unequal fuzzy clustering algorithm for efficient reprogramming in wireless sensor networks. Wirel Netw. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-021-02660-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bongale AM, Nirmala CR, Bongale AM (2020) Energy efficient intra-cluster data aggregation technique for wireless sensor network. Int J Inf Technol 14:827–835

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nabi F, Jamwal S, Padmanbh K (2020) Wireless sensor network in precision farming for forecasting and monitoring of apple disease: a survey. Int J Inf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-020-00418-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Agarkhed J, Dattatraya PY, Patil S (2021) Multi-QoS constraint multipath routing in cluster-based wireless sensor network. Int J Inf Technol 13(3):865–876

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ohlan A (2021) Multiple attribute decision-making based on distance measure under pythagorean fuzzy environment. Int J Inf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-021-00800-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sharma R, Singh U (2021) Fuzzy based energy efficient clustering for designing WSN-based smart parking systems. Int J Inf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-021-00789-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Saha M, Panda SK, Panigrahi S (2021) A hybrid multi-criteria decision making algorithm for cloud service selection. Int J Inf Technol 13(4):1417–1422

    Google Scholar 

  29. Krishna RK, Ramanjaneyulu BS (2018) A strategic node placement and communication method for energy efficient wireless sensor network. Proceedings of 2nd international conference on micro- electronics, electromagnetics and telecommunications. Springer, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lekhraj.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lekhraj, Kumar, A. & Kumar, A. An approach based on modified multiple attribute decision making for optimal node deployment in wireless sensor networks. Int. j. inf. tecnol. 14, 1805–1814 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-022-00919-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-022-00919-8

Keywords

Navigation