SpringerLink
Log in

Centroid and Graded Mean Ranking Methods for Intuitionistic Trapezoidal Dense Fuzzy Set to Solve MCDM Problems of Robot Selection

  • Published:
International Journal of Fuzzy Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fuzzy ranking plays a vital role in decision-making problems and various fuzzy applications. There are plenty of ranking methods that are used to rank fuzzy numbers. However, they fail to give satisfactory results in certain situations due to the complexity of the problem. In this present study, an attempt has been made to introduce four types of ranking methods in the field of intuitionistic dense fuzzy (IDF) depending on centroid and graded mean ranking. Also, arithmetic operations based on \(\lambda _1, \lambda _2\)-cuts, fuzzy numbers, and extension principles are defined for IDF environment. A model is framed to rank MCDM problems, which are aggregated using a weighted aggregation operator and ordered using the proposed and extended ranking methods. To illustrate the proposed MCDM model under the field of IDF, the problem of robot selection is taken for war fighter robots and exoskeleton robots to help and replace humans in war and help assistive walking patients with spinal cord injuries. The result reveals that the Ripsaw and Rewalk emerge as preferable options for substituting humans in the contexts of war fighters and exoskeleton robots, respectively. To analyze the effectiveness of the ranking results, comparative and sensitivity analyses are examined. Thus, the results provide a satisfactory output.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The authors confirm that the data and material supporting the findings of this work are available within the article.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Swethaa, S., Felix, A.: An intuitionistic dense fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS method for military robot selection. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 44(4), 6749–6774 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sampathkumar, S., Augustin, F., Kaabar, M.K., Yue, X.G.: An integrated intuitionistic dense fuzzy Entropy-COPRAS-WASPAS approach for manufacturing robot selection. Adv. Mech. Eng. 15(3), 16878132231160264 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kang, D., Devi, S.A., Felix, A., Narayanamoorthy, S., Kalaiselvan, S., Balaenu, D., Ahmadian, A.: Intuitionistic fuzzy MAUT-BW Delphi method for medication service robot selection during COVID-19. Oper. Res. Perspect. 9, 100258 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bustince, H., Barrenechea, E., Pagola, M., Fernandez, J., Xu, Z., Bedregal, B., De Baets, B.: A historical account of types of fuzzy sets and their relationships. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 24(1), 179–194 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Peng, H.G., Wang, X.K., Wang, J.Q.: New multimoora and pairwise evaluation-based MCDM methods for hotel selection based on the projection measure of Z-numbers. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 2(4), 371–390 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nithyanandham, D., Augustin, F., Narayanamoorthy, S., Ahmadian, A., Balaenu, D., Kang, D.: Bipolar intuitionistic fuzzy graph based decision-making model to identify flood vulnerable region. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 1–21 (2023)

  7. Demir, E., Ak, M.F., Sarı, K.: Pythagorean fuzzy based AHP-VIKOR integration to assess rail transportation systems in Turkey. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 25(2), 620–632 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Devi, S.A., Felix, A., Narayanamoorthy, S., Ahmadian, A., Balaenu, D., Kang, D.: An intuitionistic fuzzy decision support system for COVID-19 lockdown relaxation protocols in India. Comput. Electr. Eng. 102, 108166 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stephen, M., Felix, A.: Fuzzy AHP point factored inference system for detection of cardiovascular disease. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 44(4), 6655–6684 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nithyanandham, D., Augustin, F.: A bipolar fuzzy p-competition graph based ARAS technique for prioritizing COVID-19 vaccines. Appl. Soft Comput. 146, 110632 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gou, X., Xu, X., Deng, F., Zhou, W., Herrera-Viedma, E.: Medical health resources allocation evaluation in public health emergencies by an improved ORESTE method with linguistic preference orderings. Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Making 1–27 (2023)

  12. Gou, X., Xu, Z., Liao, H., Herrera, F.: Probabilistic double hierarchy linguistic term set and its use in designing an improved VIKOR method: the application in smart healthcare. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 72(12), 2611–2630 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8(1), 338–353 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Atanassov, K.T.: Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 20(1), 87–96 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. De, S.K., Beg, I.: Triangular dense fuzzy sets and new defuzzication methods. Int. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 31(1), 469–477 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Maity, S., De, S.K., Mondal, S.P.: A study of a backorder EOQ model for cloud-type intuitionistic dense fuzzy demand rate. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 22(1), 201–211 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jain, R.: Decision making in the presence of fuzzy variables. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 6(10), 698–703 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yager, R.R.: A procedure for ordering fuzzy subsets of the unit interval. Inf. Sci. 24(2), 143–161 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Bortolan, G., Degani, R.: A review of some methods for ranking fuzzy subsets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 15(1), 1–19 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Mitchell, H.B.: Ranking intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst. 12(3), 377–386 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Ramli, N., Mohamad, D.: A comparative analysis of centroid methods in ranking fuzzy numbers. Eur. J. Sci. Res. 28(3), 492–501 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Abbasbandy, S., Hajjari, T.: A new approach for ranking of trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Comput. Math. Appl. 57(3), 413–419 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen, S.M., Chen, J.H.: Fuzzy risk analysis based on ranking generalized fuzzy numbers with different heights and different spreads. Expert Syst. Appl. 3(6), 6833–6842 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rezvani, S.: Ranking method of trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. Ann. Fuzzy Math. Inform. 5(3), 515–523 (2012)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Roseline, S.S., Amirtharaj, E.H.: A new method for ranking of intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. Indian J. Appl. Res. 3(6), 1–2 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Das, S., Guha, D.: Ranking of intuitionistic fuzzy number by centroid point. J. Ind. Intell. Inf. 1(2), 107–110 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Saradhi, B.P., Madhuri, M.V., Shankar, N.R.: Ordering of intuitionistic fuzzy numbers using centroid of centroids of intuitionistic fuzzy number. Int. J. Math. Trends Technol. (IJMTT) 52(5), 276–285 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chi, H.T.X., Vincent, F.Y.: Ranking generalized fuzzy numbers based on centroid and rank index. Appl. Soft Comput. 6(8), 283–292 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Shakouri, B., Abbasi Shureshjani, R., Daneshian, B., Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F.: A parametric method for ranking intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and its application to solve intuitionistic fuzzy network data envelopment analysis models. Complexity 2020, 1–25 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Thiruppathi, A., Kirubhashankar, C.K.: New ranking of generalized hexagonal fuzzy number using centroids of centroided method. Adv. Math. 9(8), 6229–6240 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Botsa, D.R., Peddi, P.B.R., Boddu, V.: Ranking parametric form of fuzzy numbers by defuzzification based on centroids value and ambiguity. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 41(1), 1445–1459 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Singh, A.P.: A comparative study of centroid ranking method and robust ranking technique in fuzzy assignment problem. Glob. J. Technol. Optim. 12, 3 (2021)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Choudhari, S.A., Regulwar, D.G., Raj, P.A.: A comparative study of two methods of fuzzy ranking. J. Algebraic Stat. 13(3), 74–88 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Thiruppathi, A., Kirubhashankar, C.K., Janaki, E.: Ranking of parabolic trapezoidal fuzzy number using the centroids and focus. Focus 2, 1 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Yogashanthi, T., Sathish, S., Ganesan, K.: A study on intuitionistic fuzzy critical path problems through centroid based ranking method. Math. Stat. 10(6), 1326–1333 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Natarajan, E., Augustin, F., Kaabar, M.K., Kenneth, C.R., Yenoke, K.: Various defuzzification and ranking techniques for the heptagonal fuzzy number to prioritize the vulnerable countries of stroke disease. Results Control Optim. 12, 100248 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Iqbal, S., Yaqoob, N.: Ranking of linear Diophantine fuzzy numbers using circumcenter of centroids. AIMS Math. 8(4), 9840–9861 (2023)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Li, D.F.: A ratio ranking method of triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and its application to MADM problems. Comput. Math. Appl. 60(6), 1557–1570 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. Yuan, Y.: Criteria for evaluating fuzzy ranking methods. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 43(2), 139–157 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang, X., Kerre, E.E.: Reasonable properties for the ordering of fuzzy quantities (I). Fuzzy Sets Syst. 118(3), 375–385 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. Odedra, S., Prior, S., Karamanoglu, M., Shen, S.T.: Increasing the trafficability of unmanned ground vehicles through intelligent morphing. In: Reconfigurable Mechanisms and Robots ReMAR2009, pp. 665–672 (2009)

  42. MarkV-A1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MarkV-A1

  43. Ripsaw. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ripsaw_(vehicle)

  44. Williams, A., Sebastian, B., Tzvi, B.P.: Review and analysis of search, extraction, evacuation, and medical field treatment robots. J. Intell. Rob. Syst. 9(6), 401–418 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Munkeby, S.H., Jones, D., Bugg, G., Smith, K.: Applications for the MATILDA robotic platform. Unmanned Ground Veh. Technol. IV 4715, 206–213 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. Gorgey, A.S., Sumrell, R., Goetz, L.L.: Exoskeletal assisted rehabilitation after spinal cord injury. In: Atlas of Orthoses and Assistive Devices, pp. 440–447 (2019)

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Research Foundation(NRF) of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government(MSIT) Grant NRF-2022R1C1C1006671.

Funding

This work was not received any external funding source.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mathematics Division, School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology (Chennai Campus), Chennai, India

    Swethaa Sampathkumar & Felix Augustin

  2. Department of Mathematics, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, 600046, India

    Samayan Narayanamoorthy

  3. Decisions Lab, Mediterranea University of Reggio Calabria, Reggio Calabria, Italy

    Ali Ahmadian

  4. Department of computer science and Mathematics, Lebanese American University, Beirut, Lebanon

    Ali Ahmadian

  5. Department of Law, Economics and Human Sciences, Mediterranea University of Reggio Calabria, Reggio Calabria, Italy

    Massimiliano Ferrara

  6. Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Institute of Digital Anti-Aging Health Care, Inje University, 197 Inje-ro, Gimhae-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, 50834, Republic of Korea

    Daekook Kang

  7. Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Istanbul Okan University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Ali Ahmadian

Authors
  1. Swethaa Sampathkumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Felix Augustin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Samayan Narayanamoorthy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ali Ahmadian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Massimiliano Ferrara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Daekook Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors have equally contributed to this work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daekook Kang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

Not applicable.

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

This work is approved by all authors for publication.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sampathkumar, S., Augustin, F., Narayanamoorthy, S. et al. Centroid and Graded Mean Ranking Methods for Intuitionistic Trapezoidal Dense Fuzzy Set to Solve MCDM Problems of Robot Selection. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-023-01647-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-023-01647-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation