Log in

Land use change and its driving factors in the ecological function area: A case study in the Hedong Region of the Gansu Province, China

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Arid Land Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Land use and cover change (LUCC) is important for the provision of ecosystem services. An increasing number of recent studies link LUCC processes to ecosystem services and human well-being at different scales recently. However, the dynamic of land use and its drivers receive insufficient attention within ecological function areas, particularly in quantifying the dynamic roles of climate change and human activities on land use based on a long time series. This study utilizes geospatial analysis and geographical detectors to examine the temporal dynamics of land use patterns and their underlying drivers in the Hedong Region of the Gansu Province from 1990 to 2020. Results indicated that grassland, cropland, and forestland collectively accounted for approximately 99% of the total land area. Cropland initially increased and then decreased after 2000, while grassland decreased with fluctuations. In contrast, forestland and construction land were continuously expanded, with net growth areas of 6235.2 and 455.9 km2, respectively. From 1990 to 2020, cropland was converted to grassland, and both of them were converted to forestland as a whole. The expansion of construction land primarily originated from cropland. From 2000 to 2005, land use experienced intensified temporal dynamics and a shift of relatively active zones from the central to the southeastern region. Grain yield, economic factors, and precipitation were the major factors accounting for most land use changes. Climatic impacts on land use changes were stronger before 1995, succeeded by the impact of animal husbandry during 1995–2000, followed by the impacts of grain production and gross domestic product (GDP) after 2000. Moreover, agricultural and pastoral activities, coupled with climate change, exhibited stronger enhancement effects after 2000 through their interaction with population and economic factors. These patterns closely correlated with ecological restoration projects in China since 1999. This study implies the importance of synergy between human activity and climate change for optimizing land use via ecological patterns in the ecological function area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Alkama R, Cescatti A. 2016. Biophysical climate impacts of recent changes in global forest cover. Science, 351(6273): 600–604.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Batllori E, Lloret F, Aakala T, et al. 2020. Forest and woodland replacement patterns following drought-related mortality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(47): 29720–29729.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett M T. 2008. China’s slo** land conversion program: Institutional innovation or business as usual? Ecological Economics, 65(4): 699–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao F, Ge Y, Wang J. 2013. Optimal discretization for geographical detectors-based risk assessment. GIScience & Remote Sensing, 50(1): 78–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damtea W G, Kim D, Im S. 2020. Spatiotemporal analysis of land cover changes in the Chemoga Basin, Ethiopia, using Landsat and Google Earth images. Sustainability, 12(9): 3607, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Hertog S J, Havermann F, Vanderkelen I, et al. 2023. The biogeophysical effects of idealized land cover and land management changes in Earth system models. Earth System Dynamics, 14(3): 629–667.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Deng Y, Jia L, Guo Y, et al. 2022. Evaluation of the ecological effects of ecological restoration programs: A case study of the slo** land conversion program on the Loess Plateau, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19: 7841, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137841.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dong L, Wang W, Ma M, et al. 2009. The change of land cover and land use and its impact factors in upriver key regions of the Yellow River. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 30(5): 1251–1265.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Erb K H, Haberl H, Jepsen M R, et al. 2013. A conceptual framework for analysing and measuring land-use intensity. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(5): 464–470.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fan J. 2015. Draft of major function oriented zoning of China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 70(2): 186–201. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang Z, Ding T, Chen J, et al. 2022. Impacts of land use/land cover changes on ecosystem services in ecologically fragile regions. Science of the Total Environment, 831: 154967, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154967.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feng Y, Zhu J, Zeng L, et al. 2021. Profit and loss prediction of ecosystem service value under county land use change: A case study of Banan District, Chongqing. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 41(9): 3381–3393. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley J A, DeFries R, Asner G P, et al. 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science, 309(5734): 570–574.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Future Earth. 2013. Future Earth Initial Design: Report of the Transition Team. Paris: International Council for Science (ICSU).

