Abstract
Geological events that cause casualties and huge property losses frequently occur in the hilly region of Southwest China. Especially for economically underdeveloped mountainous cities, the vulnerability of social and ecological systems greatly affects urban development. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct multi-hazard exposure research in mountain areas. The importance of this study is that the five machine learning algorithms: Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) and Categorical Boosting (CatBoost) are first used to develop multi-hazard (specifically landslides and rockfalls) susceptibility map in three typical hilly areas in the Southwest China (Qijiang, Chuishui and Wuxi). The performances of the models are then compared using the F1-Score and the true skill score (TSS) respectively. Finally, the multi-hazard exposure maps of each district are developed by combining multi-hazard susceptibility and exposure factors. According to the results of this study, it can be found that the LightGBM and CatBoost algorithms are suitable for the development of landslide and rockfall hazard susceptibility maps in the hilly region of southwest China, and this type of gradient boosting algorithms have good development prospects. In addition, in future research on geological hazards in this hilly area, more attention should be paid to conditioning factors such as rainfall, altitude, slope, distance from the faults, and lithology. The results of this study can provide reference for the screening of landslide and rockfall conditioning factors in such mountainous areas, and can also provide certain support for the planning of the social ecosystem in mountainous areas and the formulation of natural hazard mitigation measures.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the first author upon reasonable request.
References
Abbas Khan K, Zaman K, Shoukry AM, Sharkawy A, Gani S, Sasmoko Ahmad J, Khan A, Hishan SS (2019) Natural disasters and economic losses: controlling external migration, energy and environmental resources, water demand, and financial development for global prosperity. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:14287–14299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04755-5
Akinci H, Kilicoglu C, Dogan S (2020) Random forest-based landslide susceptibility map** in coastal regions of Artvin, Turkey. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inform 9:553. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9090553
Althuwaynee OF, Pradhan B, Lee S (2012) Application of an evidential belief function model in landslide susceptibility map**. Comput Geosci 44:120–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.03.003
Alvioli M, Guzzetti F, Rossi M (2014) Scaling properties of rainfall induced landslides predicted by a physically based model. Geomorphology 213:38–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.12.039
Arabameri A, Saha S, Roy J, Chen W, Blaschke T, Bui DT (2020) Landslide susceptibility evaluation and management using different machine learning methods in the gallicash river watershed, Iran. Remote Sens 12(3):475. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030475
Ayalew L, Yamagishi H (2005) The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility map** in the KakudaYahiko Mountains, Central Japan. Geomorphology 65:15–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.06.010
Azarafza M, Azarafza M, Akgün H, Atkinson PM, Derakhshani R (2021) Deep learning-based landslide susceptibility map**. Sci Rep 11:24112. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03585-1
Azizi V, Hu GP (2020) Multi-product pickup and delivery supply chain design with location-routing and direct shipment. Int J Prod Econ 226:107648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107648
Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45:5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324
Bucci F, Santangelo M, Cardinali M, Fiorucci F, Guzzetti F (2016) Landslide distribution and size in response to Quaternary fault activity: the Peloritani Range, NE Sicily, Italy. Earth Surf Process Landforms 41(5):711–720. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3898
Bui DT, Tuan TA, Klempe H, Pradhan B, Revhaug I (2016) Spatial prediction models for shallow landslide hazards: a comparative assessment of the efficacy of support vector machines, artificial neural networks, kernel logistic regression, and logistic model tree. Landslides 13:361–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-015-0557-6
Cao J, Zhang Z, Du J, Zhang LL, Song Y, Sun G (2020) Multi-geohazards susceptibility map** based on machine learning-a case study in Jiuzhaigou, China. Nat Hazards 102(3):851–871. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-03927-8
Catani F, Lagomarsino D, Segoni S, Tofani V (2013) Landslide susceptibility estimation by random forests technique: sensitivity and scaling issues. Nat Hazard 13(11):2815–2831. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2815-2013
Chatra AS, Dodagoudar GR, Maji VB (2019) Numerical modelling of rainfall effects on the stability of soil slopes. Int J Geotech Eng 13:425–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2017.1359912
Chen X, Chen W (2021) GIS-based landslide susceptibility assessment using optimized hybrid machine learning methods. CATENA 196:104833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2020.104833
Chen T, Guestrin C (2016) XGBoost. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on knowledge discovery and data mining
Chen W, Li Y, Xue W, Shahabi H, Li S, Hong H, Wang X, Bian H, Zhang S, Pradhan B, Ahmad BB (2020) Modeling flood susceptibility using data-driven approaches of naïve Bayes tree, alternating decision tree, and random forest methods. Sci Total Environ 701:134979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134979
Chen S, Miao Z, Wu L, Zhang A, Li Q, He Y (2021) A one-class-classifier-based negative data generation method for rapid earthquake-induced landslide susceptibility map**. Front Earth Sci 9:609896. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.609896
Chen X, Liu MZ, Li DF, Jia JR, Yang AQ, Zheng WF, Yin LR (2023) Conv-trans dual network for landslide detection of multi-channel optical remote sensing images. Front Earth Sci 11:1182145. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2023.1182145
Cheng S, Zhang S, Li L, Zhang D (2018) Water quality monitoring method based on TLD 3D fish tracking and XGBoost. Math Probl Eng 7:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5604740
Colkesen I, Sahin EK, Kavzoglu T (2016) Susceptibility map** of shallow landslides using kernel-based Gaussian process, support vector machines and logistic regression. J Afr Earth Sci 118:53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2016.02.019
Conforti M, Pascale S, Robustelli G, Sdao F (2014) Evaluation of prediction capability of the artificial neural networks for map** landslide susceptibility in the Turbolo River catchment (northern Calabria, Italy). CATENA 113:236–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2013.08.006
Conoscenti C, Rotigliano E, Cama M, Caraballo-Arias NA, Lombardo L, Agnesi V (2016) Exploring the effect of absence selection on landslide susceptibility models: a case study in Sicily, Italy. Geomorphology 261:222–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.03.006
Cordoba JP, Mergili M, Aristizabal E (2020) Probabilistic landslide susceptibility analysis in tropical mountainous terrain using the physically based r.slope.stability model. Nat Hazard 20:815–829. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-815-2020
Cross M (2002) Landslide susceptibility map** using the matrix assessment approach: a Derbyshire case study. Eng Geol Spec Publ 15:247–261. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.ENG.1998.015.01.26
Dayal KS, Deo RC, Apan AA (2018) Spatio-temporal drought risk map** approach and its application in the drought-prone region of south-east Queensland, Australia. Nat Hazards 93:823–847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3326-8
Dev VA, Eden MR (2019) Formation lithology classification using scalable gradient boosted decision trees. Comput Chem Eng 128:392–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2019.06.001
Ding Q, Chen W, Hong H (2017) Application of frequency ratio, weights of evidence and evidential belief function models in landslide susceptibility map**. Geocarto Int 32:619–639. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2016.1165294
Dou J, Yunus AP, Tien BD (2019) Evaluating GIS-based multiple statistical models and data mining for earthquake and rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility using the LiDAR DEM. Remote Sens 11:638. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11060638
Dou J, Yunus AP, Merghadi A, Shirzadi A, Nguyen H, Hussain Y, Avtar R, Chen YL, Pham BT, Yamagishi H (2020) Different sampling strategies for predicting landslide susceptibilities are deemed less consequential with deep learning. Sci Total Environ 720:137320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137320
Drucker H, Burges CJ, Kaufman L, Smola AJ, Vapnik V (1997) Support vector regression machines. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, pp 155–161.
Feizizadeh B, Jankowski P, Blaschke T (2014) A GIS based spatially-explicit sensitivity and uncertainty analysis approach for multi-criteria decision analysis. Comput Geosci 64:81–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2013.11.009
Fell R, Corominas J, Bonnard C, Cascini L, Leroi E, Savage WZ (2008) Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land-use planning. Eng Geol 102:99–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.03.022
Fernández T, Irigaray C, El Hamdouni R, Chacón J (2003) Methodology for landslide susceptibility map** by means of a GIS. Application to the Contraviesa Area (Granada, Spain). Nat Hazards 30:297–308. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NHAZ.0000007092.51910.3f
Fuchs S, Keiler M, Zischg A (2015) A spatiotemporal multi-hazard exposure assessment based on property data. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 15:2127–2142. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-2127-2015
Ghestem M, Sidle RC, Stokes A (2011) The influence of plant root systems on subsurface flow: implications for slope stability. Bioscience 61:869–879. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2011.61.11.6
Ghorbanzadeh O, Blaschke T, Gholamnia K, Meena SR, Tiede D, Aryal J (2019) Evaluation of different machine learning methods and deep-learning convolutional neural networks for landslide detection. Remote Sens 11(2):196–217. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11020196
Ghorbanzadeh O, Xu YH, Ghamisi P, Kopp M, Kreil D (2022) Landslide4Sense: reference benchmark data and deep learning models for landslide detection. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 60:5633017. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2022.3215209
Güneralp B, Zhou Y, Ürge-Vorsatz D, Gupta M, Yu S, Patel PL, Seto KC (2017) Global scenarios of urban density and its impacts on building energy use through 2050. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114(34):8945–8950. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1606035114
Guo Z, Yin K, Fu S, Huang F, Gui L, **a H (2019) Evaluation of landslides susceptibility based on GIS and WOE-BP model. Earth Sci 44(12):4299–4312. https://doi.org/10.3799/dqkx.2018.555
Guzzetti F, Mondini AC, Cardinali M, Fiorucci F, Santangelo M, Chang K (2012) Landslide inventory maps: new tools for an old problem. Earth Sci Rev 112:42–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2012.02.001
He H, Hu D, Sun Q, Zhu L, Liu Y (2019) A Landslide susceptibility assessment method based on GIS technology and an AHP-weighted information content method: a Case Study of Southern Anhui, China. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf 8(6):266. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8060266
Heckmann T, Gegg K, Gegg A, Becht M (2014) Sample size matters: Investigating the effect of sample size on a logistic regression susceptibility model for debris flows. Nat Hazard 14:259–278. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-259-2014
Henriques C, Zzere JL, Marques F (2015) The role of the lithological setting on the landslide pattern and distribution. Eng Geol 189:17–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.01.025
Huang F, Yin K, Huang J, Gui L, Wang P (2017) Landslide susceptibility map** based on self-organizing-map network and extreme learning machine. Eng Geol 223:11–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.04.013
Huang G, Wu L, Ma X, Zhang W, Fan J, Yu X, Zeng W, Zhou H (2019) Evaluation of CatBoost method for prediction of reference evapotranspiration in humid regions. J Hydrol 574:1029–1041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.04.085
Hussin HY, Zumpano V, Reichenbach P, Sterlacchini S, Micu M, van Westen C, Bălteanu D (2016) Different landslide sampling strategies in a grid-based bi-variate statistical susceptibility model. Geomorphology 253:508–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.10.030
Irigaray C, Fernández T, El Hamdouni R, Chacón J (2007) Evaluation and validation of landslide susceptibility maps obtained by a GIS matrix method: examples from the Betic Cordillera (southern Spain). Nat Hazards 41:61–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-006-9027-8
Islam N, Sarkar B, Basak A, Das P, Paul I, Debnath M, Roy R (2022) A novel GIS-based MCDM approach to identify the potential eco-tourism sites in the Eastern Dooars region (Himalayan foothill) of West Bengal, India. Geocarto Int 37(26):13145–13175. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2022.2076917
Kang Y, Jang E, Im J, Kwon C, Kim S (2020) Develo** a new hourly forest fire risk index based on catboost in South Korea. Appl Sci 10(22):8213. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10228213
Kavzoglu T, Sahin EK, Colkesen I (2014) Landslide susceptibility map** using GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis, support vector machines, and logistic regression. Landslides 11:425–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-013-0391-7
Ke G, Meng Q, Finley T, Wang T, Chen W, Ma W, Ye Q, Liu TY (2017) Lightgbm: a highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 30:3146–3154
Kim JC, Lee S, Jung HS, Lee S (2018) Landslide susceptibility map** using random forest and boosted tree models in Pyeong-Chang, Korea. Geocarto Int 33:1000–1015. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2017.1323964
Koks EE, Jongman B, Husby TG, Botzen WJ (2015) Combining hazard, exposure and social vulnerability to provide lessons for flood risk management. Environ Sci Policy 47:42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.10.013
Koks EE, Rozenberg J, Zorn C, Tariverdi M, Vousdoukas M, Fraser SA, Hall JW, Hallegatte S (2019) A global multihazard risk analysis of road and railway infrastructure assets. Nat Commun 10(1):2677. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10442-3
Kumar R, Anbalagan R (2016) Landslide susceptibility map** using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) in Tehri reservoir rim region, Uttarakhand. J Geol Soc India 87:271286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-016-0395-8
Kumar S, Srivastava PK, Snehmani. (2016) GIS-based MCDA-AHP modelling for avalanche susceptibility map** of Nubra valley region, Indian Himalaya. Geocarto Int 32:1254–1267. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2016.1206626
Lagomarsino D, Tofani V, Segoni S, Catani F, Casagli NA (2017) Tool for classification and regression using random forest methodology: applications to landslide susceptibility map** and soil thickness modeling. Environ Model Assess 22:201–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-016-9538-y
Lee S, Hong SM, Jung HS (2017) A support vector machine for landslide susceptibility map** in Gangwon Province, Korea. Sustainability 9(1):48–63. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9010048
Liao MY, Wen HJ, Yang L (2022) Identifying the essential conditioning factors of landslide susceptibility models under different grid resolutions using hybrid machine learning: a case of Wushan and Wuxi counties, China. CATENA 217:106428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2022.106428
Ling P, Niu RQ, Huang B, Wu XL, Zhao YN, Ye RQ (2014) Landslide susceptibility map** based on rough set theory and support vector machines: a case of the Three Gorges area, China. Geomorphology 204:287–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.08.013
Ma X, Sha J, Wang D, Yu Y, Yang Q, Niu X (2018) Study on a prediction of P2P network loan default based on the machine learning LightGBM and XGboost algorithms according to different high dimensional data cleaning. Electron Commer Res Appl 31:24–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2018.08.002
Marin RJ, Velasquez MF, García EF, Alvioli M, Aristizabal E (2021) Assessing two methods of defining rainfall intensity and duration thresholds for shallow landslides in data-scarce catchments of the Colombian Andean Mountains. CATENA 206:105563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2021.105563
Merghadi A, Abderrahmane B, Tien Bui D (2018) Landslide susceptibility assessment at Mila Basin (Algeria): a comparative assessment of prediction capability of advanced machine learning methods. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf 7(7):268–298. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi7070268
Mohammady M, Pourghasemi HR, Pradhan B (2012) Landslide susceptibility map** at Golestan Province, Iran: a comparison between frequency ratio, Dempster-Shafer, and weights-of-evidence models. J Asian Earth Sci 61:221–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2012.10.005
Moradi H, Avand M, Janizadeh S (2019) Landslide susceptibility survey using modeling methods. Spat Model GIS R Earth Environ Sci 2019:259–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815226-3.00011-9
Nachappa TG, Ghorbanzadeh O, Gholamnia K, Blaschke T (2020) Multi-Hazard Exposure Map** Using Machine Learning for the State of Salzburg. Austria. Remote Sens 12:2757. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12172757
Nefeslioglu HA, Gokceoglu C, Sonmez H (2008) An assessment on the use of logistic regression and artificial neural networks with different sampling strategies for the preparation of landslide susceptibility maps. Eng Geol 97(3–4):171–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.01.004
Niu Q, Dang X, Li Y, Zhang Y, Lu X, Gao W (2018) Suitability analysis for topographic factors in loess landslide research: a case study of Gangu County, China. Environ Earth Sci 77:294–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7462-y
Ouma YO, Tateishi R (2014) Urban flood vulnerability and risk map** using integrated multi-parametric AHP and GIS: methodological overview and case study assessment. Water 6(6):1515–1545. https://doi.org/10.3390/w6061515
Park NW (2015) Using maximum entropy modeling for landslide susceptibility map** with multiple geoenvironmental data sets. Environ Earth Sci 73(3):937–949. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3442-z
Pereira S, Zezere JL, Bateira C (2012) Technical Note: assessing predictive capacity and conditional independence of landslide predisposing factors for shallow landslide susceptibility models. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12:979–988. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-979-2012
Pham BT, Pradhan B, Bui DT, Prakash I, Dholakia MB (2016) A comparative study of different machine learning methods for landslide susceptibility assessment: a case study of Uttarakhand area (India). Environ Model Softw 84:240–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.07.005
Pham BT, Prakash I, Singh SK, Shirzadi A, Shahabi H, Tran T, Tien Bui D (2019) Landslide susceptibility modeling using Reduced Error Pruning Trees and different ensemble techniques: hybrid machine learning approaches. CATENA 175:203–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.12.018
Pourghasemi HR, Rahmati O (2018) Prediction of the landslide susceptibility: which algorithm, which precision? CATENA 162:177–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2017.11.022
Pourghasemi HR, Pradhan B, Gokceoglu C, Mohammadi M, Moradi HR (2013) Application of weights-of-evidence and certainty factor models and their comparison in landslide susceptibility map** at Haraz watershed, Iran. Arab J Geosci 6:2351–2365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0532-7
Pourghasemi HR, Gayen A, Park S, Lee CW, Lee S (2018) Assessment of landslide-prone areas and their zonation using logistic regression, logitboost, and naïvebayes machine-learning algorithms. Sustainability 10:3697. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103697
Pourghasemi HR, Kornejady A, Kerle N, Shabani F (2020) Investigating the effects of different landslide positioning techniques, landslide partitioning approaches, and presence–absence balances on landslide susceptibility map**. CATENA 187:104364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.104364
Pouyan S, Pourghasemi HR, Bordbar M, Rahmanian S, Clague JJ (2021) A multi-hazard map-based flooding, gully erosion, forest fires, and earthquakes in Iran. Sci Rep 11(1):14889. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94266-6
Pradhan AMS, Kim YT (2019) Rainfall-induced shallow landslide susceptibility map** at two adjacent catchments using advanced machine learning algorithms. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf 9(10):569–591. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9100569
Pradhan AMS, Lee SR, Kim YT (2019) A shallow slide prediction model combining rainfall threshold warnings and shallow slide susceptibility in Busan, Korea. Landslides 16:647–659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-018-1112-z
Prokhorenkova L, Gusev G, Vorobev A, Dorogush AV, Gulin A (2018) CatBoost: unbiased boosting with categorical features. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 31:6638–6648
Rahmati O, Haghizadeh A, Pourghasemi HR, Noormohamadi F (2016) Gully erosion susceptibility map**: the role of GIS-based bivariate statistical models and their comparison. Nat Hazards 82(2):1231–1258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2239-7
Rahmati O, Yousefi S, Kalantari Z, Uuemaa E, Teimurian T, Keesstra S, Pham TD, Tien BD (2019) Multi-hazard exposure map** using machine learning techniques: a case study from Iran. Remote Sens 11:1943. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11161943
Reichenbach P, Rossi M, Malamud BD, Mihir M, Guzzetti F (2018) A review of statistically-based landslide susceptibility models. Earth Sci Rev 180:60–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.03.001
Rong GZ, Li KW, Su YL, Tong ZJ, Liu XP, Zhang JQ, Zhang YC, Li TT (2021) Comparison of tree-structured parzen estimator optimization in three typical neural network models for landslide susceptibility assessment. Remote Sens 13(22):4694. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13224694
Saber M, Boulmaiz T, Guermoui M, Abdrado KI, Kantoush SA, Sumi T, Boutaghane H, Nohara D, Mabrouk E (2021) Examining LightGBM and CatBoost models for wadi flash flood susceptibility prediction. Geocarto Int 2021:1974595. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2021.1974959
Saha S, Arabameri A, Saha A, Blaschke T, Ngo PTT, Nhu VH, Band SS (2021) Prediction of landslide susceptibility in Rudraprayag, India using novel ensemble of conditional probability and boosted regression tree-based on cross-validation method. Sci Total Environ 764:142928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142928
Saha S, Saha A, Santosh M, Kundu B, Sarkar R, Hembram TK (2024) Integrating deep learning neural network and M5P with conventional statistical models for landslide susceptibility modelling. Bull Eng Geol Env 83:12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-023-03498-5
Sahin EK (2020) Comparative analysis of gradient boosting algorithms for landslide susceptibility map**. Geocarto Int 37(9):2441–2465. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2020.1831623
Shrestha S, Kang TS, Suwal M (2017) An ensemble model for co-seismic landslide susceptibility using GIS and random forest method. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf 6:365–387. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi6110365
Shu H, Hürlimann M, Molowny-Horas R, Gonzalez M, Pinyol J, Abanco C, Ma J (2019) Relation between land cover and landslide susceptibility in Vald’Aran, Pyrenees (Spain): historical aspects, present situation and forward prediction. Sci Total Environ 693:133557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.363
Sidle RC, Bogaard TA (2016) Dynamic earth system and ecological controls of rainfall-initiated landslides. Earth Sci Rev 159:275–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.05.013
Sidle RC, Ochiai H (2006) Landslides: processes, prediction, and land use. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC
Sidle RC, Ziegler AD (2012) The dilemma of mountain roads. Nat Geosci 5(7):437–438. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1512
Song Y, Niu R, Xu S, Ye R, Peng L, Guo T, Li S, Chen T (2019) Landslide susceptibility map** based on weighted gradient boosting decision tree in Wanzhou section of the three gorges reservoir area (China). ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf 8(1):4–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8010004
Sujatha ER, Kumaravel P, Rajamanickam GV (2014) Assessing landslide susceptibility using Bayesian probability-based weight of evidence model. Bull Eng Geol Environ 73:147–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-013-0537-9
Sun D, Wen H, Wang D, Xu J (2020) A random forest model of landslide susceptibility map** based on hyperparameter optimization using Bayes algorithm. Geomorphology 362:107201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107201
Sun DL, Shi SX, Wen HJ, Xu JH, Zhou XZ, Wu JP (2021) A hybrid optimization method of factor screening predicated on GeoDetector and Random Forest for Landslide Susceptibility Map**. Geomorphology 379:107623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.107623
Tang YM, Feng F, Guo ZZ, Feng W, Li ZG, Wang JY, Sun QY, Ma HN, Li YN (2020) Integrating principal component analysis with statistically-based models for analysis of causal factors and landslide susceptibility map**: A comparative study from the loess plateau area in Shanxi (China). J Clean Prod 277:124159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124159
Tang X, Machimura T, Liu W, Li J, Hong H (2021) A novel index to evaluate discretization methods: a case study of flood susceptibility assessment based on random forest. Geosci Front 12:101253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101253
Thi Ngo PT, Panahi M, Khosravi K, Ghorbanzadeh O, Kariminejad N, Cerda A, Lee S (2021) Evaluation of deep learning algorithms for national scale landslide susceptibility map** of Iran. Geosci Front 12:505–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2020.06.013
Wang P, Bai X, Wu X, Yu H, Hao Y, Hu BX (2018) GIS-based random forestweight for rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility assessment at a humid region in Southern China. Water 10:1019. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10081019
Wang Y, Fang ZC, Wang M, Peng L, Hong HY (2020) Comparative study of landslide susceptibility map** with different recurrent neural networks. Comput Geosci 138:104445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2020.104445
Wang SB, Zhuang JQ, Mu JQ, Zheng J, Zhan JW, Fu YT (2021) Evaluation of landslide susceptibility of the Ya’an–Linzhi section of the Sichuan-Tibet Railway based on deep learning. Environ Earth Sci 81:250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-022-10375-z
Wang XB, Wang LQ, Zhang WG, Zhang CS, Tan CX, Yan P, Zhang ZH, Guo J (2022) Ground fissure susceptibility map** based on factor optimization and support vector machines. Bull Eng Geol Env 81:341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-022-02843-4
Wen HJ, Hu JW, Zhang JL, ** using XGBoost model by hybrid optimized factor screening and hyperparameter. Geocarto Int 37(27):16872–16899. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2022.2120547
Wong LNY, Zhou YM (2021) Boulder falls in Hong Kong—insights from power law relationships and supervised machine learning. Landslides 18:3227–3253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-021-01696-4
Wu Y, Li W, Wang Q, Liu Q, Yang D, **ng M, Pei Y, Yan S (2016) Landslide susceptibility assessment using frequency ratio, statistical index and certainty factor models for the Gangu County, China. Arab J Geosci 9:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-015-2112-0
** with a case study of Shenzen. Sci Chin Technol Sci 53(suppl 1):75–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-010-3219-x
Xue YG, Li ZQ, Qiu DH, Zhang LW, Zhao Y, Zhang XL, Zhou BH (2019) Classification model for surrounding rock based on the PCA-ideal point method: an engineering application. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78:3627–3635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1368-5
Ye P, Yu B, Chen WH, Liu K, Ye LZ (2022) Rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility map** using machine learning algorithms and comparison of their performance in Hilly area of Fujian Province. China Natural Hazards 113(2):965–995. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05332-9
Youssef AM, Pourghasemi HR (2021) Landslide susceptibility map** using machine learning algorithms and comparison of their performance at Abha Basin, Asir Region. Saudi Arabia Geosci Front 12:639–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2020.05.010
Zezere JL, Pereira S, Melo R, Oliveira SC, Garcia RAC (2017) Map** landslide susceptibility using data-driven methods. Sci Total Environ 589:250–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.188
Zhan JW, Yu ZY, Lv Y, Peng JB, Song SY, Yao ZW (2022) Rockfall hazard assessment in the Taihang Grand Canyon Scenic Area integrating regional-scale identification of potential rockfall sources. Remote Sensing 14:3021. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14133021
Zhang WG, Zhang RH, Wu CZ, Goh ATC, Lacasse S, Liu ZQ, Liu HL (2019a) State-of-the-art review of soft computing applications in underground excavations. Geosci Front 11:1095–1106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2020.03.003
Zhang YH, Ge TT, Tian W, Liou YA (2019b) Debris flow susceptibility map** using machine-learning techniques in Shigatse Area. China Remote Sens Basel 11(23):2801–2827. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11232801
Zhang Y, Wen H, **e P, Hu D, Zhang J, Zhang W (2021) Hybrid-optimized logistic regression model of landslide susceptibility along mountain highway. Bull Eng Geol Environ 80(10):7385–7401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02415-y
Zhu AX, Miao Y, Yang L, Bai S-B, Liu J, Hong H (2018) Comparison of the presence-only method and presence-absence method in landslide susceptibility map**. CATENA 171:222–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.07.012
Zhu AX, Miao YM, Liu JZ, Bai SB, Zeng CY, Ma TW, Hong HY (2019) A similarity-based approach to sampling absence data for landslide susceptibility map** using data-driven methods. CATENA 183:104188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.104188
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, contract number: U21A2032).
Funding
The National Natural Science Foundation of China, U21A2032.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Peng Ye: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Investigation, Data curation, Writing–original draft. Bin Yu: Review & editing, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition. Wenhong Chen: Investigation, Data collection. Yu Feng: Resources, Software. Hao Zhou, **aolong Luo and Yangchun Li: Data collection, Investigation, Resources.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ye, P., Yu, B., Chen, W. et al. Risk assessment of landslide and rockfall hazards in hilly region of southwestern China: a case study of Qijiang, Wuxi and Chishui. Environ Earth Sci 83, 398 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-024-11698-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-024-11698-9