References
Baker, R. S., & Hawn, M. A. (2022). Algorithmic bias in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Education, 32, 1052–1092.
Belmont, R. (1978). Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. The Commission.
D’Mello, S. K., & Graesser, A. C. (2023). Intelligent tutoring systems: How computers achieve learning gains that rival human tutors. In P. Shutz, & K. R. Muis (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (vol. 4). American Psychological Association.
du Boulay, B., Mitrovic, A., & Yacef, K. (eds). (2023). Handbook of artificial intelligence in education. Deanta Elgar Publishers.
Emanuel, E. J., Wendler, D., & Grady, C. (2000). What makes clinical research ethical?Journal of the American Medical Association, 283, 2701–2711.
European Union (2020). General Data Protection Regulation GDPR, visited June 2020. https://gdpr.eu
Fang, Y., Lippert, A., Cai, Z., Chen, S., Frijters, J., Greenberg, D., & Graesser, A. (2022). Patternsofadultswithlowliteracyskillsinteractingwithanintelligenttutoringsystem. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32, 297–322.
Graesser, A. C., & Sabatini, J. (2022). On the shoulders of giants: How the social sciences can help AI navigate its ethical concerns. In D. Hampton, & J. A. DeFalco (Eds.), The frontlines of artificial intelligence ethics: Human-centric perspectives in technology advance. Routledge.
Graesser, A. C., Hu, X., & Sottilare, R. (2018). Intelligent tutoring systems. In F. Fischer, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, S. R. Goldman, & P. Reimann (Eds.), International handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 246–255). Routledge.
Hampton, D., & DeFalco, J. A. (Eds.). (2022). The frontlines of artificial intelligence ethics: Human-centric perspectives in technology advance. Routledge.
Hattie, J. A. C., & Donoghue, G. M. (2016). Learning strategies: A synthesis and conceptual model. Nature Partner Journal: Science of Learning, 1, 1–13.
Hu, X., & Graesser, A. C. (2004). Human Use Regulatory Affairs Advisor (HURAA): Learning about research ethics with intelligent learning modules. Behavior Research Methods Instruments, and Computers, 36, 241–249.
Kay, J., Zapata-Rivera, D., & Conati, C. (2020). The gift of scrutable learner models: Why and how. In A. Sinatra, A. C. Graesser, X. Hu, B. Goldberg, & A. Hampton (Eds.), Design Recommendations for Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Data Visualization (Vol. 8). Army Research Laboratory.
Kulik, J. A., & Fletcher, J. D. (2015). Effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems: A meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 85, 171–204.
National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2018). How people learn II: Learners, contexts, and cultures. National Academies Press.
NIH 45 CFR 46. (1991). National Institutes of Health Code of Federal Regulations, Protection of Human Subjects. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare; National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Graesser, A.C., Hu, X., Sabatini, J.P. et al. Where is Ethics in the Evolution of AIED’s Future?. Int J Artif Intell Educ 34, 92–96 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-023-00353-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-023-00353-2