Abstract
In this paper, we consider semi-infinite mathematical programming problems with equilibrium constraints (SIMPPEC). By using the notion of convexificators, we establish sufficient optimality conditions for the SIMPPEC. We formulate Wolfe and Mond–Weir-type dual models for the SIMPPEC under the invexity and generalized invexity assumptions. Weak and strong duality theorems are established to relate the SIMPPEC and two dual programs in the framework of convexificators.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Polak, E.: On the mathematical foundation of nondifferentiable optimization in engineering design. SIAM Rev. 29, 21–89 (1987)
Hettich, R., Kortanek, K.O.: Semi-infinite programming: theory, methods and applications. SIAM Rev. 35, 380–429 (1993)
López, M.A., Still, G.: Semi-infinite programming. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 180(1), 491–518 (2007)
Goberna, M.A., López, M.A.: Linear Semi-infinite Optimization. Wiley, Chichester (1998)
Jeyakumar, V., Luc, D.T.: Nonsmooth calculus, minimality, and monotonicity of convexificators. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 101(3), 599–621 (1999)
Clarke, F.H.: Optimization and Nonsmooth Analysis. Wiley, New York, NY (1983)
Michel, P., Penot, J.P.: A generalized derivative for calm and stable functions. Differ. Integral Equ. 5, 433–454 (1992)
Ioffe, A.D.: Approximate subdifferentials and applications, II. Mathematika 33, 111–128 (1986)
Treiman, J.S.: The linear nonconvex generalized gradient and Lagrange multipliers. SIAM J. Optim. 5, 670–680 (1995)
Kabgani, A., Soleimani-damaneh, M., Zamani, M.: Optimality conditions in optimization problems with convex feasible set using convexificators. Math. Methods Oper. Res. 86(1), 103–121 (2017)
Laha, V., Mishra, S.K.: On vector optimization problems and vector variational inequalities using convexificators. Optimization 66(11), 1837–1850 (2017)
Kabgani, A., Soleimani-damaneh, M.: Characterization of (weakly/properly/robust) efficient solutions in nonsmooth semi-infinite multiobjective optimization using convexificators. Optimization 67(2), 217–235 (2018)
Alavi Hejazi, M., Movahedian, N., Nobakhtian, S.: Multiobjective problems: enhanced necessary conditions and new constraint qualifications through convexificators. Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim. 39(1), 11–37 (2018)
Hanson, M.A.: On sufficiency of the Kuhn–Tucker conditions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 80, 545–550 (1981)
Craven, B.D.: Invex function and constrained local minima. Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 24, 357–366 (1981)
Mishra, S.K., Giorgi, G.: Invexity and Optimization. Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications, vol. 88. Springer, Berlin (2008)
Wolfe, P.: A duality theorem for nonlinear programming. Q. J. Appl. Math. 19, 239–244 (1961)
Mond, B., Weir, T.: Generalized Concavity and Duality, Generalized Concavity in Optimization and Economics. Academic Press, New York (1981)
Mishra, S.K., Jaiswal, M., An, L.T.H.: Duality for nonsmooth semi-infinite programming problems. Optim. Lett. 6, 261–271 (2012)
Pandey, Yogendra, Mishra, S.K.: On strong KKT type sufficient optimality conditions for nonsmooth multiobjective semi-infinite mathematical programming problems with equilibrium constraints. Oper. Res. Lett. 44(1), 148–151 (2016)
Mishra, S.K., Singh, V., Laha, V.: On duality for mathematical programs with vanishing constraints. Ann. Oper. Res. 243, 249–272 (2016)
Suneja, S.K., Kohli, B.: Optimality and duality results for bilevel programming problem using convexifactors. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 150, 1–19 (2011)
Pandey, Y., Mishra, S.K.: Duality for nonsmooth mathematical programming problems with equilibrium constraints using convexificators. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 171, 694–707 (2016)
Suh, S., Kim, T.J.: Solving nonlinear bilevel programming models of the equilibrium network design problem: a comparative review. Ann. Oper. Res. 34, 203–218 (1992)
Luo, Z.Q., Pang, J.S., Ralph, D.: Mathematical Programs with Equilibrium Constraints. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)
Colson, B., Marcotte, P., Savard, G.: A overview of bilevel optimization. Ann. Oper. Res. 153, 235–256 (2007)
Dempe, S., Zemkoho, A.B.: Bilevel road pricing: theoretical analysis and optimality conditions. Ann. Oper. Res. 196, 223–240 (2012)
Raghunathan, A.U., Biegler, L.T.: Mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints in process engineering. Comput. Chem. Eng. 27, 1381–1392 (2003)
Britz, W., Ferris, M., Kuhn, A.: Modeling water allocating institutions based on multiple optimization problems with equilibrium constraints. Environ. Model. Softw. 46, 196–207 (2013)
Harker, P.T., Pang, J.S.: Finite-dimensional variational inequality and nonlinear complementarity problems: a survey of theory, algorithms and applications. Math. Program. 48(1–3), 161–220 (1990)
Haslinger, J., Neittaanmäki, P.: Finite Element Approximation for Optimal Shape Design: Theory and Applications, p. xii. Wiley, Chichester (1988)
Dutta, J., Chandra, S.: Convexificators, generalized convexity and vector optimization. Optimization 53, 77–94 (2004)
Soleimani-damaneh, M.: Characterizations and applications of generalized invexity and monotonicity in Asplund spaces. Top 20(3), 592–613 (2012)
Pandey, Y., Mishra, S.K.: Optimality conditions and duality for semi-infinite mathematical programming problems with equilibrium constraints, using convexificators. Ann. Oper. Res. 269, 1–16 (2017)
Ansari Ardali, A., Movahedian, N., Nobakhtian, S.: Optimality conditions for nonsmooth mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints, using convexificators. Optimization 65(1), 67–85 (2016)
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to the anonymous referees for their valuable comments and suggestions which helped to improve the presentation of the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The research of Shashi Kant Mishra was supported by Department of Science and Technology-Science and Engineering Research Board (No. MTR/2018/000121), India.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Joshi, B.C., Mishra, S.K. & Kumar, P. On Semi-infinite Mathematical Programming Problems with Equilibrium Constraints Using Generalized Convexity. J. Oper. Res. Soc. China 8, 619–636 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40305-019-00263-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40305-019-00263-y