Log in

Adaptive Iterative Learning Trajectory Tracking Control for Spraying Manipulator With Arbitrary Initial States and Iteration-varying Reference Trajectory

  • Regular Papers
  • Robot and Applications
  • Published:
International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a novel adaptive iterative learning control (AILC) scheme to improve the tracking performance of the manipulator for spraying hull to achieve high-quality spraying effectively. First, a novel way of modifying the reference trajectory is proposed to deal with arbitrary initial states and iteration-varying reference trajectory when the manipulator reciprocates spraying. The modified way comprises constructing an error variable containing an initial correction term and determining the shortest limited time of completely tracking the desired trajectory by optimization principle. Based on this, an AILC scheme uses adaptive and backstep** techniques to handle the system’s uncertain physical parameters and external disturbance. Theoretically, this control scheme can guarantee the tip-position of the spraying manipulator to perfectly track the desired reference trajectory within an appropriate, limited time under arbitrary initial states and iteration-varying reference trajectory. Simulations and experiments verify the proposed method’s effectiveness and advantage by comparison with other control algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Z. Wang, X. Jiao, and M. Feng, “Tip-position/velocity tracking control of manipulator for hull derusting and spray painting based on active disturbance rejection control,” International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 1916–1926, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. S. Zhou, C. Shen, Y. **a, Z. Chen, and S. Zhu, “Adaptive robust control design for underwater multi-DoF hydraulic manipulator,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 248, 110822, 2022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Peng, R. Dubay, and S. Ding, “Observer-based adaptive neural control of robotic systems with prescribed performance,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 114, 108142, 2022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. R. Fareh, M. Al-Shabi, M. Bettayeb, and J. Ghommam, “Robust active disturbance rejection control for flexible link manipulator,” Robotica, vol. 38, pp. 118–135, 2020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. D. Shang, X. Li, M. Yin, and F. Li, “Dynamic modeling and fuzzy compensation sliding mode control for flexible manipulator servo system,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 107, pp. 530–556, 2022.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. B. Zafer and K. Oguzhan, “Real-time trajectory tracking control of Stewart platform using fractional order fuzzy PID controller optimized by particle swarm algorithm,” Industrial Robot, vol. 4, no. 49, pp. 708–725, 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  7. H. Ahn, Y. Chen, and K. Moore, “Iterative learning control-brief survey and categorization,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), vol. 37, pp. 1090–1121, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. X. **ng and J. Liu, “Modeling and robust adaptive iterative learning control of a vehicle-based flexible manipulator with uncertainties,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 9, no. 29, pp. 2385–2405, 2019.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. C. Chien and A. Tayebi, “Further results on adaptive iterative learning control of robot manipulators,” Automatica, vol. 44, pp. 830–837, 2008.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Z. Liu and J. Liu, “Adaptive iterative learning boundary control of a flexible manipulator with guaranteed transient performance,” Asian Journal of Control, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1027–1038, 2018.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Xu and R. Yan, “On initial conditions in iterative learning control,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 1349–1354, 2005.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Sun and D. Wang, “Iterative learning control with initial rectifying action,” Automatica, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 1177–1182, 2002.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. J. Xu and J. Xu, “On iterative learning from different tracking tasks in the presence of time-varying uncertainties,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics), vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 589–597, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. K. Wan and X. Li, “High-order internal model-based iterative learning control for 2-D linear FMMI systems with iteration-varying trajectory tracking,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 1462–1472, 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  15. X. Li, T. Chow, and L. Cheng, “Adaptive iterative learning control of non-linear MIMO continous systemswith iteration-varying initial error and reference trajectory,” International Journal of Systems Science, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 786–794, 2013.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Xu, “Iterative learning control for non-repetitive trajectory tracking of robot manipulators with joint position constraints and actuator faults,” International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 859–875, 2017.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. R. Zhang, Z. Hou, H. Ji, and C. Yin, “Adaptive iterative learning control for a class of non-linearly parameterised systemswith input saturations,” International Journal of Systems Science, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 1084–1094, 2016.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. C. Liu, D. Shen, and J. Wang, “Adaptive learning control for general nonlinear systems with nonuniform trial lengths, initial state deviation, and unknown control direction,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 29, pp. 6227–6243, 2019.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. W. Qiu, Z. **ong, J. Zhang, Y. Hong, and W. Li, “Integrated predictive iterative learning control based on updating reference trajectory for point-to-point tracking,” Journal of Process Control, vol. 85, pp. 41–51, 2020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. S. Hao, T. Liu, and E. Rogers, “Extended state observer based indirect-type ILC for single-input single-output batch processes with time- and batch-varyinguncertainties,” Automatica, vol. 112, 108673, 2020.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. X. Li, Q. Ren, and J. Xu, “Precise speed tracking control of a robotic fish via iterative learning control,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 2221–2228, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  22. V. Feliu, E. Pereira, and I. Diaz, “Passivity-based control of single-link flexible manipulators using a linear strain feedback,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 191–208, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. D. Liberzon, Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control Theory-A Concise Introduction, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. W. Chen and L. Zhang, “Adaptive iterative learning control for nonlinearly parameterized systems with unknown time-varying delays,” International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 177–186, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. X. Ruan and Z. Bien, “Pulse compensation for PD-type iterative learning control against initial state shift,” International Journal of Systems Science, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 2172–2184, 2012.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhong Wang.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.61973265).

Ting Zhang received her Ph.D. degree in control science and engineering from Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, China, in 2023. Her research interests include repetitive control (RC), iterative learning control (ILC), trajectory tracking control, autonomous farming vehicle control, and spraying manipulator control.

**aohong Jiao received her Ph.D. degree in mechanical engineering from Sophia University, Tokyo, Japan, in 2004. She is a Professor with the School of Electrical Engineering, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, China. Her research interests include robust control of nonlinear systems and applications to hybrid distributed generation systems and automotive powertrains.

Zhong Wang received his Ph.D. degree in control engineering from Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, China, in 2020. He is a lecturer with the School of Vehicle and Energy, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, China. His research interests include intelligent control of construction machinery, such as manipulator control.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, T., Jiao, X. & Wang, Z. Adaptive Iterative Learning Trajectory Tracking Control for Spraying Manipulator With Arbitrary Initial States and Iteration-varying Reference Trajectory. Int. J. Control Autom. Syst. 22, 1958–1970 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-023-9030-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-023-9030-9

Keywords

Navigation