Abstract
The Rapa whelk (Rapana venosa), which entered the Black Sea as an invader, has become a commercial stock and has brought many problems in its management since the 1980s. This research aimed to get a detailed idea about the views of the stakeholders of the Rapa whelk sector and to develop concrete and applicable suggestions for the sustainability of the sector. For this, first of all, all stakeholder groups were brought together and their opinions were taken. Afterward, the management measure suggestions collected from the group were evaluated by everyone through questionnaires. When the general opinions of the stakeholders were evaluated, it was seen that most of the beam trawlers argued that legal restrictions should be softened to be able to fish more while academicians and representatives of environmental organizations stated that environmentally friendly fishing gear should be designed and used to protect the marine ecosystem. The policymakers participating in the workshop think that some arrangements can be made in the current legislation, but there is no need for radical changes. Industry sector stakeholders participating in the workshop, on the other hand, think that measures that restrict their production, such as quota limitation, are not appropriate. In summary, in the study, alternative management measures were examined and their possible effects were evaluated. As a result of this study, recommendations were made for sustainable fishing of Rapa whelk.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs41208-023-00601-1/MediaObjects/41208_2023_601_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs41208-023-00601-1/MediaObjects/41208_2023_601_Fig2_HTML.jpg)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Artüz İ (1989) Marmara denizinde 1986-88 Döneminde yapılan Ekolojik Araştırma sonuçları. Marmara Denizi ve Boğazlarda Çevre Sorunları Sempozyumu 1989
Aydın M, Düzgüneş E, Karadurmuş U (2016) Rapa whelk (Rapana venosa Valenciennes. 1846) fishery along the turkish coast of the Black Sea. J Aquaculture Eng Fisheries Res 2(2):85–96
Busch WDN, Weimer MT, Keppner SM (1999) Aquatic exotic species: a Fisheries Management Dilemma. ASMFC Fisheries Focus 8(9)
Dağtekin M, Candemir S, Erik G, Mısır GB (2022) Determinants of economic efficiency: a case study of Rapa whelk (Rapana venosa) fisheries in the South Black Sea. Ege J Fisheries Aquat Sci 39(1):1–10
Dağtekin. M, Erik G, Altuntaş C, Adıgüzel M (2021b) Rapa Whelk Research Surveys In The Eastern Coastal Waters Of Turkey, GFCM Blacksea4fish Project Final Report, 38
Dağtekin M, Misir DS, Şen İ, Altuntaş C, Balçik Misir G, Çankaya A (2021a) Small-scale fisheries in the southern Black Sea: which factors affect net profit? Acta Ichthyol Piscat 51(2):145–152. https://doi.org/10.3897/aiep.51.62792
Demirel N, Ulman A, Yıldız T, Ertör-Akyazi P (2021) A moving target: Achieving good environmental status and social justice in the case of an alien species. Rapa whelk in the Black Sea. Marine Policy 132:104687
Erik G, Dağtekin M (2022) Effect of Fishery Closure on Discard Composition of Rapa Whelk. Rapana venosa (Valenciennes 1846) Beam Trawl Fisheries in the Black Sea. Turkish J Fisheries Aquat Sci 22(5)
Erik G, Dağtekin M, Çankaya A, Genç Y, Mısır S, Kutlu S (2020) Karadeniz’de Deniz Salyangozu (Rapana venosa Valenciennes 1846) Balıkçılığının İzlenmesi. TAGEM/HAYSÜD/2016/A11/P-02/04.(67pp). Trabzon
GFCM (2019) https://www.fao.org/gfcm/technical-meetings/detail/en/c/1196000/ . Accessed 6 Oct 2022
GFCM (2021) https://www.fao.org/gfcm/technical-meetings/detail/en/c/1439089/ . Accessed 6 Oct 2022
Hatcher A (2022) A Model of Quota Prices in a Multispecies Fishery with “Choke” Species and Discarding. Environ Resource Econ 1–22
Janssen R, Knudsen S, Todorova V, Hoşgör AG (2014) Managing Rapana in the Black Sea: stakeholder workshops on both sides. Ocean Coast Manag 87:75–87
Kaiser MJ, Spencer BE (1996) The effects of beam-trawl disturbance on infaunal communities in different habitats. J Anim Ecol 348–358
Lanfranconi A, Hutton M, Brugnoli E, Muniz P (2009) New record of the alien mollusc Rapana venosa (Valenciennes 1846) in the Uruguay an coastal zone of Río de la Plata. Pan-American J Aquat Sci 4(2):216–221
Mackinson S, Wilson DC, Galiay P, Deas B (2011) Engaging stakeholders in fisheries and marine research. Mar Policy 35(1):18–24
Morrisey DJ, Cole RG, Davey NK, Handley SJ, Bradley A, Brown SN, Madarasz AL (2006) Abundance and diversity of fish on mussel farms in New Zealand. Aquaculture 252(2–4):277–288
Petrova E, Tserkova F, Mihneva V, Stoykov S, Valchev S, Penchev P (2020) Fish bycatch rate by Rapana venosa (Valenciennes. 1846) fishery in the bulgarian Black Sea waters. With a special emphasis on the bycatch of turbot Scophthalmus maximus (L. 1758). Acta Zool Bulg. 165–172
Pita C, Pierce GJ, Theodossiou I (2010) Stakeholders’ participation in the fisheries management decision-making process: fishers’ perceptions of participation. Mar Policy 34(5):1093–1102
Saglam H, Dagtekin M, Kutlu S, Bascinar S, Sahin A, Duzgunes E (2017) Rapa whelk pot fishery in the Black Sea of Turkey: pot type. Soak time. Depth. And season. Cah Biol Mar 58(1):75–81
Savini D (2006) Consumption rates and prey preference of the invasive gastropod Rapana venosa in the Northern Adriatic Sea. Helgol Mar Res 60(2):153–159
Seyhan K, Mazlum ER, Emiral H, Engin S, Demirhan S (2003) Diel feeding periodicity. Gastric emptying. And estimated daily food consumption of whelk (Rapana venosa) in the south eastern Black Sea (Turkey) marine ecosystem
Teaca A, Muresan M, Begun T, Popa A, Ion G (2019) Marine benthic habitats within a physical disturbed site from the Romanian Coast of the Black Sea. J Environ Prot Ecol 20(2):723–732
TURKSTAT (2022) https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Su-Urunleri-202037252 . Accessed 6 Oct 2022
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.D. Conceptualization, Methodology, Data collection, Writing – original draft. Writing V.C. review & editing. B.B.D. Review & editing
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interest
The authors declare that they do not have competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Dağtekin, M., Ceyhan, V. & Dağtekin, B.B. Stakeholders’ Perspectives On the Management Measures in Rapana venosa Fisheries in the Black Sea Turkish Coast. Thalassas 39, 1245–1255 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41208-023-00601-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41208-023-00601-1