Log in

Facilitating Smart Ontology Alignment Over Comprehensive Knowledge Structure

  • Research Article-Computer Engineering and Computer Science
  • Published:
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The vision of the semantic web is to give a semantic perspective to the data so that data become a real-world entity rather than a string of characters. The most important step for achieving this vision is defining and describing the relations among the available data on the web. This is the place where ontologies serve as a backbone for the semantic web. An ontology is a knowledge representation scheme that offers enriched semantic meaning of data. Various ontologies are available on the web within the same or different domains with some common information among them that create a hinder during the map** of the data due to their heterogeneous nature. The ontology alignment is a core solution to resolve this issue; hence, it is demanded to provide a sophisticated ontology alignment approach for semantic map**. This paper defines a universal and Smart Ontology Alignment (SOA) approach for finding relations between entities by dividing the set of attributes of an entity into ‘distinctive features’ and ‘cancellable features’. The SOA approach is termed smart because of the smart knowledge representation scheme it is based upon. State-of-the-art ontology alignment tools do not use this effect and offer wrong relations between the entities. The proposed structure of knowledge is believed to be more natural and comprehensible, and the relations found using SOA increase the performance of the system. The proposed SOA approach is tested with respect to five benchmarks, and the results show that the performance of our approach is near to optimal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ngo, D.; Bellahsene, Z.: Overview of YAM++—(not) yet another matcher for ontology alignment task. Web Semant. Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web 41, 30–49 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ochieng, P.; Kyanda, S.: Large-scale ontology matching: state-of-the-art analysis. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 51(4), 75 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mohammadi, M.; Hofman, W.; Tan, Y.H.: A comparative study of ontology matching systems via inferential statistics. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 31(4), 615–628 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Patel, A.; Debnath, N.C.; Mishra, A.K.; Jain, S.: Covid19-IBO: a Covid-19 impact on Indian banking ontology along with an efficient schema matching approach. N. Gener. Comput. 39(3), 647–676 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rahm, E.: Towards large-scale schema and ontology matching. In Schema matching and map** (pp. 3–27). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. (2011)

  6. Verhoosel, J.P.; Van Bekkum, M.; Van Evert, F.: Ontology matching for big data applications in the smart dairy farming domain. In OM (pp. 55–59). (2015)

  7. Salahi, A. and Ansarinia, M.: Predicting network attacks using ontology-driven inference. ar**v preprint ar**v:1304.0913. (2013)

  8. Patel, A.; Sharma, A.; Jain, S.: An intelligent resource manager over terrorism knowledge base. Recent Adv. Comput. Sci. Commun. (Former. Recent Pat. Comput. Sci.) 13(3), 394–405 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ehrig, M. and Euzenat, J.: Relaxed precision and recall for ontology matching. In Proc. K-Cap 2005 workshop on Integrating ontology (pp. 25–32). No commercial editor. (2005)

  10. Euzenat, J.: Semantic Precision and Recall for Ontology Alignment Evaluation. In IJCAI (Vol. 7, pp. 348–353). (2007)

  11. Taye, M. and Alalwan, N.: Ontology alignment technique for improving semantic integration. In Proceedings in the Fourth International Conference on Advances in Semantic Processing, Florence, Italy (pp. 13–18). (2010)

  12. Shvaiko, P.; Giunchiglia, F.; Yatskevich, M.: Semantic matching with s-match. In Semantic Web Information Management (pp. 183–202).Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. (2010)

  13. Giunchiglia, F.; Autayeu, A.; Pane, J.: S-Match: an open source framework for matching lightweight ontologies. Semantic Web 3(3), 307–317 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Giunchiglia, F.; Shvaiko, P.; Yatskevich, M.: S-Match: an algorithm and an implementation of semantic matching. In European Semantic Web Symposium (pp. 61–75).Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. (2004)

  15. Faria, D., Martins, C., Nanavaty, A., Oliveira, D., Sowkarthiga, B., Taheri, A., Pesquita, C., Couto, F.M., Cruz, I.F.: AML results for OAEI 2015. In OM. (pp. 116–123). 2015

  16. Ngo, D.; Bellahsene, Z.; Coletta, R.: Yam++-a combination of graph matching and machine learning approach to ontology alignment task. J. Web Semant. 16, 16 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gulić, M.; Vrdoljak, B.; Banek, M.: Cromatcher: an ontology matching system based on automated weighted aggregation and iterative final alignment. Web Semant. Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web 41, 50–71 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. OAEI: http://oaei.ontologymatching.org/2018/results/anatomy/index.html

  19. Patel, A.; Jain, S.: A novel approach to discover ontology alignment. Recent Adv. Comput. Sci. Commun. (Former. Recent Pat. Comput. Sci.) 14(1), 273–281 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jain, S. and Patel, A.: Smart Ontology-Based Event Identification. In 2019 IEEE 13th International Symposium on Embedded Multicore/Many-core Systems-on-Chip (MCSoC) (pp. 135–142). IEEE. (2019)

  21. Jain, S. and Patel, A.: Situation-Aware Decision-Support during Man-Made Emergencies. International Conference on Emerging Trends in Information Technology. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering. (2019)

  22. Katis, E.; Kondylakis, H.; Agathangelos, G.; Vassilakis, K.: Develo** an ontology for curriculum and syllabus. In European Semantic Web Conference (pp. 55–59). Springer, Cham. (2018)

  23. Chujai, P.; Kerdprasop, N.; Kerdprasop, K.: On transforming the ER model to ontology using protégé OWL tool. Int. J. Comput. Theory Eng. 6(6), 484 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Archana Patel or Sarika Jain.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Patel, A., Debnath, N.C. & Jain, S. Facilitating Smart Ontology Alignment Over Comprehensive Knowledge Structure. Arab J Sci Eng 48, 9713–9725 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-022-07308-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-022-07308-0

Keywords

Navigation