Log in

Efficacy and Safety of MAO-B Inhibitors Safinamide and Zonisamide in Parkinson’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

  • Systematic Review
  • Published:
CNS Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and Objective

In Parkinson’s disease, safinamide and zonisamide are novel monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors with a dual mechanism of action involving the inhibition of sodium and calcium channels and the subsequent release of glutamate. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the efficacy and safety of both drugs compared with placebo on motor symptoms, cognitive function, and quality of life in patients with Parkinson’s disease.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, Scopus, PsycINFO, and trials registries up to March 2023 for randomized controlled trials of adults with Parkinson’s disease administered either safinamide or zonisamide and published in English. We excluded single-arm trials or if neither the efficacy nor safety outcomes of interest were reported. Primary outcomes were the change from baseline in Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale section III (UPDRS-III) and serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes included a change from baseline in OFF-time, Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire 39 to evaluate quality of life, and Mini-Mental State Examination for cognitive function assessment. The meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.4.1. Random-effect models were used to calculate the pooled mean differences (MDs) and risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses by medication, doses, Parkinson’s disease stage, and risk of bias were conducted. We assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane’s risk of bias tool. Sensitivity analysis was conducted, and publication bias were evaluated. This meta-analysis was not externally funded, and the protocol is available on the Open Science Framework Registration (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/AMNP5).

Results

Of 3570 screened citations, 16 trials met inclusion criteria (4314 patients with Parkinson’s disease). Ten safinamide trials were conducted in several countries. Six zonisamide trials were included, five of which were conducted in Japan and one in India. UPDRS Part III scores were significantly lower with both monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors than with placebo (MD = −  2.18; 95% CI −  2.88 to −  1.49; I 2 =63%; n = 14 studies). A subgroup analysis showed a significant improvement in UPDRS-III in safinamide (MD = −  2.10; 95% CI −  3.09 to −  1.11; I2 = 71%; n = 8 studies) and zonisamide (MD = −  2.31; 95% CI −  3.35 to −  1.27; I2 = 52%; n = 6 studies) compared with placebo. Monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors significantly decreased OFF-time compared with placebo. No significant differences in cognitive function (Mini-Mental State Examination), whereas an improvement in quality of life (Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire 39 scores) was observed. There was no significant difference in incidence rates of serious adverse events among all examined doses of zonisamide and safinamide compared with placebo. Two trials were reported as a high risk of bias and sensitivity analyses confirmed the primary analysis results.

Conclusions

Evidence suggests that novel monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors not only improve motor symptoms but also enhance patients’ quality of life. The meta-analysis showed that both medications have a similar safety profile to placebo with regard to serious adverse events. The overall findings emphasize the effectiveness of safinamide and zonisamide in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease as adjunct therapy. Further long-term studies examining the impact of these medications on motor and non-motor symptoms are necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lonneke ML, de Lau MMB. The epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:525–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yan R, Cai H, Cui Y, et al. Zonisamide: in Parkinson’s disease. CNS Drugs. 2009;23:703–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Erkkinen MG, Kim MO, Geschwind MD. Clinical neurology and epidemiology of the major neurodegenerative diseases. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1101/CSHPERSPECT.A033118.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Pringsheim T, Jette N, Frolkis A, Steeves TDL. The prevalence of Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mov Disord. 2014;29:1583–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu Y, Zhang Y, Zhu K, Chi S, Wang C, **e A. Emerging role of sirtuin 2 in Parkinson’s Disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3389/FNAGI.2019.00372.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Greenamyre JT, Hastings TG. Biomedicine. Parkinson’s: divergent causes, convergent mechanisms. Science. 2004;304:1120–2.

  7. Wolters EC. Non-motor extranigral signs and symptoms in Parkinson’s disease. Park Relat Disord. 2009;15:S6-12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Boland DF, Stacy M. The economic and quality of life burden associated with Parkinson’s disease: a focus on symptoms. Am J Manag Care. 2012;18:168–75.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Poewe W, Antonini A, Zijlmans JC, Burkhard PR, Vingerhoets F. Levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease: an old drug still going strong. Clin Interv Aging. 2010;5:229–38.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Bastide MF, Meissner WG, Picconi B, et al. Pathophysiology of L-dopa-induced motor and non-motor complications in Parkinson’s disease. Prog Neurobiol. 2015;132:96–168.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fox SH, Katzenschlager R, Lim SY, Barton B, de Bie RMA, Seppi K, et al. International Parkinson and movement disorder society evidence-based medicine review: update on treatments for the motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2018;33:1248–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. NICE. Overview: Parkinson’s disease in adults: guidance. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/NG71. Accessed 27 Mar 2022.

  13. Kong L, ** J, Jiang Z, Yu X, Liu H, Wang Z. Zonisamide’s efficacy and safety on Parkinson’s Disease and dementia with lewy bodies: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Biomed Res Int. 2022;2022:4817488.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Sharaf J, Williams K-AD, Tariq M, et al. The efficacy of safinamide in the management of Parkinson’s Disease: a systematic review. Cureus. 2022;14:e29118.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Matsunaga S, Kishi T, Iwata N. Combination therapy with zonisamide and antiparkinson drugs for Parkinson’s disease: a meta-analysis. J Alzheimer’s Dis. 2017;56:1229–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ WV, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.3 (updated February 2022). 2022. www.training.cochrane.org/handbook. Accessed 27 Mar 2023.

  17. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, The PRISMA, et al. statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.N71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Higgins JPT, Savovi J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, SterneJAC. Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial. Available from: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-08. Accessed 27 Mar 2022.

  19. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21:1539–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ioannidis JPA, Trikalinos TA. The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey. CMAJ. 2007;176:1091–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Murata M, Odawara T, Hasegawa K, Kajiwara R, Takeuchi H, Tagawa M, et al. Effect of zonisamide on parkinsonism in patients with dementia with Lewy bodies: a phase 3 randomized clinical trial. Park Relat Disord. 2020;76:91–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Murata M, Hasegawa K, Kanazawa I, et al. Zonisamide improves motor function in Parkinson disease: a randomized, double-blind study. Neurology. 2007;68:45–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Murata M, Hasegawa K, Kanazawa I, et al. Zonisamide improves wearing-off in Parkinson’s disease: a randomized, double-blind study. Mov Disord. 2015;30:1343–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Murata M, Hasegawa K, Kanazawa I, et al. Randomized placebo-controlled trial of zonisamide in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Neurol Clin Neurosci. 2016;4:10–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Murata M, Odawara T, Hasegawa K, Iiyama S, Nakamura M, Tagawa M, et al. Adjunct zonisamide to levodopa for DLB parkinsonism: a randomized double-blind phase 2 study. Neurology. 2018;90:e664–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Pillai K, Bhat P, Kumar A, Rajan R, Bhushan M, Vishnu, et al. Zonisamide add-on in tremor-dominant Parkinson’ s disease: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Park Relat Disord. 2022;105:1–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Stocchi F, Borgohain R, Onofrj M, Schapira AHV, Bhatt M, Lucini V, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of safinamide as add-on therapy in early Parkinson’s disease patients. Mov Disord. 2012;27:106–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Stocchi F, Arnold G, Onofrj M, et al. Improvement of motor function in early Parkinson disease by safinamide. Neurology. 2004;63:746–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schapira AHV, Fox SH, Hauser RA, Jankovic J, Jost WH, Kenney C, et al. Assessment of safety and efficacy of safinamide as a levodopa adjunct in patients with Parkinson disease and motor fluctuations a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2017;74:216–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hattori N, Tsuboi Y, Yamamoto A, Sasagawa Y, Nomoto M. Efficacy and safety of safinamide as an add-on therapy to L-DOPA for patients with Parkinson’s disease: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II/III study. Park Relat Disord. 2020;75:17–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Borgohain R, Szasz J, Stanzione P, et al. Two-year, randomized, controlled study of safinamide as add-on to levodopa in mid to late Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2014;29:1273–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Schapira AHV, Stocchi F, Borgohain R, Onofrj M, Bhatt M, Lorenzana P, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of safinamide as add-on therapy in early Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Neurol. 2013;20:271–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wei Q, Tan Y, Xu P, et al. The XINDI Study: a randomized phase III clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of safinamide as add-on therapy to levodopa in Chinese patients with Parkinson’s disease with motor fluctuations. CNS Drugs. 2022;36:1217–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Kulisevsky J, Martinez-Horta S, Campolongo A, Pascual-Sedano B, Marin-Lahoz J, Bejr-kasem H, et al. A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effects of safinamide on apathetic non-demented patients with Parkinson’s Disease. Front Neurol. 2022;13: 866502.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Borgohain R, Szasz J, Stanzione P, et al. Randomized trial of safinamide add-on to levodopa in Parkinson’s disease with motor fluctuations. Mov Disord. 2014;29:229–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. ClinicalTrials.gov. Xadago report (2013): safinamide in early IPD , as add-on to dopamine agonist (MOTION). NCT00605683. Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP): p. 1–9

  37. Müller T, Foley P. Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of safinamide. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017;56:251–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Cattaneo C, Kulisevsky J, Tubazio V, Castellani P. Long-term efficacy of safinamide on Parkinson’s Disease chronic pain. Adv Ther. 2018;35:515–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Cattaneo C, Jost WH, Bonizzoni E. Long-term efficacy of safinamide on symptoms severity and quality of life in fluctuating Parkinson’s disease patients. J Parkinsons Dis. 2020;10:89–97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Cattaneo C, Müller T, Bonizzoni E, Lazzeri G, Kottakis I, Keywood C. Long-term effects of safinamide on mood fluctuations in Parkinson’s Disease. J Parkinsons Dis. 2017;7:629–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Odawara T, Hasegawa K, Kajiwara R, Takeuchi H, Tagawa M, Kosaka K, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of zonisamide for treatment of parkinsonism in patients with dementia with lewy bodies: an open-label extension of a phase three randomized controlled trial. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2022;30:314–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Martinez-Martin P, Rodriguez-Blazquez C, Forjaz MJ, Kurtis MM. Impact of pharmacotherapy on quality of life in patients with Parkinson’s disease. CNS Drugs. 2015;29:397–413.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Barone P, Santangelo G, Morgante L, et al. A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effects of rasagiline on depressive symptoms in non-demented Parkinson’s disease patients. Eur J Neurol. 2015;22:1184–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Li C, Xue L, Liu Y, Yang Z, Chi S, **e A. Zonisamide for the treatment of Parkinson disease: a current update. Front Neurosci. 2020;14:1–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Goel A, Sugumaran R, Narayan SK. Zonisamide in Parkinson’s disease: a current update. Neurol Sci. 2021;42:4123–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Miwa H. Zonisamide for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Expert Rev Neurother. 2007;7:1077–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Onofrj M, Bonanni L, Thomas A. An expert opinion on safinamide in Parkinson’s disease. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2008;17:1115–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Blair HA, Dhillon S. Safinamide: a review in Parkinson’s disease. CNS Drugs. 2017;31:169–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Yan R, Cai H, Cui Y. Comparative efficacy and safety of monoamine oxidase type B inhibitors plus channel blockers and monoamine oxidase type B inhibitors as adjuvant therapy to levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled. Eur J Neurol. 2023;30:1118–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Giossi R, Carrara F, Mazzari M, et al. Overall efficacy and safety of safinamide in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Clin Drug Investig. 2021;41:321–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Blesa R, Pujol M, Aguilar M, et al. Clinical validity of the “mini-mental state” for Spanish speaking communities. Neuropsychologia. 2001;39:1150–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Tsai JC, Chen CW, Chu H, Yang HL, Chung MH, Liao YM, et al. Comparing the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Mini-Mental State Examination when screening people for mild cognitive impairment and dementia in Chinese population. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2016;30:486–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Fiorenzato E, Zurlo L, Cianci C, Garon M, Gandolfi T, Pistonesi F, et al. MoCA and MMSE subitems’ sensitivity across the PD-cognitive spectrum [abstract]. Mov Disord. 2023;37 (suppl 2).

  54. Hagell P, Nygren C. The 39 item Parkinson’s disease questionnaire (PDQ-39) revisited: Implications for evidence based medicine. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;78:1191–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Stathis P, Papadopoulos G. Evaluation and validation of a patient-reported quality-of-life questionnaire for Parkinson’s disease. J Patient-Reported Outcomes. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00427-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Peto V, Jenkinson C, Fitzpatrick R. PDQ-39: a review of the development, validation and application of a Parkinson’s Disease quality of life questionnaire and its associated measures. J Neurol. 1998;245 Suppl.:10–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Jenkinson C, Fitzpatrick R, Peto V, Greenhall R, Hyman N. The Parkinson’s disease questionnaire (PDQ-39): development and validation of a Parkinson’s disease summary index score. Age Ageing. 1997;26:353–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the University of Manitoba Library for the peer review of the MEDLINE search strategy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sherif Eltonsy.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflicts of Interest/Competing Interests

Laila Aboulatta, Lara Haidar, Ahmed Abou-Setta, Nicole Askin, Rasheda Rabbani, Alekhya Lavu, Payam Peymani, Ryan Zarychanski, and Sherif Eltonsy have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this article.

Ethics Approval

Not applicable.

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Availability of Data and Material

Not applicable.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

Authors’ Contributions

LA, AA, RR, RZ, NA, and SE contributed to the conception and design of the study. LA and NA performed the literature search. LA, LH, AL, and PP conducted the screening and data extraction. LA conducted the data analysis. LA, AA, RR, and SE contributed to the data interpretation. LA drafted the manuscript. AA, RR, RZ, NA, PP, AL, LH, and SE critically revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final submitted manuscript and agree to be accountable for the work.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 1002 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aboulatta, L., Haidar, L., Abou-Setta, A. et al. Efficacy and Safety of MAO-B Inhibitors Safinamide and Zonisamide in Parkinson’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. CNS Drugs 37, 941–956 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40263-023-01048-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40263-023-01048-x

Navigation