SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of three environmental flow techniques in Shoor wetland of Golpayegan, Iran

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 27 May 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

Shoor wetland, in south central Iran, is a unique ecosystem which plays an important role in maintaining stability of this eco-region. The most important function of Shoor is dust control. Environmental flow releases are a tool for wetland restoration, but their success has not been consistent. We utilized Justin (Watershed), Flow Duration Curve (FDC), and Water Resources Balance (WRB) methods to determine optimal environmental flow for Shoor wetland, which can help in its preservation. Data pertaining to Golpayegan River flow, reported by Chamesfand Hydrometric Station between 1985 and 2017 were used for FDC analysis. FDC results say that 60% of flow frequency occurrence in to Shoor is < 2 m3/s, and 20% is > 5 m3/s. Water resource balance analysis indicates that between May and November, environmental flow to Shoor is negative, and the wetland is in desiccation mode. Suggesting that, at this time, surface water charges are essential for health of the wetland. The average monthly environmental flow rate (l/s) for each method are as follows: Justin (1282), FDC (1397.5), and WRB (5373). Environmental flow assessed by WRB is the highest. To protect health of Shoor and prevent further degradation of this wetland, we recommend shutting down agricultural drains. This action will safeguard appropriate groundwater levels and protect areas of Shoor that are prone to dust creation. Better well water management will also help restore Shoor ecosystem. We highly recommend these measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article. More details are available from the corresponding author on request.

Change history

References

  • Aazami J, Motevalli A, Khosravi Y, Hasani A, Rajaei M, Sohrabi H (2018) Studies for estimating the water requirement of Golpayegan Shoor wetland. Isfahan General Department of Environmental Protection, Isfahan, pp 1–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbaspour M, Nazaridoust A (2007) Determination of environmental water requirements of Lake Urmia, Iran: an ecological approach. Int J Environ Stud 64:161–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbaspour KC, Johnson CA, van Genuchten MT (2004) Estimating uncertain flow and transport parameters using a sequential uncertainty fitting procedure. Vadose Zo J 3:1340–1352. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2004.1340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdeta GC, Tesemma AB, Tura AL, Atlabachew GH (2020) Morphometric analysis for prioritizing sub-watersheds and management planning and practices in Gidabo Basin, Southern Rift Valley of Ethiopia. Appl Water Sci 10(7):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acreman MC, Dunbar MJ (2004) Defining environmental river flow requirements—a review. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 8:861–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acreman M, Arthington AH, Colloff MJ, Couch C, Crossman ND, Dyer F, Overton I, Pollino CA, Stewardson MJ, Young W (2014) Environmental flows for natural, hybrid, and novel riverine ecosystems in a changing world. Front Ecol Environ 12:466–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bos MG, Kselik RAL, Allen RG, Molden D (2008) Water requirements for irrigation and the environment. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowling LC, Lettenmaier DP (2010) Modeling the effects of lakes and wetlands on the water balance of Arctic environments. J Hydrometeorol 11:276–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullock A, Acreman M (2003) The role of wetlands in the hydrological cycle. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 7:358–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgan HI, Aksoy H (2020) Monthly flow duration curve model for ungauged river basins. Water 12:338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cigizoglu HK, Bayazit M (2000) A generalized seasonal model for flow duration curve. Hydrol Process 14:1053–1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui B, Tang N, Zhao X, Bai J (2009) A management-oriented valuation method to determine ecological water requirement for wetlands in the Yellow River Delta of China. J Nat Conserv 17:129–141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Groot RS, Fisher B, Christie M, Aronson J, Braat L, Haines-Young R, Gowdy J, Maltby E, Neuville A, Polasky S (2010) Integrating the ecological and economic dimensions in biodiversity and ecosystem service valuation. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB): Ecological and Economic Foundations. Routledge, Earthscan, pp 9–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon AB, Wood AP (2003) Wetland cultivation and hydrological management in eastern Africa: matching community and hydrological needs through sustainable wetland use. Nat Resour Forum 27:117–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domeneghetti A, Tarpanelli A, Grimaldi I, Brath I, Schumann G (2018) Flow duration curve from satellite: potential of a lifetime SWOT mission. J Remote Sens 10:1107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erwin KL (2009) Wetlands and global climate change: the role of wetland restoration in a changing world. Wetl Ecol Manag 17:71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fongkhamdeng P (2019) Surface water balance and future water demands under environmental flow requirements. Nam Xong Watershed, Laos

    Google Scholar 

  • Foroughi M, Aazami J, Khosravi Y (2021) Predicting future changes in temperature and precipitation using hadcm2 model (case study): Golpayegan Shoor Wetland, Iran. Arab J Geosci 14:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia SM (2003) The ecosystem approach to fisheries: issues, terminology, principles, institutional foundations, implementation and outlook. Food & Agriculture Org

