Log in

Phenological Stages Analysis in Grapevines Using an Electronic Nose

  • Full-Length Research Article
  • Published:
Agricultural Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The vineyards present different phenological phases that comprise dormancy, bud break, and flowering buds going through different stages of development, such as inflorescence formation, flowering, fruit set, growth and fruit maturation. To control the quantity and quality of production, thinning is used in table grapes. The technique reduces berry number to improve fruit growth, but it is costly and in some cases impractical in the entire extension of an orchard. The right moment for execution and the intensity are complex issues that involve specific knowledge about the conditions of the vineyard. Therefore, phenological information that can help planning and decision-making about thinning is relevant and can improve the cost-effectiveness of the technique in viticulture. An electronic nose system was developed to collect and analyze compound volatile variations during the growing season, more specifically during the period of bud growth and ripening in three grape cultivars (BRS Vitória, Niagara Rosada, Bordô). The data were collected from October 2021 to February 2022. The research hypothesis is that the electronic nose can identify the general stage of plant development. To verify the hypothesis, a classification analysis was performed for each cultivar. The result showed that all models presented balanced accuracy above 85% for the cultivar BRS Vitória, above 92% for Niagara, and above 93% for Bordô, with better performance for models based on K-nearest neighbors (KNN), and random forest, than those based on extreme learning machine and support vector machine. In the total of 24 models, 9 for BRS Vitória, 9 for Niagara, and 11 for Bordô did not obtain error given the metrics used. It was observed that the normalization of the database is not necessary to improve the accuracy rates obtained, which obtained total rates using the KNN classifier. Regarding the research hypothesis, it is considered that the electronic nose is capable of distinguishing between the different stages proposed for each analyzed cultivar and between them. The results of this work indicate a potential use of the electronic nose to aid decision-making in vineyard activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data may be made available depending on demand, requested from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Ahmed S, Roberto SR, Shahab M, Colombo RC, Silvestre JP, Koyama R, de Souza RT (2019) Proposal of double-crop** system for ‘BRS Isis’ seedless grape grown in subtropical area. Sci Hortic 251:118–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aleixandre M, Santos JP, Sayago I, Cabellos JM, Arroyo T, Horrillo MC (2015) A wireless and portable electronic nose to differentiate musts of different ripeness degree and grape varieties. Sensors 15(4):8429–8443. https://doi.org/10.3390/s150408429

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Almeida LW, d., Mota, R. V. d., Souza, C. R. d., Silva, L. P., Fernandes, F. d. P., Mendonça, T. d. R., Peregrino, I., and Regina, M. d. A. (2020) In-row spacing and shoot thinning for ‘Chardonnay’grapevines in the south of minas Gerais, Brazil. Sci Agric. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-992x-2018-0185

  4. Alvares CA, Stape JL, Sentelhas PC, Gonçalves JL, d. M., and Sparovek, G. (2013) Köppen’s climate classification map for brazil. Meteorol Z 22(6):711–728. https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Athamneh AI, Zoecklein BW, Mallikarjunan K (2008) Electronic nose evaluation of cabernet sauvignon fruit maturity. J Wine Res 19(1):69–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571260802164061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barbiero P, Squillero G, Tonda A (2020) Modeling generalization in machine learning: A methodological and computational study. ar**v preprint ar**v:2006.15680

  7. Basf (2023) Meteorological data from the basf s.a. experimental station ponta grossa, paraná, brazil

  8. Bernizzoni F, Civardi S, Van Zeller M, Gatti M, Poni S (2011) Shoot thinning effects on seasonal whole-canopy photosynthesis and vine performance in Vitis vinifera l. cv. Barbera. Aust J Grape Wine Res 17(3):351–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0238.2011.00159.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bishop CM (2006) Pattern recognition and machine learning, vol 4. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bleiholder H, Feller C, Hess M, Meier U, Van Den Boom T, Lancashire PD, Buhr L, Hack H, Klose R, Stauss R, Weber E, P M (1997) Compendium of Growth Stage Identification Keys for Mono- and Dicotyledonous Plants - Extended BBCH scale 2nd edn

  11. Cameron W, Petrie P, Barlow E (2022) The effect of temperature on grapevine phenological intervals: Sensitivity of budburst to flowering. Agric For Meteorol 315:108841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.108841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cawley GC, Talbot NLC (2010) On over-fitting in model selection and subsequent selection bias in performance evaluation. J Mach Learn Res 11:2079–2107

    Google Scholar 

  13. Coombe BG (1995) Growth stages of the grapevine: adoption of a system for identifying grapevine growth stages. Aust J Grape Wine Res 1(2):104–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0238.1995.tb00086.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Devarajan YS, Zoecklein BW, Mallikarjunan K, Gardner DM (2011) Electronic nose evaluation of the effects of canopy side on cabernet franc (Vitis vinifera L.) grape and wine volatiles. Am J Enol Vitic 62(1):73–80. https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2010.10028

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. FAO (2023). Crops and livestock products. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/data/QCL/visualize

  16. Gamero E, Moreno D, Talaverano I, Prieto M, Guerra M, Valdés M (2014) Effects of irrigation and cluster thinning on tempranillo grape and wine composition. S Afr J Enol Vitic 35(2):196–204

    Google Scholar 

  17. Georgiadou EC, Mina M, Neoptolemou V, Koundouras S, D’Onofrio C, Bellincontro A, Mencarelli F, Fotopoulos V, Manganaris GA (2022) The beneficial effect of leaf removal during fruit set on physiological, biochemical, and qualitative indices and volatile organic compound profile of the Cypriot reference cultivar ‘Xynisteri’. J Sci Food Agric. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.12268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ghojogh B, Samad MN, Mashhadi SA, Kapoor T, Ali W, Karray F, Crowley M (2019) Feature selection and feature extraction in pattern analysis: a literature review. ar**v preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/ar**v.1905.02845

  19. Grandini M, Bagli E, Visani G (2020) Metrics for multi-class classification: an overview. ar**v preprint ar**v:2008.05756

  20. Grillakis MG, Doupis G, Kapetanakis E, Goumenaki E (2022) Future shifts in the phenology of table grapes on Crete under a warming climate. Agric For Meteorol 318:108915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.108915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gu X, Zhang X, Wang K, Lv X, Li R, Ma W (2022) Gc-ms untargeted analysis of volatile compounds in four red grape varieties (Vitis vinifera l. cv) at different maturity stages near harvest. Foods, 11(18)

  22. Han J, Kamber M, Pei J (2012) Data mining: concepts and techniques. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hines EL, Boilot P, Gardner JW, Gongora MA (2003) Chapter 6 pattern analysis for electronic noses. In: Handbook of machine Olfaction. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/3527601597.ch6

  24. Huang G-B, Zhu Q-Y, Siew C-K (2004) Extreme learning machine: a new learning scheme of feedforward neural networks. IEEE Int Joint Conf Neural Netw 2:985–990. https://doi.org/10.1109/ijcnn.2004.1380068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Intrigliolo DS, Castel JR (2011) Interactive effects of deficit irrigation and shoot and cluster thinning on grapevine cv. Tempranillo. water relations, vine performance and berry and wine composition. Irrig Sci 29:443–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-010-0252-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kalua CM, Boss PK (2009) Evolution of volatile compounds during the development of cabernet sauvignon grapes (Vitis vinifera l.). J Agric Food Chem 57(9):3818–3830

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Karakaya D, Ulucan O, Turkan M (2020) Electronic nose and its applications: a survey. Int J Autom Comput 17(2):179–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11633-019-1212-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mawdsley PF, Peterson JCD, Casassa LF (2019) Multi-year study of the effects of cluster thinning on vine performance, fruit and wine composition of pinot noir (clone 115) in california’s edna valley ava (usa). Sci Hortic 256:108631

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Mazzinghy ACdC, Mendonca HdOP, Garcia YM, Viana ITdS, Guedes MNS, Fagundes MCP, Augusti R, Araujo RLBd., Reina LDCB, Melo JOF (2021) Análise de mostos de variedades de uvas do rio grande do sul por microextração em fase sólida. Ciencias Agrarias: o avanço da ciencia no Brasil - Capitulo 5. Volume 1. Editora Cientifica Digital, pp 84–100. https://doi.org/10.37885/210504615

  30. Mota RV, d Souza CR, d Silva CPC, Freitas GF, Shiga TM, Purgatto E, Lajolo FM, Regina MA (2010) Biochemical and agronomical responses of grapevines to alteration of source-sink ratio by cluster thinning and shoot trimming. Bragantia 69:17–25

