Abstract
The leaching behavior of molybdenite was investigated in H2O2–H2SO4 solution in this paper. The results show that H2O2 was an effective oxidant for molybdenite leaching, but it had fast decomposition kinetics. A final molybdenum extraction of 73.0% was obtained under the experimental conditions of 0.5 mol/L H2SO4, 0.5 mol/L H2O2, and the fresh H2O2 addition enhanced molybdenum extraction from 73.0 to 94.5%. The leaching process was controlled by a mixture of surface reactions and diffusion, and the activation energy was 27.98 kJ/mol. Ethylene glycol enhanced molybdenum extraction and improved the stability of H2O2. Electrochemical studies suggested that the decomposition kinetics of H2O2 was faster than that of molybdenite oxidation, and ethylene glycol enhanced recovery by increasing the resistance of H2O2 decomposition and decreasing the resistance of molybdenite oxidation. XRD and XPS analysis confirmed that ethylene glycol did not alter the phase composition and the surface chemical statues of molybdenite.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12666-022-02702-6/MediaObjects/12666_2022_2702_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12666-022-02702-6/MediaObjects/12666_2022_2702_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12666-022-02702-6/MediaObjects/12666_2022_2702_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12666-022-02702-6/MediaObjects/12666_2022_2702_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12666-022-02702-6/MediaObjects/12666_2022_2702_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12666-022-02702-6/MediaObjects/12666_2022_2702_Fig6_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12666-022-02702-6/MediaObjects/12666_2022_2702_Fig7_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12666-022-02702-6/MediaObjects/12666_2022_2702_Fig8_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12666-022-02702-6/MediaObjects/12666_2022_2702_Fig9_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12666-022-02702-6/MediaObjects/12666_2022_2702_Fig10_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Li X B, Wu T, Zhou Q S, Qi T G, Peng Z H, and Liu G H, Trans Nonferr Met Soc China 31 (2021) 842.
Zeng Q D, Liu J M, Qin K Z, Fan H R, Chu S X, Wang Y B, and Zhou L L, Int Geol Rev 55 (2013) 1311.
Chen M L, Zhang L, Gu G H, Hu Y H, and Su L J, Trans Nonferr Met Soc China 18 (2007) 1421.
Khoshnevisan A, Yoozbashizadeh H, Mozammel M, and Sadrnezhaad S K, Hydrometallurgy 111 (2012) 52.
Wu B L, and Zhao Z W, Rare Metals Cem Carbides 32 (2004) 1.
Yu J, Yang H Y, Tong L L, and Zhu J, Redk Met 34 (2015) 207.
Aracena A, Sanino A, and Jerez O, Trans Nonferr Met Soc China 28 (2018) 177.
Vizsolyi A, and Peters E, Hydrometallurgy 6 (1980) 103.
Cao Z F, Zhong H, Qiu Z H, Liu G Y, and Zhang W X, Hydrometallurgy 99 (2009) 2.
Cao Z F, Zhong H, Jiang T, Wang S, Liu G Y, and **a L Y, J Chem Technol Biotechnol 87 (2012) 938.
Cao Z F, Zhong H, Liu G Y, Qiu Y R, and Wang S, J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 41 (2010) 338.
Smirnov K M, Raspopov N A, Shneerson Y M, Lapin A Y, Bitkov G A, Men’shikov Y A, Paskin P N, and Kirichenko V P, Russ Metall (2010) 588.
Goodarzi M M, Rezai B, and Seifikhani A, Iran J Chem Chem Eng 33 (2014) 73.
Harris D L, and Lottermoser B G, Appl Geochem 21 (2006) 1216.
Aydogan S, Ucar G, Canbazoglu M, Hydrometallurgy 81 (2006) 45.
Hirajima T, Miki H, Suyantara G P W, Matsuoka H, Elmahby A M, Sasaki K, Imaizumi Y, and Kuroiwa S, Miner Eng 100 (2017) 83.
Olubami P A, Borode J O, and Ndlovu S, J South Afr Inst Min Metall 106 (2006) 765.
Huang H H, Lu M C, and Chen J N, Water Res 35 (2001) 2291.
Zeineb O, Hedi B A, Jeday M R, and Cheker C, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 40 (2015) 1278.
Mahajan V, Misra M, Zhong K, and Fuerstenau, M C, Miner Eng, 20 (2007) 670
Ginath S, Lurie S, Golan A, Amsterdam A, Sandbank J, Sadan O, and Kovo M, Water Res, 35 (2001) 2129
Veloso T C, Peixoto J J M, Pereira M S, and Leao V A, Int J Miner Process, 48 (2016) 147.
Ghahremaninezhad A, Asselin E, and Dixon D G, Electrochim Acta, 55 (2010) 5041
Kartal M, **a F, Ralph D, Rickard W D A, Renard F, and Li W, Hydrometallurgy, 191 (2020) 105192.
Ghahremaninezhad A, Dixon D G, and Asselin E, Electrochim Acta, 87 (2013) 97.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [No. 51574072 and No. 51434001] and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [No. 2025028].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Bai, Y., Wang, W., **e, F. et al. Effect of H2O2 and Ethylene Glycol on Molybdenite Dissolution in H2SO4 Solution. Trans Indian Inst Met 76, 39–47 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-022-02702-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-022-02702-6