Log in

Decomposition of Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile Leaf Blade and Rhizome in Terrestrial Conditions: Effect of Temperature and Substrate Fertility

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Waste and Biomass Valorization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Posidonia oceanica litter debris accumulate in large quantities in coastal areas and pose a serious problem of negative economic impact on tourism activities. Here, we investigated the possibility of managing such residues by in situ decomposition using green leaves, brown litter, and rhizomes for 720 days at two temperatures (10 and 20 °C) alone or in the presence of nitrogen-rich soil or compost.

Methods

P. oceanica debris were characterized for remaining mass, carbon, nitrogen, sodium, cellulose, lignin content, and by 13C CPMAS NMR. Temperature sensitivity of litter decomposition was assessed by Q10 index.

Results

Nitrogen was highest in green leaves compared to brown litter and rhizomes, with C/N and lignin/N ratios highest in rhizomes. Lignin was higher in brown litter and rhizomes compared to green leaves. Sodium was highest in green leaves compared to brown litter and rhizomes. Data from 13C CPMAS NMR showed that O-alkyl-C predominated in all litter. Aromatic C regions were highest in rhizomes compared to green leaves and brown litter. Decomposition was slow in all debris, with mass loss never exceeding 46.59% after 720 days of incubation. Based on Q10 values, P. oceanica debris showed a limited temperature sensitivity to decomposition, and was highest for brown litter compared to green leaves and rhizomes.

Conclusion

Our two-year experiment showed that P. oceanica is highly resistant to microbial decomposition, and the presence of nitrogen-rich substrate does little to promote the process. Overall, in situ decomposition does not seem to be a suitable way to manage human-induced P. oceanica deposition under terrestrial conditions.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Campagne, C.S., Salles, J.M., Boissery, P., Deter, J.: The seagrass Posidonia oceanica: ecosystem services identification and economic evaluation of goods and benefits. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 97(1–2), 391–400 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Marbà, N., Díaz-Almela, E., Duarte, C.M.: Mediterranean seagrass (Posidonia oceanica) loss between 1842 and 2009. Biol. Cons. 176, 183–190 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pergent-Martini, C., Rico-Raimondino, V., Pergent, G.: Primary production of Posidonia oceanica in the Mediterranean Basin. Mar. Biol. 120(1), 9–15 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Boudouresque, C.F., Pergent, G., Pergent-Martini, C., Ruitton, S., Thibaut, T., Verlaque, M.: The necromass of the Posidonia oceanica seagrass meadow: fate, role, ecosystem services and vulnerability. Hydrobiologia 781(1), 25–42 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. De Falco, G., Simeone, S., Baroli, M.: Management of beach-cast Posidonia oceanica seagrass on the island of Sardinia (Italy, Western Mediterranean). J. Coast. Res. 24(10024), 69–75 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Castaldi, P., & Melis, P.: Composting of Posidonia oceanica and its use in agriculture. In: Insam, H., Riddech, N., Klammer, S. (Eds.) Microbiology of composting, pp. 425–434. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2002)

  7. Chiodo, V., Zafarana, G., Maisano, S., Freni, S., Urbani, F.: Pyrolysis of different biomass: direct comparison among Posidonia Oceanica. Lacustrine Alga and White-Pine. Fuel 164, 220–227 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. De Sanctis, M., Chimienti, S., Pastore, C., Piergrossi, V., Di Iaconi, C.: Energy efficiency improvement of thermal hydrolysis and anaerobic digestion of Posidonia oceanica residues. Appl. Energy 252, 113457 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mininni, C., Grassi, F., Traversa, A., Cocozza, C., Parente, A., Miano, T., Santamaria, P.: Posidonia oceanica (L) based compost as substrate for potted basil production. J. Sci. Food Agric. 95(10), 2041–2046 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kouki, S., Saidi, N., Ben Rajeb, A., Brahmi, M., Bellila, A., Fumio, M., Ouzari, H.: Control of Fusarium wilt of tomato caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicis-lycopersici using mixture of vegetable and Posidonia oceanica compost. Appl. Environ. Soil Sci. 2012, 1–11 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mateo, M.Á.J., Romero, M., Pérez, M.M., Littler, D.S.: Littler Dynamics of millenary organic deposits resulting from the growth of the mediterranean seagrass Posidonia oceanica Estuar. Coast Shelf Sci. 44(1), 103–110 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hodge, A., Robinson, D., Fitter, A.: Are microorganisms more effective than plants at competing for nitrogen? Trends Plant Sci. 5(7), 304–308 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Berglund, S.L., Ågren, G.I.: When will litter mixtures decompose faster or slower than individual litters? A model for two litt. Oikos 121, 1112–1120 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schimel, J.P., Hättenschwiler, S.: Nitrogen transfer between decomposing leaves of different N status. Soil Biol Biochem 39, 1428–1436 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bonanomi, G., Capodilupo, M., Incerti, G., Mazzoleni, S.: Nitrogen transfer in litter mixture enhances decomposition rate, temperature sensitivity, and C quality changes. Plant Soil 38(1), 1–15 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bonanomi, G., Cesarano, G., Gaglione, S.A., Ippolito, F., Sarker, T., Rao, M.A.: Soil fertility promotes decomposition rate of nutrient poor, but not nutrient rich litter through nitrogen transfer. Plant Soil 412(1), 397–411 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kögel-Knabner, I.: The macromolecular organic composition of plant and microbial residues as inputs to soil organic matter. Soil Biol. Biochem. 34(2), 139–162 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Berg, B., McClaugherty, C.: Plant litter: decomposition, humus formation, carbon sequestration. Springer, Berlin (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Gessner, M.O.: Proximate lignin and cellulose. In: Graca, M.A.S., Bärlocher, F., Gessner, M.O. (eds.) Methods to Study Litter Decomposition A Practical Guide, pp. 115–120. Springer Verlag, Dordrecht (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Apostolaki, E.T., Marbà, N., Holmer, M., Karakassis, I.: Fish farming impact on decomposition of Posidonia oceanica litter. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 369(1), 58–64 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bonanomi, G., Zotti, M., Cesarano, G., Sarker, T.C., Saulino, L., Saracino, A., Allevato, E.: Decomposition of woody debris in Mediterranean ecosystems: the role of wood chemical and anatomical traits. Plant Soil 460(1), 263–280 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Meentemeyer, V.: Macroclimate and lignin control of litter decomposition rates. Ecology 59, 465–472 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Taylor, B.R., Parkinson, D., Parsons, W.F.: Nitrogen and lignin content as predictors of litter decay rates: a microcosm test. Ecology 70, 97–104 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Melillo, J.M., Aber, J.D., Muratore, J.F.: Nitrogen and lignin control of hardwood leaf litter decomposition dynamics. Ecology 63(3), 621–626 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Findlay, S.E., Kelly, V.R.: Emerging indirect and long-term road salt effects on ecosystems. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1223, 58–68 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kaspari, M., Roeder, K.A., Benson, B., Weiser, M.D., Sanders, N.J.: Sodium co-limits and catalyzes macronutrients in a prairie food web. Ecology 98, 315–320 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gora, E.M., Sayer, E.J., Turner, B.L., Tanner, E.V.J.: Decomposition of coarse woody debris in a long-term litter manipulation experiment: A focus on nutrient availability. Funct. Ecol. 32, 1128–1138 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kaspari, M., Clay, N.A., Donoso, D.A., Yanoviak, S.P.: Sodium fertilization increases termites and enhances decomposition in an Amazonian forest. Ecology 95, 795–800 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hartley, I.P., Ineson, P.: Substrate quality and the temperature sensitivity of soil organic matter decomposition. Soil Biol Biochem 40, 1567–1574 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Davidson, E.A., Janssens, I.A.: Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climatic change. Nature 440, 165–173 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Guidetti, P., Busotti, S., Gambi, M.C., Lorenti, M.: Invertebrate borers in Posidonia oceanica scales: relationship between their distribution and lepidochronological parameters. Aquat. Bot. 58, 151–164 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Costa, V., Mazzola, A., Rossi, F., Vizzini, S.: Decomposition rate and invertebrate colonization of seagrass detritus along a hydrodynamic gradient in a Mediterranean coastal basin: the Stagnone di Marsala (Italy) case study. Mar. Ecol. 40, e12570 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The 13C CPMAS NMR measurements were performed at the CERMANU-Interdepartmental Research Centre, University of Napoli Federico II. We thank the prof. Danilo Russo for the photographic material.

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. GB, MI, RM, and GC: material preparation and decomposition experiments were performed. GI, MI, and AC: data collection at the end of the experiment was performed. MI, GB and RM: Data analysis was performed. GB: The first draft of the manuscript was written and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed Idbella.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 13 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bonanomi, G., Cesarano, G., Iacomino, G. et al. Decomposition of Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile Leaf Blade and Rhizome in Terrestrial Conditions: Effect of Temperature and Substrate Fertility. Waste Biomass Valor 14, 1869–1878 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-022-01990-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-022-01990-9

Keywords

Navigation