Abstract
Chest-wall perforator-based techniques to replace volume for breast conservative therapy allow excision of large breast areas with minimal sequalae, such as the nipple–areolar complex displacement, parenchymal indentation or contour deformity. Furthermore, chest wall perforator flaps facilitate the maintenance of breast symmetry, hence decreasing the need for contralateral surgery. Lateral intercostal flap was described in numerous variants among which the most famous are the propeller flap and the turnover version. The turnover version is the easiest and fastest version that allows the replacement of large amount of volume. In this paper, we evaluate patients reported outcomes, before and after surgery, collected through the Breast Q. This study was conducted on 21 patients who were admitted to the plastic surgery department. A prospectively maintained database was used to identify the patients and their records were assessed retrospectively. The pre/post operative patients data were collected. The Breast-Q questionnaire was administered before the surgery and at least 1 year after. No major surgical complications were reported. Mean Breast-Q scores were evaluated at least 1 year after surgery and radiotherapy and compared with pre-surgical scores. Among all the modules, no significant differences between the pre-surgical and post-surgical Breast-Q scores were observed. Until now, the lateral intercostal artery perforator flap has not been widely used, due to a difficult dissection and a challenging preoperative planning. According to the reported surgical technique, the execution is easy. This technique provides the same breast-related quality of life compared to preoperative values, reduces the mastectomy rate and increases the overall survival.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data supporting this study are included within the article and/or supporting materials
References
Youssif S, Hassan Y, Tohamy A, Eid S, Ashour T, Malahias M, Khalil H (2019) Pedicled local flaps: a reliable reconstructive tool for partial breast defects. Gland Surg 8(5):527–536. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs.2019.09.06
Carrasco-López C, Julian Ibañez JF, Vilà J, Luna Tomás MA, Navinés López J, Pascual Miguel I, Fernandez-Llamazares-Rodriguez J, Higueras-Suñe C (2017) Anterior intercostal artery perforator flap in immediate breast reconstruction: anatomical study and clinical application. Microsurgery 37(6):603–610. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.30171
Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J et al (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1233–1241
Clough KB, Lewis JS, Couturaud B et al (2003) Oncoplastic techniques allow extensive resections for breast-conserving therapy of breast carcinomas. Ann Surg 237:26
Losken A, Dugal CS, Styblo TM et al (2014) A meta-analysis comparing breast conservation therapy alone to the oncoplastic technique. Ann Plast Surg 72:145–149
Hamdi M, Decorte T, Demuynck M et al (2008) Shoulder function after harvesting a thoracodorsal artery perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 122:1111–1117
Meybodi F et al (2019) The modified lateral intercostal artery perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 7:e2066
Kim JB, Eom JR, Lee JW, Lee J, Park HY, Yang JD (2019) Utility of two surgical techniques using a lateral intercostal artery perforator flap after breast-conserving surgery: a single-center retrospective study. Plast Reconstr Surg 143(3):477e–487e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005374
Koslow S, Pharmer LA, Scott AM, Stempel M, Morrow M, Pusic AL, King TA (2013) Long-term patient-reported satisfaction after contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and implant reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3026-2
Pusic AL, Klassen A, Scott A, Klok J, Cordeiro PG, Cano SJ (2009) Development of a new patient reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q©. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(2):345–353
de Boniface J, Szulkin R, Johansson ALV (2021) Survival after breast conservation vs mastectomy adjusted for comorbidity and socioeconomic status: a Swedish National 6-year follow-up of 48,986 women. JAMA Surg 156(7):628–637. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2021.1438
Hakakian CS, Lockhart RA, Kulber DA, Aronowitz JA (2016) Lateral intercostal artery perforator flap in breast reconstruction: a simplified pedicle permits an expanded role. Ann Plast Surg 76(Suppl 3):S184–S190
Pilewskie M, Morrow M (2018) Margins in breast cancer: how much is enough? Cancer 124(7):1335–1341. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31221
Lombardo GA, Hyza P, Stivala A, Tamburino S, Vesely J, Perrotta RE (2015) A novel model to evaluate the learning curve in microsurgery: serial anastomosis of the rat femoral artery. Acta Chir Plast 57(1–2):9–12
Sparavigna M, Gipponi M, Carmisciano L, Franchelli S, Atzori G, Cornacchia C, Diaz R, Murelli F, Depaoli F, Friedman D, Fregatti P (2023) Oncoplastic level II volume displacement surgery for breast cancer: oncological and aesthetic outcomes. Updates Surg 75(5):1289–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-023-01472-0
Gurrado A, Pasculli A, Toma A, Maruccia M, Elia R, Moschetta M, Telegrafo M, De Luca GM, Lavermicocca W, Poli E, Prete FP, Sgaramella LI, Giudice G, Testini M (2023) Mastectomy with one-stage or two-stage reconstruction in breast cancer: analysis of early outcomes and patient’s satisfaction. Updates Surg 75(1):235–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-022-01416-0. (Erratum in: Updates Surg. 2022 Dec 17)
Fancellu A (2019) The need to diminish mastectomy rates in patients with breast cancer eligible for breast conservation. Updates Surg 71:597–598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-018-00619-8
McCulley SJ, Schaverien MV, Tan VK, Macmillan RD (2015) Lateral thoracic artery perforator (LTAP) flap in partial breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 68(5):686–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2015.01.008
Lipman K, Graw G, Nguyen D (2021) Lateral intercostal artery perforator (LICAP) flap for breast volume augmentation: applications for oncoplastic and massive weight loss surgery. JPRAS Open 29:123–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2021.05.005
Pujji OJS, Blackhall V, Romics L, Vidya R (2021) Systematic review of partial breast reconstruction with pedicled perforator artery flaps: clinical, oncological and cosmetic outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol 47(8):1883–1890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2021.03.249
Angrigiani C, Rancati A, Escudero E, Artero G (2015) Extended thoracodorsal artery perforator flap for breast reconstruction. Gland Surg 4(6):519–527. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2015.04.20
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None of the authors has a financial interest in any of the products, devices, or drugs mentioned in this article.
Ethical approval
Not required.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Video 1 Video of the operative technique (MP4 417958 KB)
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Lombardo, G., Stivala, A., Ciancio, F. et al. A before and after evaluation of patient reported outcomes assessed by Breast Q following LICAP turnover flap in breast conservative therapy. Updates Surg 76, 1047–1054 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-023-01714-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-023-01714-1