Abstract
A compressive split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) apparatus is utilised for the high strain-rate investigation of symmetrical epoxy-based carbon/glass (CGE) and carbon/Kevlar (CKE) hybrid composite samples along the through-thickness direction. The stacking sequence used for the hybrid composites was [C5/G5]S and [C5/K5]S. Compared to the density of neat epoxy-based carbon (CE) composite, the density of CGE composite was about 14% higher, whereas the density of CKE composite was about 8% lower. An initial striker velocity of about 25 m/s was used for all experiments. The mean reference strain rate observed for CGE and CKE hybrid composites was 2293 and 2333 s−1, respectively, with a negligible difference in mean compressive strength. The mean strain to failure of [C5/K5]S was almost 17% higher than [C5/G5]S, and proper stress equilibrium was observed. This article presents the significant outcomes of SHPB testing, including mechanical response and failure analysis of the hybrid composite samples.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12666-022-02619-0/MediaObjects/12666_2022_2619_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12666-022-02619-0/MediaObjects/12666_2022_2619_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12666-022-02619-0/MediaObjects/12666_2022_2619_Fig3_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12666-022-02619-0/MediaObjects/12666_2022_2619_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12666-022-02619-0/MediaObjects/12666_2022_2619_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12666-022-02619-0/MediaObjects/12666_2022_2619_Fig6_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12666-022-02619-0/MediaObjects/12666_2022_2619_Fig7_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12666-022-02619-0/MediaObjects/12666_2022_2619_Fig8_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12666-022-02619-0/MediaObjects/12666_2022_2619_Fig9_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D.K. Rathore, R.K. Prusty, S.C. Mohanty, B.P. Singh, B.C. Ray, Mech. Mater. 105 (2017) 99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2016.11.013.
J. Kaur, K. Millington, S. Smith, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 133 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/app.43963.
S.M. Walley, J.E. Field, DYMAT J. 1 (1994) 211.
K.S. Pandya, Ch. Veerraju, N.K. Naik, Mater. Des. 32 (2011) 4094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.03.003.
J. Zhang, H. zhong Shen, H. yu Li, L. feng Gu, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 138 (2021) 50195. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.50195.
D.J. Frew, M.J. Forrestal, W. Chen, Exp. Mech. 41 (2001) 40. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02323102.
M.E. Korkmaz, P. Verleysen, M. Günay, Trans. Indian Inst. Met. 71 (2018) 2945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-018-1394-9.
W. Tang, S. Kang, Z. Liu, Trans. Indian Inst. Met. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-021-02372-w.
Shubham, C.S. Yerramalli, R.K. Prusty, B.C. Ray, . in: K. Jonnalagadda, A. Alankar, N.J. Balila, T. Bhandakkar (Eds.), Adv. Struct. Integr., Springer, Singapore, 2022: pp. 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8724-2_10.
N.K. Naik, V. Ch, V.R. Kavala, Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 498 (2008) 87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2007.10.124.
N.K. Naik, V.R. Kavala, Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 474 (2008) 301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2007.05.032.
H. Kolsky, Proc. Phys. Soc. Sect. B. 62 (1949) 676. https://doi.org/10.1088/0370-1301/62/11/302.
E.D.H. Davies, S.C. Hunter, J. Mech. Phys. Solids. 11 (1963) 155. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(63)90050-4.
R.A. Govender, L.A. Louca, A. Pullen, A.S. Fallah, G.N. Nurick, J. Compos. Mater. 46 (2012) 1219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998311415444.
Y. Ou, D. Zhu, Constr. Build. Mater. 96 (2015) 648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.044.
S. Jia, F. Wang, J. Zhou, Z. Jiang, B. Xu, Compos. Struct. 258 (2021) 113421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113421.
F. Stojceveski, A. Hendlmeier, J.D. Randall, C.L. Arnold, M.K. Stanfield, D.J. Eyckens, R. Alexander, L.C. Henderson, Materials. 11 (2018) 1786. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11091786.
C. Yerramalli, A.M. Waas, Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 6 (2004) 1.
M.C.G. Jones, E. Lara-Curzio, A. Kopper, D.C. Martin, J. Mater. Sci. 32 (1997) 2855. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018672400459.
D.S. Kumar, M.J. Shukla, K.K. Mahato, D.K. Rathore, R.K. Prusty, B.C. Ray, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 75 (2015) 012012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/75/1/012012.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to express deep gratitude to Prof. Chandra Sekher Yerramalli, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, India, for his valuable suggestions and support in conducting this study. The authors acknowledge the National Institute of Technology Rourkela, India, and the Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, India, for supporting the study. Also, we would like to express gratitude to Mr. Rajesh Patnaik and Mr. Chinmay Sumant for providing technical support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shubham, Prusty, R.K. & Ray, B.C. High Strain-Rate Through-Thickness Compression Testing of Symmetrical Inter-ply Hybrid Polymer Composites Reinforced with Carbon/Glass and Carbon/Kevlar Fibers. Trans Indian Inst Met 75, 2507–2516 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-022-02619-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-022-02619-0