SpringerLink
Log in

A GIS-based approach for evaluating public open spaces in Dammam city, Saudi Arabia

  • Published:
Spatial Information Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has experienced rapid urbanization and population growth in recent decades. As a result, Saudi people have sought more public open spaces (POS) for social and physical activities. Moreover, each POS provides valuable services and opportunities for urban population. The Saudi government aims to provide the minimum standard value of per capita POS (9 m2/person) suggested by the World Health Organization (WHO). Therefore, valuating POS spatial characteristics is essential for local planners and decision-makers to prepare future urban and landscape development plans. This study aimed to quantitatively and spatially evaluate the POS in Dammam City. Five types of POS were considered: parks, walkways, plazas, waterfronts, and proposed parks. These types were organized into three assumptions, each targeting the development of certain types of POS. The per capita and service areas for POS were measured for each assumption. The POS per capita was compared with the number of international standards. Finally, the service area was used as an indicator to evaluate POS accessibility. Geographic information system (GIS) functionalities were used to model Dammam City and estimate the indicators required for evaluation. The service area was studied using both buffer and network analysis methods. The findings revealed that Dammam’s per capita POS of less than 7 m2/person is less than any international standard, and that a significant proportion of the city’s inhabitants do not have convenient access to POS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2019) World urbanization prospects: the 2018 revision

  2. United Nations Department for Economic and Social Affairs (2020) Sustainable Development Goals Report 2020. United Nations, S.l

  3. UN-Habitat,. (2015). Global public space toolkit: From global principles to local policies and practice. Nairobi: United Nations Human Settlements Programme UN-Habitat.

    Google Scholar 

  4. US EPA What is Open Space/Green Space? In: United States Environmental Protection Agency. https://www3.epa.gov/region1/eco/uep/openspace.html. Accessed 22 Oct 2021

  5. Gehl, J. (1987). Life between buildings: Using public space. Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  6. UN-Habitat,. (2020). City-Wide Public Space Strategies: a Guidebook for City Leaders. Nairobi: United Nations Human Settlements Programme UN-Habitat.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Carmona, M. (2010). Contemporary public space, part two: Classification. Journal of Urban Design, 15, 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574801003638111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nochian, A., Mohd Tahir, O., Maulan, S., & Rakhshandehroo, M. (2015). A Comprehensive public open space categorization using classification System for sustainable development of public open spaces. International Journal on Sustainable Tropical Design Research and Practice, 8, 29–40.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pratt, A. (2017). The rise of the quasi-public space and its consequences for cities and culture. Palgrave Commun, 3, 36. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-017-0048-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Newman, O. (1996). Creating Defensible Space (2nd ed.). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Paul, A., Nath, T. K., Noon, S. J., et al. (2020). Public Open space, Green exercise and well-being in Chittagong. Bangladesh. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 55, 126825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Swapan, A. Y., Bay, J. H., & Marinova, D. (2019). Importance of the residential front yard for social sustainability: Comparing sense of community levels in semi-private-public open spaces. Journal of Green Building, 14, 177–202. https://doi.org/10.3992/1943-4618.14.2.177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Van Hecke, L., Ghekiere, A., Veitch, J., et al. (2018). Public open space characteristics influencing adolescents’ use and physical activity: A systematic literature review of qualitative and quantitative studies. Health & Place, 51, 158–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jennings, V., & Bamkole, O. (2019). The Relationship between social cohesion and urban green space: An avenue for health promotion. IJERPH, 16, 452. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16030452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sugiyama, T., Gunn, L. D., Christian, H., et al. (2015). Quality of public open spaces and recreational walking. American Journal of Public Health, 105, 2490–2495. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hooper, P., Knuiman, M., Bull, F., et al. (2015). Are we develo** walkable suburbs through urban planning policy? Identifying the mix of design requirements to optimise walking outcomes from the ‘Liveable Neighbourhoods’ planning policy in Perth, Western Australia. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 12, 63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-015-0225-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Noordzij, J. M., Beenackers, M. A., Oude Groeniger, J., & Van Lenthe, F. J. (2020). Effect of changes in green spaces on mental health in older adults: A fixed effects analysis. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 74, 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2019-212704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Selmi, W., Weber, C., Rivière, E., et al. (2016). Air pollution removal by trees in public green spaces in Strasbourg city, France. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 17, 192–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.04.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Aleksandrowicz, O., Vuckovic, M., Kiesel, K., & Mahdavi, A. (2017). Current trends in urban heat island mitigation research: Observations based on a comprehensive research repository. Urban Climate, 21, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2017.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Abbasi, A., Alalouch, C., & Bramley, G. (2016). Open space quality in deprived urban areas: User perspective and use pattern. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216, 194–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen, Q., Du, M., Cheng, Q., & **g, C. (2020). Quantitative evaluation of spatial differentiation for public open spaces in urban built-up areas by assessing SDG 11.7: A case of deqing county. IJGI, 9, 575. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9100575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cuirong, W., Zhao**, Y., Huaxian, L., et al. (2016). Campgrounds suitability evaluation using GIS-based multiple criteria decision analysis: A case study of kuerdening. China. Open Geosciences. https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2016-0028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Seifu, S., & Stellmacher, T. (2021). Accessibility of public recreational parks in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A GIS based analysis at sub-city level. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 57, 126916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Marušić, B. G. (2011). Analysis of patterns of spatial occupancy in urban open space using behaviour maps and GIS. Urban Des Int, 16, 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2010.20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jian, I. Y., Luo, J., & Chan, E. H. W. (2020). Spatial justice in public open space planning: Accessibility and inclusivity. Habitat International, 97, 102122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Addas, A., & Alserayhi, G. (2020). Quantitative evaluation of public open space per inhabitant in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A case study of the city of Jeddah. SAGE Open, 10, 215824402092060. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020920608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Abubakar I, Aina Y Achieving Sustainable Cities in Saudi Arabia: Juggling the Competing Urbanization Challenges. In: E-Planning and Collaboration: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications

  28. GaStat (2021) General Authority of Statistics. In: General Authority of Statistics. https://www.stats.gov.sa/en/node. Accessed 24 Aug 2021

  29. (2017) Vision 2030 for Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

  30. Addas, A., & Rishbeth, C. (2018). The transnational Gulf City: Saudi and migrant values of public open spaces in Jeddah. Landscape Research, 43, 939–951. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2018.1427709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mandeli, K. (2019). Public space and the challenge of urban transformation in cities of emerging economies: Jeddah case study. Cities, 95, 102409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Maniruzzaman, K. M., Alqahtany, A., Abou-Korin, A., & Al-Shihri, F. S. (2021). An analysis of residents’ satisfaction with attributes of urban parks in Dammam city. Saudi Arabia. Ain Shams Engineering Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.11.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Addas, A., & Maghrabi, A. (2020). A proposed planning concept for public open space provision in Saudi Arabia: A study of three Saudi Cities. IJERPH, 17, 5970. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ahmed, B. (1993). Climate of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Kuwait University.

    Google Scholar 

  35. OSGeo QGIS Desktop. In: The Open Source Geospatial Foundation OSGeo. https://www.osgeo.org/projects/qgis/. Accessed 14 Jun 2022

  36. OpenStreetMap contributors OpenStreetMap. In: OpenStreetMap. https://www.openstreetmap.org

  37. Egorov, A., Mudu, M., Braubach, M., & Martuzzi, M. (2016). Urban green spaces and health - a review of evidence. WHO Regional Office for Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Raffler C (2018) QNEAT3 - Qgis Network Analysis Toolbox 3

  39. Russo, A., & Cirella, G. (2018). Modern compact cities: How much greenery do we need? IJERPH, 15, 2180. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. QoLP (2020) Quality of Life Program 2020 - Delivery Plan. Quality of Life Program - Saudi Arabia 2030 Vision

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Landscape Architecture Department, College of Architecture and Planning, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, P.O. Box 1982, Dammam, 31441, Saudi Arabia

    Abdulbaqi Al Taisan & Wisam E. Mohammed

Authors
  1. Abdulbaqi Al Taisan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wisam E. Mohammed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wisam E. Mohammed.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Ethical approval

The material in the study has been ethically approved by all of the paper’s authors.

Consent for publication

All the authors of the paper give their consent to publish the material presented in the paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Taisan, A.A., Mohammed, W.E. A GIS-based approach for evaluating public open spaces in Dammam city, Saudi Arabia. Spat. Inf. Res. 30, 691–706 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-022-00460-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-022-00460-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation