Abstract
Purpose of Review
As the first identified human oncogenic virus, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is widely circulating in humans. EBV presents mainly in latent state in tumors, and the maintenance of latency is an outcome of the virus-host interaction. The understanding of the viral latency will provide insight into the pathogenesis and therapeutics of EBV-associated diseases.
Recent Findings
Recent studies have found that EBV latency differs in the 3D chromatin conformation of the genome according to its type, and that this difference affects gene expression. In addition, EBV latency is also regulated by many other factors, especially the discovery of epigenetic and immune regulation provides new ideas for EBV latency maintenance.
Summary
Here, we focus on the characteristics and maintenance of EBV latency, as well as the effect of viral latent infection on diseases, summarizing recent progress in the regulation EBV latency. The pathogenesis of EBV-related diseases is also discussed.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40588-024-00230-z/MediaObjects/40588_2024_230_Fig1_HTML.png)
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Ambinder RF, **an RR. Sir Michael Anthony Epstein (1921–2024). Science (New York, NY). 2024;384(6693):274. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adp2961.
Yu H, Robertson ES. Epstein-Barr Virus History and Pathogenesis Viruses. 2023;15(3):714. https://doi.org/10.3390/v15030714.
Crawford DH. Biology and disease associations of Epstein-Barr virus. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2001;356(1408):461–73. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2000.0783.
Wong Y, Meehan MT, Burrows SR, Doolan DL, Miles JJ. Estimating the global burden of Epstein-Barr virus-related cancers. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2022;148(1):31–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-021-03824-y.
Perri F, Sabbatino F, Ottaiano A, Fusco R, Caraglia M, Cascella M, et al. Impact of Epstein Barr Virus Infection on Treatment Opportunities in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Cancer. Cancers. 2023;15(5):1626. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15051626.
Jangra S, Yuen K-S, Botelho MG, ** D-Y. Epstein-Barr Virus and Innate Immunity: Friends or Foes? Microorganisms. 2019;7(6):183. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7060183.
Kanda T. EBV-Encoded Latent Genes. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1045:377–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7230-7_17.
Yates J, Warren N, Reisman D, Sugden B. A cis-acting element from the Epstein-Barr viral genome that permits stable replication of recombinant plasmids in latently infected cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984;81(12):3806–10. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.81.12.3806.
Mei Y, Messick TE, Dheekollu J, Kim HJ, Molugu S, Muñoz LJC, et al. Cryo-EM Structure and Functional Studies of EBNA1 Binding to the Family of Repeats and Dyad Symmetry Elements of Epstein-Barr Virus oriP. J Virol. 2022;96(17):e0094922. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.00949-22.
Norseen J, Thomae A, Sridharan V, Aiyar A, Schepers A, Lieberman PM. RNA-dependent recruitment of the origin recognition complex. EMBO J. 2008;27(22):3024–35. https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2008.221.
Lieberman PM. Chromatin Structure of Epstein-Barr Virus Latent Episomes. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2015;390(Pt 1):71–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22822-8_5.
Jenkins PJ, Binné UK, Farrell PJ. Histone acetylation and reactivation of Epstein-Barr virus from latency. J Virol. 2000;74(2):710–20. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.74.2.710-720.2000.
Khanna R, Burrows SR. Role of cytotoxic T lymphocytes in Epstein-Barr virus-associated diseases. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2000;54:19–48. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.54.1.19.
Fudenberg G, Imakaev M, Lu C, Goloborodko A, Abdennur N, Mirny LA. Formation of Chromosomal Domains by Loop Extrusion. Cell Rep. 2016;15(9):2038–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2016.04.085.
Morgan SM, Tanizawa H, Caruso LB, Hulse M, Kossenkov A, Madzo J, et al. The three-dimensional structure of Epstein-Barr virus genome varies by latency type and is regulated by PARP1 enzymatic activity. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):187. Recent studies have found that PARP regulates EBV genome structure and gene expression.
Maestri D, Napoletani G, Kossenkov A, Preston-Alp S, Caruso LB, Tempera I. The three-dimensional structure of the EBV genome plays a crucial role in regulating viral gene expression in EBVaGC. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51(22):12092–110. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkad936.
Wang L, Laing J, Yan B, Zhou H, Ke L, Wang C, et al. Epstein-Barr Virus Episome Physically Interacts with Active Regions of the Host Genome in Lymphoblastoid Cells. J Virol. 2020;94(24). https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.01390-20.
Kim KD, Tanizawa H, De Leo A, Vladimirova O, Kossenkov A, Lu F, et al. Epigenetic specifications of host chromosome docking sites for latent Epstein-Barr virus. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):877. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-14152-8.
Wang Y, Du S, Zhu C, Wang C, Yu N, Lin Z, et al. STUB1 is targeted by the SUMO-interacting motif of EBNA1 to maintain Epstein-Barr Virus latency. PLoS Pathog. 2020;16(3):e1008447. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008447.
Holowaty MN, Sheng Y, Nguyen T, Arrowsmith C, Frappier L. Protein interaction domains of the ubiquitin-specific protease, USP7/HAUSP. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(48):47753–61. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M307200200.
**n S, Du S, Liu L, **e Y, Zuo L, Yang J, et al. Epstein-Barr Virus Nuclear Antigen 1 Recruits Cyclophilin A to Facilitate the Replication of Viral DNA Genome. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:2879. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02879.
Dheekollu J, Wiedmer A, Ayyanathan K, Deakyne JS, Messick TE, Lieberman PM. Cell-cycle-dependent EBNA1-DNA crosslinking promotes replication termination at oriP and viral episome maintenance. Cell. 2021;184(3):643-54.e13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.12.022.
Liu CD, Lee HL, Peng CW. B Cell-Specific Transcription Activator PAX5 Recruits p300 To Support EBNA1-Driven Transcription. J Virol. 2020;94(7). https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.02028-19.
Ding W, Wang C, Narita Y, Wang H, Leong MML, Huang A, et al. The Epstein-Barr Virus Enhancer Interaction Landscapes in Virus-Associated Cancer Cell Lines. J Virol. 2022;96(18):e0073922. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.00739-22.
Lupey-Green LN, Caruso LB, Madzo J, Martin KA, Tan Y, Hulse M, et al. PARP1 Stabilizes CTCF Binding and Chromatin Structure To Maintain Epstein-Barr Virus Latency Type. J Virol. 2018;92(18). https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.00755-18.
Lupey-Green LN, Moquin SA, Martin KA, McDevitt SM, Hulse M, Caruso LB, et al. PARP1 restricts Epstein Barr Virus lytic reactivation by binding the BZLF1 promoter. Virology. 2017;507:220–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2017.04.006.
Guo R, Jiang C, Zhang Y, Govande A, Trudeau SJ, Chen F, et al. MYC Controls the Epstein-Barr Virus Lytic Switch. Mol Cell. 2020;78(4):653-69.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2020.03.025.
Li S, Yang L, Li Y, Yue W, **n S, Li J, et al. Epstein-Barr Virus Synergizes with BRD7 to Conquer c-Myc-Mediated Viral Latency Maintenance via Chromatin Remodeling. Microbiol Spectr. 2023;11(2):e0123722. https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01237-22.
Miller CL, Burkhardt AL, Lee JH, Stealey B, Longnecker R, Bolen JB, et al. Integral membrane protein 2 of Epstein-Barr virus regulates reactivation from latency through dominant negative effects on protein-tyrosine kinases. Immunity. 1995;2(2):155–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1074-7613(95)80040-9.
Khasnis S, Veenstra H, McClellan MJ, Ojeniyi O, Wood CD, West MJ. Regulation of B cell receptor signalling by Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigens. The Biochemical journal. 2022;479(23):2395–417. Recent studies have found that EBNA2 and 3 inhibit latency to lysis by inhibiting BCR pathway genes.
Zhang L, Wang R, **e Z. The roles of DNA methylation on the promotor of the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) gene and the genome in patients with EBV-associated diseases. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2022;106(12):4413–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-022-12029-3.
Li J, Liu X, Liu M, Che K, Luo B. Methylation and expression of Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1, 2A and 2B in EBV-associated gastric carcinomas and cell lines. Dig Liver Dis. 2016;48(6):673–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2016.02.017.
Ho JWY, Li L, Wong KY, Srivastava G, Tao Q. Comprehensive Profiling of EBV Gene Expression and Promoter Methylation Reveals Latency II Viral Infection and Sporadic Abortive Lytic Activation in Peripheral T-Cell Lymphomas. Viruses. 2023;15(2). Recent studies have found differences in the methylation level of the type II latency promoter.
Weber E, Buzovetsky O, Heston L, Yu KP, Knecht KM, El-Guindy A, et al. A Noncanonical Basic Motif of Epstein-Barr Virus ZEBRA Protein Facilitates Recognition of Methylated DNA, High-Affinity DNA Binding, and Lytic Activation. J Virol. 2019;93(14). https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.00724-19.
Bernaudat F, Gustems M, Günther J, Oliva MF, Buschle A, Göbel C, et al. Structural basis of DNA methylation-dependent site selectivity of the Epstein-Barr virus lytic switch protein ZEBRA/Zta/BZLF1. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50(1):490–511. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab1183.
Zhang Y, Jiang C, Trudeau SJ, Narita Y, Zhao B, Teng M, et al. Histone Loaders CAF1 and HIRA Restrict Epstein-Barr Virus B-Cell Lytic Reactivation. mBio. 2020;11(5). https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01063-20.
Xu H, Li X, Rousseau BA, Akinyemi IA, Frey TR, Zhou K, et al. IFI16 Partners with KAP1 to Maintain Epstein-Barr Virus Latency. J Virol. 2022;96(17):e0102822. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.01028-22.
De La Cruz-Herrera CF, Tatham MH, Siddiqi UZ, Shire K, Marcon E, Greenblatt JF, et al. Changes in SUMO-modified proteins in Epstein-Barr virus infection identifies reciprocal regulation of TRIM24/28/33 complexes and the lytic switch BZLF1. PLoS Pathog. 2023;19(7):e1011477. Recent studies have shown that SUMO1 inhibits BZLF1 expression.
Ward BJH, Prasai K, Schaal DL, Wang J, Scott RS. A distinct isoform of lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1 (LEF1) epigenetically restricts EBV reactivation to maintain viral latency. PLoS Pathog. 2023;19(12):e1011873. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1011873.
Albanese M, Tagawa T, Hammerschmidt W. Strategies of Epstein-Barr virus to evade innate antiviral immunity of its human host. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:955603. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.955603.
Westhoff Smith D, Chakravorty A, Hayes M, Hammerschmidt W, Sugden B. The Epstein-Barr Virus Oncogene EBNA1 Suppresses Natural Killer Cell Responses and Apoptosis Early after Infection of Peripheral B Cells. mBio. 2021;12(6):e0224321. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02243-21.
Song H, Zhang Y, Liu J, Liu W, Luo B. Activation of DNA methyltransferase 3a by Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen 1 in gastric carcinoma. Dig Liver Dis. 2022;54(7):973–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2021.06.004.
Zhang W, Li Y, **n S, Yang L, Jiang M, **n Y, et al. The emerging roles of IFIT3 in antiviral innate immunity and cellular biology. J Med Virol. 2023;95(1):e28259. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.28259.
Zhang W, Jiang M, Liao X, Li Y, **n S, Yang L, et al. IFIT3 inhibits Epstein-Barr virus reactivation via upregulating innate immunity. J Med Virol. 2023;95(11):e29237. Recent studies have found that the innate immune molecule IFIT3 maintains EBV latency.
Xu Y, **ong J, Sun X, Gao H. Targeted nanomedicines remodeling immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment for enhanced cancer immunotherapy. Acta pharmaceutica Sinica B. 2022;12(12):4327–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2022.11.001.
Abou Harb M, Meckes DG Jr, Sun L. Epstein-Barr virus LMP1 enhances levels of large extracellular vesicle-associated PD-L1. J Virol. 2023;97(10):e0021923. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.00219-23.
Huo S, Luo Y, Deng R, Liu X, Wang J, Wang L, et al. EBV-EBNA1 constructs an immunosuppressive microenvironment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma by promoting the chemoattraction of Treg cells. J Immunother Cancer. 2020;8(2). https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-001588.
Wang WT, Yang Y, Zhang Y, Le YN, Wu YL, Liu YY, et al. EBV-microRNAs as Potential Biomarkers in EBV-related Fever: A Narrative Review. Curr Mol Med. 2024;24(1):2–13. https://doi.org/10.2174/1566524023666221118122005.
Humme S, Reisbach G, Feederle R, Delecluse HJ, Bousset K, Hammerschmidt W, et al. The EBV nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA1) enhances B cell immortalization several thousandfold. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(19):10989–94. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1832776100.
Zhang J, Sommermann T, Li X, Gieselmann L, de la Rosa K, Stecklum M, et al. LMP1 and EBNA2 constitute a minimal set of EBV genes for transformation of human B cells. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1331730. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1331730.
Sugimoto A, Watanabe T, Matsuoka K, Okuno Y, Yanagi Y, Narita Y, et al. Growth Transformation of B Cells by Epstein-Barr Virus Requires IMPDH2 Induction and Nucleolar Hypertrophy. Microbiol Spectr. 2023;11(4):e0044023. https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00440-23.
**n S, Liu L, Li Y, Yang J, Zuo L, Cao P, et al. Cyclophilin A binds to AKT1 and facilitates the tumorigenicity of Epstein-Barr virus by mediating the activation of AKT/mTOR/NF-κB positive feedback loop. Virol Sin. 2022;37(6):913–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virs.2022.09.001.
Li JSZ, Abbasi A, Kim DH, Lippman SM, Alexandrov LB, Cleveland DW. Chromosomal fragile site breakage by EBV-encoded EBNA1 at clustered repeats. Nature. 2023;616(7957):504–9. Recent studies have found that chromatin breakage caused by EBNA1 enrichment is associated with cancer development.
Mrozek-Gorska P, Buschle A, Pich D, Schwarzmayr T, Fechtner R, Scialdone A, et al. Epstein-Barr virus reprograms human B lymphocytes immediately in the prelatent phase of infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(32):16046–55. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1901314116.
Zhang J, Jia L, Liu T, Yip YL, Tang WC, Lin W, et al. mTORC2-mediated PDHE1α nuclear translocation links EBV-LMP1 reprogrammed glucose metabolism to cancer metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Oncogene. 2019;38(24):4669–84. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-019-0749-y.
Lo AK, Lung RW, Dawson CW, Young LS, Ko CW, Yeung WW, et al. Activation of sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1 (SREBP1)-mediated lipogenesis by the Epstein-Barr virus-encoded latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) promotes cell proliferation and progression of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Pathol. 2018;246(2):180–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.5130.
Wang LW, Wang Z, Ersing I, Nobre L, Guo R, Jiang S, et al. Epstein-Barr virus subverts mevalonate and fatty acid pathways to promote infected B-cell proliferation and survival. PLoS Pathog. 2019;15(9):e1008030. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008030.
Farrell PJ. EBV and MS: The evidence is growing stronger. Cell. 2023;186(26):5675–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2023.11.023.
Banko A, Cirkovic A, Jeremic I, Basaric M, Grk M, Miskovic R, et al. Uncovering the Role of Epstein-Barr Virus Infection Markers for Remission in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Biomedicines. 2023;11(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11092375.
Afrasiabi A, Keane JT, Ong LTC, Alinejad-Rokny H, Fewings NL, Booth DR, et al. Genetic and transcriptomic analyses support a switch to lytic phase in Epstein Barr virus infection as an important driver in develo** Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. J Autoimmun. 2022;127:102781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaut.2021.102781.
Bjornevik K, Cortese M, Healy BC, Kuhle J, Mina MJ, Leng Y, et al. Longitudinal analysis reveals high prevalence of Epstein-Barr virus associated with multiple sclerosis. Science (New York, NY). 2022;375(6578):296–301. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abj8222.
Gottlieb A, Pham HPT, Saltarrelli JG, Lindsey JW. Expanded T lymphocytes in the cerebrospinal fluid of multiple sclerosis patients are specific for Epstein-Barr-virus-infected B cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024;121(3):e2315857121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2315857121.
Lanz TV, Brewer RC, Ho PP, Moon JS, Jude KM, Fernandez D, et al. Clonally expanded B cells in multiple sclerosis bind EBV EBNA1 and GlialCAM. Nature. 2022;603(7900):321–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04432-7.
Vietzen H, Berger SM, Kühner LM, Furlano PL, Bsteh G, Berger T, et al. Ineffective control of Epstein-Barr-virus-induced autoimmunity increases the risk for multiple sclerosis. Cell. 2023;186(26):5705-18.e13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2023.11.015.
Funding
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82272981).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Mengdi Chen prepared the figure and tables and drafted the manuscript. Yanling Li, Qingshuang Qin and Li Yang revised the manuscript. Mingjuan Jiang, Yujie **n, Huirong Yan and Xuefei Liao collected the related references and participated in discussion. Jianhong Lu designed this review and revised this review. All authors contributed to this manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics
Not applicable.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article contains no studies with human or animal subjects performed by the author.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Viral Latency
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, M., Li, Y., Qin, Q. et al. Update on the Regulation and Maintenance of Epstein-Barr Virus Latency. Curr Clin Micro Rpt (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40588-024-00230-z
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40588-024-00230-z