Log in

Diversification and size in venture capital investing

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Eurasian Business Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We empirically examine the interaction between different types of diversification (stage, industry, geography) and portfolio size, i.e., number of investee companies, in explaining venture capital (VC) funds’ returns. We study a comprehensive dataset of 422 liquidated US VC funds to conduct multiple analyses in a large timeframe. The results show that large portfolio size and diversification in a limited number of industries contribute positively to fund performance, while stage and geographical diversification have no significant relationship with returns. Our findings can support both the practice of VC portfolio management in reaching better capital allocation efficiency and policymakers in providing guidance for VC fund development programmes backed by sovereign and international institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aigner, P., Albrecht, S., Beyschlag, G., Friederich, T., Kalepky, M., & Zagst, R. (2008). What drives PE? Analysis of success factors for private equity funds. Journal of Private Equity, 11(4), 63–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belderbos, R., Jacob, J., & Lokshin, B. (2018). Corporate venture capital (CVC) investments and technological performance: Geographic diversity and the interplay with technology alliances. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(1), 20–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernile, G., Cumming, D., & Lyandres, E. (2007). The size of private equity fund portfolios: Theory and international evidence. Journal of Corporate Finance, 13, 564–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blohm, I., Antretter, T., Siren, C., Grichnik, D., & Wincent, J. (2022). It’s peoples game, isn’t it?! A comparison between the investment returns of business angels and machine learning algorithms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 46(4), 1054–1091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BVCA. (2015). Private equity performance measurement.

  • Cumming, D. J. (2006). The determinants of venture capital portfolio size: Empirical evidence. The Journal of Business, 79(3), 1083–1126.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • DeMiguel, V., Garlappi, L., & Uppal, R. (2007). Optimal versus naive diversification: How inefficient is the 1/N portfolio strategy? Review of Financial Studies, 22(5), 1915–1953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimov, D., & Murray, G. (2008). Determinants of the incidence and scale of seed capital investments by venture capital firms. Small Business Economics, 30(2), 127–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulghieri, P., & Sevilir, M. (2009). Size and focus of a venture capitalist’s portfolio. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(11), 4643–4680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulghieri, P., & Severil, M. (2019). Human Capital Integration in Mergers and Acquisitions. In: Conference on Finance, Labor and Inequality.

  • Gil-Gomez, H., Oltra-Badenes, R., Guerola-Navarro, V., & Zegarra Saldana, P. (2021). Crowdfunding: A bibliometric analysis. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-021-00784-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gompers, P. (1996). Grandstanding in the venture capital industry. Journal of Financial Economics, 42(1), 133–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gompers, P., & Lerner, J. (1999). The venture capital cycle (1st ed.). The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gornall, W., & Strebulaev, I. A. (2020). Squaring venture capital valuations with reality. Journal of Financial Economics, 135, 120–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochberg, Y. V. & Westerfield, M. M. (2010). The size and the specialization of direct investment portfolios, AFA 2011 Denver Meetings Paper, SSRN Electronic Journal.

  • Humphery-Jenner, M. (2013). Diversification in private equity funds: On knowledge sharing, risk aversion, and limited attention. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 48(5), 1545–1572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hüther, N., Robinson, D. T., Sievers, S., & Hartmann-Wendels, T. (2020). Paying for performance in private equity: Evidence from venture capital partnerships. Management Science, 66(4), 1756–1782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanniainen, V., & Keuschnigg, C. (2003). The optimal portfolio of startup firms in venture capital finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 9, 521–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knill, A. (2009). Should venture capitalists put all their eggs in one basket? Diversification versus pure-play strategies in venture capital. Financial Management, 38(3), 441–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korteweg, A. (2019). Risk adjustment in private equity returns. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 11, 131–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan, C., & Nguyen, D. (2021). Investment proximity and venture capital returns. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 21(1), 115–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J. (1994). The syndication of venture capital investments. Financial Management, 23(3), 16–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, H., & Duchin, R. (2009). Markowitz versus the Talmudic portfolio diversification strategies. Journal of Portfolio Management, 35, 71–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., & Chi, T. (2013). Venture capitalists’ decision to withdraw: The role of portfolio configuration from a real options lens. Strategic Management Journal, 34(11), 1351–1366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, J. D., Rong, K., Yang, K., Guo, R., & Zou, Y. (2019). Syndication through social embeddedness: A comparison of foreign, private and state-owned venture capital (VC) firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 36, 499–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H. M. (1952). Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H. M. (1991). Foundation of portfolio theory. Journal of Finance, 7, 469–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matusik, S. F., & Fitza, M. A. (2012). Diversification in the venture capital industry: Leveraging knowledge under uncertainty. Strategic Management Journal, 33(4), 407–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, E., & Tenenbaum, B. H. (1993). Specialization versus diversification as a venture capital investment strategy. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(5), 431–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrisia, N., & Dastgir, S. (2017). Diversification and corporate social performance in manufacturing companies. Eurasian Business Review, 7, 21–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phalippou, L., & Gottschalk, O. (2009). The performance of private equity funds. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(4), 1747–1776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rashid, A., Hassan, M. K., & Karamat, H. (2021). Firm size and the interlinkages between sales volatility, exports, and financial stability of Pakistani manufacturing firms. Eurasian Business Review, 11, 111–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahlman, W. A. (1990). The structure and governance of venture-capital organizations. Journal of Financial Economics, 27(2), 473–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson Reuters (2020). Annual Report 2019. March 10, 2020.

  • Trigeorgis, L. (2005). Making use of real options simple: An overview and applications in flexible/modular decision making. The Engineering Economist, 50(1), 25–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu, J., & Zhou, G. (2009). Markowitz meets Talmud: A combination of sophisticated and naive diversification strategies. Journal of Financial Economics, 99(1), 204–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this research. We consent for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emanuele Teti.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This article does not contain any studies involving human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Consent for publication availability of data and material

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Teti, E., Dell’Acqua, A. & Bovsunovsky, A. Diversification and size in venture capital investing. Eurasian Bus Rev (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-024-00258-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-024-00258-7

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation