Log in

Novel angular evaluation method for radiation field using Lie derivative

  • Original Paper - Cross-Disciplinary Physics and Related Areas of Science and Technology
  • Published:
Journal of the Korean Physical Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In radiotherapy, quality assurance (QA) for beam delivery from linear accelerator (linac) of treatment machine is a highly crucial factor for accurate radiotherapy because of the fluctuations in the conditions of the machine. The radiation field is one of the important evaluation items, and this has been well-checked by crossline (right-to-left) and inline (caudal-to-cranial) profiles. Diagonal or angular profiles of the radiation field are also an important component of irradiation field; however, these are frequently omitted or not fully taken into account as it requires inefficient measurements. To detect the angular and radial conditions of the radiation field, we proposed a novel evaluation method using Lie derivative analysis against radiochromic film dosimetry in this study. This method directly compared the detected dose distributions with the calculations, obtained the discrepancy of the flow field from the mathematical characteristic of Lie derivative, resulted in a detection of the radial and angular discrepancies that have not been handled by conventional gamma analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G.J. Kutcher, L. Coia, M. Gillin et al., Comprehensive QA for radiation oncology: report of AAPM radiation therapy committee task group 40. Med. Phys. 21(4), 581–618 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. I.J. Das, C.W. Cheng, R.J. Watts et al., Accelerator beam data commissioning equipment and procedures: report of the TG-106 of the Therapy Physics Committee of the AAPM. Med. Phys. 35(9), 4186–4215 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. E.E. Klein, J. Hanley, J. Bayouth et al., Task Group 142 report: quality assurance of medical accelerators a. Med. Phys. 36(9 Part 1), 4197–4212 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. T. Pawlicki, M. Whitaker, A.L. Boyer, Statistical process control for radiotherapy quality assurance. Med. Phys. 32(9), 2777–2786 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. K. Smith, P. Balter, J. Duhon et al., AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline 8. A.: linear accelerator performance tests. J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 18(4), 23–39 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. D. Chacón, M. Strumia, M. Valente et al., Effect of inorganic salts and matrix crosslinking on the dose response of polymer gel dosimeters based on acrylamide. Radiat. Meas. 117, 7–18 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. S.-I. Hayashi, F. Fujiwara, S. Usui et al., Effect of inorganic salt on the dose sensitivity of polymer gel dosimeter. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 81(7), 884–888 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. K. Yano, The theory of Lie derivatives and its applications. Courier Dover Publications (2020)

  9. A. Niroomand-Rad, S.T. Chiu-Tsao, M.P. Grams et al., Report of AAPM task group 235 radiochromic film dosimetry: an update to TG-55. Med. Phys. 47(12), 5986–6025 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. D. Lewis, M.F. Chan, Correcting lateral response artifacts from flatbed scanners for radiochromic film dosimetry. Med. Phys. 42(1), 416–429 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Devic, N. Tomic, C.G. Soares et al., Optimizing the dynamic range extension of a radiochromic film dosimetry system. Med. Phys. 36(2), 429–437 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Hanley, S. Dresser, W. Simon et al., AAPM Task Group 198 Report: an implementation guide for TG 142 quality assurance of medical accelerators. Med. Phys. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. C. Amies, A. Rose, P. Metcalfe et al., Multicentre dosimetry study of mantle treatment in Australia and New Zealand. Radiother. Oncol. 40(2), 171–180 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. W. Crijns, F. Maes, U. Van Der Heide et al., Calibrating page sized Gafchromic EBT3 films. Med. Phys. 40(1), 012102 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was financially supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists [grant number 18K15650] and [grant number 20K16742] from the Japan Society for Promotion of Science.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yusuke Anetai.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anetai, Y., Kinami, S., Koike, Y. et al. Novel angular evaluation method for radiation field using Lie derivative. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 81, 1157–1168 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40042-022-00595-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40042-022-00595-8

Keywords

Navigation