Abstract
The sustainability performances of campuses are of importance as it could model the effective sustainable initiatives that could be then applied to campuses by decision-makers and designers. Studies have been conducted on the environmental and economic assessment of campuses in specification with the identification of their carbon footprint and cost analysis, respectively. The studies have lacked a showcase of an ideal sustainable campus along with its urban and architectural features, facilities, and services through analyzing their social aspects as well. The objective of this study was to evaluate the sustainability of the Abdullah Gul University Sumer Campus to model a sustainable campus integrating the Environmental Life Cycle Assessment(E-LCA), the Life Cycle Costing (LCC) and the Social Life Cycle Assessment using life cycle sustainability assessment approaches for the use-phase analysis of the campus. E-LCA was applied to quantify the global warming potential and cumulative energy demand based on International Organization for Standardization 14,040 and 14,044 by considering the gate-to-gate approach. The environmental assessment results showed that the global warming potential of the campus was 2.92 tCO2 eq./person, and the cumulative energy demand was found as 15.4 GJ/person. In LCC, the total cost of the campus was calculated as 200 US Dollars/person, and the energy cost is found as a major contributor with 86% of the total cost for the year of 2019. In the social performance assessment, it is found that the university has a weak social performance for the local community, the consumer, the worker, and the society.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material
The data used in the manuscript are included in the Supporting Information file. Additional data are available upon request from the corresponding author Nigmet Uzal (nimetuzal@gmail.com).
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Abad-Segura E, González-Zamar MD (2021) Sustainable economic development in higher education institutions: a global analysis within the SDGs framework. J Clean Prod 294:126133
Abdullah Gul University (2019) 2019 Yılı Faaliyet Raporu. http://www.agu.edu.tr/userfiles//AGÜ_2019_Yılı_İdare_Faaliyet_R.pdf
Adenle YA, Chan EHW, Sun Y, Chau CK (2021) Assessing the relative importance of sustainability indicators for smart campuses: a case of higher education institutions in Nigeria. Environ Sustain Indic 9:100092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2020.100092
Ai N, Kjerland M, Klein-Banai C, Theis TL (2019) Sustainability assessment of universities as small-scale urban systems: a comparative analysis using fisher information and data envelopment analysis. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.205
Ajayi V, Weyman-Jones T, Glass A (2017) Cost efficiency and electricity market structure: a case study of OECD countries. Energy Econ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.05.005
Almufadi FA, Irfan MA (2016) Initial estimate of the carbon footprint of Qassim university, Saudi Arabia. Int J Appl Eng Res 11:8511–8514
Anand C (2017) University of Leicester Carbon Management Plan (2016–2025)
Asiliskender B, Baturayoglu Yoney N (2016) The revolarization of industrial heritage: AGU sumer campus in Kayseri, Turkey. World Heritage and Degradation: Smart Design, Planning and Technologies
Bakay MS, Ağbulut U (2021) Electricity production based forecasting of greenhouse gas emissions in Turkey with deep learning, support vector machine and artificial neural network algorithms. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125324
Benoît-Norris C, Vickery-Niederman G, Valdivia S, Franze J, Traverso M, Ciroth A, Mazijn B (2011) Introducing the UNEP/SETAC methodological sheets for subcategories of social LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0301-y
Bork CAS, Junior DJDB, de Oliveira GJ (2015) Social life cycle assessment of three companies of the furniture sector. Procedia Cirp 29:150–155
Bueno G, de Blas M, Pérez-Iribarren E, Zuazo I, Torre-Pascual E, Erauskin A, Etxano I, Tamayo U, García M, Akizu-Gardoki O, León I, Marieta C, Zulueta G, Barrio I (2021) The environmental and social footprint of the university of the Basque Country UPV/EHU. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128019
Cascone S, Sciuto G (2018) Recovery and reuse of abandoned buildings for student housing: a case study in Catania, Italy. Front Archit Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2018.08.004
Chang C, Shi W, Mehta P, Dauwels J (2019) Life cycle energy assessment of university buildings in tropical climate. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117930
Chau CK, Leung TM, Ng WY (2015) A review on life cycle assessment, life cycle energy assessment and life cycle carbon emissions assessment on buildings. Appl Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.023
Ciroth A, Franze J, Berlin G (2009) Life cycle costing in simapro. Int J Life Cycle Assess
Clabeaux R, Carbajales-Dale M, Ladner D, Walker T (2020) Assessing the carbon footprint of a university campus using a life cycle assessment approach. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122600
Ecoinvent v 3.1 (2013) Datasets related to electricity production and supply in ecoinvent version 3–Short overview. Electricity in Ecoinvent V3
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2016) Understanding Global Warming Potentials. https://www.Epa.Gov/Ghgemissions/Understanding-Global-Warming-Potentials.
Erdoğan S, Gedikli A, Kırca M (2019) A note on time-varying causality between natural gas consumption and economic growth in Turkey. Resour Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101504
Foolmaun RK, Ramjeeawon T (2013) Comparative life cycle assessment and social life cycle assessment of used polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles in Mauritius. Int J Life Cycle Assess. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0447-2
Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N, Althaus HJ, Doka G, Dones R, Heck T, Hellweg S, Hischier R, Nemecek T, Rebitzer G, Spielmann M (2005) The ecoinvent database: overview and methodological framework. Int J Life Cycle Assess. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2004.10.181.1
Frischknecht R, Wyss F, Büsser Knöpfel S, Lützkendorf T, Balouktsi M (2015) Cumulative energy demand in LCA: the energy harvested approach. Int J Life Cycle Assess. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0897-4
Fuller S (2010) Life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA) National Institute of Building Sciences. An Authoritative Source of Innovative Solutions for the Built Environment (www.WBDG.org, Washington)
Hannouf M, Assefa G (2018) A life cycle sustainability assessment-based decision-analysis framework. Sustainability (switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113863
Herrmann IT, Moltesen A (2015) Does it matter which life cycle assessment (LCA) tool you choose?-a comparative assessment of SimaPro and GaBi. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.004
Hossain MU, Poon CS (2018) Global warming potential and energy consumption of temporary works in building construction: a case study in Hong Kong. Build Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.06.026
Huang L, Liu Y, Krigsvoll G, Johansen F (2018) Life cycle assessment and life cycle cost of university dormitories in the southeast China: case study of the university town of Fuzhou. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.021
International Energy Agency (IEA) and United Nation Environment Programme (UNEP) (2019) 2019 Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction: Towards a zero-emissions, efficient and resilient buildings and construction sector
International Organization for Standardization (2015) ISO 9001:2015 Quality management systems—Requirements. 03.100.70 Management Systems
ISO (2006) ISO 14044:2006 environmental management-life cycle assessement-requirements and guidelines, ISO 14044. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
ISO (2006a) 14040: Environmental management–life cycle assessment—principles and framework. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
Kaufman RJ (1969) Life cycle costing: decision making tool for capital equipment acquisitions. J Purch. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493x.1969.tb00599.x
Klaassen N, Scheepens A, Flipsen B, Vogtlander J (2020) Eco-efficient value creation of residential street lighting systems by simultaneously analysing the value, the costs and the eco-costs during the design and engineering phase. Energies. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13133351
Legorburu G, Smith A (2020) Incorporating observed data into early design energy models for life cycle cost and carbon emissions analysis of campus buildings. Energy Build. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110279
Macombe C, Loeillet D, Gillet C (2018) Extended community of peers and robustness of social LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1226-2
Petti L, Serreli M, Di Cesare S (2018) Systematic literature review in social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1135-4
Ragazzi M, Ghidini F (2017) Environmental sustainability of universities: critical analysis of a green ranking. Energy Procedia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.07.054
Reich MC (2005) Economic assessment of municipal waste management systems-case studies using a combination of life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC). J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.02.015
Resumen de datos relevantes de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid 2015–2016 (2017)
Sala S, Ciuffo B, Nijkamp P (2015) A systemic framework for sustainability assessment. Ecol Econ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.09.015
Shuqin C, Minyan L, Hongwei T, **aoyu L, Jian G (2019) Assessing sustainability on Chinese university campuses: development of a campus sustainability evaluation system and its application with a case study. J Build Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100747
Slorach PC, Stamford L (2021) Net zero in the heating sector: technological options and environmental sustainability from now to 2050. Energ Convers Manage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.113838
Spillemaeckers S, Mazijn B, Borgo E (2001) An Integrated Approach to Chain Analysis for the Purpose of Chain Management by Companies. Centrume Duurzame Ontwikkeling: Ghent, Belgium.
Stanford University (2005) GUIDELINES FOR LCCA in Buildings. In Stanford University Land and Buildings. https://sustainable.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/Guidelines_for_Life_Cycle_Cost_Analysis.pdf
Times Higher Education (2019) World University Rankings 2020. THE. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2021/world-ranking#!/page/0/length/25/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats
Tisch JM (2017) Student voting rates for university of Pennsylvania. https://allinchallenge.org/wp-content/uploads/University-of-Pennsylvania-NSLVE-2016.pdf
Too L, Bajracharya B (2015) Sustainable campus: engaging the community in sustainability. Int J Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-07-2013-0080
Townsend J, Barrett J (2015) Exploring the applications of carbon footprinting towards sustainability at a UK university: reporting and decision making. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.004
United Nation the Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA) (2012) World urbanization prospects: The 2011 revision. UNDESA, Population Division
United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) and Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) (2009) Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products. Management
United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) and Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) (2013) The methodological sheets for subcategories in social life cycle assessment (S-LCA)
University of Cambridge (2019) university of cambridge environmental sustainability report 2018/19
Vásquez L, Iriarte A, Almeida M, Villalobos P (2015) Evaluation of greenhouse gas emissions and proposals for their reduction at a university campus in Chile. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.073
Wiganingrum R, Handayani NU, Suliantoro H (2018) Framework development of campus sustainability assessment. Case study: diponegoro university. E3S Web of Conferences, 73. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20187302004
Yañez P, Sinha A, Vásquez M (2020) Carbon footprint estimation in a university campus: evaluation and insights. Sustainability (switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12010181
Zhou X, Yan J, Zhu J, Cai P (2013) Survey of energy consumption and energy conservation measures for colleges and universities in Guangdong province. Energy Build. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.07.055
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to all academic and administrative departments of Abdullah Gul University, for providing inventory data to carry out this study.
Funding
The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Editorial responsibility: Chenxi Li.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gulcimen, S., Qadri, S., Donmez, R.O. et al. A holistic sustainability assessment of a university campus using life cycle approach. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 20, 3309–3322 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-04214-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-04214-8