Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the clinical efficacy at 6 months (6 M) and 12 months (12 M) of 3 adhesive strategies (two-step etch-and-rinse; two-step self-etch; one step self-etch) used in composite resin restorations in primary molars.
Methods
This randomized clinical study involved 101 class II restorations in primary molars of 34 children (4–8 years old), distributed by 3 groups according to the 3 tested adhesive systems: GI- ClearfilTMS3Bond Plus (CSB); GII- ClearfilTMSE Protect Bond (CSEPB); GIII- Prime&Bond®XP (PBXP). Restorations were evaluated according to FDI criteria, immediately after execution, at 6 M and 12 M. All ethical and legal requirements were met. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM®SPSS®v26 and MS Excel® (5% significance level).
Results
The aesthetic, biological and most of the functional parameters evaluated remained without significant changes over time. Statistically significant differences were only found regarding the "marginal adaptation" parameter at 12 M, with worsening of scores for the three groups (p < 0.001). Comparing the groups, no significant differences were detected between any of the evaluated parameters (aesthetics properties: p = 0.721; functional properties: p = 0.122).
Conclusions
After a one-year period, the self-etch adhesives tested presented a clinical efficacy similar to the etch-and-rinse adhesive in restoring class II cavities in primary molars.
Trial registration number
ISRCTN11458186.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bucher K, Metz I, Pitchika V, Hickel R, Kuhnisch J. Survival characteristics of composite restorations in primary teeth. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19(7):1653–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1389-9.
Carvalho RM, Manso AP, Geraldeli S, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Durability of bonds and clinical success of adhesive restorations. Dent Mater. 2012;28(1):72–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.011.
Casagrande L, Dalpian DM, Ardenghi TM, Zanatta FB, Balbinot CE, Garcia-Godoy F, et al. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results. Am J Dent. 2013;26(6):351–5.
Chisini LA, Collares K, Cademartori MG, de Oliveira LJC, Conde MCM, Demarco FF, et al. Restorations in primary teeth: a systematic review on survival and reasons for failures. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2018;28(2):123–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12346.
Cumerlato CBF, Demarco FF, Barros AJD, Peres MA, Peres KG, Cascaes AM, et al. Reasons for direct restoration failure from childhood to adolescence: A birthcohort study. J Dent. 2019;89: 103183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2019.103183.
Donmez SB, Turgut MD, Uysal S, Ozdemir P, Tekcicek M, Zimmerli B, et al. Randomized clinical trial of composite restorations in primary teeth: effect of adhesive system after three years. Biomed Res Int. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5409392.
Dye BA, Tan S, Smith V, Lewis BG, Barker LK, Thornton-Evans G, et al. Trends in oral health status: United States, 1988–1994 and 1999–2004. Vital Heal Stat. 2007;11(248):1–92.
Ebrahimi M, Janani A, Majidinia S, Sadeghi R, Shirazi AS. Are self-etch adhesives reliable for primary tooth dentin? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Conserv Dent. 2018;21(3):243–50. https://doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_287_17.
Fröhlich TT, Gindri LD, Soares FZ, Rocha RO. Does the etching strategy influence the bonding of universal adhesivesystems to primary teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysisof in vitro studies. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2021;22(6):1015–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-021-00639-w.
Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, Heintze SD, Mjor IA, Peters M, et al. Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Science Committee Project 2/98--FDI World Dental Federation study design (Part I) and criteria for evaluation (Part II) of direct and indirect restorations includi. J Adhes Dent. 2007;9(1):121–47.
Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, Mjor I, Bayne S, Peters M, et al. FDI World Dental Federation - clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations. Update and clinical examples. J Adhes Dent. 2010;12(4):259–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-010-0432-8.
Kramer N, Tilch D, Lucker S, Frankenberger R. Status of ten self-etch adhesives for bonding to dentin of primary teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2014;24(3):192–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12059.
Kupietzky A, Joachim DA, Tal E, Moskovitz M. Long-term clinical performance of heat-cured high-viscosity glass ionomer class II restorations versus resin-based composites in primary molars: a randomized comparison trial. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2019;20(5):451–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-019-00423-x.
Landuyt KLV, Snauwaert J, Munck J, Peumans M, Yoshida Y, Poitevin A, et al. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials. 2007;28(26):3757–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.044.
Lenzi TL, Soares FZM, de Oliveira RR. Does Bonding Approach Influence the Bond Strength of Universal Adhesive to Dentin of Primary Teeth? J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2017;41(3):214–8. https://doi.org/10.17796/1053-4628-41.3.214.
Lenzi TL, Pires CW, Soares FZM, Raggio DP, Ardenghi TM, de Oliveira Rocha R. Performance of Universal Adhesive in Primary Molars After Selective Removal of Carious Tissue: An 18-Month Randomized Clinical Trial. Pediatr Dent. 2017a;39(5):371–6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29070159
Memarpour M, Shafiei F, Razmjouei F, Soltani M. Shear bond strength and scanning electron microscopy characteristics of universal adhesive in primary tooth dentin: An in vitro study. Dent Res J. 2018;15(4):264–70.
Miyazaki M, Tsujimoto A, Tsubota K, Takamizawa T, Kurokawa H, Platt JA. Important compositional characteristics in the clinical use of adhesive systems. J Oral Sci. 2014;56(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.56.1.
Ortiz-Ruiz AJ, Pérez-Guzmán N, Rubio-Aparicio M, Sánchez-Meca J. Success rate of proximal tooth-coloured direct restorations in primary teeth at 24 months: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):6409. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63497-4.
Pashley DH, Tay FR, Breschi L, Tjaderhane L, Carvalho RM, Carrilho M, et al. State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dent Mater. 2011;27(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.016.
Perdigão J, Ceballos L, Giráldez I, Baracco B, Fuentes MV. Effect of a hydrophobic bonding resin on the 36-month performance of a universal adhesive-a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24(2):765–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02940-x.
Phantumvanit P, Makino Y, Ogawa H, Rugg-Gunn A, Moynihan P, Petersen PE, et al. WHO Global Consultation on Public Health Intervention against Early Childhood Caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2018;46(3):280–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12362.
Pires CW, Soldera EB, Bonzanini LIL, Lenzi TL, Soares FZM, Montagner AF, et al. Is adhesive bond strength similar in primary an permanent teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2018;20(2):87–97. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a40296.
Sengul F, Gurbuz T. Clinical Evaluation of Restorative Materials in Primary Teeth Class II Lesions. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015;39(4):315–21. https://doi.org/10.17796/1053-4628-39.4.315.
Sofan E, Sofan A, Palaia G, Tenore G, Romeo U, Migliau G. Classification review of dental adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the universal type. Ann Stomatol. 2017;8(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.11138/ads/2017.8.1.001.
Takeda M, Takamizawa T, Imai A, Suzuki T, Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, et al. Immediate enamel bond strength of universal adhesives to unground and ground surfaces in different etching modes. Eur J Oral Sci. 2019;127(4):351–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12626.
Thanaratikul B, Santiwong B, Harnirattisai C. Self-etch or etch-and-rinse mode did not affect the microshear bond strength of a universal adhesive to primary dentin. Dent Mater J. 2016;35(2):174–9. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2015-109.
Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, Munck J, Van Landuyt KL. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater. 2011;27(1):17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.023.
Vinagre A, Ramos J, Marques F, Chambino A, Messias A, Mata A. Randomized clinical trial of five adhesive systems in occlusal restorations:One-year results. Dent Mater J. 2020;39(3):397–406. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2019-011.
Zamudio-Ortega CM, Contreras-Bulnes R, Scougall-Vilchis RJ, Morales-Luckie RA, Olea-Mejia OF, Rodriguez-Vilchis LE. Morphological, chemical and structural characterisation of deciduous enamel: SEM, EDS, XRD, FTIR and XPS analysis. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2014;15(3):275–80.
Acknowledgements
We certify this paper has not been published, it is not under consideration for publication in other journal and it will not be submitted elsewhere until the final decision on this submission is taken.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
We further state they have no conflict of interest regarding this work.
Ethical statement
Requirements for authorship have been met and all authors gave approval and have agreed to be accountable for all aspects of work ensuring integrity and accuracy.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Soares, A.D., Ramos, J.C., Alves, L.C. et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of a 2-step etch-and-rinse, 2-step self-etch and 1-step self-etch adhesive systems, in class II primary molars restorations. An one year prospective, randomized clinical trial. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 23, 845–854 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-022-00748-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-022-00748-0