Log in

Mechanical properties of lightweight green concrete including nano calcium carbonate

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Building Pathology and Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Green concrete is concrete taking waste materials within its constituents. Researchers seek always to develop this kind of concrete in order to produce higher performance of using. This research pursues and emphasis on the using of nano waste material to enhance the properties of lightweight concrete and get lightweight green concrete. Aluminum powder has been used to obtain lightweight concrete (aerated concrete). Nano calcium carbonate (Nano-CaCO3) and Ceramic waste powder (CWP) used by containing 0%, 1%, 2%, 3% and 4% and 0%, 25% 50%, 75% and 100%, respectively. Nano-CaCO3 substituted by percent weight of cement, while the CWP substituted by percent weight of fine aggregate. Flowability, compressive strength and splitting tensile strength have been investigated of lightweight green concrete (LWGC). Nano-CaCO3 and CWP showed significance affecting on compressive strength and splitting tensile strength. Increasing in Nano-CaCO3 content lead to increasing on the strength of LWGC. Also, using CWP up to 25% and 50% content gave a remarkable results when comparing with other mixes. The flowability reduced with rising in Nano-CaCO3 and CWP content. MCDM procedure is used in this study to represent the optimal mix. M50-4 reflected the best mix within 25 different mixture, which means that using 50% CWP and 4% Nano-CaCO3 presented the best compressive and splitting tensile strength. M50-4 represented the optimal using up of the wastes materials (CWP and Nano-CaCO3).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data that been used to support of this research have included within the article. Additional data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AC:

Aerated concrete

LWGC:

Lightweight green concrete

LWC:

Lightweight concrete

CWP:

Ceramic waste powder

SCM:

Supplementary cementitious materials

GGBS:

Slag ground granulated blast slag

OPC (PC):

Ordinary Portland cement

XRD:

X-ray diffraction

C3A:

Tricalcium aluminate

C–S–H:

Calcium–silicate–hydrate

UHD:

Ultra high density

MCDM:

Multiple criteria decision making

References

  1. Al-Mansour A, Chow CL, Feo L, Penna R, Lau D (2019) Green concrete: by-products utilization and advanced approaches. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aly S, El-Dieb A, Taha M (2018) Ceramic waste powder for eco-friendly self-compacting concrete (SCC). Adv Civ Eng Mater 7(1):426–446. https://doi.org/10.1520/ACEM20180043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aly ST, El-Dieb AS, Taha MR (2019) Effect of high-volume ceramic waste powder as partial cement replacement on fresh and compressive of self-compacting concrete. J Mater Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. ASTM (2017) C150/C150M, standard specification for Portland cement. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  5. ASTM (2017) C33/C33M, standard specification for concrete aggregates. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  6. ASTM (2017) C496/C496M. Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  7. ASTM (2017) C192/C192M. Standard practice for making and curing concrete test specimens in the laboratory. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  8. ASTM (2017) C 1437/C1437M. Standard test method for flow of hydraulic cement mortar. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  9. BS EN 12390-3, 2002. Testing hardened concrete. In: Part 3: Compressive Strength of Test Specimens. BSI, London, UK

  10. Camiletti J, Nehdi ML, Soliman AM (2013) Effect of nano-calcium carbonate on early-age properties of ultrahigh-performance concrete. Mag Concr Res 65(5):297–307. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.12.00015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dawood ET, Hamad AJ (2013) High performance lightweight concrete reinforced with glass fibers. AL-Mansour J 20, Special Issue

  12. Hamad AJ (2014) Materials, production, properties and application of aerated lightweight concrete: review. Int J Mater Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.12720/ijmse.2.2.152-157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gwo-Hshiung T, Jih-Jeng H (2011) Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, pp 69–76

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Hamad AJ, Sldozian RJA, Mikhaleva AZ (2020) Effect of ceramic waste powder as partial fine aggregate replacement on properties of fiber-reinforced aerated concrete. Eng Rep. https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.12134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hamad AJ (2017) Size and shape effect of specimen on the compressive strength of HPLWFC reinforced with glass fibers. J King Saud Univ Eng Sci 29(4):373–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2015.09.003

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Hamad AJ, Sldozian RJA (2019) Flexural and flexural toughness of fiber reinforced concrete-American standard specifications review. Global Res Dev J Eng 4(3):5–13

    Google Scholar 

  17. **chang P, Ronggui L (2016) Improvement of performance of ultra-high performance concrete based composite material added with nano materials. Frattura ed Integrità Struttural 10(36):130–138. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.36.13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kashyap R, Saxena M, Gautam A, Chauhan S, Mourya A, Verma P (2022) A study on recycled lightweight aggregate concrete. J Build Pathol Rehabil 7:28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-022-00168-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kakali G, Tsivilis S, Aggeli E, Bati M (2000) Hydration products of C3A, C3S and Portland cement in the presence of CaCO3. Cem Concr Res 30(7):1073–1077. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00292-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kabir G, Sumi RS (2012) Selection of concrete production facility location integrating fuzzy AHP with TOPSIS method. Int J Product Manag Assess Technol 1(1):40–59. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijpmat.2012010104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu X, Chen L, Liu A, Wang X (2012) Effect of Nano-CaCO3 on Properties of Cement Paste. Int Conf Future Energy Environ Mater Energy Proc 16(Part B):991–996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2012.01.158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ltifi GA, Mounanga P, Khelidj A (2011) Experimental study of the effect of addition of nano-silica on the behaviour of cement mortars. Proc Eng 10:900–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Le HT, Ludwig HM (2016) Effect of rice husk ash and other mineral admixtures on properties of self-compacting high performance concrete. Mater Des 89(5):156–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Myers R (2007) Calcium carbonate. In 100 most important chemical compounds a reference guide. Greenwood Press, Westport, pp. 59–61

  25. Muhd Norhasri MS, Hamidah MS, Mohd Fadzil A (2017) Applications of using nano material in concrete: a review. Constr Build Mater 133:91–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nejad FM, Tolouei M, Nazari H, Naderan A (2018) Effects of calcium carbonate nanoparticles and fly ash on mechanical and permeability properties of concrete. Adv Civ Eng Mater 7(1):651–668. https://doi.org/10.1520/ACEM20180066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Suhendro B (2014) Toward green concrete for better sustainable environment. Proc Eng 95:305–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sanchez F, Sobolev K (2010) Nanotechnology in concrete—a review. Constr Build Mater 24(11):2060–2071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.03.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rashid K, Rehman M, Brito J, Ghafoor H (2020) Multi-criteria optimization of recycled aggregate concrete mixes. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Revilla-Cuesta V, Skaf M, Espinosa AB, Ortega-López V (2021) Multi-criteria feasibility of real use of self-compacting concrete with sustainable aggregate, binder and powder. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Revilla-Cuesta V, Skaf M, Santamaría A, Hernandez-Bagaces JJ, Ortega-Lopez V (2021) Temporal flowability evolution of slag-based self-compacting concrete with recycled concrete aggregate. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Revilla-Cuesta V, Skaf M, Chica JA, Fuente-Alonso JA, Ortega-López V (2020) Thermal deformability of recycled self-compacting concrete under cyclical temperature variations. Mater Lett. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2020.128417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sun Y, Zhang P, Guo W, Bao J, Qu C (2020) Effect of nano-CaCO3 on the mechanical properties and durability of concrete incorporating fly ash. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2020:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7365862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Samad S, Shah A (2017) Role of binary cement including Supplementary Cementitious Material (SCM), in production of environmentally sustainable concrete: a critical review. Int J Sustain Built Environ 6(2):663–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2017.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Steve WMS, Faiz UAS (2014) Effect of nano-CaCO3 on compressive strength development of high volume fly ash mortars and concretes. ACT 12(6):178–186. https://doi.org/10.3151/jact.12.178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Shaikh FU, Supit SWM (2014) Mechanical and durability properties of high volume fly ash (HVFA) concrete containing calcium carbonate (CaCO3) nanoparticles. Constr Build Mater 70:309–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Seifan M, Mendoza S, Berenjian A (2021) A comparative study on the influence of nano and micro particles on the workability and mechanical properties of mortar supplemented with fly ash. Buildings. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings110200600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Simsek B, Uygunoglu T (2016) Multi-response optimization of polymer blended concrete: a TOPSIS based Taguchi application. Construct Build Mater 117:251–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Van Boggelen W, van Boggelen J (2018) Sustainable building solutions with new generation autoclaved aerated concrete panel applications. ce papers 2:513–525. https://doi.org/10.1002/cepa.825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Yang J (2020) Effect of nano CaCO3 on durability of concrete. In: E3S web of conferences, 2020 2nd on civil architecture and energy science (CAES 2020), vol. 165. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016503029.

  41. Zhang P, Wang L, Wei H, Wang J (2021) A critical review on effect of nanomaterials on workability and mechanical properties of high-performance concrete. Adv Civ Eng 2021:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8827124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zaki SI, Hodhod OA, Eid OA (2018) Comparison between the effect of addition of nano-calcium carbonate and nano-Kaoline on develo** the properties of reinforced concrete. In: 10th international conference on nano-technology in construction

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors thank Dr. Shihab Ahmed for his assistance in data acquisition, and Mr. Moaid fiak for his assistance with measurements and analyses. The authors’ responsibilities were as follows—Rami Joseph Sldozian and Ali Jihad: designed the research and wrote the manuscript; Hesham Salim: analyzed data; all of the authors: edited the manuscript and conducted the research and had primary responsibility for the final content of the manuscript; and all authors: read and approved the final manuscript. None of the authors had a conflict of interest.

Funding

The authors have not disclosed any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Jihad Hamad.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sldozian, R.J.A., Hamad, A.J. & Al-Rawe, H.S. Mechanical properties of lightweight green concrete including nano calcium carbonate. J Build Rehabil 8, 3 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-022-00247-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-022-00247-1

Keywords

Navigation