Log in

Physical Violence Against Women by Their Partner: A Latent Class Measurement and Causal Analysis from Rural Counterparts of Dakshin Dinajpur District, India

  • Published:
Global Social Welfare Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This study examined a hypothesised relationship between a couple’s behavioural and cultural attitudes and the severity of physical partner violence among the ever-married women (aged 15–49) who inhabited rural parts of Dakshin Dinajpur district, West Bengal, India.

Method

A total of 182 sample women were included in the final causal path model which was one form of advanced Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) approach. This study also accounted for some latent construction models based on some allied indicator variables before establishing the final causal path model. Direct effects, indirect effects (mediation effect) in connection with direct effects and total effects of the exposures were estimated to test the hypothesised model.

Result

Results revealed that wives’ violence supporting attitudes (standardise β, 0.10; P < 0.001), partner’s domineering attitudes (standardise β, 0.29; P < 0.001), patriarchal family norms (standardise β, 0.39; P < 0.001), communication dysfunction (standardise β, 0.53; P < 0.001) and introvert attitudes (standardise β, 0.17; P < 0.001) all are some positive predictors for severe physical partner violence. Patriarchal family norms mediating with partner’s domineering attitudes can increase (standardise β, 0.55; P < 0.001) the severity of physical partner violence. In addition, an indirect positive association also has been established between wives’ introverted attitudes in combination with communication dysfunction (standardise β, 0.43; P < 0.001) on the severity of physical partner violence.

Conclusion

The study findings suggest that more socialization, life-long learning and skill development, stimulating positive behavioural attitudes and strengthening voice and representation for rural women are very much required to break the contemporary undesirable ambience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad, J., Khan, N., & Mozumdar, A. (2021). Spousal violence against women in India: A social–ecological analysis using data from the National Family Health Survey 2015 to 2016. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(21–22), 10147–10181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed-Ghosh, H. (2004). Chattels of society: Domestic violence in India. Violence against Women, 10(1), 94–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amora, J. T. (2021). Convergent validity assessment in PLS-SEM: A loadings-driven approach. Data Analysis Perspectives Journal, 2(3), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, B. J., Habibov, N., & Chernyak, E. (2012). Factors affecting prevalence and extent of intimate partner violence in Ukraine: Evidence from a nationally representative survey. Violence against Women, 18(10), 1147–1176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Testing Structural Equation Models, 154, 136–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheah, J. H., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Ramayah, T., & Ting, H. (2018). Convergent validity assessment of formatively measured constructs in PLS-SEM: On using single-item versus multi-item measures in redundancy analyses. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management.

  • Chowdhary, N., & Patel, V. (2008). The effect of spousal violence on women’s health: Findings from the Stree Arogya Shodh in Goa, India. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine, 54(4), 306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coker, A. L., Smith, P. H., Bethea, L., King, M. R., & McKeown, R. E. (2000). Physical health consequences of physical and psychological intimate partner violence. Archives of Family Medicine, 9(5), 451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalal, K. (2011). Does economic empowerment protect women from intimate partner violence? Journal of Injury and Violence Research, 3(1), 35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalal, K., Lee, M. S., & Gifford, M. (2012). Male adolescents’ attitudes toward wife beating: A multi-country study in South Asia. Journal of Adolescent Health, 50(5), 437–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, T., & Roy, T. B. (2020). More than individual factors; is there any contextual effect of unemployment, poverty and literacy on the domestic spousal violence against women? A multilevel analysis on Indian context. SSM-Population Health, 12, 100691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, T., Roy, T. B., & Roy, R. (2021). Reintegration with family and intimate partner violence (IPV) against women among the returnee migrant worker’s family during COVID-19 induced lockdown: A block-level analysis using multinomial logistic regression model. Children and Youth Services Review, 130, 106226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, S. D., & Warrier, S. (1996). In the footsteps of “Arundhati” Asian Indian women’s experience of domestic violence in the United States. Violence against Women, 2(3), 238–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dearwater, S. R., Coben, J. H., Campbell, J. C., Nah, G., Glass, N., McLoughlin, E., & Bekemeier, B. (1998). Prevalence of intimate partner abuse in women treated at community hospital emergency departments. JAMA, 280(5), 433–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foa, E. B., Cascardi, M., Zoellner, L. A., & Feeny, N. C. (2000). Psychological and environmental factors associated with partner violence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 1(1), 67–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Moreno, C., Jansen, H. A., Ellsberg, M., Heise, L., & Watts, C. H. (2006a). Prevalence of intimate partner violence: Findings from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence. The Lancet, 368(9543), 1260–1269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Moreno, C., Jansen, H. A., Ellsberg, M., Heise, L., & Watts, C. H. (2006b). Prevalence of intimate partner violence: Findings from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence. The Lancet, 368(9543), 1260–1269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Go, V. F., Johnson, S. C., Bentley, M. E., Sivaram, S., Srikrishnan, A. K., Celentano, D. D., & Solomon, S. (2003). Crossing the threshold: Engendered definitions of socially acceptable domestic violence in Chennai, India. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 5(5), 393–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haj-Yahia, M. M. (2003). Beliefs about wife beating among Arab men from Israel: The influence of their patriarchal ideology. Journal of Family Violence, 18(4), 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heise, L. (2011). What works to prevent partner violence? An evidence overview. Working Paper. STRIVE Research Consortium, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London.

  • Heise, L., & Garcia-Moreno, C. (2002). Violence by intimate partners. E. G. Krug, L. L. Dahlberg, J. A. Mercy, A. B. Zwi, & R. Lozano (Eds.) World report on violence and health, İçinde. 87–113. Geneva. World Health Organization (WHO).

