Log in

Development on bio-based concrete crack healing in soil exposures: isolation, identification, and characterization of potential bacteria and evaluation of crack healing performance

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 20 September 2023

This article has been updated

Abstract

Undeniably, concrete cracks if not healed on time could cause various durability issues, resulting in high-cost crack repairing strategy. Recently, due to several environmental concerns, bio-based construction materials gained much attention among researchers. In this context, bacterial precipitation of calcium carbonate can be effectively exploited in concrete structures to heal cracks. With this in view, this study focused to isolate bacterial strains from five different locations towards examining the crack healing potential. The investigations were carried out for urease positive test and calcium carbonate precipitate test among the five different isolated bacteria of whom three bacterial species were found to have the needed potential. Using the 16S rRNA molecular gene sequencing, they were identified and subjected to concrete healing inspection using an appropriate nutrient solution. On the 7th day of conventional water curing, bacteria-added concrete cubes were pre-cracked and kept in soil exposures in four different pits for a healing period of 120 days. Filling soil material was supplemented with three different proportions of nutrient and bacterial solution ratios (7:3, 8:2, and 9:1) without any changes in the existing natural water content. A microstructure study revealed that the formation of significant calcium carbonate compounds in bacteria supplemented the concrete specimens. The bacterial pit, having a proportion of 9:1, had showed higher healing efficiency of about 88%, nevertheless while the remaining pits showed only 60% and 66% healing efficiency. The study implied bacteria addition with nutrient supply in soil environment could be highly beneficial for healing cracks in concrete specimens. Consequently, the study’s inference can pave the way for futuristic bio-based processing in construction materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

Change history

Abbreviations

m2/kg:

Meter square per kg

mins:

Minutes

kg/m3 :

Kilogram per meter cube

%:

Percentage

°C:

Degree celsius

h:

Hours

g:

Gram

v/v:

Volume per volume

Nos:

Numbers

ml:

Milliliter

ID:

Identification

NCBI:

National Center for Biotechnology Information

rpm:

Revolution per minute

SEM:

Scanning electron microscopy

XRD:

X-ray diffraction

CaCO3 :

Calcium carbonate

RNA:

Ribonucleic acid

DNA:

Deoxyribonucleic acid

pH:

Potential of hydrogen

OD:

Optical density

BP:

Bacterial pit

mm:

Millimeter

cm:

Centimeter

References

  1. Gebremariam EC, Malede YC, Prabhu SV, Varadharajan V, Manivannan S, Jayakumar M, Gurunathan B (2023) Development of bio-based adhesive using tannery shaving dust: process optimization using statistical and artificial intelligence techniques. Bioresource Technol Rep 22:101413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2023.101413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Akeed MH, Qaidi S, Ahmed HU, Faraj RH, Mohammed AS, Emad W, Tayeh BA, Azevedo AR (2022) Ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete. Part IV: durability properties, cost assessment, applications, and challenges. Case Stud Constr Mater 17:e01271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Xu J, Tang Y, Wang X, Wang Z, Yao W (2020) Application of ureolysis-based microbial CaCO3 precipitation in self-healing of concrete and inhibition of reinforcement corrosion. Constr Build Mater 265:120364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Awad SA, Ghaffar SH, Hamouda T, Midani M, Katsou E, Fan M (2022) Critical evaluation of date palm sheath fibre characteristics as a reinforcement for develo** sustainable cementitious composites from waste materials. Biomass Convers Biorefinery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02759-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Luo M, Qian CX, Li RY (2015) Factors affecting crack repairing capacity of bacteria-based self-healing concrete. Constr Build Mater 87:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang J, Liu Y, Feng T, Zhou M, Zhao L, Zhou A, Li Z (2017) Immobilizing bacteria in expanded perlite for the crack self-healing in concrete. Constr Build Mater 148:610–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Justo-Reinoso I, Heath AC, Gebhard S, Paine K (2021) Aerobic non-ureolytic bacteria-basedself-healing cementitious composites: a comprehensive review. J Build Eng 42:102834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Alemu D, Demiss W, Korsa G (2022) Bacterial performance in crack healing and its role in creating sustainable construction. Int J Microbiol 2022:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6907314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sathyapriya S, Sharvesh R, Karthik V, Periyasamy S, Sundramurthy VP (2023) Study on Osmotic Consolidation and Hydraulic Conductivity Behavior of an Expansive Soil Inundated with Sodium Chloride Solution. Int J Chem Eng 2023(6574646):10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6574646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Skevi L, Reeksting B, Hoffmann TD, Gebhard S, Paine K (2021) Incorporation of bacteria in concrete: the case against MICP as a means for strength improvement. Cem Concr Compos 120:104056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Siddique R, Nanda V, Kunal, Khatib J, Khan MI, Singh M, Rajor A (2016) Influence of bacteria on compressive strength and permeation properties of concrete made with cement baghouse filter dust. Constr Build Mater 106:461–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hesham AE, Alrumman SA, Al-Amari JA (2016) 16S rDNA phylogenetic and RAPD–PCR analyses of petroleum polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons-degrading bacteria enriched from oil-polluted soils. Arab J Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-015-1843-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mokhtar G, Ahmed AA-E-A, Reyad AM (2021) The effect of isolated Bacillus ureolytic bacteria in improving the bio-healing of concrete cracks. Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 10:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43088-021-00142-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Canakci H, Sidik W, Kiliç İ (2015) Bacterail calcium carbonate precipitation in peat. Arab J Sci Eng 40(8):2251–2260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-015-1760-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sumathi A, Murali G, Gowdhaman D, Amran M, Fediuk R, Vatin N, Laxme RD, Gowsika TS (2020) Development of bacterium for crack healing and improving properties of concrete under wet–dry and full-wet curing. Sustainability 12(24):10346. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Raut SH, Sarode DD, Lele SS (2014) Biocalcification using B. pasteurii for strengthening brick masonry civil engineering structures. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 30(1):191–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-013-1439-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Prabhu SV, Varadharajan V, Mohanasundaram S et al (2023) A comparative study on process optimization of betalain pigment extraction from Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris: RSM, ANN, and hybrid RSM-GA methods. Biomass Conv Bioref. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-023-04581-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Esaker M, Hamza O, Souid A, Elliott D (2021) Self-healing of bio-cementitious mortar incubated within neutral and acidic soil. Materials and Structures 54:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-021-01690-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hamza O, Esaker M, Elliott D, Souid A (2020) The effect of soil incubation on bio self-healing of cementitious mortar. Mater Today Commun. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.100988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hoang T, Alleman J, Cetin B, Ikuma K, Choi S (2019) Sand and silty-sand soil stabilization using bacterial enzyme–induced calcite precipitation (BEICP). Can Geotech J 56(6):808–822. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2018-0191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ramachandran AL, Dubey AA, Dhami NK, Mukherjee A (2021) Multiscale Study of Soil Stabilization Using Bacterial Biopolymers. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 147:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0002575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gowthaman S, Mitsuyama S, Nakashima K, Komatsu M, Kawasaki S (2019) Biogeotechnical approach for slope soil stabilization using locally isolated bacteria and inexpensive low-grade chemicals: a feasibility study on Hokkaido expressway soil, Japan. Soils Found 59(2):484–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2018.12.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mekonnen E, Amdie Y, Etefa H et al (2022) Stabilization of expansive black cotton soil using bioenzymes produced by ureolytic bacteria. International Journal of Geo-Engineering 13:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40703-022-00175-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. IS. 269–2015, Ordinary Portland cement specification (sixth Revision); Bureau of Indian Standard: New Delhi, India

