SpringerLink
Log in

Dynamic efficiency evaluation of electric power and environmental treatment efficiency in China

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Energy and especially power generation are key requirements for economic growth; however, the excessive use of fossil fuels for power generation has resulted in serious environmental pollution problems. Past research has examined the relationship between power energy efficiency and CO2 on a single level, but there has been little focus on other damaging pollutants such as PM2.5 or their treatment. Further, most past efficiency analyses have been static and have lacked dynamic time considerations. Therefore, to go some way to filling these research gaps, this study proposed an undesirable directional distance function (DDF) dynamic data envelopment analysis (DEA) to explore power production and environmental efficiency in 31 Chinese provinces/municipalities/autonomous regions from 2008 to 2017, from which it was found that Bei**g, Guangdong, Hunan, Jilin, Jiangsu, Shanghai, Tian** and Tibet all had efficiencies of 1, but the power industry efficiencies in the western provinces/municipalities/autonomous regions—Inner Mongolia, Gansu, Ningxia and **njiang— needed significant improvements; Most areas, especially Liaoning, Inner Mongolia, Fujian, Shandong, and Tibet, needed environmental treatment efficiency improvements; and the need for carbon dioxide emissions improvements in most provinces/municipalities/autonomous regions was relatively stable, but there were large differences in the need for PM2.5 improvements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Air pollution prevention action plan. http://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2013-09/12/content_2486918.htm

  • Ali HS, Nathaniel SP, Uzuner G, Bekun FV, Sarkodie SA (2020) Trivariate modelling of the nexus between electricity consumption, urbanization and economic growth in Nigeria: fresh insights from Maki Cointegration and causality tests. Heliyon 6(2)

  • Akadiri S, Alola A, Olasehinde-Williams G, Etokakpan M (2020) The role of electricity consumption, globalization and economic growth in carbon dioxide emissions and its implications for environmental sustainability targets. Sci Total Environ 708:134653

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Barros CP, Peypoch N (2007) The determinants of cost efficiency of hydroelectric generating plants: a random frontier approach. Energy Policy 35:4463–4470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barros CP, Peypoch N (2008) Technical efficiency of thermoelectric power plants. Energy Econ 30:3118–3127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bei**g Institute of Technology, Review and prospect of China's carbon market, January 10, 2022. https://ceep.bit.edu.cn/zxcg/ndycbg/c2ec0a3cc44e41f8a69f2ec9e673f892.htm

  • Bi G-B, Song W, Zhou P, Liang L (2014) Does environmental regulation affect energy efficiency in China’s thermal power generation? Empirical evidence from a slacks-based DEA model. Energy Policy 66:537–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogetoft P, Nielsen K (2008) DEA based auctions. Eur J Retail Distrib Manag 36(11):883–900

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbon Brief (2018) Mapped: the world’s coal power plants. https://www.carbonbrief.org/mapped-worlds-coal-power-plants

  • Chang H, Choy HL, Cooper WW, Ruefli TW (2009) Using Malmquist Indexes to measure changes in the productivity and efficiency of US accounting firms before and after the Sarbanes. Omega 37(5):951–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen CM (2009) Network-DEA, a model with new efficiency measures to incorporate the dynamic effect in production networks. Eur J Oper Res 194(3):687–699

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Zhou K, Yang S (2017) Evaluation of China’s electric energy efficiency under environmental constraints: a DEA cross efficiency model based on game relationship. J Clean Prod 164:38–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • China Electrification Report Development Report 2019. http://www.cec.org.cn/zhuanti/2020nianzhuanti/zhongguodianqihuafazhanbaogao2019/

  • Chung YH, Färe R, Grosskopf R (1997) Productivity and undesirable outputs: a directional distance function approach. J Environ Manag 51:229–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Energy Information and Consulting Service Provider (2019). http://www.cnenergynews.cn/hb/201905/t20190522_755310.html. Accessed 5 May 2019

