Abstract
The Yuhuang hydrothermal field (YHF) is located between the Indomed and Gallieni fracture zones near the top of the off-axis slope on the south rift wall of Segment 29 on the ultraslow Southwest Indian Ridge (SWIR). Previous studies have shown that sulfides in the YHF formed during different mineralization episodes and the YHF has the greatest potential for the formation of large-scale seafloor massive sulfide deposits. However, the sulfide chronology and hydrothermal activity of the YHF remain poorly constrained. In this study, mineralogical analyses and 230Th/U dating were performed. Hydrothermal activity may start about (35.9 ± 2.3) ka from the southwest part of the YHF and may cease about (708 ± 81) a ago from the northeast part of the YHF. The 74 nonzero chronological data from hydrothermal sulfide samples provide the first quantitative characterization of the spatial and temporal history along the SWIR. Hydrothermal activity in the SWIR has been relatively active over the past 20 ka. In contrast, between 40 ka and 100 ka, hydrothermal activity was relatively infrequently and short in duration. The maximum activity occurred at 15–11 ka, 9–7 ka, 6–0.2 ka. There was a slight positive correlation between the maximal age and estimated surface area or estimated tonnage. The minimum mass accumulation rate of YHF is about 278 t/a, which is higher than most HFs related to ultramafic systems. The ultraslow spreading SWIR has the greatest potential to form large-scale seafloor massive sulfides (SMS) deposits. The results of this study provide new insights into the metallogenic mechanism of hydrothermal sulfides along ultraslow-spreading ridges.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Bach W, Banerjee N R, Dick H J B, et al. 2002. Discovery of ancient and active hydrothermal systems along the ultra-slow spreading Southwest Indian Ridge 10–16°E. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 3(7): 1–14, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GC000279
Baker E T, German C R. 2004. On the global distribution of hydrothermal vent fields. In: German C R, Lin J, Parson L M, eds. Mid-Ocean Ridges: Hydrothermal Interactions Between the Lithosphere and Oceans. Washington: AGU, 245–266
Cannat M, Rommevaux-Jestin C, Sauter D, et al. 1999. Formation of the axial relief at the very slow spreading Southwest Indian Ridge (49° to 69°E). Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 104(B10): 22825–22843, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/1999jb900195
Cao Hong, Sun Zhilei, Jiang Zike, et al. 2021. Source origin and ore-controlling factors of hydrothermal sulfides from the Tianzuo hydrothermal field, Southwest Indian Ridge. Ore Geology Reviews, 134: 104168, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2021.104168
Chen Jie, Tao Chunhui, Liang **, et al. 2018. Newly discovered hydrothermal fields along the ultraslow-spreading Southwest Indian Ridge around 63°E. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 37(11): 61–67, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-018-1333-y
Chen J H, Wasserburg G J, von Damm K L, et al. 1986. The U-Th-Pb systematics in hot springs on the East Pacific Rise at 21°N and Guaymas Basin. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 50(11): 2467–2479, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(86)90030-x
Cheng Hai, Edwards R L, Shen Chuanchou, et al. 2013. Improvements in 230Th dating, 230Th and 234U half-life values, and U-Th isotopic measurements by multi-collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 371–372: 82–91, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2013.04.006
Cherkashov G, Kuznetsov V, Kuksa K, et al. 2017. Sulfide geochronology along the Northern Equatorial Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Ore Geology Reviews, 87: 147–154, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2016.10.015
Cherkashov G, Poroshina I, Stepanova T, et al. 2010. Seafloor massive sulfides from the northern equatorial Mid-Atlantic Ridge: new discoveries and perspectives. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology, 28(3): 222–239, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119X.2010.483308
Dezileau L, Bareille G, Reyss J L, et al. 2000. Evidence for strong sediment redistribution by bottom currents along the Southeast Indian Ridge. Deep-Sea Research Part I, 47(10): 1899–1936, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0637(00)00008-X
Dick H J B, Lin Jian, Schouten H. 2003. An ultraslow-spreading class of ocean ridge. Nature, 426(6965): 405–412, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02128
Ding Teng, Tao Chunhui, Dias Á A, et al. 2021. Sulfur isotopic compositions of sulfides along the Southwest Indian Ridge: implications for mineralization in ultramafic rocks. Mineralium Deposita, 56(6): 991–1006, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00126-020-01025-0
Edwards R L, Chen James H, Ku Teh-Lung, et al. 1987. Precise timing of the last interglacial period from mass spectrometric determination of thorium-230 in corals. Science, 236(4808): 1547–1553, doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.236.4808.1547
Fouquet Y. 1997. Where are the large hydrothermal sulphide deposits in the oceans? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 355(1723): 427–441
Fouquet Y, Cambon P, Etoubleau J, et al. 2010. Geodiversity of hydrothermal processes along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge and ultramafic-hosted mineralization: A new type of oceanic Cu-Zn-Co-Au volcanogenic massive sulfide deposit. American Geophysical Union (AGU). 321–366, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GM000746
German C R, Petersen S, Hannington M D. 2016. Hydrothermal exploration of mid-ocean ridges: where might the largest sulfide deposits be forming? Chemical Geology, 420: 114–126, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2015.11.006
Graber S, Petersen S, Yeo I, et al. 2020. Structural control, evolution, and accumulation rates of massive sulfides in the TAG hydrothermal field. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 21(9): e2020GC009185, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GC009185
Han **qiu, Wu Guanghai, Cui Ruyong, et al. 2010. Discovery of a hydrothermal sulfide deposit on the Southwest Indian Ridge at 49.2°E. In: Proceedings of the AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, San Francisco, CA, USA, 13–17 December 2010. Washington, DC, USA: American Geophysical Union, p, OS21C–1531
Hannington M D, De Ronde C E J, Petersen S. 2005. Sea-floor tectonics and submarine hydrothermal systems. In: Hedenquist J W, Thompson J F H, Goldfarb R J, et al., eds. One Hundredth Anniversary Volume. Littelton, Colorado, USA: Society of Economic Geologists, 111–141, doi: https://doi.org/10.5382/AV100.06
Hannington M D, Galley A G, Herzig P M, et al. 1998. Comparison of the TAG mound and stockwork complex with Cyprus-type massive sulfide deposits. In: Herzig P M, Humphris S E, Miller D J, et al., eds. Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results. San Antonio, Texas: Texas A & M University, 158: 389–415, doi: https://doi.org/10.2973/odp.proc.sr.158.217.1998
Hannington M, Jamieson J, Monecke T, et al. 2011. The abundance of seafloor massive sulfide deposits. Geology, 39(12): 1155–1158, doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/G32468.1
Huang Yong**. 2021. Study on hydrothermal sedimentary records near the hydrothermal field of mafic and ultramafic rocks: a case study from Longqi and Tianzuo fields in the Southwest Indian Ridge (in Chinese)[dissertation]. Hangzhou: Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources
Jamieson J W, Clague D A, Hannington M D. 2014. Hydrothermal sulfide accumulation along the Endeavour Segment, Juan de Fuca Ridge. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 395: 136–148, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2014.03.035
Jamieson J W, Hannington M D, Clague D A, et al. 2013. Sulfide geochronology along the Endeavour Segment of the Juan de Fuca Ridge. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 14(7): 2084–2099, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ggge.20133
Kuznetsov V, Maksimov F, Zheleznov A, et al. 2011. 230Th/U chronology of ore formation within the semyenov hydrothermal district (13°31′N) at the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Geochronometria, 38(1): 72–76, doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/s13386-011-0001-1
Kuznetsov V, Tabuns E, Kuksa K, et al. 2015. The oldest seafloor massive sulfide deposits at the Mid-Atlantic Ridge: 230Th/U chronology and composition. Geochronometria, 42(1): 100–106, doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/geochr-2015-0009
Lalou C, Brichet E. 1982. Ages and implications of East Pacific Rise sulphide deposits 21°N. Nature, 300(5888): 169–171, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/300169a0
Lalou C, Brichet E. 1987. On the isotopic chronology of submarine hydrothermal deposits. Chemical Geology: Isotope Geoscience Section, 65(3–4): 197–207, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9622(87)90003-0
Lalou C, Brichet E, Hekinian R. 1985. Age dating of sulfide deposits from axial and off-axial structures on the East Pacific Rise near 12°50’N. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 75(1): 59–71, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(85)90050-0
Lalou C, Münch U, Halbach P, et al. 1998. Radiochronological investigation of hydrothermal deposits from the MESO zone, Central Indian Ridge. Marine Geology, 149(1–4): 243–254, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-3227(98)00042-5
Lalou C, Reyss J L, Brichet E, et al. 1993. New age data for Mid-Atlantic Ridge hydrothermal sites: TAG and Snakepit chronology revisited. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 98(B6): 9705–9713, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/92jb01898
Lalou C, Reyss J L, Brichet E, et al. 1995. Hydrothermal activity on a 105-year scale at a slow-spreading ridge, TAG hydrothermal field, Mid-Atlantic Ridge 26°N. Journal of Geophysical Research, 100(B9): 17855–17862, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/95JB01858
Lalou C, Reyss J L, Brichet E, et al. 1996. Initial chronology of a recently discovered hydrothermal field at 14°45’N, Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 144(3–4): 483–490, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(96)00190-2
Lalou C, Thompson G, Arnold M, et al. 1990. Geochronology of TAG and Snakepit hydrothermal fields, Mid-Atlantic Ridge: witness to a long and complex hydrothermal history. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 97(1–2): 113–128, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(90)90103-5
Liang **, Tao Chunhui, Yang Weifang, et al. 2018. 230Th/238U dating of sulfide chimneys in the Longqi-1 hydrothermal field, Southwest Indian Ridge. Acta Geologica Sinica (English Edition), 92(S2): 77–78, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-6724.14202
Liao Shili, Tao Chunhui, Jamieson J W, et al. 2022. Oxidizing fluids associated with detachment hosted hydrothermal systems: example from the Suye hydrothermal field on the ultraslow-spreading Southwest Indian Ridge. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 328: 19–36, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2022.04.025
Liao Shili, Tao Chunhui, Li Huaiming, et al. 2018. Bulk geochemistry, sulfur isotope characteristics of the Yuhuang-1 hydrothermal field on the ultraslow-spreading Southwest Indian Ridge. Ore Geology Review, 96: 13–27, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2018.04.007
Liao Shili, Tao Chunhui, Zhu Chuanwei, et al. 2019. Two episodes of sulfide mineralization at the Yuhuang-1 hydrothermal field on the Southwest Indian Ridge: Insight from Zn isotopes. Chemical Geology, 507: 54–63, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.12.037
Liu Zhonglan, Buck W R. 2018. Magmatic controls on axial relief and faulting at mid-ocean ridges. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 491: 226–237, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2018.03.045
Ludwig K A, Shen Chuanzhou, Kelley D S, et al. 2011. U-Th systematics and 230Th ages of carbonate chimneys at the lost city hydrothermal field. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 75(7): 1869–1888, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2011.01.008
Meyzen C M, Toplis M J, Humler E, et al. 2003. A discontinuity in mantle composition beneath the Southwest Indian Ridge. Nature, 421(6924): 731–733, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01424
Münch U, Lalou C, Halbach P, et al. 2001. Relict hydrothermal events along the super-slow Southwest Indian spreading ridge near 63°56’E-mineralogy, chemistry and chronology of sulfide samples. Chemical Geology, 177(3–4): 341–349, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-2541(00)00418-6
Murton B J, Lehrmann B, Dutrieux A M, et al. 2019. Geological fate of seafloor massive sulphides at the TAG hydrothermal field (Mid-Atlantic Ridge). Ore Geology Review, 107: 903–925, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2019.03.005
Musatov A E, Cherkashov G A. 2020. Influence of global glaciation on the origin of hydrothermal activity within the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Oceanology, 60(3): 405–411, doi: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001437020030066
Nayak B, Halbach P, Pracejus B, et al. 2014. Massive sulfides of Mount Jourdanne along the super-slow spreading Southwest Indian Ridge and their genesis. Ore Geology Reviews, 63: 115–128, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2014.05.004
Pedersen R B, Rapp H T, Thorseth I H, et al. 2010. Discovery of a black smoker vent field and vent fauna at the Arctic Mid-Ocean Ridge. Nature Communications, 1(1): 126, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/NCOMMS1124
Petersen S, Hein J R. 2013. Deep Sea Minerals: Sea-Floor Massive Sulphides; A Physical, Biological, Environmental, and Technical Review. Secretariat of the Pacific Community, GRID-Arendal, Chapter1: 7–18.
Sánchez-Mora D, Jamieson J, Cannat M, et al. 2022. Age and rate of accumulation of metal-rich hydrothermal deposits on the sea-floor: the lucky strike vent field, Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 127(6): e2022JB024031, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JB024031
Sauter D, Cannat M. 2010. The ultraslow spreading Southwest Indian Ridge. In: Rona P A, Devey C W, Dyment J, et al., Eds. Diversity of Hydrothermal Systems on Slow Spreading Ocean Ridges. Washington: AGU, 153–173, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GM000843
Sauter D, Patriat P, Rommevaux-Jestin C, et al. 2001. The Southwest Indian Ridge between 49°15′ E and 57°E: focused accretion and magma redistribution. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 192(3): 303–317, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0012-821x(01)00455-1
Tao Chunhui, Lin Jian, Guo Shiqin, et al. 2012. First active hydrothermal vents on an ultraslow-spreading center: Southwest Indian Ridge. Geology, 40(1): 47–50, doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/G32389.1
Tao Chunhui, Seyfried W EJr, Lowell R P, et al. 2020. Deep high-temperature hydrothermal circulation in a detachment faulting system on the ultra-slow spreading ridge. Nature Communication, 11(1): 1300, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15062-w
Wang Yejian, Han **qiu, ** **onglong, et al. 2012. Hydrothermal activity events at Kairei field, Central Indian Ridge 25°S. Resource Geology, 62(2): 208–214, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-3928.2012.00189.x
Wang Lisheng, Sun Zhilei, Cao Hong, et al. 2021. A new method for the U-Th dating of a carbonate chimney deposited during the Last Glaciation in the northern Okinawa Trough, East China Sea. Quaternary Geochronology, 66: 101199, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quageo.2021.101199
Yang Weifang, Liao Shili, Dias Á A, et al. 2023. Geochemistry, sulfur and lead isotopic composition of hydrothermal sulfide from the Duanqiao hydrothermal field on the Southwest Indian Ridge: implications for ore genesis. International Geology Review, 65(6): 883–899, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00206814.2022.2081937
Yang Weifang, Tao Chunhui, Li Huaiming, et al. 2017. 230Th/238U dating of hydrothermal sulfides from Duanqiao hydrothermal field, Southwest Indian Ridge. Marine Geophysical Research, 38(1–2): 71–83
You C F, Bickle M J. 1998. Evolution of an active sea-floor massive sulphide deposit. Nature, 394(6694): 668–671, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/29279
Yu Junyu. 2022. Enrichment and migration of ore-forming elements in Yuhuang-1 hydrothermal field at ultraslow-spreading Southwest Indian Ridge (in Chinese)[dissertation]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University
Yu Junyu, Tao Chunhui, Liao Shili, et al. 2021. Resource estimation of the sulfide-rich deposits of the Yuhuang-1 hydrothermal field on the ultraslow-spreading Southwest Indian Ridge. Ore Geology Reviews, 134: 104169, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2021.104169
Zhu Zhongmin, Tao Chunhui, Shen **song, et al. 2020a. Self-potential tomography of a deep-sea polymetallic sulfide deposit on Southwest Indian Ridge. Journal of Geophysical Research:Solid Earth, 125(11): e2020JB019738, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JB019738
Zhu Chuanwei, Tao Chunhui, Yin Runsheng, et al. 2020b. Seawater versus mantle sources of mercury in sulfide-rich seafloor hydrothermal systems, Southwest Indian Ridge. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 281: 91–101, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2020.05.008
Acknowledgements
We thank the captains, crew and the science parties who participated the DY115-21, DY125-34 cruises on R/V Dayangyihao. We are also grateful to three anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Foundation item: The National Key R&D Program of China under contract No. 2022YFE0140200; the National Natural Science Foundation of China under contract Nos 42127807 and 42006074; the China Ocean Mineral Resources R&D Association Project under contract Nos DY135-S1-1-02 and DY135-S1-1-01;the Macao Science and Technology Development Fund under contract No. FDCT-002/2018/A1.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, W., Tao, C., Liao, S. et al. Record of hydrothermal activity in the Yuhuang hydrothermal field and its implications for the Southwest Indian Ridge: evidence from sulfide chronology. Acta Oceanol. Sin. 42, 59–68 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-023-2287-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-023-2287-2