SpringerLink
Log in

Firms’ Participation in Global Value Chains Research and Development Activities and Firm Performance: The Joint Moderating Effects of Knowledge Intensity and Technological Turbulence

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Firms’ participation in GVCs R&D activities is contextually complex, and understanding the factors influencing its participation process is important to gaining firms’ competitiveness and performance improvement. This paper examines the impact of firms’ participation in GVCs R&D activities on firm performance and the mediating effect of technological progress. Additionally, we also test their effect under various levels of knowledge intensity and technological turbulence. Based on GVCs and dynamic capability theories, the study developed hypotheses that are tested through unbalanced panel data, which consists of 1343 observations from 428 individual firms in China’s manufacturing industries from 2014 to 2018. Fixed-effects models are used to examine hypotheses. The results indicate that technological progress partially mediates a positive relationship between firms’ participation in GVCs R&D activities and firm performance and that firms’ participation in GVCs R&D activities has a greater impact on firm performance when knowledge intensity is high. In contrast, this positive moderating effect is diminished when technological turbulence is high. This study provides a new perspective on firms’ participation in GVCs and useful guidelines for firms’ strategy selection and implementation that will facilitate the pursuit of performance excellence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Abbass, K., Sharif, A., Song, H., Ali, M. T., Khan, F., & Amin, N. (2022). Do geopolitical oil price risk, and global macroeconomic fundamentals relate to Islamic and conventional stock market? Empirical evidence from QARDL approach. Resources Policy, 77, 102730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adomako, S., Amankwah-Amoah, J., Danso, A., Danquah, J. K., Hussain, Z., & Khan, Z. (2021a). R&D intensity, knowledge creation process and new product performance: The mediating role of international R&D teams. Journal of Business Research, 128, 719–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adomako, S., Frimpong, K., Amankwah-Amoah, J., Donbesuur, F., & Opoku, R. A. (2021b). Strategic decision speed and international performance: The roles of competitive intensity, resource flexibility, and structural organicity. Management International Review, 61(1), 27–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agostino, M., Brancati, E., Giunta, A., Scalera, D., & Trivieri, F. (2019). Firms’ efficiency and global value chains: An empirical investigation on Italian industry. The World Economy, 43(4), 1000–1033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alam, A., Uddin, M., Yazdifar, H., Shafique, S., & Lartey, T. (2020). R&D investment, firm performance and moderating role of system and safeguard: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of Business Research, 106, 94–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amjad, A., Abbass, K., Hussain, Y., Khan, F., & Sadiq, S. (2022). Effects of the green supply chain management practices on firm performance and sustainable development. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 29(44), 66622–66639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreeva, T., Martín-de Castro, G., & Kianto, A. (2011). Knowledge processes, knowledge-intensity and innovation: A moderated mediation analysis. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(6), 1016–1034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apa, R., De Noni, I., Orsi, L., & Sedita, S. R. (2018). Knowledge space oddity: How to increase the intensity and relevance of the technological progress of European regions. Research Policy, 47(9), 1700–1712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydin, H. (2020). Market orientation and product innovation: The mediating role of technological capability. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(4), 1233–1267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azmeh, S., & Nadvi, K. (2014). Asian firms and the restructuring of global value chains. International Business Review, 23(4), 708–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1987). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benkovskis, K., Masso, J., Tkacevs, O., Vahter, P., & Yashiro, N. (2019). Export and productivity in global value chains: Comparative evidence from Latvia and Estonia. Review of World Economics, 156(3), 557–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beverelli, C., Stolzenburg, V., Koopman, R. B., & Neumueller, S. (2019). Domestic value chains as step** stones to global value chain integration. The World Economy, 42(5), 1467–1494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J., & Tian, X. (2016). Transnationality and financial performance in the era of the global factory. Management International Review, 57(4), 501–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J., Craig, T. D., & Mudambi, R. (2019). Time to learn? Assignment duration in global value chain organization. Journal of Business Research, 103, 508–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgers, J. H., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2008). Why new business development projects fail: Co** with the differences of technological versus market knowledge. Long Range Planning, 41(1), 55–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, W., Wu, J., & Gu, J. (2020). From CEO passion to exploratory and exploitative innovation: The moderating roles of market and technological turbulence. Management Decision, 59(6), 1363–1385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J.-X., Sharma, P., Zhan, W., & Liu, L. (2019). Demystifying the impact of CEO transformational leadership on firm performance: Interactive roles of exploratory innovation and environmental uncertainty. Journal of Business Research, 96, 85–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cloodt, M., Hagedoorn, J., & Kranenburg, H. V. (2006). Mergers and acquisitions: Their effect on the innovative performance of companies in high-tech industries. Research Policy, 35(4), 642–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui, V., Yang, H., & Vertinsky, I. (2018). Attacking your partners: Strategic alliances and competition between partners in product markets. Strategic Management Journal, 39(12), 3116–3139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai, H., Zeng, D., Qualls, W. J., & Li, J. (2018). Do social ties matter for the emergence of dominant design? The moderating roles of technological turbulence and IRP enforcement. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 47, 96–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denicolai, S., Ramirez, M., & Tidd, J. (2014). Creating and capturing value from external knowledge: The moderating role of knowledge intensity. R & D Management, 44(3), 248–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Distel, A. P., Sofka, W., de Faria, P., Preto, M. T., & Ribeiro, A. S. (2019). Dynamic capabilities for hire – How former host-country entrepreneurs as MNC subsidiary managers affect performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 53(4), 657–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, T., Nummela, N., & Saarenketo, S. (2014). Dynamic capability in a small global factory. International Business Review, 23(1), 169–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M., & Zhongyang, Z. (1994). Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. The American Economic Review, 84(1), 66–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortanier, F., Miao, G., Kolk, A., & Pisani, N. (2019). Accounting for firm heterogeneity in global value chains. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(3), 432–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallego-Álvarez, I., & Pucheta-Martínez, M. C. (2020). Hofstede’s cultural dimensions and R&D intensity as an innovation strategy: A view from different institutional contexts. Eurasian Business Review, 11(2), 191–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentry, R. J., & Shen, W. (2010). The relationship between accounting and market measures of firm financial performance: How strong is it. Journal of Managerial Issues, 22(4), 514–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gimenez-Fernandez, E. M., Sandulli, F. D., & Bogers, M. (2020). Unpacking liabilities of newness and smallness in innovative start-ups: Investigating the differences in innovation performance between new and older small firms. Research Policy, 49(10), 104049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, H., Tang, J. T., Su, Z. F., & Katz, J. A. (2017). Opportunity recognition and SME performance: The mediating effect of business model innovation. R & D Management, 47(3), 431–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, K., Crilly, D., & Greckhamer, T. (2020). Stakeholder engagement strategies, national institutions, and firm performance: A configurational perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 41(10), 1869–1900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao, B., Ye, J. F., Feng, Y. A., & Cai, Z. M. (2020). Explicit and tacit synergies between alliance firms and radical innovation: The moderating roles of interfirm technological diversity and environmental technological dynamism. R & D Management, 50(4), 432–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hejazi, W., Tang, J., & Wang, W. (2020). Selection, learning, and productivity at the firm level: Evidence from Canadian outward FDI. Journal of International Business Studies, 52(2), 306–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, J., Zhou, C., & Wang, R. (2020). Influence of local institutional profile on global value chain participation. Chinese Management Studies, 14(3), 715–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, F., **, X., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Influencing mechanism of reverse knowledge spillover on investment enterprises’ technological progress: An empirical examination of Chinese firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 169, 120797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurtado-Torres, N. E., Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N. (2018). How does R&D internationalization in multinational firms affect their innovative performance? The moderating role of international collaboration in the energy industry. International Business Review, 27(3), 514–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam, M. T., & Polonsky, M. J. (2020). Validating scales for economic upgrading in global value chains and assessing the impact of upgrading on supplier firms’ performance. Journal of Business Research, 110, 144–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jardim, W. C., & Wegner, D.& Ladeira, W. J. (2020). The moderating effects of competitiveness and technological turbulence on the interaction between relational competence and knowledge generation. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 19(2), 217–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiao, H., Yang, J., Zhou, J., & Li, J. (2019). Commercial partnerships and collaborative innovation in China: The moderating effect of technological uncertainty and dynamic capabilities. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(7), 1429–1454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kano, L., Tsang, E. W. K., & Yeung, H.W.-C. (2020). Global value chains: A review of the multi-disciplinary literature. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(4), 577–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M., Lampert, C. M., & Roy, R. (2020). Regionalization of R&D activities: (Dis)economies of interdependence and inventive performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(7), 1054–1075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, A. K., Jaworski, B. J., & Kumar, A. (1993). A measure of market orientation. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(4), 467–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S., & Bhatia, M. S. (2021). Environmental dynamism, industry 4.0 and performance: Mediating role of organizational and technological factors. Industrial Marketing Management, 95, 54–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. Y., Jiménez, A., Yang, Y. S., & Song, Y. (2020). Political risk, internal versus global value chain knowledge, and subsidiary operational integration. Global Strategy Journal, 10(3), 444–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Kwok, R.C.-W., Zhang, S., & Gao, S. (2019). How could firms benefit more from absorptive capacity under technological turbulence? The contingent effect of managerial mechanisms. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 28(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linbing, S., Tienan, W., & Feiyang, G.& Liqing, T. (2022). Firms’ participation in global value chains marketing activities and performance: The roles of international experience and technological turbulence. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 32(4), 553–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipparini, A., Lorenzoni, G., & Ferriani, S. (2014). From core to periphery and back: A study on the deliberate sha** of knowledge flows in interfirm dyads and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 35(4), 578–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Y., Lu, Y., **e, R., & Yu, X. (2019). Does global value chain engagement improve firms’ wages: Evidence from China. The World Economy, 42(10), 3065–3085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y., & Witt, M. A. (2021). Springboard MNEs under de-globalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 53(4), 767–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malik, A. R., Manroop, L., & Patel, P. C. (2017). An empirical examination of the relationship between skills shortage and firm performance: The role of high-performance work systems. Journal of Management & Organization, 25(5), 695–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mata, J., & Portugal, P. (2000). Closure and divestiture by foreign entrants: The impact of entry and post-entry strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 549–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaelis, B., Rogbeer, S., Schweizer, L., & Özleblebici, Z. (2020). Clarifying the boundary conditions of value creation within dynamic capabilities framework: A grafting approach. Review of Managerial Science, 15(6), 1797–1820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouzas, S., & Bauer, F. (2022). Rethinking business performance in global value chains. Journal of Business Research, 144, 679–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudambi, R., & Navarra, P. (2004). Is knowledge power? Knowledge flows, subsidiary power and rent-seeking within MNCs. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5), 385–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mundlak, Y. (1978). On the pooling of time series and cross section data. Econometrica, 46(6), 9–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, Q., Kim, T., & Papanastassiou, M. (2017). Policy uncertainty, derivatives use, and firm-level FDI. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(1), 96–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pananond, P., Gereffi, G., & Pedersen, T. (2020). An integrative typology of global strategy and global value chains: The management and organization of cross-border activities. Global Strategy Journal, 10(3), 421–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peerally, J. A., De Fuentes, C., & Figueiredo, P. N. (2019). Inclusive innovation and the role of technological capability-building: The social business Grameen Danone Foods Limited in Bangladesh. Long Range Planning, 52(6), 101843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, X. B., Liu, Y. L., Jiao, Q. Q., Feng, X. B., & Zheng, B. (2020). The nonlinear effect of effectuation and causation on new venture performance: The moderating effect of environmental uncertainty. Journal of Business Research, 117, 112–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pham, H. S. T., & Petersen, B. (2021). The bargaining power, value capture, and export performance of Vietnamese manufacturers in global value chains. International Business Review, 30(6), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randhawa, K., Wilden, R., & Gudergan, S. (2020). How to innovate toward an ambidextrous business model? The role of dynamic capabilities and market orientation. Journal of Business Research, 130, 618–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnatterly, K., Calvano, F., Berns, J. P., & Deng, C. (2021). The effects of board expertise-risk misalignment and subsequent strategic board reconfiguration on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 42(11), 2162–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schriber, S., & Löwstedt, J. (2020). Reconsidering ordinary and dynamic capabilities in strategic change. European Management Journal, 38(3), 377–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheng, S. B., Zhou, K. Z., & Li, J. J. (2011). The effects of business and political ties on firm performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Marketing, 75(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinkovics, N., Choksy, U. S., Sinkovics, R. R., & Mudambi, R. (2019). Knowledge connectivity in an adverse context: Global value chains and Pakistani offshore service providers. Management International Review, 59(1), 131–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, J. Q., Ma, H. H., & Zhang, S. (2021). Develo** innovation capabilities for upgrading in global value chains: Evidence from China. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 16(8), 1654–1676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, W., Ding, Z., Xu, X., & Cui, K. (2020). Internationalization and firm default risk: The roles of environmental dynamism and marketing capability. Journal of Business Research, 121, 142–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tasheva, S.& Nielsen, B. B. (2020). The role of global dynamic managerial capability in the pursuit of international strategy and superior performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 53(4), 689–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres Mazzi, C., & Foster-McGregor, N. (2021). Imported intermediates, technological capabilities and exports: Evidence from Brazilian firm-level data. Research Policy, 50(1), 104141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsouri, M., Hanson, J., & Normann, H. E. (2021). Does participation in knowledge networks facilitate market access in global innovation systems? The case of offshore wind. Research Policy, 50(5), 104227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ugur, M., Churchill, S. A., & Luong, H. M. (2020). What do we know about R&D spillovers and productivity? Meta-analysis evidence on heterogeneity and statistical power. Research Policy, 49(1), 103866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Industrial Development Organization. Competing through innovation and learning-the focus of UNIDO’s industrial development. 2002/2003 Vienna: 107–116.

  • Von Nordenflycht, A. (2010). What is a professional service firm? Toward a theory and taxonomy of knowledge-intensive firms. Academy of Management Review, 35(1), 155–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Wang, T. N., & Li, X. (2017). Does R&D create additional business value through IT. Chinese Management Studies, 11(2), 194–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witt, M. A. (2019). De-globalization: Theories, predictions, and opportunities for international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(7), 1053–1077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, L., Liu, H., & Zhang, J. (2017). Bricolage effects on new-product development speed and creativity: The moderating role of technological turbulence. Journal of Business Research, 70, 127–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • **e, L., Zhou, J., Zong, Q., & Lu, Q. (2020). Gender diversity in R&D teams and innovation efficiency: Role of the innovation context. Research Policy, 49(1), 103885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yacoub, G., Storey, C., & Haefliger, S. (2020). Appropriability mechanisms for manufacturing and service firms: The contingencies of openness and knowledge intensity. R & D Management, 50(5), 551–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, T., Luo, J., Zhang, C. Y., & Lee, C. K. M. (2020). The joint effects of information and communication technology development and intercultural miscommunication on international trade: Evidence from China and its trading partners. Industrial Marketing Management, 89, 40–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant numbers N71972061, N72172043].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, Southwest University, No. 2, Tiansheng Road, Beibei District, Chongqing, 400715, China

    Linbing Sun

  2. School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, No. 92 West Dazhi Street, Nan Gang District, Harbin, 150001, Hei Longjiang Province, China

    Linbing Sun, Tienan Wang, Liqing Tang & Qianqian Fan

  3. School of Business Administration, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, No.555 Liu Tai Da Dao, Wenjiang District, Chengdu, 611130, Sichuan Province, China

    Liqing Tang

  4. Business School, Shandong University of Technology, No. 88 West Gongqingtuan Road, Zhangdian District, Zibo, 255000, Shandong Province, China

    Qianqian Fan

Authors
  1. Linbing Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tienan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Liqing Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qianqian Fan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tienan Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

We certify that the submission is original work and has not been submitted  elsewhere for publication, in whole or in part.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, L., Wang, T., Tang, L. et al. Firms’ Participation in Global Value Chains Research and Development Activities and Firm Performance: The Joint Moderating Effects of Knowledge Intensity and Technological Turbulence. J Knowl Econ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02211-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02211-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation