Log in

Power transmission project: a framework to align project success with organization goal

  • Original article
  • Published:
International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Power Transmission plays a vital role in Power Sector to transport power from the generation plant to the end-user. Achieving organizational goals through power transmission is a significant concern for any organization, especially in India. The study proposes a project management framework for power transmission projects based on project critical success factors. Power Transmission projects are often influenced by numerous critical success factors which support the organization to reach its intended goals with high efficiency. A total of 46 critical success factors are considered of strategy, risk, contract, information technology, and stakeholder. The survey questionnaire is used as a research tool with professionals of power transmission projects from 14 private and public companies in India, who actively engage in the projects at different levels. The outcome of statistical analysis by SPSS-25 reveals that Project success has a positive direct relation with strategy, risk, information technology, stakeholder and whereas, a contract has not directed relation. As mediator variable risk, contract, information technology, and stakeholder have a direct relation with strategy. So, the contract has a significant indirect relation with project success. The proposed framework will support the alignment of project success with organizational goals through identified Critical Success Factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Assaf S, Al-Hejji S (2006) Causes of delay in large construction projects. Int J Project Manag 24(4):349–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assaf SA, Al-Khalil M, Al-Hazmi M (1995) Causes of delay in large building construction projects. J Manag Eng 11:45–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan DW, Kumaraswamy MM (1997) A comparative study of causes of time overruns in Hong Kong construction projects. Int J Project Manag 15(1):55–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou JS, Pramudawardhani D (2015) Cross-country comparisons of key drivers, critical success factors and risk allocation for public-private partnership projects. Int J Project Manag 33:1136–1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choudhury DK (2014) Project management information system for construction of thermal power plant: a case study with special reference to national thermal power corporation limited, India. Int J Eng Res Technol (IJERT) 3(3):2352–2377

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke-Davies T (2002) The “Real” success factors on project. Int J Project Manag 20:185–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Divi VV, Sundara KP (2017) Analyzing delay factors in indian affecting construction projects. Int J Civ Eng Technol (IJCIET) 8(4):1938–1953

    Google Scholar 

  • Doloi H (2009) Analysis of pre-qualification criteria in contractor selection and their impacts on project success. J Constr Manag Econ 27(12):1245–1263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doloi H, Sawhney A, Iyer KC, Rentala S (2012) Analyzing factors affecting delays in Indian construction projects. Int J Project Manag 30(4):479–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong J, Liu D, Wang D, Zhang Q (2019) Identification of key influencing factors of sustainable development for traditional power generation groups in a market by applying an extended MCDM model. Sustainability 11(6):1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Dvir D, Lipovetsky S, Yhar A, Tishler A (1998) In search of project classification: a non-universal approach to project success factors. Res Policy 27:915–935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faridi A, El-Sayegh S (2006) Significant factors causing delay in the UAE construction industry. Constr Manag Econ 24:1167–1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field A (2005) Reliability analysis. In: Field A (ed) Discovering statistics using SPSS, 2nd edn. Sage, London, Chapter 15

  • Françoise O, Bourgault M, Pellerin R (2009) ERP implementation through critical success factors’ management. Bus Process Manag J 15(3):371–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman M, Beale P (1992) Measuring project success. Proj Manag J 23(1):8–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang X (2011) An analysis of the selection of project contractor in the construction management process. Int J Bus Manag 6(3):184–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram H, Biermann K, Cannon J, Neil J, Waddle C (2000) Internalizing action learning: a company perspective. Establishing critical success factors for action learning courses. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag 12(2):107–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyer KC, Jha KN (2005) Factors affecting cost performance: evidence from Indian construction projects. Int J Project Manag 23(4):283–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield N, Ugwu O, Doran T (1994) Causes of delay and cost overruns in Nigerian construction projects. Int J Project Manag 12(4):254–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maqbool R, Rashid Y, Sultana S, Sudong Y (2018) Identifying the critical performance factors and their relevant aspects for renewable energy projects; An empirical perspective. J Civ Eng Manag 24(3):223–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammed IA, Alshaoush OS (2018) Critical success factors for the public-private partnership in electric infrastructure projects in Hadhramout-Yemen. Int J Civ Eng Technol (IJCIET) 9(9):1971–1984

    Google Scholar 

  • Nundwe M, Mulenga MN (2017) Delays in construction of electrical power transmission lines in Zambia. Am Sci Res J Eng Technol Sci (ASRJETS) 30(1):82–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Pall GK, Bridge AJ, Skitmore M, Gray J (2016) Comprehensive review of delays in power transmission projects. IET Gener Transm Distrib 10(14):3393–3404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan Y, Jackson RT (2008) Ethnic difference in the relationship between acute inflammation and serum ferritin in US adult males. Epidemiol Infect 136:421–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patah LA (2010) Avaliação da relação do uso de métodos e treinamentos em gerenciamento de projetos no sucesso dos projetos através de uma perspectiva contingencial: uma análise quantitative”. [Evaluation of the relationship between the use of methods and training in project management and the success of projects through a contingency perspective: a quantitative analysis]. PhD in Production Engineering (Dissertation)–Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo

  • Rogerson PA (2001) Statistical methods for geography. Sage Publication Ltd, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rolstadås A, Johansen A (2008) From protective to offensive project management. PMI Global Congress EMEA, Malta, pp 19–21

  • Salihudin H, Jaafar MS, Sazalli SAAH (2009) The contractor perception towers industrialized building system risk in construction projects in Malaysia. Am J Appl Sci 6(5):937–942

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders MNK, Lewis P, Thornhill A (2015) Research methods for business students, 7th edn

  • Schultz RL, Slevin DP, Pinto JK (1997) Strategy and tactics in a process model of project implementation. Interfaces 17: 34–46

  • Sharma A, Chodankar DP, Priolkar JG (2017) Power sector in India: issues, challenges & prospects. Int J Innov Res Electr Electron Instrum Control Eng 5(6):194–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Takim R Akintoye A (2002) Performance indicators for successful construction project performance. In: Greenwood D (ed) 18th annual ARCOM conference, and University of Northumbria. Association of Researchers in Construction Management, vol 2, pp 545–555

  • Toor SR, Ogunlana SO (2010) Beyond the ‘iron triangle’: stakeholder perception of key performance indicators (KPIs) for large-scale public sector development projects. Int J Project Manag 28(3):228–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood S, Paris CB, Ridgwell A, Hendy EJ (2013) Modelling dispersal and connectivity of broadcast spawning corals at the global scale. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 23(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X (2005) Critical success factors for public-private partnerships in infrastructure development. J Constr Eng Manag 131(1):3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao H, Li N (2015) Risk evaluation of a UHV power transmission construction project based on a cloud model and FCE method for sustainability. Sustainability 7:2885–2914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Z-Y, Chen Y-L (2018) Critical factors affecting the development of renewable energy power generation: evidence from China. J Clean Prod 184:466–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for conducting the present study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Achintya Ghatak.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

“We declare that we do not have any conflict of interest.

Human or Animal Rights

The manuscript does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by anyone of us.

Informed Consent

We have obtained the Informed consent from all participants included in the study”.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghatak, A., Garg, A. Power transmission project: a framework to align project success with organization goal. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 13, 1817–1833 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-021-01568-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-021-01568-z

Keywords

Navigation