  31. Reynolds A, Edwards C, Wardle D, Webster D, Dever M (1994) Shoot density affects ‘Riesling’ grapevines. I. Vine performance. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 119:874–880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Reynolds A, Molek T, de Savigny C (2005) Timing of shoot thinning in Vitis vinifera: impacts on yield and fruit composition variables. Am J Enol Vitic 56:343–356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Roberto SR, Borges WFS, Colombo RC, Koyama R, Hussain I, de Souza RT (2015) Berry-cluster thinning to prevent bunch compactness of ‘BRS Vitoria’, a new black seedless grape. Sci Hortic 197:297–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Roberto SR, Mashima CH, Colombo RC, Assis AMd, Koyama R, Yamamoto LY, Shahab M, Souza RTd (2017) Berry-cluster thinning to reduce compactness of ‘black star’ table grapes. Ciência Rural. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20160661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sanches Azevedo MC, Silva RRE, Jacomino AP, Genovese MI (2017) Physicochemical variability of cambuci fruit (Campomanesia phaea) from the same orchard, from different locations and at different ripening stages. J Sci Food Agric 97(2):526–535

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Schroeder L, Pessenti I, VOSS, H., Ayub, R., Farinelli, M., Siqueira, H., and Stevan Jr, S. (2023) Discriminant analysis of volatile compounds in wines obtained from different managements of vineyards obtained by e-nose. Smart Agric Technol 6:100343

  37. Silvestre JP, Roberto SR, Colombo RC, Gonçalves LSA, Koyama R, Shahab M, Ahmed S, de Souza RT (2017) Bunch sizing of ‘BRS Nubia’table grape by inflorescence management, shoot tip** and berry thinning. Sci Hortic 225:764–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Steyn J, Lötze E, Hoffman E (2023) The seasonal progression of the reproductive phenology of two southern highbush blueberry (v. corymbosum l. interspecific hybrids) cultivars in the western cape, South Africa. Sci Hortic 307:111493

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Sun Q, Ebersole C, Wong DP, Curtis K (2022) The impact of vineyard mechanization on grape and wine phenolics, aroma compounds, and sensory properties. Fermentation 8(7):318

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Tan J, Xu J (2020) Applications of electronic nose (e-nose) and electronic tongue (e-tongue) in food quality-related properties determination: A review. Artif Intell Agric 4:104–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiia.2020.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Tyagi P, Semwal R, Sharma A, Tiwary US, Varadwaj P (2023) E-nose: a low-cost fruit ripeness monitoring system. J Agric Eng. https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2022.1389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Voss H, Ayub R, Stevan Jr S (2020). E-nose prototype to monitoring the growth and maturation of peaches in the orchard. IEEE Sens J, PP:1–1

  43. Voss H, Mendes Júnior J, Farinelli M, Stevan Jr S (2019a) A prototype to detect the alcohol content of beers based on an electronic nose. Sensors, 19

  44. WeatherSpark (2023) Climate climate and average weather conditions in ponta grossa throughout the year. https://pt.weatherspark.com/y/29814/Clima-caracteristico-em-Ponta-Grossa-Brasil-durante-o-ano

  45. Weaverdyck ME, Lieberman MD, Parkinson C (2020) Multivoxel pattern analysis in fMRI: a practical introduction for social and affective neuroscientists. Soc Cognit Affect Neurosci 15:487–509. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Yin Y, Li M, Jia N, Sun Y, Han B, Liu C, Liu S, Zhao S, Guo Z (2022) Effects of trellis system and berry thinning intensity on vine performance and quality composition of two table grape cultivars under protected cultivation in northern china. Sci Hortic 299:111045

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the support of the postgraduate programs involved in this research at State University of Ponta Grossa (UEPG) and Federal University of Technology - Parana (UTFPR).

Funding

This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoa de Nível Superior–Brasil (CAPES)–Finance Code 001. The authors thank the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), process numbers 315298/2020-0 and 306448/2021-1, and Araucária Foundation, process number 51497 and 19.311.894-1, for their financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AFCG contributed to conceptualization, formal analysis, software, methodology, investigation, and writing—original draft. RAA contributed to conceptualization and investigation. JCFdR contributed to formal analysis, software, and writing—review and editing. HVS contributed to formal analysis, data curation, and visualization. SLSJ. contributed to resources, conceptualization, investigation, methodology, writing—review and editing, and supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergio Luiz Stevan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Garcia, A.F.C., Ayub, R.A., Rocha, J.C.F.D. et al. Phenological Stages Analysis in Grapevines Using an Electronic Nose. Agric Res (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-024-00730-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-024-00730-w

Keywords

Navigation