Abstract
The inclusion of private events in the philosophy of our science is integral to avoid dualism and remain objective rather than making assumptions about an unseen mind. However, the inclusion of behaviors and stimuli which cannot be observed in an analysis poses obvious issues. One established method of studying covert behavior is to examine tasks that are presumed to require verbal mediation, and observing how a participant’s performance is affected when they are required to speak out loud during the task (often called “blocking”), again presuming this will make it difficult or impossible to simultaneously talk to yourself covertly. This study investigated the effects of vocal blocking on a sequencing task, or lining things up in a specified order. In one experiment, the items sequenced were abstract line drawings, and a second experiment used differently textured fabric stimuli (or “tactile cards”). In the second experiment, participants learned to tact and then sequence the tactile stimuli while they were blindfolded. The effect of vocal blocking on putative covert rehearsal was dissimilar across the two modalities of the experiments. This preliminary study provides insight into the nature of covert behavior as it relates to different senses and opens questions about the generality of studies examining covert mediation.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40616-023-00187-y/MediaObjects/40616_2023_187_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40616-023-00187-y/MediaObjects/40616_2023_187_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40616-023-00187-y/MediaObjects/40616_2023_187_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40616-023-00187-y/MediaObjects/40616_2023_187_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40616-023-00187-y/MediaObjects/40616_2023_187_Fig5_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Ampuero, M. E., & Miklos, M. (2019). The effect of joint control training on the performance of multiply controlled behavior: A systematic literature review relevant to children with autism spectrum disorder and other developmental disabilities. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 35(2), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-019-00116-y
Baum, W. M. (2017). Understanding behaviorism: Behavior, culture, and evolution (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Blough, D. S. (1959). Delayed matching in the pigeon. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2(2), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1959.2-151
Cariveau, T., Batchelder, S., Ball, S., & La Cruz Montilla, A. (2020). Review of methods to equate target sets in the adapted alternating treatments design. Behavior Modification, 45(5), 695–714. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445520903049
Causin, K. G., Albert, K. M., Carbone, V. J., & Sweeney-Kerwin, E. J. (2013). The role of joint control in teaching listener responding to children with autism and other developmental disabilities. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7, 997–1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2013.04.011
Clough, C. W., Meyer, C. S., & Miguel, C. F. (2016). The effects of blocking and joint control training on sequencing visual stimuli. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 32, 242–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-016-0067-1
Gutierrez, R. (2006). The role of rehearsal in joint control. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 22, 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393038
Harman, M. J., Kodak, T., Bohl, L., & Mayland, T. (2021). The effects of competing verbal behavior on performance in a math task. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 37, 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-021-00145-6
Lowenkron, B. (1984). Coding responses and the generalization of matching to sample in children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1984.42-1
Lowenkron, B. (1988). Generalization of delayed identity matching in retarded children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1988.50-163
Lund, S. K., & Troha, J. M. (2008). Teaching young people who are blind and have autism to make requests using a variation on the Picture Exchange Communication System with tactile symbols: A preliminary investigation. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 719–730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-007-0439-4
Moore, J. (2008). Conceptual foundations of radical behaviorism. Sloan Pub.
Palmer, D. C. (2009). The role of private events in the interpretation of complex behavior. Behavior and Philosophy, 37, 3–19.
Palmer, D. C. (2011). Consideration of private events is required in a comprehensive science of behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 34(2), 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392250
Palmer, D. C. (2020). Introduction to the extended edition. In Skinner (Ed.), Verbal behavior: Extended edition (pp. 5–15). The B. F. Skinner Foundation.
Ratkos, T., Frider, J. E., & Poling, A. (2016). Accurate delayed matching-to-sample responding without rehearsal: An unintentional demonstration with children. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 32, 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s4061-016-0052-8
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Acton: Copley.
Sundberg, C. T., Sundberg, M. L., & Michael, J. (2018). Covert verbal mediation in arbitrary matching to sample. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 109(3), 600–623. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.434
Torgrud, L. J., & Holborn, S. W. (1989). Effectiveness and persistence of precurrent mediating behavior in delayed matching to sample and oddity matching with children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 52(2), 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1989.52-181
Vosters, M. E., & Luczynski, K. C. (2020). Emergent completion of multistep instructions via joint control. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 53(3), 1432–1451. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.670
Acknowledgments
Thanks to Cristina García-Corrales and Cade Whitesell for their help describing stimuli.
Funding
This study was conducted with financial support from the Kirbo Scholar Grant at Berry College, awarded to the second author.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The Institutional Review Board for Human Subjects Research at Berry College examined the procedures of this study and found them to be in compliance with all standards and regulations. All participants gave informed consent to participate in the study.
Conflict of interest
We have no known conflict of interest to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ratkos, T., Camacho, M. The Effects of Vocal Blocking on Sequencing Visual and Tactile Stimuli. Analysis Verbal Behav 39, 226–246 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-023-00187-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-023-00187-y