Abstract
The purpose of this research was to formulate epoxy composites with basalt fibre and foxtail millet biosilica reinforcement for the use in horizontal and vertical wind turbine blade manufacturing. The study primarily focused on the effect of adding ceramic biosilica on mechanical, wear, flammability and thermal degradation behaviour when reinforcing with basalt fibre in epoxy resin. The biosilica particles were prepared via thermo-chemical process and silane surface-treated subsequently. The composites were developed using hand layup method and evaluated in accordance with the relevant American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) criteria. According to the results, the confirmation analysis confirmed the biosilica formation with via FTIR and XRD analysis. The size of biosilica produced was between 10 and 15 nm. It is further noted that the maximum values for tensile, flexural, compression, ILSS and Izod impact for composite designation EBB2 are 147 MPa, 182 MPa, 155 MPa, 27.1 MPa and 5.85 J. The SEM fractographs revealed highly reacted phases of biosilica as well as basalt fibre. It is further noted that the composite designation EBB3 has the lowest sp. wear loss of 0.0110 mm3/Nm and coefficient of friction (COF) of about 0.266. Moreover, the EBB3 composite designation also exhibits improved thermal degradation stability among all composite designations with a lowest combustion rate of 5.26 mm/min. Such improved load bearing effect, resistance to wear and thermally stable sustainable composites could be employed as working material for wind turbine applications.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13399-023-04656-1/MediaObjects/13399_2023_4656_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13399-023-04656-1/MediaObjects/13399_2023_4656_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13399-023-04656-1/MediaObjects/13399_2023_4656_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13399-023-04656-1/MediaObjects/13399_2023_4656_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13399-023-04656-1/MediaObjects/13399_2023_4656_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13399-023-04656-1/MediaObjects/13399_2023_4656_Fig6_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13399-023-04656-1/MediaObjects/13399_2023_4656_Fig7_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13399-023-04656-1/MediaObjects/13399_2023_4656_Fig8_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13399-023-04656-1/MediaObjects/13399_2023_4656_Fig9_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data are within the manuscript.
References
Meena et al (2021) Global Scenario Of Millets Cultivation. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0676-2_2
Dharmavarapu P, Reddy MBSS (2021) Emergent Mater 4:1377–1386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42247-021-00266-7
Dharmavarapu P, Reddy MBSS (2020) J Fail Anal Preven 20:1719–1725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-020-00979-7
Madhu et al (2023). Biomass Conv Bioref. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-023-03792-y
Alshahrani et al (2022) Prog Org Coat 172:107080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2022.107080
Nugraha et al (2022) Polymers (Basel) 14(23):5138. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14235138
Miliket TA et al (2022) Heliyon 8(3) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09092
Kalagi GR et al (2018) Mater Today Proc 5.1:2588–2596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.043
Reddy SSP et al (2021) Mater Today: Proc 46:2827–2830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.745
Park H (2016) Adv Compos Mater 25(2):125–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243046.2015.1052186
Batu T et al (2020) Adv Sci Technol Res J 14(2) https://doi.org/10.12913/22998624/118201
Balasubramanian et al (2020) Materials 13:5126. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13225126
Khandelwal S, Rhee KY (2020) Compos Part B: Eng 192:108011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108011
Fegade V et al (n.d.) In AIP Conf Proc 2393(1):020172. AIP Publishing LLC. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0074178
Derradjiet al. (2022) Polymers 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/09540083221143688
Jain et al (2019) Mater Res Express 6:105373. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab4332
Prabhu et al (2022). Bio Conv Bioref. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-02177-3
Neopoleanet et al (2022). Silicon. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-021-01634-y
Mahalingamet et al (2022) Silicon 14:8129–8139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-021-01549-8
Ben et al (2021) Silicon 13:1703–1712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-020-00569-0
Arun et al (2020). Bio Conv Bioref. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00938-0
Sharma N, Niranjan K (2018) Food Rev Intl 34(4):329–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2017.1290103
Peng R, Zhang B (2021) Trends Plant Sci 26(3):199–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2020.12.003
Yang T et al (2022) Grain Oil Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaost.2022.06.005
Kour D et al (2020) Environ Sustain 3:23–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10776-020-00491-7
Gairola et al (2022) Ind Crops Prod 182:114891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.114891
Reddy et al (n.d.) J Nat Fibers 19(5):1851–1863. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2020.1788494
Hassan et al (2022) J Ind Text 52:15280837221137382. https://doi.org/10.1177/15280837221137382
Alshahrani H, Prakash VRA (2022) Prog Org Coatings 172:107080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2022.107080
Poomathi S, Sheeju Selva Roji S (2022) Biomass Convers Biorefinery 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02867-6
Babu JS et al (n.d.) Biomass Convers Biorefinery 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02653-4
Jayabalakrishnan D (2023) Biomass Convers Biorefinery 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-023-04055-6
Rajadurai A (2016) Appl Surf Sci 384:99–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.04.185
Prakash VA, Viswanthan R (2019) Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf 118:317–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.01.008
Alshahrani H, Prakash VA (2022) Int J Biol Macromol 223:851–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.10.272
ASTM, ASfTa M (2017) “ASTM D3039-standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials.” Book ASTM D3039-standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials (ASTM International, 2017) 360
ASTM, Standard (1997) “Standard test methods for flexural properties of unreinforced and reinforced plastics and electrical insulating materials. ASTM D790.” Annual book of ASTM Standards
Standard ASTM (2008) “D3410.” Standard test method for compressive properties of polymer matrix composite materials with unsupported gage section by shear loading. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA
Astm D (2010) ASTM D 256–10 standard test methods for determining the Izod pendulum impact resistance of plastics. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA
American Society for Testing and Materials (2010) “ASTM D2240–05 standard test method for rubber property: durometer hardness.” West Conshohocken: ASTM
Standard ASTM (2006) “G99, Standard test method for wear testing with a pin-on-disk apparatus.” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA
Extinguishing, Self (1988) “Provide wall guards with a CC1 classification, as tested in accordance with the procedures specified in ASTM D-635–74.” Standard Test Method for Rate of Burning and/or Extent and Time of Burning of Self-Supporting plastics in a Horizontal Position, as referenced in UBC 52–4
Valero MF, Ortegón Y (2015) Synthesis, characterization, and in vitro degradation”. J Elastomers Plast 47(4):360–369
Balaji et al (2022) Silicon 14:12773–12779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-022-01981-4
Sivamurugan et al (2022). Biomass Conv Bioref. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-03342-y
Vishnuvarthanan et al (2020). Silicon. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-020-00732-7
Lamhour K et al (2022) J Compos Mater 56(21):3253–3268. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219983221111493
Lamhour K et al (2022) J Compos Mater 56(21):3253–3268. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.23700
Arun et al (2021). Silicon. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-021-01456-y
Neopolean P, Karuppasamy K (2022) Silicon 14(15):9331–9340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-021-01634-y
Karthigairajan M et al (2021) Silicon 13:4421–4430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-020-00772-z
Kumar S et al (n.d.) Compos Interfaces 28(9):905–923. https://doi.org/10.1080/09276440.2020.1833594
Kavitha D et al (n.d.) Mater Chem Phys 263:124225.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.124225
Kanaginahal GM et al (2023) Heliyon e12950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e12950
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Shenbagaraman S.—research.
B. K. Gnanavel—research, testing and drafting.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
S, S., Gnanavel, B.K. Development of sustainable epoxy composites using foxtail millet husk biosilica and basalt fibre for wind turbine blade applications. Biomass Conv. Bioref. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-023-04656-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-023-04656-1