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghanbarpour MR, Zolfaghari S, Geiss C, Darvari Z (2013) Investigation of river flow alterations using environmental flow assessment and hydrologic indices: Tajan River Watershed, Iran. Int J River Basin Manag 11:311–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2013.823978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gholami V, Khalili A, Sahour H, Khaleghi MR, Tehrani EN (2020) Assessment of environmental water requirement for rivers of the Miankaleh wetland drainage basin. Appl Water Sci 10:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghotbi S, Wang D, Singh A, Blöschl G, Sivapalan M (2020) A new framework for exploring process controls of flow duration curves. Water Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilman K (1994) Water balance of wetland areas. In: Conference on "The balance of water-present and future", AGMET Group (Ireland) and Agricultural Group of the Royal Meteorological Society Dublin, pp 123–142

  • Gippel CJ, Stewardson MJ (1995) Development of an environmental flow management strategy for the Thomson River, Victoria Australia. Regul Rivers Res Manag 10(2–4):121–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleason CJ, Wada Y, Wang J (2018) A hybrid of optical remote sensing and hydrological modeling improves water balance estimation. J Adv Model Earth Syst 10:2–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleeson T, Wada Y, Bierkens MFP, Van Beek LPH (2012) Water balance of global aquifers revealed by groundwater footprint. Nature 488:197–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goes BJM, Clark AK, Bashar K (2021) Water allocation strategies for meeting dry-season water requirements for Ganges Kobadak Irrigation Project in Bangladesh. Int J Water Resour Dev 37(2):300–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez Balandra A, SaldañaFabela P, Martínez Jiménez M (2014) The Mexican environmental flow standard: scope, application and implementation. JEP 5:71–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haghighi AT, Fazel N, Hekmatzadeh AA, Klöve B (2018) Analysis of effective environmental flow release strategies for Lake Urmia restoration. Water Resour Manag 32:3595–3609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Guzmán R, Ruiz-Luna A, Cervantes-Escobar A (2019) Environmental flow assessment for rivers feeding a coastal wetland complex in the Pacific coast of northwest Mexico. Water Environ J 33:536–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton RE (1932) Drainage-basin characteristics. Eos. Trans Am Geophys Union 13:350–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iranian Meteorological Organization (IRMO) (2017) Meteorological data from 2003–2017

  • Karakoyun Y, Yumurtaci Z, Dönmez AH (2016) Environmental flow assessment for energy generation sustainability employing different hydraulic evaluation methods: Çambaşi hydropower plant case study in Turkey. Clean Technol Environ Policy 18:583–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karimi SS, Yasi M, Eslamian S (2012) Use of hydrological methods for assessment of environmental flow in a river reach. Int J Environ Sci Technol 9(3):549–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karimi S, Salarijazi M, Ghorbani K, Heydari M (2021) Comparative assessment of environmental flow using hydrological methods of low flow indexes, Smakhtin, Tennant and flow duration curve. Acta Geophys 69:285–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keshavarz A, Ashrafi S, Hydari N, Pouran M, Farzaneh E (2005) Water allocation and pricing in agriculture of Iran. In: Water conservation, reuse, and recycling: proceeding of an Iranian American Workshop. The National Academies Press, Washington, pp 153–172

  • Książek L, Woś A, Florek J, Wyrębek M, Młyński D, Wałęga A (2019) Combined use of the hydraulic and hydrological methods to calculate the environmental flow: Wisloka river, Poland: case study. Environ Monit Assess 191:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larinier M (2001) Environmental issues, dams and fish migration. FAO Fish Tech Pap 419:45–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Maitre DC, Milton SJ, Jarmain C, Colvin CA, Saayman I, Vlok JHJ (2007) Linking ecosystem services and water resources: landscape-scale hydrology of the Little Karoo. Front Ecol Environ 5:261–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee O, Kim HS, Kim S (2020) Hydrological simple water balance modeling for increasing geographically isolated doline wetland functions and its application to climate change. Ecol Eng 149:105812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Yang W, Shao H, Yu Z, Lindsay J (2018) Development of an integrated modelling system for evaluating water quantity and quality effects of individual wetlands in an agricultural watershed. Water 10:774

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McKnight PE, Najab J (2010) Mann–Whitney U test. Corsini Encycl Psychol 1:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Modaberi H, Shokoohi A (2019) Determining Anzali Wetland environmental water requirement using eco-hydrologic methods. Iran Water Resour Res 15:91–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Nestler JM, Milhous RT, Payne TR, Smith DL (2019) History and review of the habitat suitability criteria curve in applied aquatic ecology. River Res Appl 35(8):1155–1180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikitina OI, Dubinina VG, Bolgov MV, Parilov MP, Parilova TA (2020) Environmental flow releases for wetland biodiversity conservation in the Amur River Basin. Water 12:2812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal S, Sarda R (2020) Damming effects on the degree of hydrological alteration and stability of wetland in lower Atreyee River basin. Ecol Indic 116:106542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persiano S, Salinas JL, Stedinger JR, Farmer WH, Lun D, Viglione A, Blöschl G, Castellarin A (2021) A comparison between generalized least squares regression and top-kriging for homogeneous cross-correlated flood regions. Hydrol Sci J 66(4):565–579

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pu J, Zhao X, Dong P, Wang Q, Yue Q (2021) Extracting information on Rocky desertification from satellite images: a comparative study. Remote Sensing 13(13):2497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quimpo RG, Alejandrino AA, McNally TA (1983) Regionalized flow duration for Philippines. J Water Resour Plan Manag 109(4):320–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajendran GB, Kumarasamy UM, Zarro C, Divakarachari PB, Ullo SL (2020) Land-use and land-cover classification using a human group-based particle swarm optimization algorithm with an LSTM Classifier on hybrid pre-processing remote-sensing images. Remote Sens 12(24):4135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regional Water Company of Isfahan (RWCI) (2017) Report of the water balance of the Salt Lake Basin, pp 1–69

  • Rufin P, Müller D, Schwieder M, Pflugmacher D, Hostert P (2021) Landsat time series reveal simultaneous expansion and intensification of irrigated dry season crop** in Southeastern Turkey. J Land Use Sci 16(1):94–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sajedipour S, Zarei H, Oryan S (2017) Estimation of environmental water requirements via an ecological approach: a case study of Bakhtegan Lake, Iran. Ecol Eng 100:246–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarhadi A, Soltani S (2013) Determination of water requirements of the Gavkhuni wetland, Iran: a hydrological approach. J Arid Environ 98:27–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smakhtin VY (2006) An assessment of environmental flow requirements of Indian river basins, vol 107. IWMI

    Google Scholar 

  • Snelder T, Booker D, Lamouroux N (2011) A method to assess and define environmental flow rules for large jurisdictional regions 1. JAWRA J Am Water Resour Assoc 47:828–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern BA (2000) Interactive data language. In: Space 2000, pp 1011–1015

  • Tennant DL (1976) Instream flow regimens for fish, wildlife, recreation and related environmental resources. Fisheries 1:6–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terer T, Ndiritu GG, Gichuki NN (2004) Socio-economic values and traditional strategies of managing wetland resources in Lower Tana River, Kenya. Hydrobiologia 527:3–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tharme RE (2003) A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers. River Res Appl 19:397–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Touchette BW, Iannacone LR, Turner GE, Frank AR (2007) Drought tolerance versus drought avoidance: a comparison of plant-water relations in herbaceous wetland plants subjected to water withdrawal and repletion. Wetlands 27:656–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel RM, Fennessey NM (1994) Flow-duration curves. I: new interpretation and confidence intervals. J Water Resour Plan Manag 120:485–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel RM, Fennessey NM (1995) Flow duration curves II: a review of applications in water resources planning 1. JAWRA J Am Water Resour Assoc 31:1029–1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voldseth RA, Johnson WC, Gilmanov T, Guntenspergen GR, Millett BV (2007) Model estimation of land-use effects on water levels of northern prairie wetlands. Ecol Appl 17:527–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Yang T, Guan W, Peng W, Wu P, Zhong B, Zhou C, Chen Q, Zhang R, Xu K (2021) Ecological wetland paradigm drives water source improvement in the stream network of Yangtze River Delta. J Environ Sci 110:55–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Western AW, Matic V, Peel MC (2020) Justin Costelloe: a champion of arid-zone water research. Hydrogeol J 28:37–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z, Mao X (2011) Wetland system network analysis for environmental flow allocations in the Baiyangdian Basin, China. Ecol Model 222:3785–3794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Chen H, Yang ZF (2012) Integration of water quantity and quality in environmental flow assessment in wetlands. Procedia Environ Sci 13:1535–1552

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Yin X, Yang Z (2016) Environmental flow management strategies based on the integration of water quantity and quality, a case study of the Baiyangdian Wetland, China. Ecol Eng 96:150–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zedler JB, Kercher S (2005) Wetland resources: status, trends, ecosystem services, and restorability. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30:39–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am especially indebted to Dr. Akbar Hasani, and Masih Rajaie, who have been supportive of my career goals.

Funding

This work received financial support and award from the Department of Environment (DoE), the Iranian Protected Agency (IREPA).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran

    J. Aazami, A. Motevalli & M. Savabieasfahani

  2. Center for Middle Eastern Studies and Department of Water Resources Engineering, Lund University, Lund, Sweden

    J. Aazami, A. Motevalli & M. Savabieasfahani

  3. P.O. Box 7038, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    J. Aazami, A. Motevalli & M. Savabieasfahani

Authors
  1. J. Aazami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Motevalli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Savabieasfahani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Aazami.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: Maryam Shabani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aazami, J., Motevalli, A. & Savabieasfahani, M. Evaluation of three environmental flow techniques in Shoor wetland of Golpayegan, Iran. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 19, 7885–7898 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-03998-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-03998-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation