SpringerLink
Log in

Stable Social Knowledge Creation to Solve the Contract Failure Dilemma in International Construction Engineering: A Liquid Crystal Metaphor

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The importance of social knowledge in the theory and practice of international construction engineering is growing, yet related contract failures are still frequent to date, and much less is known about the inner content of social knowledge and how to realize its full potential in international projects. Therefore, this study attempts to demonstrate the internal structure of social knowledge in the context of the current intercultural era to enhance the development of international construction engineering. Considering the commonalities between the social knowledge iceberg and the liquid crystal, the study regarded liquid crystal as a metaphor for the social knowledge iceberg and embodies the flow path of social knowledge from internal formations to external effects. A multiple case study was used to verify the proposed metaphorical model and visualize the internal structure of social knowledge. We find that cross-cultural leadership, which determines the stability of the social knowledge iceberg by adjusting the degree of cultural integration within the range of 20–40% and thereby promoting the catalytic effect of social knowledge for contract completion, is the core of social knowledge creation. This paper theoretically explores the structure, influencing factors, and functions of social knowledge stability and, in the meantime in practice, provides guidance for the success of international construction engineering by combing knowledge management and chemistry theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afuah, A. & Tucci, C. L. (2012). Crowdsourcing as a solution to distant search. Academy of Management Review, 37(3), 355–375.

  • Ang, C. S., Zaphiris, P. & Wilson, S. (2005) Social interaction in game communities and second language learning, paper presented at the 19th British HCI Group Annual Conference, Edinburgh, UK, September.

  • Arrow, K. J. (1994). Methodological individualism and social knowledge. The American Economic Review, 84 (2), 1–9.

  • Balsamo, A. (2011). Taking culture seriously in the age of innovation. Designing Culture: The Technological Imagination at Work, 2–25.

  • Bashir, M., & Verma, R. (2019). Internal factors & consequences of business model innovation. Management Decision, 57(1), 262–290.

  • Bjorvatn, T., & Wald, A. (2020). The impact of time pressure on knowledge transfer effectiveness in teams: Trust as a critical but fragile mediator. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(10), 2357–2372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S. P., & Halgin, D. S. (2011). On network theory. Organization Science, 22(5), 1168–1181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, L., & Maslen, R. (2010). Metaphor analysis. London: Equinox.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caputo, F., Evangelista, F., Perko, I., & Russo, G. (2017). The role of big data in value co-creation for the knowledge economy. In Vrontis, S., Weber, T. & Tsoukatos, E. (Eds), Global and national business theories and practice: bridging the past with the future. EuroMed Pres, Cyprus, pp. 269–280.

  • Cetto, A., Klier, M., Richter, A., & Zolitschka, J. F. (2018). Thanks for sharing – Identifying users’ roles based on knowledge contribution in enterprise social networks. Computer Networks, 135, 275–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekhar, S., Sadashiva, B. K., & Suresh, K. A. (1977). Liquid crystals of Disc-like Molecules. Pramana, 9, 471–480.

  • Cheng, E. W., & Li, H. (2002). Construction partnering process and as- sociated critical success factors: Quantitative investigation. Journal of Management in Engineering, 18(4), 194–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, T., Li, G., Jiao, H., Addo, F. & Jawahar, I. M. (2019). Career sustainability during manufacturing innovation: a review, a conceptual framework and future research agenda. Career Development International, 24(6), 509–528.

  • Chin, T., Rowley, C., Redding, G., & Wang, S. (2018). Chinese strategic thinking on competitive conflict: Insights from Yin-Yang harmony cognition. International Journal of Conflict Management, 29(5), 683–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, T., Wang, S., & Rowley, C. (2021). Polychronic knowledge creation in cross-border business models: A sea-like heuristic metaphor. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinnaswamy, A., Papa, A., Dezi, L., & Mattiacci, A. (2019). Big data visualisation, geographic information systems and decision making in healthcare management. Management Decision, 57(8), 1937–1959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotte, J., & Ratneshwar, S. (1999). Juggling and hop**: What does it mean to work polychronically? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 14(3/4), 184–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curado, C., Oliveira, M., Maçada, A. C. G., & Nodari, F. (2017). Teams’ innovation: Getting there through knowledge sharing and absorptive capacity. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 15, 45–53.

  • Dainty, A. R., Briscoe, G. H., & Millett, S. J. (2001). Subcontractor perspectives on supply chain alliances. Construction Management and Economics, 19(8), 841–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Long, D. W., & Fahey, L. (2000). Diagnosing cultural barriers to knowledge management. Academy of Management Perspectives, 14(4), 113–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Giudice, M., Carayannis, E. G., & Maggioni, V. (2017). Global knowledge intensive enterprises and international technology transfer: Emerging perspectives from a quadruple helix environment. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(2), 229–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Giudice, M., & Maggioni, V. (2014). Managerial practices and operative directions of knowledge management within inter-firm networks: a global view. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(5), 841–846.

  • Dennis, A. R., Valacich, J. S., & Nunamaker, J. F. (1990). An ex- perimental investigation of the effects of group size in an electronic meeting environment. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 20(5), 1049–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, S. E. (2014). The role of cultural artifacts in the interpretation of metaphorical expressions about time. Metaphor and Symbol, 29(2), 94–112.

  • Durkheim, E. (1951). (First published in 1897.) Suicide: A study in sociology, New York: Free Press.

  • Eriksson, P. E. (2007). Cooperation and partnering in facilities construction—Empirical application of prisoner’s dilemma. Facilities, 25(1/2), 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farjoun, M. (2010). Beyond dualism: Stability and change as a duality. Academy of Management Review, 35(2), 202–225.

  • Ferraris, A., Santoro, G., & Bresciani, S. (2017). Open innovation in multinational companies' subsidiaries: the role of internal and external knowledge. European Journal of International Management, 11(4), 452–468.

  • Fjeldstad, Q. D., & Snow, C. C. (2018). Business models and organization design. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 32–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, K., & Qin, H. (2020). The role of information and interaction processes in the adoption of agriculture inputs in Uganda. Agronomy, 10(2), 202.

  • Gibbs, R. W. (2007). Why cognitive linguists should care more about empirical methods. Methods in Cognitive Linguistics, 2–18.

  • Glynn, D., & Fischer, K. (Eds.). (2010). Quantitative methods in cognitive semantics: Corpus-driven approaches (Vol. 46). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

  • Goldberg, A. B. (2014). Norms within networks: Opinion leader and peer network influences on mothers/caregivers' childhood immunization decisions in rural northern Nigeria. Columbia University.

  • Gomila, R., Shepherd, H., & Paluck, E. L. (2023). Network insiders and observers: who can identify influential people?. Behavioural Public Policy, 7(1), 115–142.

  • Goodby, Y. J. W., Collings, P. J., Kato, T., Tschierske, C., Gleeson, H. F., & Raynes, P. (2014). Handbook of Liquid Crystals (2nd ed.). Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halgin, D. S., & Borgatti, S. P. (2019). Audience perceptions of high-status ties and network advantage: The market for coaching jobs in the National Collegiate Athletic Association (2000–2011). Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(4), 332–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K. L., & Nibler, R. (1998). Decision making by Chinese and US students. Journal of Social Psychology, 138(1), 102–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, W. S., Mitchell, V.-W., Almeida Jones, A., & Knight, E. (2021). The tensions of defining and develo** thought leadership within knowledge-intensive firms. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(11), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-06-2020-0431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, A., Ling, F. Y. Y., & Tan, J. S. (2009). Relative importance of subcontractor selection criteria: Evidence from Singapore. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(9), 826–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinze, J., & Tracey, A. (1994). The contractor-subcontractor relation- ship: The subcontractor’s view. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 120(2), 274–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G.J. & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, Mcgrawhill, New York, NY.

  • Holden, N. J., & Michailova, S. (2014). A more expansive perspective on translation in IB research: Insights from the Russia handbook of knowledge management. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(7), 906–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, K. P. (2017). Entrepreneurial education: The effect of entrepreneurial political skill on social network, tacit knowledge, and innovation capability. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 5061–5072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilgen, D. R., Major, D. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., & Sego, D. J. (1991). Decision making in teams: Raising an individual decision making model to the team level. Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: four approaches. AMS Review, 10(1/2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0

  • Jianmu, Ye., & **aoyao, P. (2017). Risk transmission and control of Chinese enterprises’ overseas investment under the background of “One Belt, One Road”——Taking China Railway Construction’s Saudi light rail project as an example. Finance and Accounting Monthly, 33, 96–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez-Jiménez, D., Martínez-Costa, M., & Sanz-Valle, R. (2014). Knowledge management practices for innovation: a multinational corporation’s perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(5), 905–918.

  • Jone, J. L., & Mcleish, T. C. B. (1995). Rheological response of surfactant cubic phase. Langmuir, 11(3), 785–792.

  • Jone, J. L., & Mcleish T. C. B. (1999). Concentration fluctuations in surfactant cubic phases: Theory, rheology, and light scattering. Langmuir, 15(22), 7495–7503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, A. & Paquin, R. L. (2016). The triple layered business model canvas: A tool to design more sustainable business models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 1474–1486.

  • Hasson, U., & Giora, R. (2007). Experimental methods for studying the mental representation of language. Methods in Cognitive Linguistics, 302–322.

  • Keller, J., Loewenstein, J., & Yan, J. (2017). Culture, conditions, and paradoxical frames. Organization Studies, 38(3/4), 539–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krackhardt, D. (1987). Cognitive social structures. Social Networks, 9(2), 109–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2008). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago press.

  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laughlin, R. G. (1994). The aqueous phase behavior of surfactants. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 760–776

  • Li, G. Z., Li, Y., Zeng, X. C., Zhai, L. M., Hao, S. X., & Sui, H. (1994). Studies on lyotropic liquid crystal for the system of C14BE/n-Butanol/H2O by 2H NMR. Chinese Science Bulletin, 39, 1478–1481

  • Lin, H., Qu, T., & Hu, Y. (2021). How do organizational routines paradoxically affect organizational innovation?. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(4), 1400–1429.

  • Liu, J. Y., Josephson, P. E., & Rong, S. (2013). “Practices in bidding process of contractors: A comparative study between China and Sweden,” in Proceedings of the CITC-VII, Bangkok, Thailand, December 2013.

  • Lukka, K. & Vinnari, E. (2014). Domain theory and method theory in management accounting research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(8), 1308–1338. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2013-1265

  • Massa, L., Tucci, C., & Afuah, A. (2017). A critical assessment of business model research. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 73–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milch, K. F., Weber, E. U., Appelt, K. C., Handgraaf, M. J. J., & Krantz, D. H. (2009). From individual preference construction to group decisions: Framing effects and group processes. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 108(2), 242–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niewolny, K. L., & Lillard, P. T. (2010). Expanding the boundaries of beginning farmer training and program development: A review of contemporary initiatives to cultivate a new generation of American farmers. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 1(1), 65–88.

  • Nascimento, L.d.S., Reichert, F.M., Janissek-Muniz, R. and Zawislak, P.A. (2021). Dynamic interactions among knowledge management, strategic foresight and emerging technologies. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(2), 275–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Chop, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Toyama, R. (2003). The knowledge-creating theory revisited: Knowledge creation as a synthesizing process. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 1(1), 2–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & von Krogh, G. (2009). Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organization Science, 20(3), 635–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension. Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polat, G. (2015). Subcontractor selection using the integration of the AHP and PROMETHEE methods. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 22(8), 1042–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raudeliuniene, J., Albats, E., & Kordab, M. (2021). Impact of information technologies and social networks on knowledge management processes in Middle Eastern audit and consulting companies. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(4), 871–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, C., & Oh, I. (2020). Trends in Chinese management and business: change, Confucianism, leadership, knowledge & innovation. Asia Pacific Business Review, 26(1), 1–8.

  • Roff-Wexler, S., Donovan, L. L., & Rasa, S. (2011). Challenging our assumptions: Making sense of the sharing of social knowledge. In Social Knowledge: Using Social Media to Know What You Know (pp. 37-60). IGI Global.

  • Ryu, S., Park, J. E., & Min, S. (2007). Factors of determining long-term orientation in interfirm relationships. Journal of Business Research, 60(12), 1225–1233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saviano, M., Barile, S., & Caputo, F. (2017). “Re-affirming the need for systems thinking in social sciences: A viable systems view of smart city”, in Vrontis, S., Weber, T. and Tsoukatos, E. (Ed.s), Global and National Business Theories and Practice: bridging the past with the Future, EuroMed Pres, Cypru, pp. 1552–1567.

  • Schad, J., Lewis, M. W., Raisch, S., & Smith, W. K. (2016). Paradox research in management science: Looking back to move forward. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 5–64.

  • Shams, S. R., Vrontis, D., Weber, Y., Tsoukatos, E., & Ferraris, A. (Eds). (2019). Cross-functional knowledge management: The international landscape, Routledge.

  • Shi, X., Li, F., & Bigdeli, A. Z. (2016). An examination of NPD models in the context of business models. Journal of Business Research, 69(7), 2541–2550

  • Shu, D. -F. (2013). Methods in Cognitive Linguistics. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.

  • Singhaputtangkul, N., & Zhao, X. (2016). Applying a fuzzy consensus scheme to enhance the group decision making of a building envelope design team. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(8), 04016025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sligo, F. X., & Massey, C. (2007). Risk, trust and knowledge networks in farmers’ learning. Journal of Rural Studies, 23(2), 170–182.

  • Spieth, P., Schneider, S., Clauß, T., & Eichenberg, D. (2019). Value drivers of social businesses: A business model perspective. Long Range Planning, 52(3), 427–444.

  • Taylor, C., & Dewsbury, B. M. (2018). On the problem and promise of metaphor use in science and science communication. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 19(1), 19–1.

  • Tronvoll, B., Barile, S., & Caputo, F. (2018). “A systems approach to understanding the philosophical foundation of marketing studies”, Barile S., Pellicano M., Polese F. (Ed.), Social Dynamics in a Systems Perspective, Springer, Cham, pp. 1–18.

  • Trompenaars, F., & Hampden-Turner, C. (1998). Riding the waves of culture. McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tserng, H. P., & Lin, P. H. (2002). An accelerated subcontracting and procuring model for construction projects. Automation in Construction., 11(1), 105–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velden, F. S. T., Beersma, B., & De Dreu, C. K. (2007). Majority and minority influence in group negotiation: The moderating ef- fects of social motivation and decision rules. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 259–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S., & Chin, T. (2020). A stratified system of knowledge and knowledge icebergs in cross-cultural business models: Synthesising ontological and epistemological views. Journal of International Management, 26(4), 1075–4253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E., & Roberts, K. H. (1993). Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3), 357–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wirtz, B. W., Prstoia, A., Ullrich, S., & Gottel, V. (2016). Business models: Origin, development and future research perspectives. Long Range Planning, 48(1), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, M. A., & Redding, G. (2009). Culture, meaning and institutions: Executive rationale in Germany and Japan. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(5), 859–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, Y., & Guan, J. C. (2018). Social capital, exploitative and exploratory innovations: The mediating roles of ego-network dynamics. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 126, 244–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, P., Liu, J., & Skitmore, M. (2018). Individual, group, and organizational factors affecting group bidding decisions for construction projects. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2018.

  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Design and methods. Case Study Research, 3(9.2).

  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zbaracki, M. J., & Bergen, M. (2010). When truces collapse: A longitudinal study of price-adjustment routines. Organization Science, 21(5), 955–972.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Bei**g, China

    Haoyan Li

  2. School of Engineering Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Bei**g, China

    Haoyan Li & Hui Jiang

Authors
  1. Haoyan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hui Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hui Jiang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, H., Jiang, H. Stable Social Knowledge Creation to Solve the Contract Failure Dilemma in International Construction Engineering: A Liquid Crystal Metaphor. J Knowl Econ (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01142-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01142-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation