Log in

Political mud slandering and power dynamics during Indian assembly elections

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Social Network Analysis and Mining Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Political parties often engage in verbal swordplay, which worsens during elections. Free and fair elections are the pillar of a democratic society. Come election season, all media outlets, including the Internet, are buzzing with politically-charged content. We curated 46 k posts from Twitter between January and March, 2022 to examine political content during the Indian assembly elections of February 2022. We begin our analysis by manually labeling 1.7 k posts for different forms of attack and employ the annotation to examine political attacks against defamatory hashtags and name-calling. It anecdotally lends itself to the target’s online reputation. Similarly, we quantify the power dynamics of self-promotion and negation pinned on the ruling party before and after elections. To aid large-scale analysis, we obtain pseudo-labels for the rest of the dataset via training a political attack detector for the Indic setting. Subsequently, we observe that the patterns detected via manual annotations hold at scale too. Our analyses and findings aim to educate the citizenry about the quality of political discourse on Indian Twitter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Brazil)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Following Twitter’s data-sharing policy, the tweet-ids, corresponding attack labels, and source code of all the analyses and modeling are available at https://github.com/LCS2-IIITD/india_pol_attack.

References

  • Awal MR, Cao R, Lee RK, Mitrovic S (2021) AngryBERT: joint learning target and emotion for hate speech detection. In: Karlapalem K, Cheng H, Ramakrishnan N, Agrawal RK, Reddy PK, Srivastava J, et al, (eds) Advances in knowledge discovery and data mining—25th Pacific-Asia conference, PAKDD 2021, Virtual Event, May 11–14, 2021, proceedings, Part I. vol 12712 of Lecture notes in computer science. Springer. pp 701–713. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75762-5_55

  • Borah A, Singh SR (2022 Jul) Investigating political polarization in India through the lens of Twitter. Soc Netw Anal Mining. 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-022-00939-z

  • Cao R, Lee RK, Hoang T (2021) DeepHate: hate speech detection via multi-faceted text representations. CoRR. ar** in the bud: detection, diffusion and mitigation of hate speech on social media. SIGWEB Newsl 2022(Winter ):3:1–3:9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3522598.3522601

  • Chan TKH, Cheung CMK, Lee ZWY (2021) Cyberbullying on social networking sites: a literature review and future research directions. Inf Manag 58(2):103411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson T, Warmsley D, Macy M, Weber I (2017) Automated hate speech detection and the problem of offensive language. In: ICWSM, pp 512–515

  • Devlin J, Chang MW, Lee K, Toutanova K (2019) BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In: NAACL, pp 4171–4186

  • García Benítez-D’Ávila H (2022) Populism and polarization in the digital arena: categorizing and measuring political attacks on Twitter

  • Harriss J (2015) Hindu Nationalism in Action: The Bharatiya Janata Party and Indian Politics. South Asia: J South Asian Stud 38(4):712–718. https://doi.org/10.1080/00856401.2015.1089826

  • Jafri FA, Siddiqui MA, Thapa S, Rauniyar K, Naseem U, Razzak I (2023) Uncovering the dynamics of political hate speech during Indian Election Campaign: a new low-resource dataset and baselines. In: Workshop proceedings of the 17th ICWSM

  • Jakesch M, Garimella K, Eckles D, Naaman M (2021) Trend alert: a cross-platform organization manipulated Twitter Trends in the Indian General election. Proc ACM Hum-Comput Interact. 5

  • Kakwani D, Kunchukuttan A, Golla S, N C G, Bhattacharyya A, Khapra MM, et al (2020) IndicNLPSuite: monolingual corpora, evaluation benchmarks and pre-trained multilingual language models for Indian languages. In: Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020. Online: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp 4948–4961. Available from: https://aclanthology.org/2020.findings-emnlp.445

  • Kalmoe NP (2014) Fueling the fire: violent metaphors, trait aggression, and support for political violence. Polit Commun 31:545–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar K (2022) Changing political landscape in state assembly elections of Uttar Pradesh. J Positive School Psychol, 7752–7762

  • Masud S, Bedi M, Khan MA, Akhtar MS, Chakraborty T (2022) Proactively reducing the hate intensity of online posts via hate speech normalization. In: Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. KDD ’22. Association for Computing Machinery: New York. pp 3524–3534. https://doi.org/10.1145/3534678.3539161

  • Masud S, Dutta S, Makkar S, Jain C, Goyal V, Das A, et al. (2021) Hate is the New Infodemic: a topic-aware modeling of hate speech diffusion on Twitter. In: 37th IEEE International conference on data engineering, ICDE 2021, Chania, Greece, April 19–22, 2021. IEEE. pp 504–515. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE51399.2021.00050

  • Nellis G (2023) Election cycles and global religious intolerance. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 120(1):e2213198120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2213198120

  • Petkevic V, Nai A (2022) Political attacks in 280 characters or less: a new tool for the automated classification of campaign negativity on social media. Am Polit Res 50(3):279–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piazza JA (2020) Politician hate speech and domestic terrorism. Int Interactions 46(3):431–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rheault L, Rayment E, Musulan A (2019) Politicians in the line of fire: incivility and the treatment of women on social media. Res Polit 6(1):2053168018816228

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt A, Wiegand M (2017) A survey on hate speech detection using natural language processing. In: Proceedings of the fifth international workshop on natural language processing for social media, pp 1–10

  • Siddarth D, Shankar R, Pal J (2021) We do politics so we can change politics’: communication strategies and practices in the Aam Aadmi Party’s institutionalization process. Inf Commun Soc 24(10):1361–1381. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1856910

  • Singh AK, Jain J, Kameswari L, Kumaraguru P, Pal J (2022) Note: urbanization and literacy as factors in politicians’ social media use in a largely rural state: evidence from Uttar Pradesh, India. In: ACM COMPASS, pp 564–568

  • Solovev K, Pröllochs N (2022) Hate Speech in the political discourse on social media: disparities across parties, gender, and ethnicity. In: Proceedings of the ACM web conference 2022. WWW ’22. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, pp 3656–3661. https://doi.org/10.1145/3485447.3512261

  • Turbic NGB, Galesic M (2023) Group threat, political extremity, and collective dynamics in online discussions. Sci Rep. 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28569-1

  • Waller I, Anderson A (2021) Quantifying social organization and political polarization in online platforms. Nature. 600(7888):264–268. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04167-x

  • Waseem Z, Davidson T, Warmsley D, Weber I (2017) Understanding abuse: a typology of abusive language detection subtasks. In: Proceedings of the first workshop on abusive language online, pp 78–84

  • Zahrah F, Nurse JRC, Goldsmith M (2022) A comparison of online hate on Reddit and 4chan: a case study of the 2020 US Election. In: ACM SIGAPP. pp 1797–1800

  • Zhuravskaya E, Petrova M, Enikolopov R (2020) Political effects of the internet and social media. Annu Rev Econ 12(1):415–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Drishya and Priyanshi for contributing to the initial data curation and annotation. Sarah is supported by the Prime Minister Doctoral Fellowship in partnership with Wipro AI and SERB India.

Funding

The work is not funded by any political group.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.M. contributed to data collection, annotation, and modeling. S.M. and T.C. analysed and wrote the paper. Both the authors reviewed the manuscripts.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah Masud.

Ethics declarations

Competing interest

The authors declare no competing interest. The authors are not affiliated with any political group.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file 1 (ZIP 74 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Masud, S., Charaborty, T. Political mud slandering and power dynamics during Indian assembly elections. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 13, 108 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-023-01103-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-023-01103-x

Keywords

Navigation