Log in

Multi-criteria Group Decision-Making Portfolio Optimization Based on Variable Subscript Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets

  • Published:
International Journal of Fuzzy Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper applies the cumulative prospect theory to improve the traditional integer subscript hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set (IS-HFLTS). The proposed variable subscript hesitant fuzzy language set (VS-HFLTS) takes into account the subjectivity and differences of investors' behavior when investing in the securities market, and extends the application of behavioral finance to multi-criteria group decision-making portfolio. To evaluate the financial products, the VS-HFLTS multi-criteria group decision-making portfolio evaluation system is constructed in the research. The hesitant fuzzy linguistic value function and the purchase appetite weight function are proposed to convert the natural linguistic evaluation into a quantitative score for the judgment of future portfolio return in the securities market. Furthermore, a variable subscript hesitant fuzzy linguistic portfolio model is put forward for the risk-averse, risk-neutral, and risk-seeking investment decision-makers. The optimal portfolio strategy is obtained by solving the equivalent non-linear model. Meanwhile, an optimized group decision-making portfolio strategy is established to better achieve the goal of increasing group decision-making investors' returns or reducing risks. Finally, numerical simulations are performed to find effective frontiers for future portfolio selection, which verifies the validity and feasibility of the models and methods proposed in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data and material used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code Availability

Some or all code generated or used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Liu, Y.J., Zhang, W.G.: A multi-period fuzzy portfolio optimization model with minimum transaction lots. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 242, 93–94 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhou, X.G., He, X., Huang, X.X.: Uncertain minimax mean-variance and mean-semivariance models for portfolio selection. J. Intell. Fuzzy. Syst. 43, 4723–4740 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Markowitz, H.: Portfolio selection. J. Financ. 1(7), 77–91 (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hirschberger, M., Qi, Y., Steuer, R.E.: Randomly generating portfolio-selection covariance matrices with specified distributional characteristics. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 177, 1610–1625 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhou, W., Xu, Z.S.: Portfolio selection and risk investment under the hesitant fuzzy environment. Knowl. Based. Syst. 144, 21–31 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Young, M.R.: A minimax portfolio selection rule with linear programming solution. Manag. Sci. 44(5), 673–683 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Konno, H., Shirakawa, H., Yamazaki, H.: A mean-absolute deviation-skewness portfolio optimization model. Ann. Oper. Res. 45(1), 205–220 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Crama, Y., Schyns, M.: Simulated annealing for complex portfolio selection problems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 150, 546–571 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Yanushevsky, D.: Multicriteria portfolio selection problem: Robust assets allocation. Int. J. Multi Decis. Mater. 6(2), 101–111 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Patari, E., Karell, V., Luukka, P., Yeomans, J.S.: Comparison of the multi-criteriaa decision-making methods for equity portfolio selection: The U.S. evidence. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 265(2), 655–672 (2018)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Glogger, S., Heiden, S., Schneller, D.: Bearing the bear: sentiment-based disagreement in multi-criteria portfolio optimization. Financ. Res. Lett. 31, 47–53 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. **donas, P., Doukas, H., Hassapis, C.: Grouped data, investment committees & multi-criteria portfolio selection. J. Bus. Res. 129, 205–222 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tsaur, R.C.: Fuzzy portfolio model with different investor risk attitudes. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 227, 385–390 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, S.Y., Zhu, S.: On Fuzzy portfolio selection problems. Fuzzy. Optim. Decis. Ma. 1(4), 361–377 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhou, W., Xu, Z.S.: Score-hesitation trade-off and portfolio selection under intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 34(2), 325–341 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhou, X.Y., Wang, L.Q., Liao, H.C., Wang, S.Y., Lev, B., Fujita, H.: A prospect theory-based group decision approach considering consensus for portfolio selection with hesitant fuzzy information. Knowl-Based Syst. 168, 28–38 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rodríguez, R.M., Martinez, L., Herrera, F.: Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy. Syst. 20(1), 109–119 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liao, H.C., Gou, X.J., Xu, Z.S.: A survey of decision making theory and methodologies of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set. Syst. Eng. 37(1), 35–48 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhou, W., Xu, Z.S.: Hesitant fuzzy linguistic portfolio model with variable risk appetite and its application in the investment ratio calculation. Appl. Soft. Comput. 84, 1–14 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pfiffelmann, M., Roger, T., Bourachnikova, O.: When behavioral portfolio theory meets Markowitz theory. Econ. Model. 53, 419–435 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.: Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 2(47), 263–292 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Shefrin, H., Statman, M.: Behavioral portfolio theory. J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 35(2), 127–151 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cai, M., Gong, Z.W.: Group decision making using distances between unbalanced linguistic assessments. Appl. Soft. Comput. 67, 613–624 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mottola, G., Utkus, S.: Group Decision-Making: Implications for Investment Committees. The Vanguard Group, Valley Forge (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk. Uncertain. 5, 297–323 (1992)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Liao, H.C., Xu, Z.S., Zeng, X.J., Jose, M.: Merigo: qualitative decision making with correlation coefficients of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Knowl. Based. Syst. 76, 127–138 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Xu, Z.S.: A note on linguistic hybrid arithmetic averaging operator in multiple attribute group decision making with linguistic information. Group. Decis. Negot. 15, 593–604 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Simo-Kengne, B.D., Ababio, K.A., Mba, J., Koumba, U.: Behaviral portfolio selection and optimization: an application to international stocks. Financ. Mark. Portf. 32, 311–328 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bi, J.N., **, H.Q., Meng, Q.B.: Behavioral mean-variance portfolio selection. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 271, 644–663 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu, A.Y., Wei, F.J.: Research on the method of determining experts’ posterior weight based on improved language evaluation scale. Chin. J. Manag. Sci. 19(06), 149–155 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by "the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71771023)."

Funding

Funding was provided by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71771023).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

XH wrote the manuscript, provided the methodology, solved the portfolio model, and carried out numerical simulation. XZ gave methodological guidance and reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to **aoguang Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical Approval

Not applicable.

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, X., Zhou, X. Multi-criteria Group Decision-Making Portfolio Optimization Based on Variable Subscript Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 25, 896–915 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-022-01413-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-022-01413-w

Keywords

Navigation