    Google Scholar 

  • Geng X, Hu S, Wang X, et al. 2023. Adaptive change of land use to nature and society in China’s agro-pastoral ecotone. Land Use Policy, 126: 106554, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grace J B, Keeley J E. 2006. A structural equation model analysis of post fire plant diversity in California shrub lands. Ecological Applications, 16(2): 503–514.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hailu A, Mammo S, Kidane M. 2020. Dynamics of land use, land cover change trend and its drivers in Jimma Geneti District, Western Ethiopia. Journal of Land Use Policy, 99: 105011, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halmy M W A, Gessler P E, Hicke J A, et al. 2015. Land use/land cover change detection and prediction in the north-western coastal desert of Egypt using Markov-CA. Applied Geography, 63: 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He C, Zhang J, Liu Z, et al. 2022. Characteristics and progress of land use/cover change research during 1990–2018. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 32(3): 537–559. (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hishe S, Bewket W, Nyssen J, et al. 2020. Analysing past land use land cover change and CA-Markov-based future modelling in the middle Suluh Valley, Northern Ethiopia. Geocarto International, 35(3): 225–255.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Y, Hu S, Yao J. 2014. Factors affecting farmland abandonment behavior of farmers in semi-arid regions of Gansu Province. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 42(9): 227–231. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • ** S, Li B, Yang Y, et al. 2016. Basic characteristics and pattern of land use change in Gansu Province. Journal of Lanzhou University: Natural Science, 52(3): 334–341. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleyer M, Trinogga J, Cebrián-Piqueras M A, et al. 2019. Trait correlation network analysis identifies biomass allocation traits and stem specific length as hub traits in herbaceous perennial plants. Journal of Ecology, 107(2): 829–842.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lambin E F, Baulies X, Bockstael N, et al. 1995. Land-use and land-cover change (LUCC): Implementation strategy. A core project of the International Geospere-Biosphere Programme and the International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change. In: IGBP Report 48. IHDP Report 10. IGBP, Stockholm, Sweden.

  • Lambin E F, Meyfroidt P. 2011. Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(9): 3465–3472.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Le Quéré C, Andrew R M, Canadell J G, et al. 2016. Global carbon budget 2016. Earth System Science Data, 8(2): 605–649.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Leroux L, Begue A, Lo Seen D, et al. 2017. Driving forces of recent vegetation changes in the Sahel: Lessons learned from regional and local level analyses. Remote Sensing of Environment, 191: 38–54.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Li G, Sun S B, Han J C, et al. 2019. Impacts of Chinese Grain for Green program and climate change on vegetation in the Loess Plateau during 1982–2015. Science of the Total Environment, 660: 177–187.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li K, Feng M, Biswas A, et al. 2020. Driving factors and future prediction of land use and cover change based on satellite remote sensing data by the LCM model: A case study from Gansu Province, China. Sensors, 20(10): 2757, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/s20102757.

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Li X Y, Wang L X, Zhang Y S. 2004. Analysis of roles of human activities in land desertification in arid area of Northwest China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 24(1): 68–75. (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Kuang W, Zhang Z, et al. 2014. Spatiotemporal characteristics, patterns, and causes of land-use changes in China since the late 1980s. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 24: 195–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long Y, Jiang F, Deng M, et al. 2023 Spatial-temporal changes and driving factors of eco-environmental quality in the Three-North region of China. Journal of Arid Land, 15(3): 231–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lunyolo L D, Khalifa M, Ribbe L. 2021. Assessing the interaction of land cover/land use dynamics, climate extremes and food systems in Uganda. Science of the Total Environment, 753: 142549, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142549.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luyssaert S, Jammet M, Stoy P C, et al. 2014. Land management and land-cover change have impacts of similar magnitude on surface temperature. Nature Climate Change, 4: 389–393.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Lyu J, Jiang W, Wang W, et al. 2018. Wetland landscape pattern change and its driving forces in Bei**g-Tian**-Hebei region in recent 30 years. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 38(12): 4492–4503. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Parihar C M, Yadav M R, Jat S L, et al. 2018. Long-term conservation agriculture and intensified crop** systems: Effects on growth, yield, water, and energy-use efficiency of maize in northwestern India. Pedosphere, 28(6): 952–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powers R P, Jetz W. 2019. Global habitat loss and extinction risk of terrestrial vertebrates under future land-use-change scenarios. Nature Climate Change, 9: 323–329.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Qacami M, Khattabi A, Lahssini S, et al. 2023. Land-cover/land-use change dynamics modeling based on land change modeler. Annals of Regional Science, 70(1): 237–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Refati D C, da Silva J L B, Macedo R S, et al. 2023. Influence of drought and anthropogenic pressures on land use and land cover change in the Brazilian semi-arid region. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 126: 104362, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2023.104362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao W Y, Zhang Z P, Guan Q Y, et al. 2024. Comprehensive assessment of land degradation in the arid and semiarid area based on the optimal land degradation index model. Catena, 234: 107563, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2023.107563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva L, Xavier A, Silva R, et al. 2020. Modeling land cover change based on an artificial neural network for a semiarid river basin in northeastern Brazil. Global Ecology and Conservation, 21: 00811, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song W, Feng Y, Wang Z. 2022. Ecological restoration programs dominate vegetation greening in China. Science of the Total Environment, 848: 157729, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157729.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Song X P, Hansen M C, Stehman S V, et al. 2018. Global land change from 1982 to 2016. Nature, 560: 639–643.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Song Z F. 2010. **gtai water supply project: Yingwu reservoir commences construction. Gansu Daily, [2010-10-19(02)]. (in Chinese)

  • Sy S, Quesada B. 2020. Anthropogenic land cover change impact on climate extremes during the 21st century. Environmental Research Letter, 15(3): 034002, doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab702c.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Turner B L, Skole D, Sanderson S, et al. 1995. Land Cover Change Science/Research Plan. Stockholm and Geneva: The International Geosphere Biosphere Program (IGBP) of the International Council for Science (ICSU) and Human Dimensions Programme (HDP) of the International Social Science Council (ISSC).

  • Turner B L, Lambin E F, Reenberg A. 2007. The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104: 20666–20671.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J F, Xu C D. 2017. Geodetector: Principle and prospective. Acta Geographica Sinica, 72(1): 116–134. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang K, Li X, Lyu X, et al. 2022. Optimizing the land use and land cover pattern to increase its contribution to carbon neutrality. Remote Sensing, 14(19): 3607, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093607.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, LESI M, Zhang M. 2019. Ecosystem pattern change and its influencing factors of “Two Barriers and Three Belts”. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 38(7): 2138–2148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler K, Fuchs R, Rounsevell M, et al. 2021. Global land use changes are four times greater than previously estimated. Nature Communications, 12: 2501, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22702-2.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Yan J J, Zhang G P, Deng X Y, et al. 2019a. Does climate change or human activity lead to the degradation in the grassland ecosystem in a mountain-basin system in an arid region of China? Sustainability, 11(9): 2618–2632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan X, Li L. 2023. Spatiotemporal characteristics and influencing factors of ecosystem services in Central Asia. Journal of Arid Land, 15(1): 1–19.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Yan X Y, Zhang Q, Yan X M, et al. 2019b. An overview of distribution characteristics and formation mechanisms in global arid areas. Advances in Earth Science, 34(8): 826–841. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Huang X. 2021. The 30 m annual land cover dataset and its dynamics in China from 1990 to 2019. Earth System Science Data, 13(8): 3907–3925.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan X L, Li L H, Chen X, et al. 2015. Effects of precipitation intensity and temperature on NDVI-based grass change over Northern China during the period from 1982 to 2011. Remote Sensing, 7(8): 10164–10183.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Zerouali B, Celso A G S, do Nascimento T V M, et al. 2023. A cloud-integrated GIS for forest cover loss and land use change monitoring using statistical methods and geospatial technology over Northern Algeria. Journal of Environmental Management, 341: 118029, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118029.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang G L, Biradar C M, **ao X M, et al. 2018. Exacerbated grassland degradation and desertification in Central Asia during 2000–2014. Ecological Applications, 28(2): 442–456.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y F, Zhang B, Wang B L, et al. 2012. Spatiotemporal climate change in Hedong Region in Gansu Province in recent 54 years. Arid Zone Research, 29(6): 956–964. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U20A2098, 41701219) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFC0507801). The authors appreciate the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: WEI Zhudeng; Methodology: WEI Zhudeng, DU Na; Formal analysis: WEI Zhudeng, DU Na; Writing - original draft preparation: DU Na; Writing - review and editing: WEI Zhudeng, YU Wenzheng; Funding acquisition: WEI Zhudeng, YU Wenzheng; Resources: WEI Zhudeng, DU Na; Supervision: WEI Zhudeng. All authors approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhudeng Wei.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wei, Z., Du, N. & Yu, W. Land use change and its driving factors in the ecological function area: A case study in the Hedong Region of the Gansu Province, China. J. Arid Land 16, 71–90 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-024-0001-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-024-0001-7

Keywords

Navigation