SpringerLink
Log in

Recent trends in bio-inspired meta-heuristic optimization techniques in control applications for electrical systems: a review

  • Published:
International Journal of Dynamics and Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article represents a brief study on popular bio-inspired meta-heuristic optimization methods and their applications. These methods, which imitate biological phenomena or natural occurrences, have the potential to solve real-world problems. This article looked at several popular optimization methods and briefly discussed them. Although these methods have been used in a variety of domains of science and engineering, this article has focused on control engineering and electrical power systems in particular. This article aimed to provide a clearer picture of the recent trends and practices in the use of optimization in various control studies and research studies related to electrical system optimization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

      ACO:

Ant colony optimization

ABC:

Artificial bee colony

AVR:

Automatic voltage regulator

CS:

Cuckoo search

DA:

Dragonfly algorithm

GA:

Genetic algorithm

GWO:

Grey wolf optimization

GOA:

Grasshopper optimization algorithm

ILQG:

Integral linear quadratic Gaussian

ITAE:

Integral of time multiplied absolute error

ITSE:

Integral of time weighted squared error

LQR:

Linear quadratic regulator

LQG:

Linear quadratic Gaussian

LAE:

Least average error

MA:

Mayfly algorithm

MPC:

Model predictive control

MPPT:

Maximum power point tracking

MG:

Microgrid

PSO:

Particle swarm optimization

PID:

Proportional integral derivative

PV:

Photovoltaic

SSA:

Salp swarm algorithm

WO:

Whale optimization

References

  1. Mirjalili S, Dong JS, Lewis A (2020) Nature-inspired optimizers

  2. Binitha S, Sathya SS et al (2012) A survey of bio inspired optimization algorithms. Int J Soft Comput Eng 2(2):137

    Google Scholar 

  3. He J, Li YW, Guerrero JM, Blaabjerg F, Vasquez JC (2013) An islanding microgrid power sharing approach using enhanced virtual impedance control scheme. IEEE Trans Power Electron 28(11):5272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sarker SK, Badal FR, Das P, Das SK (2019) Multivariable integral linear quadratic Gaussian robust control of islanded microgrid to mitigate voltage oscillation for improving transient response. Asian J Control 21(4):2114

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Patarroyo-Montenegro JF, Andrade F, Guerrero JM, Vasquez JC (2020) A linear quadratic regulator with optimal reference tracking for three-phase inverter-based islanded microgrids. IEEE Trans Power Electron 36(6):7112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Haque MYYU, Islam MR, Hasan J, Sheikh MRI (2021) Negative imaginary theory-based proportional resonant controller for voltage control of three-phase islanded microgrid. J Control Autom Electr Syst 32(1):214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Karimi-Ghartemani M, Karimi H (2020) A robust multivariable approach for current control of voltage-source converters in synchronous frame. IEEE J Emerg Sel Top Power Electron. https://doi.org/10.1109/JESTPE.2020.3031206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Holland JH (1984) Genetic algorithms and adaptation., In: Adaptive control of Ill-defined systems (Springer, 1984), pp. 317–333

  9. Kennedy J, Eberhart R (1995) Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of ICNN’95-international conf. on neural networks. 4:1942–1948

  10. Dorigo M, Maniezzo V, Colorni A (1996) Ant system: optimization by a colony of cooperating agents. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B 26(1):29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Passino KM (2010) Bacterial foraging optimization. Int J Swarm Intell Res 1(1):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Karaboga D, Basturk B (2007) A powerful and efficient algorithm for numerical function optimization: artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm. J Global Optim 39(3):459

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang XS, Deb S (2009) Cuckoo search via Lévy flights. In: 2009 World congress on nature & biologically inspired computing (NaBIC) (Ieee, 2009), pp. 210–214

  14. Mirjalili S, Mirjalili SM, Lewis A (2014) Grey wolf optimizer. Adv Eng Softw 69:46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bansal JC, Sharma H, Jadon SS, Clerc M (2014) Spider monkey optimization algorithm for numerical optimization. Memetic Comput 6(1):31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ghaemi M, Feizi-Derakhshi MR (2014) Forest optimization algorithm. Expert Syst Appl 41(15):6676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mirjalili S (2015) Moth-flame optimization algorithm: a novel nature-inspired heuristic paradigm. Knowl-Based Syst 89:228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mirjalili S, Lewis A (2016) The whale optimization algorithm. Adv Eng Softw 95:51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mirjalili S (2016) Dragonfly algorithm: a new meta-heuristic optimization technique for solving single-objective, discrete, and multi-objective problems. Neural Comput Appl 27(4):1053

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Yazdani M, Jolai F (2016) Lion optimization algorithm (LOA): a nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithm. J Comput Des Eng 3(1):24

    Google Scholar 

  21. Saremi S, Mirjalili S, Lewis A (2017) Grasshopper optimisation algorithm: theory and application. Adv Eng Softw 105:30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pierezan J, Coelho LDS (2018) Coyote optimization algorithm: a new metaheuristic for global optimization problems, In: 2018 IEEE congress on evolutionary computation (CEC) (IEEE, 2018), pp. 1–8

  23. Masadeh R, Mahafzah BA, Sharieh A (2019) Sea lion optimization algorithm. Sea 10(5):388

    Google Scholar 

  24. Heidari AA, Mirjalili S, Faris H, Aljarah I, Mafarja M, Chen H (2019) Harris hawks optimization: algorithm and applications. Futur Gener Comput Syst 97:849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Qais MH, Hasanien HM, Alghuwainem S (2019) Enhanced salp swarm algorithm: application to variable speed wind generators. Eng Appl Artif Intell 80:82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Arora S, Singh S (2019) Butterfly optimization algorithm: a novel approach for global optimization. Soft Comput 23(3):715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dhiman G, Kaur A (2019) STOA: a bio-inspired based optimization algorithm for industrial engineering problems. Eng Appl Artif Intell 82:148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zervoudakis K, Tsafarakis S (2020) A mayfly optimization algorithm. Comput Ind Eng 145:106559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jia H, Peng X, Lang C (2021) Remora optimization algorithm. Expert Syst Appl 185:115665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Abualigah L, Yousri D, Abd Elaziz M, Ewees AA, Al-qaness MA, Gandomi AH (2021) Aquila optimizer: a novel meta-heuristic optimization algorithm. Comput. Ind. Eng. 157:107250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Połap D, Woźniak M (2021) Red fox optimization algorithm. Expert Syst Appl 166:114107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. MiarNaeimi F, Azizyan G, Rashki M (2021) Horse herd optimization algorithm: a nature-inspired algorithm for high-dimensional optimization problems. Knowl-Based Syst 213:106711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Naruei I, Keynia F (2021) A new optimization method based on coot bird natural life model. Exp Syst Appl 183:115352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mirjalili S (2019) Genetic algorithm. In: Evolutionary algorithms and neural networks. Springer, pp. 43–55

  35. Potts JC, Giddens TD, Yadav SB (1994) The development and evaluation of an improved genetic algorithm based on migration and artificial selection. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 24(1):73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Park JB, Park YM, Won JR, Lee KY (2000) An improved genetic algorithm for generation expansion planning. IEEE Trans Power Syst 15(3):916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Gen M, Cheng R (1999) Genetic algorithms and engineering optimization. Wiley

  38. Wang D, Tan D, Liu L (2018) Particle swarm optimization algorithm: an overview. Soft Comput 22(2):387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Benuwa BB, Ghansah B, Wornyo DK, Adabunu SA (2016) A comprehensive review of Particle swarm optimization. Int J Eng Res Afr 23:141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Nayyar A, Singh R (2016) Ant colony optimization-computational swarm intelligence technique. In: 2016 3rd International conference on computing for sustainable global development (INDIACom) (IEEE, 2016), pp. 1493–1499

  41. Balasubramani K, Marcus K (2013) A comprehensive review of artificial bee colony algorithm. Int J Comput Technol 5(1):15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Rajabioun R (2011) Cuckoo optimization algorithm. Appl Soft Comput 11(8):5508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Fister I Jr, Fister D, Fister I (2013) A comprehensive review of cuckoo search: variants and hybrids. Int J Math Modell Numer Optim 4(4):387

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Gharehchopogh FS, Gholizadeh H (2019) A comprehensive survey: Whale optimization algorithm and its applications. Swarm Evol Comput 48:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Meraihi Y, Ramdane-Cherif A, Acheli D, Mahseur M (2020) Dragonfly algorithm: a comprehensive review and applications. Neural Comput Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-04866-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Abualigah L, Diabat A (2020) A comprehensive survey of the Grasshopper optimization algorithm: results, variants, and applications. Neural Comput Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-04789-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Meraihi Y, Gabis AB, Mirjalili S, Ramdane-Cherif A (2021) Grasshopper optimization algorithm: theory, variants, and applications. IEEE Access 9:50001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Mirjalili S, Gandomi AH, Mirjalili SZ, Saremi S, Faris H, Mirjalili SM (2017) Salp swarm algorithm: a bio-inspired optimizer for engineering design problems. Adv Eng Softw 114:163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Abualigah L, Shehab M, Alshinwan M, Alabool H (2020) Salp swarm algorithm: a comprehensive survey. Neural Comput Appl 32(15):11195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Lin CL, Jan HY, Shieh NC (2003) GA-based multiobjective PID control for a linear brushless DC motor. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 8(1):56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Kim DH (2007) GA-PSO based vector control of indirect three phase induction motor. Appl Soft Comput 7(2):601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Habib M, Khoucha F, Harrag A (2017) GA-based robust LQR controller for interleaved boost DC-DC converter improving fuel cell voltage regulation. Electr Power Syst Res 152:438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Huerta F, Perez J, Cóbreces S, Rizo M (2018) Frequency-adaptive multiresonant LQG state-feedback current controller for LCL-filtered VSCs under distorted grid voltages. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 65(11):8433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Yoshida H, Kawata K, Fukuyama Y, Takayama S, Nakanishi Y (2000) A particle swarm optimization for reactive power and voltage control considering voltage security assessment. IEEE Trans Power Syst 15(4):1232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Gaing ZL (2004) A particle swarm optimization approach for optimum design of PID controller in AVR system. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 19(2):384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Bevrani H, Habibi F, Babahajyani P, Watanabe M, Mitani Y (2012) Intelligent frequency control in an AC microgrid: online PSO-based fuzzy tuning approach. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 3(4):1935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Bououden S, Chadli M, Karimi HR (2015) An ant colony optimization-based fuzzy predictive control approach for nonlinear processes. Inf Sci 299:143

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  58. Kaliannan J, Baskaran A, Dey N (2015) Automatic generation control of thermal-thermal-hydro power systems with PID controller using ant colony optimization. Int J Serv Sci Manag Eng Technol 6(2):18

    Google Scholar 

  59. Tiwari PK, Vidyarthi DP (2016) Improved auto control ant colony optimization using lazy ant approach for grid scheduling problem. Futur Gener Comput Syst 60:78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Oshaba A, Ali ES, Abd Elazim SM (2017) Speed control of SRM supplied by photovoltaic system via ant colony optimization algorithm. Neural Comput Appl 28(2):365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Bergna G, Garcés A, Berne E, Egrot P, Arzandé A, Vannier JC, Molinas M (2013) A generalized power control approach in ABC frame for modular multilevel converter HVDC links based on mathematical optimization. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 29(1):386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Naidu K, Mokhlis H, Bakar AA (2014) Multiobjective optimization using weighted sum artificial bee colony algorithm for load frequency control. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 55:657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Babaie M, Sharifzadeh M, Mehrasa M, Chouinard G, Al-Haddad K (2020) Supervised learning model predictive control trained by ABC algorithm for common mode voltage suppression in NPC inverter. IEEE J Emerg Sel Top Power Electron 9:3446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Puangdownreong D, Nawikavatan A, Thammarat C (2016) Optimal design of I-PD controller for DC motor speed control system by cuckoo search. Proc Comput Sci 86:83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Stojanovic V, Nedic N, Prsic D, Dubonjic L, Djordjevic V (2016) Application of cuckoo search algorithm to constrained control problem of a parallel robot platform. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87(9):2497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Chitara D, Niazi KR, Swarnkar A, Gupta N (2018) Cuckoo search optimization algorithm for designing of a multi-machine power system stabilizer. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 54(4):3056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Mohanty S, Subudhi B, Ray PK (2015) A new MPPT design using grey wolf optimization technique for photovoltaic system under partial shading conditions. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 7(1):181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Pradhan M, Roy PK, Pal T (2016) Grey wolf optimization applied to economic load dispatch problems. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 83:325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Sun X, ** Z, Cai Y, Yang Z, Chen L (2020) Grey wolf optimization algorithm based state feedback control for a bearingless permanent magnet synchronous machine. IEEE Trans Power Electron 35(12):13631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Oliva D, Abd El Aziz M, Hassanien AE (2017) Parameter estimation of photovoltaic cells using an improved chaotic whale optimization algorithm. Appl Energy 200:141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Hasanien HM (2018) Performance improvement of photovoltaic power systems using an optimal control strategy based on whale optimization algorithm. Electric Power Syst Res 157:168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. **ong G, Zhang J, Shi D, He Y (2018) Parameter extraction of solar photovoltaic models using an improved whale optimization algorithm. Energy Convers Manag 174:388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Palappan A, Thangavelu J (2018) A new meta heuristic dragonfly optimizaion algorithm for optimal reactive power dispatch problem. Gazi Univ J Sci 31(4):1107

    Google Scholar 

  74. Vanishree J, Ramesh V (2018) Optimization of size and cost of static var compensator using dragonfly algorithm for voltage profile improvement in power transmission systems. Int J Renew Energy Res 8(1):56

    Google Scholar 

  75. Kouba NEY, Menaa M, Hasni M, Boudour M (2018) A novel optimal combined fuzzy PID controller employing dragonfly algorithm for solving automatic generation control problem. Electric Power Components Syst 46(19–20):2054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Jumani TA, Mustafa MW, Md Rasid M, Mirjat NH, Leghari ZH, Saeed MS (2018) Optimal voltage and frequency control of an islanded microgrid using grasshopper optimization algorithm. Energies 11(11):3191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Omar AI, Aleem SHA, El-Zahab EE, Algablawy M, Ali ZM (2019) An improved approach for robust control of dynamic voltage restorer and power quality enhancement using grasshopper optimization algorithm. ISA Trans 95:110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Bhuyan M, Barik AK, Das DC (2020) GOA optimised frequency control of solar-thermal/sea-wave/biodiesel generator based interconnected hybrid microgrids with DC link. Int J Sustain Energ 39(7):615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Yang B, Zhong L, Zhang X, Shu H, Yu T, Li H, Jiang L, Sun L (2019) Novel bio-inspired memetic salp swarm algorithm and application to MPPT for PV systems considering partial shading condition. J Clean Prod 215:1203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Kansal V, Dhillon JS (2020) Emended salp swarm algorithm for multiobjective electric power dispatch problem. Appl Soft Comput 90:106172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Liu Z, Jiang P, Wang J, Zhang L (2021) Ensemble forecasting system for short-term wind speed forecasting based on optimal sub-model selection and multi-objective version of mayfly optimization algorithm. Expert Syst Appl 177:114974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. He X, He B, Zhao Y, Cui R, Zhang J, Dong Y, Jiang R (2021) MPPT control based on improved mayfly optimization algorithm under complex shading conditions. Int J Emerg Electr Power Syst. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijeeps-2021-0008/html

  83. Elsisi M, Tran MQ, Mahmoud K, Lehtonen M, Darwish MM (2021) Robust design of ANFIS-based blade pitch controller for wind energy conversion systems against wind speed fluctuations. IEEE Access 9:37894

  84. Saravanan R, Kannayeram GP, Muniraj R (2021) Mitigating unbalance and improving voltage considering higher penetration of EVs and DG using hybrid optimization technique. Int Trans Electr Energy Syst. https://doi.org/10.1002/2050-7038.13119

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

Not Available.Availability of data and material  Not Available.Code availability  Not Available.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Rajshahi University of Engineering & Technology, Rajshahi, 6204, Bangladesh

    Md. Hassanul Karim Roni, M. S. Rana & Md. Mahmudul Hasan

  2. School of Engineering and Information Technology, University of New South Wales, Canberra, ACT, 2600, Australia

    H. R. Pota

  3. Department of Physics, Jahangirnagar University, Savar, Dhaka, 1342, Bangladesh

    Md. Shajid Hussain

Authors
  1. Md. Hassanul Karim Roni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. S. Rana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. H. R. Pota
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Md. Mahmudul Hasan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Md. Shajid Hussain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

1. Md. Hassanul Karim Roni: Research, writing, drafting. 2. M. S. Rana: Supervision, Proof Reading, drafting. 3. H. R. Pota: Supervision, Proof Reading. 4. Md. Mahmudul Hasan: Research. 5. Md. Shajid Hussain: Research.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We declare that there are no conflicts of interest for this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roni, M.H.K., Rana, M.S., Pota, H.R. et al. Recent trends in bio-inspired meta-heuristic optimization techniques in control applications for electrical systems: a review. Int. J. Dynam. Control 10, 999–1011 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-021-00892-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-021-00892-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation