Log in

Thermal evaluation of geometrical innovations in concentric and eccentric evacuated single and double solar collectors

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, an experimental and numerical investigation of eight geometrical configurations of evacuated tube solar collectors was conducted. The configurations were tested simultaneously in outdoor installation under the same operational conditions. Parameters such as collector eccentricity, solar concentration, vacuum, collector absorber, and cover tube materials were investigated. The numerical model developed in MATLAB was validated with experimental results. The results show that the eccentricity and the absorptivity of the material of the absorber are the parameters that have the highest influence on the collector performance. Using reflective film in the eccentric solar collector configurations can increase efficiency by 33%. The vacuum presented an efficiency increase variation between 1 and 4% in the eccentric tube collectors. For the concentric collectors configurations, the use of the vacuum between the tubes can reach an increase of 9% in its performance. The eccentricity of the collector using reflective film and vacuum allows an effective solar concentration in the collector absorber and presents a 26% higher efficiency when compared with the concentric collector. The numerical results show that Makrolon can used as a sub for the usual glass cover, and the selection of the solar absorption for the absorber has the highest impact on the collector efficiency. Using steel black chrome for the absorber reached a maximum efficiency of 82%. These results can be used to support the design of future solar collectors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kumar A, Said Z, Bellos E (2021) An up-to-date review on evacuated tube solar collectors. J Therm Anal Calorim 145:2873–2889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09953-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Olfian H, Ajarostaghi SSM, Ebrahimnataj M (2020) Development on evacuated tube solar collectors: a review of the last decade results of using nanofluids. Sol Energy 211:265–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.09.056

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sethi M, Tripathi RK, Pattnaik B et al (2022) Recent developments in design of evacuated tube solar collectors integrated with thermal energy storage: a review. Mater Today Proc 52:1689–1696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.324

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Aggarwal S, Kumar R, Lee D et al (2023) A comprehensive review of techniques for increasing the efficiency of evacuated tube solar collectors. Heliyon 9:e15185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15185

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Maraj A, Londo A, Gebremedhin A, Firat C (2019) Energy performance analysis of a forced circulation solar water heating system equipped with a heat pipe evacuated tube collector under the Mediterranean climate conditions. Renew Energy 140:874–883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.03.109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yaïci W, Entchev E, Talebizadehsardari P, Longo M (2021) Performance investigation of solar organic Rankine cycle system with zeotropic working fluid mixtures for use in micro-cogeneration. J Energy Resour Technol Trans ASME 143:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4049582

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chowdhury MT, Mokheimer EMA (2021) Energy and exergy performance comparative analysis of a solar-driven organic rankine cycle using different organic fluids. J Energy Resour Technol Trans ASME 143:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4050343

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang X, Lin Q, Singh P et al (2023) Evaluating the proficiency of a novel solar evacuated tube collector. Appl Therm Eng 226:120311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.120311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Meraj M, Khan ME, Azhar M (2020) Performance analyses of photovoltaic thermal integrated concentrator collector combined with single effect absorption cooling cycle: constant flow rate mode. J Energy Resour Technol Trans ASME 142:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4047407

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pandya B, Kumar V, Patel J, Matawala VK (2018) Optimum heat source temperature and performance comparison of LiCl-H2O and LiBr-H2O type solar cooling system. J Energy Resour Technol Trans ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4038918/384567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jiang Y, Zhang H, Zhao R et al (2023) Thermal and optical performance analysis of triangular solar air collectors and regional applicability in China. Sol Energy 249:288–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2022.11.010

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Karabuga A, Yakut MZ, Utlu Z (2021) Evaluation of the thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen production from a middle-temperature intensity solar collector, a case study. Int J Hydrogen Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.11.246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Imponenti L, Shininger R, Gawlik K et al (2020) Controllable solar flux heating for freeze recovery in molten salt parabolic trough collectors. J Energy Resour Technol Trans ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4047303/1083969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Al-Tahaineh H, AlEssa AHM (2022) A hybrid TEG/evacuated tube solar collectors for electric power generation and space heating. J Eng Appl Sci 69:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-021-00065-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kumar A, Tiwari AK, Said Z (2021) A comprehensive review analysis on advances of evacuated tube solar collector using nanofluids and PCM. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 47:101417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Henein SM, Abdel-Rehim AA (2022) The performance response of a heat pipe evacuated tube solar collector using MgO/MWCNT hybrid nanofluid as a working fluid. Case Stud Therm Eng 33:101957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2022.101957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Alrowaili ZA, Ezzeldien M, Shaaalan NM et al (2022) Investigation of the effect of hybrid CuO–Cu/water nanofluid on the solar thermal energy storage system. J Energy Storage 50:104675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2022.104675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ismail KAR, Teles MPR, Lino FAM (2021) Comparative analysis of eccentric evacuated tube solar collector with circular and rectangular absorber working with nanofluid. Clean Eng Technol 3:100105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2021.100105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Eltaweel M, Abdel-Rehim AA, Attia AAA (2021) A comparison between flat-plate and evacuated tube solar collectors in terms of energy and exergy analysis by using nanofluid. Appl Therm Eng 186:116516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.116516

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tabarhoseini SM, Sheikholeslami M (2022) Entropy generation and thermal analysis of nanofluid flow inside the evacuated tube solar collector. Sci Rep 12:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05263-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yeh CY, Boonk KJF, Sadeghi G et al (2022) Experimental and numerical analysis of thermal performance of shape stabilized PCM in a solar thermal collector. Case Stud Therm Eng 30:101706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2021.101706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. de Teles M PR, Ismail KAR, Arabkoohsar A (2019) A new version of a low concentration evacuated tube solar collector: optical and thermal investigation. Sol Energy 180:324–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.01.039

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Al-Joboory HNS (2019) Comparative experimental investigation of two evacuated tube solar water heaters of different configurations for domestic application of Baghdad- Iraq. Energy Build. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Seddaoui A, Dar Ramdane MZ, Noureddine R (2022) Performance investigation of a new designed vacuum flat plate solar water collector: a comparative theoretical study. Sol Energy 231:936–948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2021.12.038

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Almitani KH, Alzaed A, Alahmadi A et al (2022) The influence of the geometric shape of the symmetrical twisted turbulator on the performance of parabolic solar collector having hybrid nanofluid: numerical approach using two-phase model. Sustain Energy Technol Assessments 51:101882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Veera Kumar A, Arjunan TV, Seenivasan D et al (2021) Thermal performance of an evacuated tube solar collector with inserted baffles for air heating applications. Sol Energy 215:131–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.12.037

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Roshith K, Varghese J (2022) A numerical investigation into the flow development and heat transfer characteristics for different tube geometry configurations in a water in glass evacuated tube solar water heater. J Sol Energy Eng doi 10(1115/1):4054471

    Google Scholar 

  28. Teles MPR, Ismail KAR (2022) Experimental and numerical assessments of the effects of vacuum and solar film on the performance of a low concentration eccentric solar collector. J Energy Resour Technol. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4052982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ismail KAR, Teles MPR, Lino FAM (2022) Modeling and experimental evaluation of the effects of reflective film and vacuum on the performance of concentric double tube direct flow solar collector. J Energy Resour Technol. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4054532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Duffie JA, Beckman WA (2013) Solar engineering of thermal processes, 4th edn. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Karlekar BV, Desmond RM (1977) Engineering heat transfer, 1st edn. West Publishing Company, Saint Paul

    Google Scholar 

  32. Raithby G, Hollands K (1975) A general method of obtaining approximate solutions to laminar and turbulent free convection problems. Adv Heat Transf 11:265–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2717(08)70076-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Swinbank WC (1963) Long-wave radiation from clear skies. Q J R Meteorol Soc 89:339–348. https://doi.org/10.1002/QJ.49708938105

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Patankar SV (1980) Numerical heat transfer and fluid flow. Hemisphere Pub. Corp, USA

    Google Scholar 

  35. Holman JP (2012) Experimental methods for engineers, 8th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the BIOFABRIS Laboratory from the Faculty of Chemical Engineering at the University of Campinas for providing the 3D-printed tube seals off the collector versions.

Funding

The authors wish to thank the support from Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e ao Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico do Maranhão (Fapema) for the Ph.D. [Grant No. BD-08373/17].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MPRT contributed to conceptualization, methodology, writing—original draft, and writing—review and editing, investigation. JRScontributed to writing—original draft and methodology. FAML contributed to writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, and methodology. CRESN contributed to writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, and methodology. KARI contributed to conceptualization, methodology, writing—review and editing, and funding acquisition.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudia Rosa do Espirito Santo Nóbrega.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Ahmad Arabkoohsar.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Teles, M.P.R., Lino, F.A.M., Silva, J.R. et al. Thermal evaluation of geometrical innovations in concentric and eccentric evacuated single and double solar collectors. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 46, 86 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-023-04665-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-023-04665-1

Keywords

Navigation