  • Fan H, Zhao C, Yang Y (2020) A comprehensive analysis of the spatio-temporal variation of urban air pollution in China during 2014–2018. Atmos Environ 220:117066

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S (1996) Productivity and intermediate products: a frontier approach. Econ Lett 50(1):65–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S (2010) Directional distance functions and slacks-based measures of efficiency. Eur J Oper Res 200(1):320–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S (2010) Directional distance functions and slacks-based measures of efficiency. Eur J Oper Res 200:320–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fare R, Grosskopf S, Kirkley JL, Squires D (2001) Data envelopment analysis (DEA): a framework for assessing capacity in fisheries when data are limited

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S, Norris M, Zhang Z (1994) Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. Am Econ Rev 84(1):66–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng T-T, Gong X-L, Guo Y-H, Yang Y-S, Dong J (2019) Regulatory mechanism design of GHG emissions in the electric power industry in China. Energy Policy 131:187–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Golany B, Roll Y, Rybak Y (1994) Measuring efficiency of power plants in Israel by data envelopment analysis. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 41(3):291–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Álvarez M, Montañés A (2023) CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and economic growth: determining the stability of the 3E relationship. Econ Model 121:106195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou JZ, Hou P (2018) Polarization of CO2 emissions in China’s electricity sector: production versus consumption perspectives. J Clean Prod 178:384–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu JL, Wang SC (2006) Total-factor energy efficiency of regions in China. Energy Policy 34:3206–3217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang KY, Chiu YH, Chang TH, Lin TY (2022) The effect of extreme temperature on electricity consumption, air pollution, and gross domestic product. Energy Environ. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X221130131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency (2020) Global CO2 emissions in 2019. https://www.iea.org/articles/global-co2-emissions-in-2019

  • Kao C (2008) Network data envelopment analysis: current development and future research. In: Asia-Pacific productivity conference (APPC)

  • Kloop G (1985) The analysis of the efficiency of production system with multiple inputs and outputs. University of Illinois at Chicago. Industrial and Systems Engineering College

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam PL, Shiu A (2001) A data envelopment analysis of the efficiency of China’s thermal power generation. Util Policy 10:75–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li M, Patiño-Echeverri D (2017) Estimating benefits and costs of policies proposed in the 13th FYP to improve energy efficiency and reduce air emissions of China’s electric power sector. Energy Policy 111:222–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Chiu YH, Lu LC (2019) Energy, CO2, AQI and economic performance in 31 cities in China: a slacks-based dynamic DEA. Carbon Manag 10(3):269–286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Chiu YH, Wang L, Zhou Y, Lin TY (2020) Dynamic and network slack-based measure analysis of China’s regional energy and air pollution reduction efficiencies. J Clean Prod 251:119546

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Lin TY, Chiu YH, Cen H, Lin YN (2021) Efficiency assessment of coal energy and non-coal energy under bound dynamic DDF DEA. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:20093–20110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin B, Wang Y (2019) Inconsistency of economic growth and electricity consumption in China: a panel VAR approach. J Clean Prod 229:144–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin B, Zhu J (2020) Chinese electricity demand and electricity consumption efficiency: do the structural changes matter? Appl Energy 262:114505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin T, Chiu Y, Lin Y, Chang T, Lin P (2023) Greenhouse gas emission indicators, energy consumption efficiency, and optimal carbon emission allowance allocation of the EU countries in 2030. Gas Sci Eng 110:204902

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu CH, Lin SJ, Lewis C (2010) Evaluation of thermal power plant operational performance in Taiwan by data envelopment analysis. Energy Policy 38:1049–1058

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Luenberger DG (1992) Benefit functions and duality. J Math Econ 21(5):461–481

