SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of grassland management on the community structure, aboveground biomass and stability of a temperate steppe in Inner Mongolia, China

  • Published:
Journal of Arid Land Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Plant community structure responds strongly to anthropogenic disturbances, which greatly influence community stability. The changes in community structure, aboveground biomass (AGB), biodiversity and community stability associated with different management practices were studied with a three-year field investigation in a temperate steppe of Inner Mongolia, China. The species richness, Shannon-Wiener index, evenness, plant functional type abundance, AGB, temporal community stability, summed covariance, scaling coefficient and dominant species stability were compared among areas subjected to long-term reservation (R), long-term grazing (G), mowing since enclosure in 2008 (M) and grazing enclosure since 2008 (E). Site R had higher perennial grass abundance and lower species richness than sites G, M and E, although the AGB was not significantly different among the four sites. The species structure varied from a single dominant species at site R to multiple dominant species at sites G, M and E. The long-term reservation grassland had lower biodiversity but higher stability, whereas the enclosed grassland with/without mowing had higher biodiversity but lower stability. Different stability mechanisms, such as the compensatory dynamics, mean-variance scaling and dominant species stability were examined. Results showed that community stability was most closely related to the relative stability of the dominant species, which supports the biomass ratio hypothesis proposed by Grime.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Auerswald K, Wittmer M H O M, Bai Y F, et al. 2012. C4 abundance in an Inner Mongolia grassland system is driven by temperature-moisture interaction, not grazing pressure. Basic and Applied Ecology, 13(1): 67–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai Y F, Han X G, Wu J G, et al. 2004. Ecosystem stability and compensatory effects in the Inner Mongolia grassland. Nature, 431(7005): 181–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai Y F, Wu J G, **ng Q, et al. 2008. Primary production and rain use efficiency across a precipitation gradient on the Mongolia plateau. Ecology, 89(8): 2140–2153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai Y F, Wu J G, Clark C M, et al. 2012. Grazing alters ecosystem functioning and C:N:P stoichiometry of grasslands along a regional precipitation gradient. Journal of Applied Ecology, 49(6): 1204–1215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Box G E P, Hunter W G, Hunter J S. 1978. Statistics for Experimenters. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter S R. 1989. Replication and treatment strength in whole-lake experiments. Ecology, 70(2): 453–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter S R. 1990. Large-scale perturbations: opportunities for innovation. Ecology, 71(6): 2038–2043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins S L, Knapp A K, Briggs J M, et al. 1998. Modulation of diversity by grazing and mowing in native tallgrass prairie. Science, 280(5364): 745–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conant R T, Paustian K, Elliott E T. 2001. Grassland management and conversion into grassland: effects on soil carbon. Ecological Applications, 11(2): 343–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cottenie K, De Meester L. 2003. Comment to Oksanen (2001): reconciling Oksanen (2001) and Hurlbert (1984). Oikos, 100(2): 394–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cottingham K L, Brown B L, Lennon J T. 2001. Biodiversity may regulate the temporal variability of ecological systems. Ecology Letters, 4(1): 72–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz S, Lavorel S, Mcintyre S et al. 2007. Plant trait responses to grazing–a global synthesis. Global Change Biology, 13(2): 313–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doak D F, Bigger D, Harding E K, et al. 1998. The statistical inevitability of stability-diversity relationships in community ecology. The American Naturalist, 151(3): 264–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer M, Bossdorf O, Gockel S, et al. 2010. Implementing large-scale and long-term functional biodiversity research: The biodiversity exploratories. Basic and Applied Ecology, 11: 473–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Carpenter S R, Walker B, et al. 2004. Regime shifts, resilience and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 35: 557–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garnier E, Cortez J, Billès G, et al. 2004. Plant functional markers capture ecosystem properties during secondary succession. Ecology, 85(9): 2630–2637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grime J P. 1998. Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects. Journal of Ecology, 86(6): 902–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grman E, Lau J A, Schoolmaster D R Jr, et al. 2010. Mechanisms contributing to stability in ecosystem function depend on the environmental context. Ecology Letters, 13(11): 1400–1410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillebrand H, Gruner D S, Borer E T, et al. 2007. Consumer versus resource control of producer diversity depends on ecosystem type and producer community structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(26): 10904–10909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson J, Illius A W. 1996. The ecology and Management of Grazing Systems. Oxon: CAB International Wallingford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper D U, Chapin III F S, Ewel J J, et al. 2005. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monographs, 75(1): 3–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert S H. 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecological Monographs, 54(2): 187–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ives A R. 1995. Predicting the response of populations to environmental change. Ecology, 76(3): 926–941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ives A R, Gross K, Klug J L. 1999. Stability and variability in competitive communities. Science, 286 (5439): 542–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ives A R, Carpenter S R. 2007. Stability and diversity of ecosystems. Science, 317(5834): 58–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karsten H D, Fick G W. 1999. White clover growth patterns during the grazing season in a rotationally grazed dairy pasture in New York. Grass and Forage Science, 54(2): 174–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kremen C. 2005. Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology?. Ecology Letters, 8(5): 468–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehman C L, Tilman D. 2000. Biodiversity, stability, and productivity in competitive communities. The American Naturalist, 156(5): 534–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepš J. 2004. Variability in population and community biomass in a grassland community affected by environmental productivity and diversity. Oikos, 107(1): 64–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Likens G E. 1985. An experimental approach for the study of ecosystems: the fifth Tansley lecture. Journal of Ecology, 73(2): 381–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loreau M, Naeem S, Inchausti P, et al. 2001. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: Current knowledge and future challenges. Science, 294(5543): 804–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loreau M, de Mazancourt C. 2008. Species synchrony and its drivers: neutral and nonneutral community dynamics in fluctuating environments. The American Naturalist, 172(2): E48–E66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loreau M, de Mazancourt C. 2013. Biodiversity and ecosystem stability: a synthesis of underlying mechanisms. Ecology Letters, 16(Suppl.): 106–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magurran A E. 1988. Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCann K S. 2000. The diversity-stability debate. Nature, 405(6783): 228–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millard S P. 1987. Environmental monitoring, statistics, and the law: room for improvement. The American Statistician, 41(4): 249–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petchey O L, Casey T, Jiang L, et al. 2002. Species richness, environmental fluctuations, and temporal change in total community biomass. Oikos, 99(2): 231–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polley H W, Wilsey B J, Derner J D. 2007. Dominant species constrain effects of species diversity on temporal variability in biomass production of tall grass prairie. Oikos, 116(12): 2044–2052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranta E, Kaitala V, Fowler M S, et al. 2008. Detecting compensatory dynamics in competitive communities under environmental forcing. Oikos, 117(12): 1907–1911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romanuk T N, Vogt R J, Kolasa J. 2006. Nutrient enrichment weakens the stabilizing effect of species richness. Oikos, 114(2): 291–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki T, Lauenroth W K. 2011. Dominant species, rather than diversity, regulates temporal stability of plant communities. Oecologia, 166(3): 761–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Socher S A, Prati D, Boch S, et al. 2013. Interacting effects of fertilization, mowing and grazing on plant species diversity of 1500 grasslands in Germany differ between regions. Basic and Applied Ecology, 14(2): 126–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart-Oaten A, Murdoch W W, Parker K R. 1986. Environmental impact assessment: “pseudoreplication” in time? Ecology, 67(4): 929–940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor L R. 1961. Aggregation, variance, and the mean. Nature, 189(4766): 732–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Downing J A. 1994. Biodiversity and stability in grasslands. Nature, 367(6461): 363–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Lehman C L, Bristow C E. 1998. Diversity-stability relationships: statistical inevitability or ecological consequence? The American Naturalist, 151(3): 277–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D. 1999. The ecological consequences of changes in biodiversity: a search for general principles. Ecology, 80(5): 1455–1474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valone T J, Barber N A. 2008. An empirical evaluation of the insurance hypothesis in diversity–stability models. Ecology, 89(2): 522–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahlman H, Milberg P. 2002. Management of semi-natural grassland vegetation: evaluation of a long-term experiment in southern Sweden. Annales Botanici Fennici, 39(2): 159–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker B H, Holling C S, Carpenter S R, et al. 2004. Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology & Society, 9(2): 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan H W, Bai Y F, Schönbach P, et al. 2009. Effects of grazing management system on plant community structure and functioning in a semiarid steppe: scaling from species to community. Plant and Soil, 340(1–2): 215–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • White R, Murray S, Rohweder M. 2000. Pilot Analysis of Global Ecosystems: Grassland Ecosystems. Washington DC: International Food Policy Research Institute and World Resources Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang H J, Li Y, Wu M Y, et al. 2011. Plant community responses to nitrogen addition and increased precipitation: the importance of water availability and species traits. Global Change Biology, 17(9): 2936–2944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang H J, Jiang L, Li L H et al. 2012. Diversity-dependent stability under mowing and nutrient addition: evidence from a 7-year grassland experiment. Ecology Letters, 15(6): 619–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao G S, Liu J Y, Kuang W H, et al. 2015. Disturbance impacts of land use change on biodiversity conservation priority areas across China: 1990–2010. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 25(5): 515–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Resources Science and Technology, Bei**g Normal University, Bei**g, 100875, China

    **ghui Zhang, Yongmei Huang, Huiying Chen, Jirui Gong, Yu Qi, Fei Yang & Engui Li

Authors
  1. **ghui Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yongmei Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Huiying Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jirui Gong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yu Qi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Fei Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Engui Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yongmei Huang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, J., Huang, Y., Chen, H. et al. Effects of grassland management on the community structure, aboveground biomass and stability of a temperate steppe in Inner Mongolia, China. J. Arid Land 8, 422–433 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-016-0002-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-016-0002-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation