Abstract
The study analyzes the intellectual structure of World Trade Organization (WTO) research, employing a bibliometric approach. The bibliographic information of 7203 publications in the WTO field published in the Web of Science Core Collection indexed journals over 1995–2023 was analyzed. The results indicate that the research on WTO has grown faster than that of regional trade agreements and the overall international business field during recent decades. It may partially be due to an increase in the number of active proceedings in the WTO dispute settlement body. The European countries are the major contributors to WTO research. The USA is the most productive and influential country, with 2070 WTO-related publications and an h-index of 100. In addition, the authors affiliated with institutions located in the USA have established strong research collaborations with those from China, England, Switzerland, and Canada. However, the contribution from China has grown faster in recent years. Global politics and international trade law have become highly impactful themes. As for future research avenues, the focus of this research corpus has gradually shifted from the Doha development round to a review of the trade dispute settlement mechanism and amendments to WTO laws for ensuring transparency and environmental sustainability.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13132-024-02134-1/MediaObjects/13132_2024_2134_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13132-024-02134-1/MediaObjects/13132_2024_2134_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13132-024-02134-1/MediaObjects/13132_2024_2134_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13132-024-02134-1/MediaObjects/13132_2024_2134_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13132-024-02134-1/MediaObjects/13132_2024_2134_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13132-024-02134-1/MediaObjects/13132_2024_2134_Fig6_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13132-024-02134-1/MediaObjects/13132_2024_2134_Fig7_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Not Applicable.
References
Ali, A., Ramakrishnan, S., Faisal, F., Akram, T., Salam, S., & Rahman, S. U. (2023). Bibliometric analysis of finance and natural resources: Past trend, current development, and future prospects. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25(11), 13035–13064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02602-1
Anderson, K. (2022). Trade-related food policies in a more volatile climate and trade environment. Food Policy, 109, 102253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2022.102253
Anderson, K., Martin, W., & Van der Mensbrugghe, D. (2006). Doha merchandise trade reform: What is at stake for develo** countries? The World Bank Economic Review, 20(2), 169–195. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813274730_0010
Athukorala, P. C., & Jayasuriya, S. (2003). Food safety issues, trade and WTO rules: A develo** country perspective. World Economy, 26(9), 1395–1416. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-9701.2003.00576.x
Azaria, D. (2022). Trade countermeasures for breaches of international law outside the WTO. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 71(2), 389–423. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589322000057
Bagwell, K., & Staiger, R. W. (1997). Multilateral tariff cooperation during the formation of customs unions. Journal of International Economics, 42(1–2), 91–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(96)01443-2
Bagwell, K., & Staiger, R. W. (1999). An economic theory of GATT. American Economic Review, 89(1), 215–248. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.1.215
Bagwell, K., & Staiger, R. W. (2004). The economics of the world trading system. MIT Press.
Barham, E. (2003). Translating terroir: The global challenge of French AOC labeling. Journal of Rural Studies, 19(1), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00052-9
Bettcher, D. W., Yach, D., & Guindon, G. E. (2000). Global trade and health: key linkages and future challenges. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 78, 521–534. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/268112
Bloom, N., Draca, M., & Van Reenen, J. (2016). Trade induced technical change? The impact of Chinese imports on innovation, IT and productivity. The Review of Economic Studies, 83(1), 87–117. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdv039
Bown, C. P. (2017). Mega-regional trade agreements and the future of the WTO. Global Policy, 8(1), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12391
Brandt, L., Van Biesebroeck, J., & Zhang, Y. (2012). Creative accounting or creative destruction? Firm-level productivity growth in Chinese manufacturing. Journal of Development Economics, 97(2), 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2011.02.002
Büthe, T., & Milner, H. V. (2008). The politics of foreign direct investment into develo** countries: Increasing FDI through international trade agreements? American Journal of Political Science, 52(4), 741–762. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00340.x
Cardwell, R., & Ghazalian, P. L. (2020). COVID-19 and international food assistance: Policy proposals to keep food flowing. World Development, 135, 105059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105059
Cha, H., Kotabe, M., & Wu, J. (2023). Resha** internationalization strategy and control for Global E-Commerce and digital transactions: A hayekian perspective. Management International Review, 63(1), 161–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-022-00494-x
Chen, C. J. (2022). Current developments of fisheries subsidies regulations after the failure of WTO Doha round negotiations with a focus on the Asia-Pacific region. Asian Journal of WTO & International Health Law and Policy, 17(1), 41–84. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4071950
Chu, C. C., & Lee, P. C. (2018). Paris needs Geneva, and vice versa. Global Policy, 9(4), 570–577. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12584
Claussen, K. (2022). Next-generation agreements and the WTO. World Trade Review, 21(3), 380–388. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745622000131
Davey, W. J. (2022). WTO dispute settlement: Crown jewel or costume jewelry? World Trade Review, 21(3), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745622000106
De Bièvre, D., & Dür, A. (2005). Constituency interests and delegation in European and American trade policy. Comparative Political Studies, 38(10), 1271–1296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414005277578
De Bièvre, D., Espa, I., & Poletti, A. (2017). No iceberg in sight: On the absence of WTO disputes challenging fossil fuel subsidies. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 17(3), 411–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-017-9362-0
De la Vega Hernández, I. M., Urdaneta, A. S., & Carayannis, E. (2022). Global bibliometric map** of the frontier of knowledge in the field of artificial intelligence for the period 1990–2019. Artificial Intelligence Review, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-022-10206-4
Dhingra, S., & Meyer, T. (2021). Leveling the playing field: Industrial policy and export-contingent subsidies in India-export related measures. World Trade Review, 20(4), 606–622. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147474562100032X
Estrada, M. A. R., & Koutronas, E. (2022). The impact of the Russian aggression against Ukraine on the Russia-EU trade. Journal of Policy Modeling, 44(3), 599–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2022.06.004
Fathi, M., Peiravian, F., & Yousefi, N. (2021). Impact of the trade-related aspect of intellectual property rights agreement on pharmaceutical industry in develo** countries: A sco** review. Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research: IJPR, 20(4), 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-019-0528-0
Fiorini, M., Hoekman, B., Mavroidis, P. C., Nelson, D., & Wolfe, R. (2021). Stakeholder preferences and priorities for the next WTO director general. Global Policy, 12, 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12926
Gabor, E., & Sauvat, K. P. (2021). Facilitating sustainable FDI for sustainable development in a WTO investment facilitation framework: Four concrete proposals. Journal of World Trade, 55(2), 261–285. https://doi.org/10.54648/trad2021010
Gallagher, K. P. (2007). Understanding develo** country resistance to the Doha Round. Review of International Political Economy, 15(1), 62–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290701751308
García-Lillo, F., Claver-Cortés, E., Marco-Lajara, B., & Úbeda-García, M. (2019). Identifying the ‘knowledge base’or ‘intellectual structure’of research on international business, 2000–2015: A citation/co-citation analysis of JIBS. International Business Review, 28(4), 713–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.02.001
Gnangnon, S. K. (2017). Impact of trade facilitation reforms on tax revenue. Journal of Economic Studies, 44(5), 765–780. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-03-2016-0054
Grosse, R., Gamso, J., & Nelson, R. C. (2021). China’s rise, world order, and the implications for international business. Management International Review, 61(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-020-00433-8
Guo, Y., Jasovska, P., Rammal, H. G., & Rose, E. L. (2018). Global mobility of professionals and the transfer of tacit knowledge in multinational service firms. Journal of Knowledge Management., 24(3), 553–567. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-09-2017-0399
Hartman, S. W. (2013). The WTO, the Doha Round Impasse, PTAs, and FTAs/RTAs. The International Trade Journal, 27(5), 411–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/08853908.2013.827903
Helfer, L.R. & Slaughter, A.-M. (1997). Toward a theory of effective supranational adjudication. Yale Law Journal. 107(2), 273–391. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/9054
Hillberry, R., & Zurita, C. (2022). Commitment behaviour in the world trade organization’s trade facilitation agreement. The World Economy, 45(1), 36–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.13165
Hoekman, B., & Mavroidis, P. C. (2021). WTO reform: Back to the past to build for the future. Global Policy, 12, 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12924
Hopewell, K. (2021). Trump & trade: The crisis in the multilateral trading system. New Political Economy, 26(2), 271–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2020.1841135
Kerr, W. A. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic and agriculture: Short-and long-run implications for international trade relations. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68(2), 225–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/cjag.12230
Kim, S. E., Urpelainen, J., & Yang, J. (2019). Environmental effects of GATT/WTO membership: An empirical evaluation. International Interactions, 45(5), 917–932. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2019.1632305
Koopman, R., Hancock, J., Piermartini, R., & Bekkers, E. (2020). The value of the WTO. Journal of Policy Modeling, 42(4), 829–849.
Krämer, T., Momeni, F., & Mayr, P. (2017). Coverage of author identifiers in Web of Science and Scopus. ar**v preprint ar**v:1703.01319. https://doi.org/10.48550/ar**v.1703.01319
Kromah, A. Z., & Bangura, K. Z. (2022). The WTO’s fisheries subsidies agreement: What’s new and what’s next? Global Trade and Customs Journal, 17(10), 431–435. https://doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2022061
Kucheriava, Y. (2022). Russia’s invasion of Ukraine: A WTO perspective. Global Trade and Customs Journal, 17(10), 417–430. https://doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2022060
Kuenzel, D. J. (2017). WTO dispute determinants. European Economic Review, 91, 157–179.
Li, M., Du, W., & Wang, Z. (2023). Export globalization and pollution localization: Multivariate heterogeneous data based on Chinese enterprises. Energy Reports, 9, 472–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.11.203
Li, X., & Zhang, X. (2022). Is the WTO dispute settlement system a disaster for the US? An evaluation of US–China WTO disputes. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 27, 567–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-021-09776-x
Li, Y., Yang, M., & Zhu, L. (2021). FDI, export sophistication, and quality upgrading: Evidence from China’s WTO accession. Japan and the World Economy, 59, 101086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japwor.2021.101086
Liu, W. (2021). Caveats for the use of Web of Science Core Collection in old literature retrieval and historical bibliometric analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 172, 121023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121023
Marceau, G. (1995). Transition from GATT to WTO: A most pragmatic operation. Journal of World Trade, 29(4), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.54648/trad1995027
Mavroidis, P. C. (2013). Driftin’ too far from shore–Why the test for compliance with the TBT agreement developed by the WTO appellate body is wrong, and what should the AB have done instead. World Trade Review, 12(3), 509–531.
Mayr, S., Hollaus, B., & Madner, V. (2021). Palm oil, the RED II and WTO law: EU sustainable biofuel policy tangled up in green? Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 30(2), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12386
Mermelstein, S., & Stevens, H. (2021). TRIPS to where? A narrative review of the empirical literature on intellectual property licensing models to promote global diffusion of essential medicines. Pharmaceutics, 14(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14010048
Mrázová, M., Vines, D., & Zissimos, B. (2013). Is the GATT/WTO’s Article XXIV bad? Journal of International Economics, 89(1), 216–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.**teco.2012.07.007
Mu, D., Ren, H., & Wang, C. (2021). A literature review of taxes in cross-border supply chain modeling: Themes, tax types and new trade-offs. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 17(1), 20–46. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer17010002
Ohlan, R. (2010). WTO and Indian agriculture. Global Research Publications.
Ohlan, R., & Ohlan, A. (2022). A comprehensive bibliometric analysis and visualization of smart home research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 184, 121975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121975
Ohlan, R., & Ohlan, A. (2023). Religious tourism scholarship: Current state and future research directions. Journal of Islamic Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-05-2023-0152
Okolo, C. V., Wen, J., & Kolani, K. (2023). Research assessment on the extreme social events in Africa—Evidence from a bibliometric analysis using web of science and citespace. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01553-w
Paarlberg, R. (1997). Agricultural policy reform and the Uruguay round: Synergistic linkage in a two-level game? International Organization, 51(3), 413–444. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081897550410
Palmeter, D., & Mavroidis, P. C. (1998). The WTO legal system: Sources of law. American Journal of International Law, 92(3), 398–413. https://doi.org/10.2307/2997915
Paul, J., Alhassan, I., Binsaif, N., & Singh, P. (2023). Digital entrepreneurship research: A systematic review. Journal of Business Research, 156, 113507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113507
Pauwelyn, J. (2020). Export restrictions in times of pandemic: Options and limits under international trade agreements. Journal of World Trade, 54(5), 727–747. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3579965
Petersmann, E. U. (2004). The ‘Human Rights Approach’ advocated by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and by the International Labour Organization: Is it relevant for WTO Law and Policy? Journal of International Economic Law, 7(3), 605–627. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/7.3.605
Pomfret, R. (2021). ‘Regionalism’ and the global trade system. The World Economy, 44(9), 2496–2514.
Rahman, S. U., Faisal, F., & Ali, A. (2022). Financial development and shadow economy: A bibliometric analysis using the Scopus database (1985–2021). Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-00980-5
Ripsman, N. M. (2021). Globalization, deglobalization and great power politics. International Affairs, 97(5), 1317–1333. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiab091
Rose, A. K. (2004). Do we really know that the WTO increases trade? American Economic Review, 94(1), 98–114. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282804322970724
Shih, Y. Y., & Fang, K. (2004). The use of a decomposed theory of planned behavior to study Internet banking in Taiwan. Internet Research, 14(3), 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240410542643
Simo, R. Y. (2020). Trade in services in the African continental free trade area: Prospects, challenges and WTO compatibility. Journal of International Economic Law, 23(1), 65–95. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgz031
Smith, R. D., Correa, C., & Oh, C. (2009). Trade, TRIPS, and pharmaceuticals. The Lancet, 373(9664), 684–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61779-1
Steinberg, R. H. (2004). Judicial lawmaking at the WTO: Discursive, constitutional, and political constraints. American Journal of International Law, 98(2), 247–275. https://doi.org/10.2307/3176728
Subramanian, A., & Wei, S. J. (2007). The WTO promotes trade, strongly but unevenly. Journal of International Economics, 72(1), 151–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.**teco.2006.07.007
Tenni, B., Moir, H. V., Townsend, B., Kilic, B., Farrell, A. M., Keegel, T., & Gleeson, D. (2022). What is the impact of intellectual property rules on access to medicines? A systematic review. Globalization and Health, 18(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-022-00826-4
Trachtman, J. P., & Moremen, P. M. (2003). Costs and benefits of private participation in WTO dispute settlement: Whose right is it anyway. Harvard International Law Journal, 44(1), 221–250.
Van Damme, I. (2023). 25 years of law and practice at the WTO: Did the appellate body dig its own grave? Journal of International Economic Law, 26(1), 124–132. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgac067
Wade, R. H. (2003). What strategies are viable for develo** countries today? The World Trade Organization and the shrinking of ‘development space.’ Review of International Political Economy, 10(4), 621–644. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290310001601902
Yamabhai, I., & Smith, R. D. (2012). A review of the health and economic implications of patent protection, with a specific focus on Thailand. Health Research Policy and Systems, 10, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-10-24
Zarocostas, J. (2021). New WTO leader faces COVID-19 challenges. The Lancet, 397(10276), 782. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00507-9
Zeng, K., Sebold, K., & Lu, Y. (2020). Global value chains and corporate lobbying for trade liberalization. The Review of International Organizations, 15(2), 409–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-018-9337-0
Zepeda, C., Salman, M., Thiermann, A., Kellar, J., Rojas, H., & Willeberg, P. (2005). The role of veterinary epidemiology and veterinary services in complying with the World Trade Organization SPS agreement. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 67(2–3), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2004.11.005
Zhu, J., & Liu, W. (2020). A tale of two databases: The use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers. Scientometrics, 123(1), 321–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03387-8
Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2006). An inter-sectoral comparison of green supply chain management in China: Drivers and practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(5), 472–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.01.003
Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Geng, Y. (2005). Green supply chain management in China: Pressures, practices and performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(5), 449–468. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570510593148
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ohlan, R., Ohlan, A., Chhikara, S. et al. Bibliometric Analysis and Review of World Trade Organization Research: Suggesting Future Avenues using WOS Database. J Knowl Econ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02134-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02134-1
Keywords
- WTO
- Dispute settlement body
- International business law
- Content analysis
- Network analysis
- Web of Science Core Collection
- Field weighted citation impact