Abstract
The practice of English-medium instruction (EMI) is increasing worldwide. While various obstacles and challenges facing EMI have been reported, little is known about the learning strategies employed by students to cope with EMI courses, especially among students of different disciplines. This study investigated the strategies used by students in an interdisciplinary EMI program at a Chinese university. Data were collected by inviting both English and non-English majors to participate in a survey and semi-structured interviews. The quantitative results of this study indicate that there was no significant difference in the overall use of strategies between the two groups, but the non-English majors significantly outperformed the English majors in the use of three cognitive strategies: elaboration, organization, and critical thinking. The qualitative findings indicate that these differences may be attributed to two main factors: disciplinary knowledge background and learning priorities. Finally, the implications of these findings for EMI teachers and program administrators are presented.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The dataset of this study is available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.
Notes
WeChat is a popular Chinese social media platform.
References
Airey, J. (2020). The The content lecturer and English-Medium Instruction (EMI): Epilogue to the Special Issue on EMI in higher education. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23(3), 340–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2020.1732290
Ali, H. I. H. (2020). Omani students’ co** strategies in an English Medium Engineering programmes. Arab World English Journal, 11(2), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no2.25
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Chen, N. (2020). The English major crisis in China: Why did the once-popular major fall out of favor among Chinese students? English Today, 36(4), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026607841900035X
Cohen, A. D., Wang, I. K. H., Gu, P., Sykes, J., Plonsky, L., Pawlak, M., Nyikos, M., Harris, V., Gavriilidou, Z., Mitits, L., Gunning, P., & Gao, X. (forthcoming). A review of scholarship: Tangible insights from previous, current, and future research on the strategizing of language learners and users. Language Teaching.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Coyle, D. (2007). Content and language integrated learning: Towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 543–562. https://doi.org/10.2167/beb459.0
Di Sabato, B., & Macaro, E. (2018). Language and content intersections in CLIL and EMI. Rassegna Italiana Di Linguistica Applicata, 50(2–3), 21–32.
Evans, S., & Morrison, B. (2011). Meeting the challenges of English-Medium higher education: The first-year experience in Hong Kong. English for Specific Purposes, 30(3), 198–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.01.001
Galloway, N., Numajiri, T., & Rees, N. (2020). The ‘Internationalisation’, or ‘Englishisation’, of Higher Education in East Asia. Higher Education, 80(3), 395–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00486-1
Hu, G. (2019). English-Medium Instruction in Higher Education Lessons from China. Journal of Asia TEFL, 16(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2019.16.1.1.1
Hu, J., & Wu, P. (2020). Understanding English language learning in tertiary English-Medium Instruction contexts in China. System, 93, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102305
Jaekel, N. (2020). Language learning strategy use in context: The effects of self-efficacy and CLIL on language proficiency. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 58(2), 195–220. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2016-0102
Lasagabaster, D., & García, O. (2014). Translanguaging: Towards a dynamic model of Bilingualism at school. Journal of Culture and Education, 26(3), 557–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2014.973671
Lei, J., & Hu, G. (2014). Is English-Medium Instruction effective in improving Chinese undergraduate students’ English competence? International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 52(2), 99–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2014-0005
Loranger, A. L. (1994). The study strategies of successful and unsuccessful high school students. Journal of Reading Behavior, 26, 347–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862969409547858
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage.
Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Newbury House.
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivational strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurements, 53(3), 801–813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053003024
Pun, J., & **, X. (2021). Student challenges and learning strategies at Hong Kong EMI universities. PLoS ONE, 16(5), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251564
Rivero-Menéndez, M. J., Urquía-Grande, E., López-Sánchez, P., & Camacho Miñano, M. M. (2018). Motivation and learning strategies in accounting: Are there differences in English as a Medium of Instruction (EMI) versus Non-EMI students? Revista De Contabilidad, 21(2), 128–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsar.2017.04.002
Ruiz de Zarobe, Y., & Zenotz, V. (2018). Learning strategies in CLIL classrooms: How does strategy instruction affect reading competence over time? International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(3), 319–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1391745
Salamonson, Y., Everett, B., Koch, J., Wilson, I., & Davidson, P. M. (2009). Learning strategies of first year nursing and medical students: A comparative study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46(12), 1541–1547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.05.010
Seah, L. H., & Silver, R. E. (2020). Attending to science language demands in multilingual classrooms: A case study. International Journal of Science Education, 42(14), 2453–2471. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1504177
Soruç, A., & Griffiths, C. (2017). English as a Medium of Instruction: Students’ strategies. ELT Journal, 72(1), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccx017
Tai, T.-E., & Tang, C. W. (2020). The role of graduate students’ learning strategies in reducing their English Medium Instruction avoidance: The mediation effect of language anxiety. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 41(2), 368–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1777937
Wang, Y., Yu, S., & Shao, Y. (2017). The experiences of Chinese mainland students with English-Medium Instruction in a Macau university. Educational Studies, 44(3), 357–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2017.1373635
Weinstein, C. E., Husman, J., & Dierking, D. R. (2000). Self-regulation interventions with a focus on learning strategies. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 727–747). Academic Press.
Yip, M. C. W. (2021). The linkage among academic performance, learning strategies and self-efficacy of Japanese University students: A mixed-method approach. Studies in Higher Education, 46(8), 1565–1577. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1695111
Yu, S., Wang, Y., Jiang, L., & Wang, B. (2020). Co** with EMI (English as a Medium of Instruction): Mainland China students’ strategies at a university in Macau. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1784248
Zhou, S., & Rose, H. (2022). English-medium instruction in mainland China: National trends and institutional developments. In J. McKinley & N. Galloway (Eds.), English-medium instruction practices in higher education: International perspectives (pp. 35–45). Bloomsbury Academic.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors report that there are no competing interests to declare.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Mao, Y., Peng, JE. Exploring Chinese University Students’ Learning Strategy Use in English-Medium Instruction Courses. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 33, 209–218 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-023-00720-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-023-00720-6