  • Hindin, M. J. (2003). Understanding women’s attitudes towards wife beating in Zimbabwe. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 81, 501–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeyaseelan, L., Kumar, S., Neelakantan, N., Peedicayil, A., Pillai, R., & Duvvury, N. (2007). Physical spousal violence against women in India: Some risk factors. Journal of Biosocial Science, 39(5), 657–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kishor, S., & Gupta, K. (2009). Gender equality and women’s empowerment in India. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), India, 2005–06. Mumbai: International Institute for Population Sciences.

  • Krishnan, S. (2005). Do structural inequalities contribute to marital violence? Ethnographic evidence from rural South India. Violence against Women, 11(6), 759–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwagala, B., Wandera, S. O., Ndugga, P., & Kabagenyi, A. (2013). Empowerment, partner’s behaviours and intimate partner physical violence among married women in Uganda. BMC Public Health, 13(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludermir, A. B., Lewis, G., Valongueiro, S. A., de Araújo, T. V. B., & Araya, R. (2010). Violence against women by their intimate partner during pregnancy and postnatal depression: A prospective cohort study. The Lancet, 376(9744), 903–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madan, M. (2013). Understanding attitudes toward spousal abuse: Beliefs about wife-beating justification amongst men and women in India. Michigan State University.

  • Martin, S. L., Moracco, K. E., Garro, J., Tsui, A. O., Kupper, L. L., Chase, J. L., & Campbell, J. C. (2002). Domestic violence across generations: Findings from northern India. International Journal of Epidemiology, 31(3), 560–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenry, P. C., Julian, T. W., & Gavazzi, S. M. (1995). Toward a biopsychosocial model of domestic violence. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 307–320.

  • Möller, A. T., Rabe, H. M., & Nortje, C. (2001). Dysfunctional beliefs and marital conflict in distressed and non-distressed married individuals. Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 19(4), 259–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naved, R. T., & Persson, L. Å. (2005). Factors associated with spousal physical violence against women in Bangladesh. Studies in Family Planning, 36(4), 289–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öyekçin, D. G., Yetım, D., & Şahın, E. M. (2012). Psychosocial factors affecting various types of intimate partner violence against women. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry23(2).

  • Pandey, G. K., Dutt, D., & Banerjee, B. (2009). Partner and relationship factors in domestic violence: Perspectives of women from a slum in Calcutta, India. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(7), 1175–1191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragavan, M. I., Iyengar, K., & Wurtz, R. M. (2014). Physical intimate partner violence in northern India. Qualitative Health Research, 24(4), 457–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raj, A., & Silverman, J. (2002). Violence against immigrant women: The roles of culture, context, and legal immigrant status on intimate partner violence. Violence against Women, 8(3), 367–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, E. F., Butchart, A., & Cerdá, M. (2003). Intervening with perpetrators of intimate partner violence: A global perspective (pp. 16–21). World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semahegn, A., & Mengistie, B. (2015). Domestic violence against women and associated factors in Ethiopia, Systematic review. Reproductive Health, 12(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siever, L. J. (2008). Neurobiology of aggression and violence. American Journal of Psychiatry, 165(4), 429–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, T. R., Anderson, M., Thompson, M. P., Crosby, A. E., Shelley, G., & Sacks, J. J. (2001). Attitudinal acceptance of intimate partner violence among US adults. Violence and Victims, 16(2), 115–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, S. (2008). Interpersonal violence in alcohol complicated marital relationships (a study from India). Journal of Family Violence, 23(8), 767–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiger, J. H. (1980). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. In the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Iowa City, IA. 1980.

  • Tichy, L. L., Becker, J. V., & Sisco, M. M. (2009). The downside of patriarchal benevolence: Ambivalence in addressing domestic violence and socio-economic considerations for women of Tamil Nadu, India. Journal of Family Violence, 24(8), 547–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tollestrup, K., Sklar, D., Frost, F. J., Olson, L., Weybright, J., Sandvig, J., & Larson, M. (1999). Health indicators and intimate partner violence among women who are members of a managed care organization. Preventive Medicine, 29(5), 431–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonsing, J. C., & Tonsing, K. N. (2019). Understanding the role of patriarchal ideology in intimate partner violence among South Asian women in Hong Kong. International Social Work, 62(1), 161–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, K., Bowen, E., Brown, S., & Sleath, E. (2015). Desistance from intimate partner violence: A conceptual model and framework for practitioners for managing the process of change. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(15), 2726–2750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L. (2016). Factors influencing attitude toward intimate partner violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 29, 72–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wisner, C., Gilmer, T., Saltzman, L., & Zink, T. (1999). Intimate partner violence against women. Journal of Family Practice, 48, 439–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yakubovich, A. R., Stöckl, H., Murray, J., Melendez-Torres, G. J., Steinert, J. I., Glavin, C. E., & Humphreys, D. K. (2018). Risk and protective factors for intimate partner violence against women: Systematic review and meta-analyses of prospective–longitudinal studies. American Journal of Public Health, 108(7), e1–e11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Y., & Dalal, K. (2010). Childhood exposure to domestic violence and attitude towards wife beating in adult life: A study of men in India. Journal of Biosocial Science, 42(2), 255–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tamal Basu Roy.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

The data is not freely available in public domain and there was no survey agencies that conducted the field survey. The data was collected by the authors and one can access the data upon request to the authors. The surveyor have collected a prior consent from the respondent.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Das, T., Das, P. & Roy, T.B. Physical Violence Against Women by Their Partner: A Latent Class Measurement and Causal Analysis from Rural Counterparts of Dakshin Dinajpur District, India. Glob Soc Welf 9, 229–240 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40609-022-00242-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40609-022-00242-x

Keywords

Navigation