SpringerLink
Log in

Location Selection for Dry Hot Rock Exploration Based on Large-Scale Group Decision-Making with Three-way Decision

  • Published:
International Journal of Fuzzy Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In large-scale group decision-making (LSGDM) for dry hot rock exploration location selection, decision-makers are limited by their professional fields and knowledge background, and it is difficult to provide complete evaluation information. However, brainstorming is the main advantage of LSGDM. To maximize the professional contributions of various decision-makers, a multi-attribute LSGDM method based on three-way decision (TWD) and intuitionistic fuzzy concept-oriented (IFC) is proposed. Firstly, according to the characteristics of IFC, a description of the LSGDM problem based on IFC is given; then, an LSGDM model based on TWD is proposed to classify and rank alternatives. Two algorithmic descriptions are given, namely consensus reaching process algorithm and algorithm for classifying and ranking alternatives. Then, taking dry hot rock exploration location selection as an example, the execution steps of this model were elaborated in detail, and the final classification and ranking results were obtained. Finally, the effectiveness and feasibility of this model were analyzed based on experimental results, and the influence of various parameters on the results was also studied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All data generated or analyzed in this study may be provided by the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Code Availability

Code can be provided if required.

References

  1. Atanassov, K.T.: Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 80, 87–96 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ayyildiz, E.: Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process-based green supply chain resilience evaluation methodology in post covid-19 era. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16972-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chai, J.: Thoughts on the current situation and development path of clean energy in china. Sci. Technol. Innov. Herald 17, 119–120 (2019). https://doi.org/10.16660/j.cnki.1674-098X.2019.17.119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, S., Cheng, S., Chiou, C.: Fuzzy multiattribute group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets and evidential reasoning methodology. Inf. Fusion 27, 215–227 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2015.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, S.M., Han, W.H.: Multiattribute decision making based on nonlinear programming methodology, particle swarm optimization techniques and interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values. Inf. Sci. 471, 252–268 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2018.08.021

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Dai, J.H., Chen, T., Zhang, K.: The intuitionistic fuzzy concept-oriented three-way decision model. Inf. Sci. 619, 52–83 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2022.11.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gao, J.W., Guo, F.J., Ma, Z.Y., et al.: Multi-criteria decision-making framework for large-scale rooftop photovoltaic project site selection based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Appl. Soft Comput. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jia, F., Liu, Y.Y., Wang, X.Y.: An extended mabac method for multi-criteria group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy rough numbers. Expert Syst. Appl. 127, 241–255 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.03.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. **g, T.Y., Zhao, W.T., Gao, S.W.: Practice and technical feasibility study of hot dry rock geothermal development. Sino-Global Energy 23(11), 17–22 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Joshi, R., Kumar, S.: A novel fuzzy decision-making method using entropy weights-based correlation coefficients under intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 21, 232–242 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-018-0538-8

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Li, S.T., Zhang, S.Q., Jia, X.F.: Index system research of project site selection for dry hot rocks exploration. Geol. Surv. China 5(2), 64–72 (2018). https://doi.org/10.19388/j.zgdzdc.2018.02.10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liang, D., Wang, M., Xu, Z., et al.: Risk appetite dual hesitant fuzzy three-way decisions with todim. Inf. Sci. 507, 585–605 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2018.12.017

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Liang, D.C., Wang, M.W., Xu, Z.S.: Heterogeneous multi-attribute nonadditivity fusion for behavioral three-way decisions in interval type-2 fuzzy environment. Inf. Sci. 496, 242–263 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.05.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin, W.J., Gan, H.N., Wang, G.L., et al.: Occurrence prospect of hdr and target site selection study in southeastern of china. Acta Geol. Sin. 90(8), 2043–2058 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Liu, B., Shen, Y., Chen, X., et al.: A partial binary tree dea-da cyclic classification model for decision makers in complex multi-attribute large-group interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy decision-making problems. Inf. Fusion 18, 119–130 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2013.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu, F., Li, T.R., Wu, J., et al.: Modification of the bwm and mabac method for magdm based on q-rung orthopair fuzzy rough numbers. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern. 12, 2693–2715 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-021-01357-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu, H.W.: New similarity measures between intuitionistic fuzzy sets and between elements. Math. Comput. Model. 42, 61–70 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2005.04.002

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu, P., Wang, Y., Jia, F., et al.: A multiple attribute decision making three-way model for intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 119, 177–203 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2019.12.020

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu, Y., Liu, J., Qin, Y.: Dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multiattribute decision making based on evidential reasoning and mdifwg operator. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 36, 5973–5987 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3233/jifs-181777

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang, G.L., Zhang, W., Lin, W.J., et al.: Project progress of survey, evaluation and exploration demonstration of national geothermal resource. Geol. Surv. China 5(2), 1–7 (2018). https://doi.org/10.19388/j.zgdzdc.2018.02.01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, W.J., Zhan, J.M., Mi, J.S.: A three-way decision approach with probabilistic dominance relations under intuitionistic fuzzy information. Inf. Sci. 582, 114–145 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2021.09.018

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Wu, J., Liu, Y., Liu, F., et al.: Comprehensive evaluation of land reclamation schemes in mining areas based on linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy group decision-making. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 29(58), 87,380-87,392 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20952-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Xu, Y., Wen, X., Zhang, W.: A two-stage consensus method for large-scale multi-attribute group decision making with an application to earthquake shelter selection. Comput. Ind. Eng. 116, 113–129 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.11.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Xu, Z.S.: Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 15, 1179–1187 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1109/tfuzz.2006.890678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Xu, Z.S., Wu, J.: Intuitionistic fuzzy c-means clustering algorithms. J. Syst. Eng. Electron. 21, 580–590 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-4132.2010.04.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yao, Y.Y.: Three-way decisions with probabilistic rough sets. Inf. Sci. 180, 341–353 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2009.09.021

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Ye, J., Zhan, J., Xu, Z.: A novel decision-making approach based on three-way decisions in fuzzy information systems. Inf. Sci. 541, 362–390 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2020.06.050

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Zeng, S.Z., Chen, S.M., Fan, K.Y.: Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision making based on nonlinear programming methodology and topsis method. Inf. Sci. 506, 424–442 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.08.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhan, J., Jiang, H., Yao, Y.: Three-way multi-attribute decision-making based on outranking relations. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/tfuzz.2020.3007423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhao, M., Gao, M., Li, Z.: A consensus model for large-scale multi-attribute group decision making with collaboration-reference network under uncertain linguistic environment. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 37, 4133–4156 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3233/jifs-190276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhong, X., Xu, X., Pan, B.: A non-threshold consensus model based on the minimum cost and maximum consensus-increasing for multi-attribute large group decision-making. Inf. Fusion 77, 90–106 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2021.07.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhong, X., Xu, X., Yin, X.: A multi-stage hybrid consensus reaching model for multi-attribute large group decision-making: integrating cardinal consensus and ordinal consensus. Comput. Ind. Eng. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107443

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by Open Research Fund Program of Data Recovery Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province (No. DRN2105, DRN19014); Scientific Research Innovation Team of Neijiang Normal University (No. 2021TD04); Scientific Research Project of Neijiang Normal University (No. 2021YB21); and Application basic research project of Sichuan Province (No. 2021YJ0108).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Mathematics and Physics, Chengdu University of Technology, Chenghua, Chengdu, 610059, Sichuan, China

    Fang Liu, Zhongli Zhou & Ju Wu

  2. School of Mathematics and Information Sciences, Neijiang Normal University, Dongxing, Neijiang, 641000, Sichuan, China

    Yi Liu

  3. Numerical Simulation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Provincial Universities, Data Recovery Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Neijiang Normal University, Dongxing, Neijiang, 641000, Sichuan, China

    Yi Liu

Authors
  1. Fang Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhongli Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ju Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yi Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by YL, JW, and ZZ. The first draft of the manuscript was written by FL and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yi Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declared that they have no conflict of interests.

Ethical Approval

Ethics approval is not involved in this study.

Consent to Participate

All authors agree to participate.

Consent for Publication

All authors agree to publish this paper.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, F., Zhou, Z., Wu, J. et al. Location Selection for Dry Hot Rock Exploration Based on Large-Scale Group Decision-Making with Three-way Decision. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-024-01690-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-024-01690-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation