Log in

Reconstruction of ocular surfaces with limbal stem cells supported by porous composite hydrogels

多孔复合水凝胶负载角膜缘干细胞重建眼表

  • Articles
  • Published:
Science China Materials Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stem cell-based therapy is a novel technique used to reconstruct the ocular surface of patients with limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD). However, the reported stem cell therapies for LSCD are limited to two-dimensional (2D) culture systems, which cannot mimic the native microenvironment in which stem cells reside in vivo. Herein, an injectable photocrosslinkable hydrogel was developed based on porous gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA)/silk fibroin glycidyl methacrylate (SilMA), which encapsulated limbal stem cells (LSCs) to reconstruct ocular surfaces. The porous GelMA/SilMA hydrogels demonstrated excellent transparency and good adhesion. More importantly, this hydrogel maintained viability, supported the adhesion of encapsulated rabbit LSCs and promoted their migration in vitro in three-dimensional (3D) culture environments. Proteomic analysis confirmed that the porous GelMA/SilMA hydrogel 3D cell culture system maintained both the self-renewal and differentiation of the LSCs. Furthermore, histological analyses demonstrated that the porous GelMA/SilMA hydrogel encapsulating LSCs effectively promoted the re-epithelization of LSCD. Porous hydrogels were subjected to simplified serial cell culture operations to construct an ocular surface with a uniform cell distribution. These findings provide valuable insights into stem cell therapies and regenerative medicine for ocular surface reconstruction.

摘要

干细胞疗法是一种用于重建角膜缘干细胞缺乏症(LSCD)患者眼 表的新技术. 然而, 目前报道的干细胞疗法治疗LSCD仅局限于二维 (2D)培养体系, 不能模拟干细胞在体内生存的原生微环境. 本研究基于 多孔明胶甲基丙烯酰(GelMA)/丝素蛋白甲基丙烯酸缩水甘油酯(SilMA), 制备了一种可注射的光交联水凝胶用于负载角膜缘干细胞 (LSCs)以重建眼表. 多孔GelMA/SilMA水凝胶具有优异的透明度和良 好的粘附性. 更重要的是, 该水凝胶保持了兔LSCs的活力, 支持了兔 LSCs的粘附, 并促进了它们在体外3D培养环境中的迁移. 蛋白质组学 分析证实, 多孔GelMA/SilMA水凝胶3D细胞培养体系能够保持LSCs的 自我更新和分化能力. 此外, 组织学分析表明, 负载LSCs的多孔GelMA/SilMA水凝胶能够有效的促进LSCD再上皮化. 多孔水凝胶能够简化连 续细胞培养的相关操作, 以构建具有细胞均匀分布的眼表. 这些发现为 干细胞疗法和再生医学用于眼表重建提供了有价值的见解.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Deng SX, Borderie V, Chan CC, et al. Global consensus on definition, classification, diagnosis, and staging of limbal stem cell deficiency. Cornea, 2019, 38: 364–375

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang F, Cheng J, Zhai H, et al. Correlation analysis of the clinical features and prognosis of acute ocular burns—Exploration of a new classification scheme. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2020, 258: 147–155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Singh V, Tiwari A, Kethiri AR, et al. Current perspectives of limbal-derived stem cells and its application in ocular surface regeneration and limbal stem cell transplantation. Stem Cells Transl Med, 2021, 10: 1121–1128

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Ruan Y, Jiang S, Musayeva A, et al. Corneal epithelial stem cells—physiology, pathophysiology and therapeutic options. Cells, 2021, 10: 2302

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Jurkunas UV, Yin J, Johns LK, et al. Cultivated autologous limbal epithelial cell (CALEC) transplantation: Development of manufacturing process and clinical evaluation of feasibility and safety. Sci Adv, 2023, 9: eadg6470

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Deng SX, Kruse F, Gomes JAP, et al. Global consensus on the management of limbal stem cell deficiency. Cornea, 2020, 39: 1291–1302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mahdavi SS, Abdekhodaie MJ, Mashayekhan S, et al. Bioengineering approaches for corneal regenerative medicine. Tissue Eng Regen Med, 2020, 17: 567–593

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Calonge M, Nieto-Miguel T, de la Mata A, et al. Goals and challenges of stem cell-based therapy for corneal blindness due to limbal deficiency. Pharmaceutics, 2021, 13: 1483

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhong Z, Balayan A, Tian J, et al. Bioprinting of dual ECM scaffolds encapsulating limbal stem/progenitor cells in active and quiescent statuses. Biofabrication, 2021, 13: 044101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nguyen KN, Bobba S, Richardson A, et al. Native and synthetic scaffolds for limbal epithelial stem cell transplantation. Acta BioMater, 2018, 65: 21–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tang Q, Lu B, He J, et al. Exosomes-loaded thermosensitive hydrogels for corneal epithelium and stroma regeneration. Biomaterials, 2022, 280: 121320

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pellegrini G, Ardigò D, Milazzo G, et al. Navigating market authorization: The path holoclar took to become the first stem cell product approved in the european union. Stem Cells Transl Med, 2018, 7: 146–154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Salmikangas P, Flory E, Gasparini P, et al. Regulatory viewpoints on the development of advanced stem cell-based medicinal products in light of the first EU-approved stem cell product. Cell Gene Ther Insights, 2015, 1: 109–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. López-Paniagua M, de la Mata A, Galindo S, et al. Advanced therapy medicinal products for the eye: Definitions and regulatory framework. Pharmaceutics, 2021, 13: 347

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Sangwan VS, Basu S, MacNeil S, et al. Simple limbal epithelial transplantation (SLET): A novel surgical technique for the treatment of unilateral limbal stem cell deficiency. Br J Ophthalmol, 2012, 96: 931–934

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Thokala P, Singh A, Singh VK, et al. Economic, clinical and social impact of simple limbal epithelial transplantation for limbal stem cell deficiency. Br J Ophthalmol, 2022, 106: 923–928

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hu X, **a Z, Cai K. Recent advances in 3D hydrogel culture systems for mesenchymal stem cell-based therapy and cell behavior regulation. J Mater Chem B, 2022, 10: 1486–1507

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. He Q, Liao Y, Zhang J, et al. “All-in-one” gel system for whole procedure of stem—Cell amplification and tissue engineering. Small, 2020, 16: e1906539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gouveia RM, Connon CJ. Biomechanical modulation therapy—A stem cell therapy without stem cells for the treatment of severe ocular burns. Trans Vis Sci Tech, 2020, 9: 5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Masood F, Chang JH, Akbar A, et al. Therapeutic strategies for restoring perturbed corneal epithelial homeostasis in limbal stem cell deficiency: Current trends and future directions. Cells, 2022, 11: 3247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Safina I, Embree MC. Biomaterials for recruiting and activating endogenous stem cells in situ tissue regeneration. Acta BioMater, 2022, 143: 26–38

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu G, Zhou Y, Zhang X, et al. Advances in hydrogels for stem cell therapy: regulation mechanisms and tissue engineering applications. J Mater Chem B, 2022, 10: 5520–5536

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang F, Shi W, Li H, et al. Decellularized porcine cornea-derived hydrogels for the regeneration of epithelium and stroma in focal corneal defects. Ocular Surf, 2020, 18: 748–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang L, Zhang W, Hu Y, et al. Systematic review of silk scaffolds in musculoskeletal tissue engineering applications in the recent decade. ACS BioMater Sci Eng, 2021, 7: 817–840

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sultan MT, Choi BY, Ajiteru O, et al. Reinforced-hydrogel encapsulated hMSCs towards brain injury treatment by trans-septal approach. Biomaterials, 2021, 266: 120413

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shen Y, Wang X, Wang Y, et al. Bilayer silk fibroin/sodium alginate scaffold promotes vascularization and advances inflammation stage in full-thickness wound. Biofabrication, 2022, 14: 035016

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yu Y, Yang B, Tian D, et al. Thiolated hyaluronic acid/silk fibroin dualnetwork hydrogel incorporated with bioglass nanoparticles for wound healing. Carbohydrate Polyms, 2022, 288: 119334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang W, Zhang Y, Li X, et al. Multifunctional polyphenol-based silk hydrogel alleviates oxidative stress and enhances endogenous regeneration of osteochondral defects. Mater Today Bio, 2022, 14: 100251

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Li Q, Xu S, Feng Q, et al. 3D printed silk-gelatin hydrogel scaffold with different porous structure and cell seeding strategy for cartilage regeneration. Bioactive Mater, 2021, 6: 3396–3410

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Li Y, Zhang J, Wang C, et al. Porous composite hydrogels with improved MSC survival for robust epithelial sealing around implants and M2 macrophage polarization. Acta BioMater, 2023, 157: 108–123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang F, Zhao L, Song F, et al. Hybrid natural hydrogels integrated with voriconazole-loaded microspheres for ocular antifungal applications. J Mater Chem B, 2021, 9: 3377–3388

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Luo Q, Shang K, Zhu J, et al. Biomimetic cell culture for cell adhesive propagation for tissue engineering strategies. Mater Horiz, 2023, 10: 4662–4685

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Jauković A, Abadjieva D, Trivanović D, et al. Specificity of 3D MSC spheroids microenvironment: Impact on MSC behavior and properties. Stem Cell Rev Rep, 2020, 16: 853–875

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. xu X, Feng Q, Ma X, et al. Dynamic gelatin-based hydrogels promote the proliferation and self-renewal of embryonic stem cells in long-term 3D culture. Biomaterials, 2022, 289: 121802

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Yang X, Yang B, Deng Y, et al. Coacervation-mediated cytocompatible formation of supramolecular hydrogels with self-evolving macropores for 3D multicellular spheroid culture. Adv Mater, 2023, 35: e2300636

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhao Y, Song S, Ren X, et al. Supramolecular adhesive hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. Chem Rev, 2022, 122: 5604–5640

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Tytgat L, Kollert MR, Van Damme L, et al. Evaluation of 3D printed gelatin-based scaffolds with varying pore size for MSC-based adipose tissue engineering. MacroMol Biosci, 2020, 20: e1900364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Shi W, Zhou Q, Gao H, et al. Protectively decellularized porcine cornea versus human donor cornea for lamellar transplantation. Adv Funct Mater, 2019, 29: 1902491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Tian G, Yang D, Liang C, et al. A nonswelling hydrogel with regenerable high wet tissue adhesion for bioelectronics. Adv Mater, 2023, 35: e2212302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Pedram P, Mazio C, Imparato G, et al. Bioinspired design of novel microscaffolds for fibroblast guidance toward in vitro tissue building. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2021, 13: 9589–9603

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lien SM, Ko LY, Huang TJ. Effect of pore size on ECM secretion and cell growth in gelatin scaffold for articular cartilage tissue engineering. Acta BioMater, 2009, 5: 670–679

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Annabi N, Nichol JW, Zhong X, et al. Controlling the porosity and microarchitecture of hydrogels for tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part B-Rev, 2010, 16: 371–383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Hao X, Miao S, Li Z, et al. 3D printed structured porous hydrogel promotes osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs. Materials & Design, 2023, 227: 111729

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Gauvin R, Chen YC, Lee JW, et al. Microfabrication of complex porous tissue engineering scaffolds using 3D projection stereolithography. Biomaterials, 2012, 33: 3824–3834

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Shi M, Xu Q, Ding L, et al. Cell infiltrative inner connected porous hydrogel improves neural stem cell migration and differentiation for functional repair of spinal cord injury. ACS BioMater Sci Eng, 2022, 8: 5307–5318

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Osi AR, Zhang H, Chen J, et al. Three-dimensional-printable thermo/photo-cross-linked methacrylated chitosan-gelatin hydrogel composites for tissue engineering. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2021, 13: 22902–22913

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Hong H, Seo YB, Kim DY, et al. Digital light processing 3D printed silk fibroin hydrogel for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 2020, 232: 119679

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Costa JB, Park J, Jorgensen AM, et al. 3D bioprinted highly elastic hybrid constructs for advanced fibrocartilaginous tissue regeneration. Chem Mater, 2020, 32: 8733–8746

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Ye T, Chen Z, Zhang J, et al. Large extracellular vesicles secreted by human iPSC-derived MSCs ameliorate tendinopathy via regulating macrophage heterogeneity. Bioactive Mater, 2023, 21: 194–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Long J, Yao Z, Zhang W, et al. Regulation of osteoimmune microenvironment and osteogenesis by 3D-printed PLAG/black phosphorus scaffolds for bone regeneration. Adv Sci, 2023, 10: e2302539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Lobo EP, Delic NC, Richardson A, et al. Self-organized centripetal movement of corneal epithelium in the absence of external cues. Nat Commun, 2016, 7: 12388

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Park M, Richardson A, Pandzic E, et al. Visualizing the contribution of keratin-14+ limbal epithelial precursors in corneal wound healing. Stem Cell Rep, 2019, 12: 14–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Park M, Richardson A, Delic N, et al. A bioengineering-regenerative medicine approach for ocular surface reconstruction using a functionalized native cornea-derived bio-scaffold. Adv Funct Mater, 2023, 33: 2304856

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Gouveia RM, Lepert G, Gupta S, et al. Assessment of corneal substrate biomechanics and its effect on epithelial stem cell maintenance and differentiation. Nat Commun, 2019, 10: 1496

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Yui S, Azzolin L, Maimets M, et al. YAP/TAZ-dependent reprogramming of colonic epithelium links ECM remodeling to tissue regeneration. Cell Stem Cell, 2018, 22: 35–49.e7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Chermnykh E, Kalabusheva E, Vorotelyak E. Extracellular matrix as a regulator of epidermal stem cell fate. Int J Mol Sci, 2018, 19: 1003

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Meran L, Baulies A, Li VSW. Intestinal stem cell niche: The extracellular matrix and cellular components. Stem Cells Int, 2017, 2017: 1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82201153), the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2022QH276), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFE0206700), the Key Research and Development Program of Shandong Province (2021ZDSYS14), the Academic Promotion Program of Shandong First Medical University (2019ZL001 and 2019RC008), and the Taishan Scholar Program (20161059).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Author contributions Wang F, Zhou Q and **e L conceived and designed the experiments. Wang F, Xu Y, Shi D, Cheng J, Zhao L and Qi X carried out the experiments. Wang F and Xu Y analyzed the data. Wang F, Zhou Q and **e L drafted and revised the paper. All authors participated in data discussionst. All authors read and approved the publication of the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Qingjun Zhou  (周庆军) or Lixin **e  (谢立信).

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Fuyan Wang received her MD degree from Shandong University in 2021 and then worked as an ophthalmologist at Eye Institute of Shandong First Medical University. Her interests include the basic and clinical research of tissue-engineered cornea and infections corneal diseases.

Qingjun Zhou received his PhD degree from Zhejiang University in 2006. He now serves as the executive deputy director of Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology. His interests include the basic and clinical research of corneal injury repair and functional reconstruction.

Lixin **e received his MD degree from Shandong Medical College (now Shandong University) in 1965. Since 1991, he established and worked as the director of Shandong Eye Institute. His interests include the basic and clinical research of infections corneal diseases, diabetic ocular diseases, tissue-engineered cornea and cataract.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, F., Xu, Y., Shi, D. et al. Reconstruction of ocular surfaces with limbal stem cells supported by porous composite hydrogels. Sci. China Mater. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40843-024-2970-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40843-024-2970-2

Keywords

Navigation