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Meng M, **g K, Mander S (2017) Scenario analysis of CO2 emissions from China’s electric power industry. J Clean Prod 142(4):3101–3108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nag B (2006) Estimation of carbon baselines for power generation in India: the supply side approach. Energy Policy 34(12):1399–1410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Bureau of Statistics of China (2008–2021) China Statistics Press, Bei**g, 2008–2021

  • Nemoto J, Goto M (1999) Dynamic data envelopment analysis: modeling intertemporal behavior of a frim in the presence of productive inefficiencies. Econ Lett 64(1):51–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemoto J, Goto M (2003) Measurement of dynamic efficiency in production: an application of data envelopment analysis. J Prod Anal 19(2–3):191–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakano M, Managi S (2008) Regulatory reforms and productivity: an empirical analysis of the Japanese electricity industry. Energy Policy 36(1):201–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odhiambo N (2023) A symmetric impact of energy consumption on economic growth in South Africa: new evidence from disaggregated data. Energy Nexus 9:100174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan XF, Pan XY, Ming Y (2018) The effect of regional mitigation of carbon dioxide emission on energy efficiency in China, based on a spatial econometrics approach. Carbon Manag 9:665–676

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Park SU, Lesourd JB (2000) The efficiency of conventional fuel power plants in South Korea: a comparison of parametric and non-parametric approaches. Int J Prod Econ 63(1):59–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park KS, Park K (2009) Measurement of multi-period aggregative efficiency. Eur J Oper Res 193(2):567–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan R (2005) An analysis of energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions in countries of the Middle East and North Africa. Energy 30:2831–2842

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sarica K, Or I (2007) Efficiency assessment of Turkish power plants using data envelopment analysis. Energy Policy 32:1484–1499

    Google Scholar 

  • Shephard RW (1970) The theory of cost and production functions. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava N, Sharma S, Chauhan K (2012) Efficiency assessment and benchmarking of thermal power plants in India. Energy Policy 40:159–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sozen A, Alp I, Ozdemir A (2010) Assessment of operational and environmental performance of the thermal power plants in Turkey by using data envelopment analysis. Energy Policy 38:6194–6203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The State Council the People's Republic of China (2010) http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2010-10/18/content_1724848.htm. Accessed 18 Oct 2010

  • The State Council the People's Republic of China (2013) http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2013-09/12/content_2486773.htm. Accessed on 12 Sept 2013

  • The State Council the People's Republic of China (2016) http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2016-03/17/content_5054992.htm. Accessed 17 March 2016

  • Steinberg DC, Bielen DA, Aaron T (2018) Evaluating the CO2 emissions reduction potential and cost of power sector re-dispatch. Energy Policy 112:34–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sueyoshi T, Goto M (2012) Efficiency-based rank assessment for electric power industry: a combined use of data envelopment analysis (DEA) and DEA-discriminant analysis (DA). Energy Econ 34(3):634–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sueyoshi T, Goto M (2015) Environmental assessment on coal-fired power plants in U.S. north-east region by DEA non-radial measurement. Energy Econ 50:125–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sueyoshi T, Sekitani K (2005) Returns to scale in dynamic DEA. EJOR 161(2):536–544

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sueyoshi T, Goto M, Ueno T (2010) Performance analysis of US coal-fired power plants by measuring three DEA efficiencies. Energy Policy 38:1675–1688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenente M, Henriques C, Silva P (2020) Eco-efficiency assessment of the electricity sector: evidence from 28 European Union countries. Econ Anal Policy 66:293–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teng X, Liu FP, Chang TH, Chiu YH (2023) Measuring China’s energy efficiency by considering forest carbon sequestration and applying a meta dynamic non-radial directional distance function. Energy 263:125756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Central People's Government of the People's Republic of China. China's renewable energy power generation installed capacity reached 794 million kilowatts by the end of 2019. http://big5.www.gov.cn/gate/big5/www.gov.cn/shuju/2020-03/06/content_5488145.htm

  • Tone K (2001) A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 130:498–509

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tone K, Tsutsui M (2010) Dynamic DEA: a slacks-based measure approach. Omega 38:145–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tone K, Tsutsui M (2014). Dynamic DEA with network structure: A slacks-based measure approach. Omega 42(1):124–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Feng C (2015) A performance evaluation of the energy, environmental, and economic efficiency and productivity in China: an application of global data envelopment. Appl Energy 147:617–626

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang XP, Li MY (2019) The spatiotemporal characteristic of carbon emissions from China’s power sector and its determinants: a spatial econometric analysis. Pol J Environ Stud 28:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Zhou P, Shen N, Wang S (2013) Measuring carbon dioxide emission performance in Chinese provinces: a parametric approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 21:324–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Ke, Zhang J, Wei Y-M (2017) Operational and environmental performance in China’s thermal power industry: taking an effectiveness measure as complement to an efficiency measure. J Environ Manag 192:254–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen L, Yan F (2018) Regional differences and influencing factors in the CO2 emissions of China’s power industry based on the panel data models considering power-consuming efficiency factor. Environ Dev Sustain 20:1987–2007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Energy Outlook (2018) http://www.oecd.org/about/publishing/corrigenda.htm. Accessed 2019

  • Wu Ya, Su JR, Li Ke, Sun C (2019) Comparative study on power efficiency of China’s provincial steel industry and its influencing factors. Energy 175:1009–1020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • **e BC, Chen YF, Gao J, Zhang S (2021) Dynamic environmental efficiency analysis of China’s power generation enterprises: a game cross-Malmquist index approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:1697–1711

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • **e PJ, Gao SS, Sun FH (2019) An analysis of the decoupling relationship between CO2 emission in power industry and GDP in China based on LMDI method. J Clean Prod 211:598–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan D, Lei Y, Li Li, Song W (2017) Carbon emission efficiency and spatial clustering analyses in China’s thermal power industry: evidence from the provincial level. J Clean Prod 156:518–527

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang N, Zhou P, Choi Y (2013) Energy efficiency, CO2 emission performance and technology gaps in fossil fuel electricity generation in Korea: a meta-frontier nonradial directional distance function analysis. Energy Policy 56:653–662

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Yin H, Zhao Y (2015) Impact of environmental regulations on the efficiency and CO2 emissions of power plants in China. Appl Energy 149(1):238–242

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong X, Jiang H, Zhang C, Shi R (2019) Electricity consumption and economic growth nexus in China: an autoregressive distributed lag approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:14627–21463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou P, Ang BW, Wang H (2012) Energy and CO2 emission performance in electricity generation: a non-radial directional distance function approach. Eur J Oper Res 221:625–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou WJ, Lin TY, Chiu YH, Teng T, Huang KY (2020) The efficiency of economic performance, electricity consumption, and environmental pollutants in Taiwan. Math Probl Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8260965

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

National natural Science fund in China, No. 71773082; Sichuan Science project, No. 2020JDR0079. The Fundamental Research Funds for the central Universities (Grants No. SCU-BS-PY201016).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Business School, Sichuan University, Wangjiang Road No. 29, Chengdu, 610064, People’s Republic of China

    Y. Li

  2. Department of Economics, Soochow University, 56, Kueiyang St., Sec. 1, Taipei, 100, Taiwan

    Y. Chiu & T.-H. Chang

  3. Department of Business Administration, National Cheng Kung University, No. 1, University Road, Tainan City, 701, Taiwan

    T.-Y. Lin

  4. Department of Bio-Industry Communication and Development, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Road, Taipei, 10617, Taiwan

    S.-M. Wang

Authors
  1. Y. Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Y. Chiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. T.-Y. Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S.-M. Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. T.-H. Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. Chiu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: S. Mirkia.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Y., Chiu, Y., Lin, TY. et al. Dynamic efficiency evaluation of electric power and environmental treatment efficiency in China. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 21, 5955–5970 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-023-05410-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-023-05410-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation