Log in

Modeling and simulation of a novel autonomous underwater vehicle with glider and flap**-foil propulsion capabilities

  • Published:
China Ocean Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

HAISHEN is a long-ranged and highly maneuverable AUV which has two operating modes: glider mode and flap**-foil propulsion mode. As part of the vehicle development, a three-dimensional mathematical model of the conceptual vehicle was developed on the assumption that HAISHEN has a rigid body with two independently controlled oscillating hydrofoils. A flap**-foil model was developed based on the work done by Georgiades et al. (2009). Effect of controllable hydrofoils on the vehicle stable motion performance was studied theoretically. Finally, a dynamics simulation of the vehicle in both operating modes is created in this paper. The simulation demonstrates that: (1) in the glider mode, owing to the independent control of the pitch angle of each hydrofoil, HAISHEN travels faster and more efficiently and has a smaller turning radius than conventional fix-winged gliders; (2) in the flap**-foil propulsion mode, HAISHEN has a high maneuverability with a turning radius smaller than 15 m and a forward motion velocity about 1.8 m/s; (3) the vehicle is stable under all expected operating conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arima, M., Ichihashi, N. and Miwa, Y., 2009. Modeling and motion simulation of an underwater glider with independently controllable main wings, Proc. IEEE OCEANS 2009, 1–6.

  • Apneseth, C. C., Day, A. H. and Clelland, D., 2010. Hydrodynamics of an oscillating articulated eel-like structure, Ocean Eng., 37(13): 1221–1232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R. E., Eriksen, C. C. and Jones, C. P., 2003. Autonomous buoyancy-driven underwater gliders, The Technology and Applications of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles, 37–58.

  • Eriksen, C. C., Osse, T. J., Light, R. D., Wen, T., Lehman, T. W., Sabin, P. L., Ballard, J. W. and Chiodi, A. W., 2001. Seaglider, a long range autonomous underwater vehicle for oceanographic research, IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., 26(4): 424–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fossen, T. I., 1994. Guidance and Control of Ocean Vehicles, New York, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgiades, C., Nahon, M. and Buehler, M., 2009. Simulation of an underwater hexapod robot, Ocean Eng., 36(1): 39–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graver, J. G., 2005. Underwater Gliders: Dynamics, Control and Design, Ph. D. Thesis, Princeton University.

  • Harper, K. A., Berkemerier, M. D. and Grace, S., 1998. Modeling the dynamics of spring-driven oscillating foil propulsion, IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., 23(3): 285–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey, A. J., Rock, S. M., Cody, S., Miles, D. and Brown, J. P., 1994. Toward an improved understanding of thruster dynamics for underwater vehicles, IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., 20(4): 354–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussain, N. A. A., Arshad, M. R. and Mokhtar, R. M., 2011. Underwater glider modelling and analysis for net buoyancy, depth and pitch angle control, Ocean Eng., 38(16): 1782–1791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isa, K. and Arshad, M. R., 2011. Motion Simulation for propeller-driven USM underwater glider with controllable wings and rudder, Proc. 2nd International Conference on Instrumentation, Control and Automation, Indonesia, 316–321.

  • Kelly, S. D. and Murray, R. M., 2000. Modeling efficient pisciform swimming for control, International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 10(4): 217–241.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Laurence, K. L. and Kenneth, G. C., 1951. Aerodynamic characteristics of a number of modified NACA four-digit-series airfoil sections, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics Collection.

  • Leonard, N. E. and Graver, J. G., 2001. Model based feedback control of autonomous underwater gliders, IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., 26(4): 633–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Lu, C. J. and Huang, X., 2010. Calculation of added mass of a vehicle running with cavity, Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. B, 22(3): 312–318.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Li, T. S., 2007. Torpedo Manoeuvrability, Revision. Bei**g, National Defense Industry Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Licht, S., Hover, F. and Triantafyllou, M. S., 2004a. Design of a flap** foil underwater vehicle, Proceedings of International Symposium on Underwater Technology, 311–316.

  • Licht, S., Polidoro, V., Flores, M., Hover, F. and Triantafyllou, M. S., 2004b. Design and projected performance of a flap** foil AUV, IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., 29(3): 786–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lighthill, M. J., 1970. Aquatic animal propulsion of high hydromechanical efficiency, J. Fluid Mech., 44, 265–301.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, X. Y., Yin, X. Z., Yang, J. M. and Tong, B. G., 2010. Studies of hydrodynamics in fishlike swimming propulsion, Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. B, 22(5): 17–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mantia, M. L. and Dabnichki, P., 2009. Unsteady panel method for flap** foil, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 33(4): 572–580.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, B. W., 1995. Aerodynamics, Aeronautics, and Flight Mechanics, New York, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medjroubi, W., Stoevesandt, B., Carmo, B. and Peinke, J., 2011. High-order numerical simulations of the flow around a heaving airfoil, Computers and Fluids, 51(1): 68–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrault, D. E., 2002. Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUV) Sensitivity of Motion Response to Geometric and Hydrodynamic Parameters and AUV Behaviors with Control Plane Faults, Ph. D. Thesis, Memorial University of Newfoundland.

  • Sherman, J., Davis, R. E., Owens, W. B. and Valdes J., 2001. The autonomous underwater glider “Spray”, IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., 26(4): 437–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stommel, H., 1989. The Slocum mission, Oceanography, 2(1): 22–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triantafyllou, M. S., Techet, A. H. and Hover, F. S., 2004. Review of experimental work in biomimetric foils, IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., 29(3): 585–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triantafyllou, M. S. and Triantafyllou, G. S., 1995. An efficient swimming machine, Scientific American, 272(3): 64–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S. X., Sun, X. J., Wang, Y. H., Wu, J. G. and Wang, X. M., 2011. Dynamic modeling and motion simulation for a winged hybrid-driven underwater glider, China Ocean Eng., 25(1): 97–112.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. H. and Wang, S. X., 2009. Dynamic modeling and three-dimensional motion analysis of underwater gliders, China Ocean Eng., 23(3): 489–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z. D., Lao, Y. J., Li, L. J. and Cong, W. C., 2010. Experiment on the characteristic of 3-D vortex ring behind a flexible oscillating caudal fin, Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. B, 22(3): 393–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, D. C., Simonetti, P. J. and Jones, C. P., 2001. Slocum: an underwater glider propelled by environmental energy, IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., 26(4): 447–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wen-long Tian  (田文龙).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tian, Wl., Song, Bw., Du, Xx. et al. Modeling and simulation of a novel autonomous underwater vehicle with glider and flap**-foil propulsion capabilities. China Ocean Eng 26, 603–622 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13344-012-0046-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13344-012-0046-9

Key words

Navigation