  25. IS. 2386:1963(part 1), methods of test for aggregates for concrete, Bureau of Indian Standard: New Delhi, India

  26. IS. 2386:1963(part 3), methods of test for aggregates for concrete, Bureau of Indian Standard: New Delhi, India

  27. Wang R, Haller P (2022) Applications of wood ash as a construction material in civil engineering: a review. Biomass Convers Biorefinery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-03580-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sebastian AT, Umesh M, Priyanka K, Preethi K (2021) Isolation of plant growth-promoting Bacillus cereus from soil and its use as a microbial inoculant. Arab J Sci Eng 46(1):151–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-04895-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Padhan K, Patra RK, Sethi D, Panda N, Sahoo SK, Pattanayak SK, Senapati AK (2023) Isolation, characterization and identification of cellulose-degrading bacteria for composting of agro-wastes. Biomass Convers Biorefinery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-023-04087-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mondal S, Das P, Chakraborty A (2017) Application of bacteria in concrete. Mater Today: Proc 4(9):9833–9836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.06.276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Durga CSS, Ruben N, Chand MSR, Indira M, Venkatesh C (2021) Comprehensive microbiological studies on screening bacteria for self-healing concrete. Mater 15:101051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtla.2021.101051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mekonnen E, Kebede A, Nigussie A, Kebede G, Tafesse M (2021) Isolation and characterization of urease-producing soil bacteria. Int J Microbiol 2021:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8888641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Leeprasert L, Chonudomkul D, Boonmak C (2022) Biocalcifying potential of ureolytic bacteria isolated from soil for biocementation and material crack repair. Microorganisms 10(5):963. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10050963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ahmad SSE, MohamedAR Elmahdy, ELShami AA, Yousry E-SM (2022) Bacterial sustainable concrete for repair and rehabilitation of structural cracks. Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials 12:627–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650373.2022.2101156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wei S, Cui H, Zhenglong J, Liu H, He H, Fang N (2015) Biomineralization processes of calcite induced by bacteria isolated from marine sediments. Braz J Microbiol 46(2):455–464. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1517-838246220140533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Liang H, Liu Y, Tian B, Li Z, Ou H (2022) A sustainable production of biocement via microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 172:105422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2022.105422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Naeimi M, Chu J, Khosroshahi M, Zenouzi LK (2023) Soil stabilization for dunes fixation using microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation. Geoder 429:116183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.116183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rui Y, Qian C (2022) The influence of bacteria on biologically induced calcium carbonate and its evolution process. J Cryst Growth 581:126515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2022.126515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. IS. 10262:2019, Concrete mix proportioning-guidelines, Bureau of Indian Standard: New Delhi, India

  40. Maurya KC, Rawat A, Shanker R (2022) Monitoring of biochemical based sustainable bacterial concrete system using electromechanical impedance technique with PZT sensor. Biomass Convers Biorefinery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-03674-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. IBM Corp. Released 2021. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 28.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp With the help of the SPSS Statistical Package Programme, data were statistically analysed using a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA test)

  42. Duncan DB (1955) Multiple Range and Multiple F Tests. Biometrics 11:1. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. Tripathi N, Sapra A, Gram Staining (2022) Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK562156/

  44. Shugar D, Baranowska J (1954) Studies on the gram stain; the importance of proteins in the Gram reaction. Acta Microbiol Pol (1952) 3(1):11–20

    Google Scholar 

  45. Zhang J, Zhou A, Liu Y et al (2017) Microbial network of the carbonate precipitation process induced by microbial consortia and the potential application to crack healing in concrete. Scientific Reports 7:14600. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15177-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Tamura K, Dudley JT, Nei M, Kumar S (2007) MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) Software Version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 24(8):1596–1599. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msm092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Lund P, Tramonti A, De Biase D (2014) Co** with low pH: molecular strategies in neutralophilic bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 38:1091–1125. https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6976.12076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Hirshfield IN, Terzulli S, O’Byrne C (2003) weak organic acids: a panoply of effects on bacteria. Sci Prog 86:245–270. https://doi.org/10.3184/003685003783238626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Jessica SJ (2009) Role of charge transfer in the structure and dynamics of the hydrated proton. J Phys Chem B 113:5149–5161. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp810652v

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Gutknecht J, Walter A (1981) Transport of protons and hydrochloric acid through lipid bilayer membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA) - Biomembr 641:183–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-2736(81)90582-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Salmond CV, Kroll RG, Booth IR (1984) The effect of food preservatives on pH homeostasis in Escherichia coli. Microbiology 130:2845–2850. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-130-11-2845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Maurer LM, Yohannes E, Bondurant SS et al (2005) pH regulates genes for flagellar motility, catabolism, and oxidative stress in Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol 187:304–319. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.187.1.304-319.2005

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This Research work was funded by SASTRA Deemed University under TRR research scheme (Grant no. SASTRA/SoCE/AS/TRR2022).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Anbazhagan Rajesh: methodology, investigation, writing—original draft. Arunachalam Sumathi: conceptualization, supervision, writing—review and editing. Dharmalingam Gowdhaman: conceptualization, supervision. Sundramurthy Venkatesa Prabhu: methodology, writing—review and editing, validation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sumathi Arunachalam.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Consent for publication

All authors agree to the publishing of the paper.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: Due to the first row of Table 4 of the full text is not visible.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anbazhagan, R., Arunachalam, S., Dharmalingam, G. et al. Development on bio-based concrete crack healing in soil exposures: isolation, identification, and characterization of potential bacteria and evaluation of crack healing performance. Biomass Conv. Bioref. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-023-04728-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-023-04728-2

Keywords

Navigation