Abstract
Background
Previous research has established a connection between polymorphisms rs4747203 and rs885828 in the prosaposin (PSAP) gene and an increased risk of Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, other studies have found no significant difference in risk compared to the general population.
Methods
To evaluate the current evidence linking rs4747203 and rs885828 to PD risk, we conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, the Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for relevant studies up until May 2023. In addition, we analyzed data from the publicly available “PD Variant Browser”. We performed a meta-analysis using Stata 17.0 to synthesize the findings from the selected studies.
Results
Our meta-analysis, which included data from six published studies and the public database, revealed no significant association between PD risk and either rs4747203 [OR (95% CI) = 0.99 (0.93–1.05), I2 = 90.3%, P = 0.635] or rs885828 [OR (95% CI) = 1.01 (0.95–1.07), I2 = 90.7%, P = 0.773]. These results remained consistent when examining subgroups of individuals within or outside of Asia.
Conclusion
The available evidence does not support an association between the genotype at rs4747203 or rs885828 and the risk of PD.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13760-023-02446-0/MediaObjects/13760_2023_2446_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13760-023-02446-0/MediaObjects/13760_2023_2446_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13760-023-02446-0/MediaObjects/13760_2023_2446_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13760-023-02446-0/MediaObjects/13760_2023_2446_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13760-023-02446-0/MediaObjects/13760_2023_2446_Fig5_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data used in this article are included in the paper and available upon request with no restriction.
References
Hernandez DG, Reed X, Singleton AB (2016) Genetics in Parkinson disease: Mendelian versus non-Mendelian inheritance. J Neurochem 139(Suppl 1):59–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.13593
Wang Y, Gao L, Chen J et al (2021) Pharmacological modulation of Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathway as a therapeutic target of Parkinson’s disease. Front Pharmacol 12:757161. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.757161
Bloem BR, Okun MS, Klein C (2021) Parkinson’s disease. The Lancet 397:2284–2303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00218-X
Polymeropoulos MH, Lavedan C, Leroy E et al (1997) Mutation in the alpha-synuclein gene identified in families with Parkinson’s disease. Science 276:2045–2047. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.276.5321.2045
Diaz-Font A, Cormand B, Santamaria R et al (2005) A mutation within the saposin D domain in a Gaucher disease patient with normal glucocerebrosidase activity. Hum Genet 117:275–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-005-1288-x
Vekrellis K, **louri M, Emmanouilidou E et al (2011) Pathological roles of α-synuclein in neurological disorders. Lancet Neurol 10:1015–1025. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70213-7
Moors T, Paciotti S, Chiasserini D et al (2016) Lysosomal dysfunction and α-synuclein aggregation in Parkinson’s disease: diagnostic links. Mov Disord 31:791–801. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.26562
Wong YC, Krainc D (2016) Lysosomal trafficking defects link Parkinson’s disease with Gaucher’s disease. Mov Disord 31:1610–1618. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.26802
Robak LA, Jansen IE, van Rooij J et al (2017) Excessive burden of lysosomal storage disorder gene variants in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 140:3191–3203. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awx285
Chang D, Nalls MA, Hallgrímsdóttir IB et al (2017) A meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies identifies 17 new Parkinson’s disease risk loci. Nat Genet 49:1511–1516. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3955
Tylki-Szymańska A, Czartoryska B, Vanier M-T et al (2007) Non-neuronopathic Gaucher disease due to saposin C deficiency. Clin Genet 72:538–542. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0004.2007.00899.x
Yap TL, Gruschus JM, Velayati A et al (2013) Saposin C protects glucocerebrosidase against α-synuclein inhibition. Biochemistry 52:7161–7163. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi401191v
Lin Z, Zhang B (2021) Striking while the iron is hot: the role of Prosaposin (PSAP) in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 36:2224–2224. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.28781
Oji Y, Hatano T, Ueno S-I et al (2020) Variants in saposin D domain of prosaposin gene linked to Parkinson’s disease. Brain 143:1190–1205. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaa064
Sosero YL, Bandres-Ciga S, Hassin-Baer S et al (2020) Lack of evidence for genetic association of saposins A, B, C and D with Parkinson’s disease. Brain 143:e72. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaa214
Lin Z-H, Ruan Y, Xue N-J et al (2021) PSAP intronic variants around saposin D domain and Parkinson’s disease. Brain 144:e3–e3. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaa354
Chen Y-P, Gu X-J, Ou R-W et al (2021) Genetic analysis of prosaposin, the lysosomal storage disorder gene in Parkinson’s disease. Mol Neurobiol 58:1583–1592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-020-02218-4
Zhao Y, Pan H, Zeng Q et al (2021) PSAP variants in Parkinson’s disease: a large cohort study in Chinese mainland population. Brain 144:e25–e25. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaa391
Facchi D, Rimoldi V, Straniero L et al (2020) Saposin D variants are not a common cause of familial Parkinson’s disease among Italians. Brain 143:e71. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaa213
Chao YX, Lee B, Ng EY et al (2021) Association analysis of PSAP variants in Parkinson’s disease patients. Brain 144:e9–e9. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaa358
Stang A (2010) Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 25:603–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z
Han B, Eskin E (2011) Random-effects model aimed at discovering associations in meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies. Am J Hum Genet 88:586–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.04.014
Begg CB, Mazumdar M (1994) Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 50:1088. https://doi.org/10.2307/2533446
Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315:629–634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
Zhou Z, Chen Q, Liu Q et al (2022) Cortical synaptic mechanism for chronic pain and anxiety in Parkinson’s disease. J Transl Int Med 10:300–303. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtim-2022-0046
Yu L, ** J, Xu Y, Zhu X (2022) Aberrant energy metabolism in Alzheimer’s disease. J Transl Int Med 10:197–206. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtim-2022-0024
Klein AD, Mazzulli JR (2018) Is Parkinson’s disease a lysosomal disorder? Brain 141:2255–2262. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awy147
Halperin A, Elstein D, Zimran A (2006) Increased incidence of Parkinson disease among relatives of patients with Gaucher disease. Blood Cells Mol Dis 36:426–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcmd.2006.02.004
Gegg ME, Schapira AHV (2016) Mitochondrial dysfunction associated with glucocerebrosidase deficiency. Neurobiol Dis 90:43–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2015.09.006
Pickrell AM, Youle RJ (2015) The roles of PINK1, parkin, and mitochondrial fidelity in Parkinson’s disease. Neuron 85:257–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.12.007
Burbulla LF, Song P, Mazzulli JR et al (2017) Dopamine oxidation mediates mitochondrial and lysosomal dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease. Science 357:1255–1261. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam9080
O’Brien JS, Kishimoto Y (1991) Saposin proteins: structure, function, and role in human lysosomal storage disorders. FASEB J 5:301–308. https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.5.3.2001789
Tian R, Abarientos A, Hong J et al (2021) Genome-wide CRISPRi/a screens in human neurons link lysosomal failure to ferroptosis. Nat Neurosci 24:1020–1034. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-021-00862-0
Freeman D, Cedillos R, Choyke S et al (2013) Alpha-synuclein induces lysosomal rupture and cathepsin dependent reactive oxygen species following endocytosis. PLoS ONE 8:e62143. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062143
Bellomo G, Paciotti S, Gatticchi L, Parnetti L (2020) The vicious cycle between α -synuclein aggregation and autophagic-lysosomal dysfunction. Mov Disord 35:34–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.27895
Mazzulli JR, Xu Y-H, Sun Y et al (2011) Gaucher disease glucocerebrosidase and α-synuclein form a bidirectional pathogenic loop in synucleinopathies. Cell 146:37–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.06.001
Mazzulli JR, Zunke F, Isacson O et al (2016) α-Synuclein-induced lysosomal dysfunction occurs through disruptions in protein trafficking in human midbrain synucleinopathy models. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:1931–1936. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1520335113
Funding
This study was supported by Applied Basic Research Foundation of Yunnan Province [grant numbers:202201AS070164, **nglong Yang:202101AY070001-115], Yunnan Province Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disease [grant number: 202102AA310069] and the **nglong Yang Joint Institute of Smoking and Health (No. 2021539200340039).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
XY, HR and BL contributed to the design. LZ and XZ participated in data collection and analysis. LZ, YZ and QZ written the manuscript. YG revised and improved the full text. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Ethical approval
Not required, as this is a review of existing literature.
Informed Consent
This manuscript has been approved for publication by all authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhu, L., Zhang, X., Guan, Y. et al. Meta-analysis of the association of prosaposin polymorphisms rs4747203 and rs885828 with risk of Parkinson’s disease. Acta Neurol Belg 124, 573–580 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-023-02446-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-023-02446-0