Log in

An improved nonlinear model for a helicopter and its self-repairing control with multiple faults via quantum information technique

  • Regular Papers
  • Control Theory
  • Published:
International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, an improved nonlinear model for a 3-DOF helicopter and its self-repairing control scheme are investigated via quantum information technique. Firstly, adopting the mechanism analysis, a modified dynamic model is developed, in which the couplings among axes are considered. Such a modeling scheme is useful for applications when the accuracy of original model can not be satisfied. Then, a reconfigurable control scheme is designed for the twin rotor helicopter with multiple faults and parametric uncertainties, which combines active disturbance rejection control method with model reference adaptive control method. In addition, quantum information technique is used to increase the accuracy of self-repairing control of helicopter. Finally, simulation verification is presented in both aspects of modeling and control. The effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed scheme are verified by comparative simulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. E. Lyshevski, “Nonlinear identification and control of aircraft,” International Journal of Systems Science, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 923–935, 2000.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. D. C. Peacuterez, D. Vigouroux, and M.W. Medina, “Development of a low cost inertial measurement unit for UAV applications with Kalman Filter based attitude determination,” Proc. of IEEE Conference on Technologies for Practical Robot Applications, pp. 178–183, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  3. F. Y. Chen, B. Jiang, and G. Tao, “Fault selfrepairing flight control of a small helicopter via fuzzy feedforward and quantum control techniques,” Cognitive Computation, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 543–548, December 2012.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. I. M. Meza-Sánchez, L. T. Aguilar, A. Shiriaev, L. Freidovich, and Y. Orlov, “Periodic motion planning and nonlinear H8 tracking control of a 3-DOF underactuated helicopter,” International Journal of Systems Science, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 829–838, May 2011.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. J. Apkarian, 3D Helicopter Experiment Manual, Canada, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Nishi, M. Ishitobi, and K. Nakasaki, “Nonlinear adaptive control system design and experiment for a 3-DOF model helicopter,” Artificial Life and Robotics, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 50–53, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Meza, M. Iliana, Y. Orlov, and L. T. Aguilar, “Periodic motion stabilization of a virtually constrained 3-DOF underactuated helicopter using second order sliding modes,” Proc. of IEEE International Workshop on Variable Structure Systems, pp. 422–427, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Boukhnifer, A. Chaibet, and C. Larouci, “Hinfinity robust control of 3-DOF helicopter,” Proc. of International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals and Devices, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  9. I. A. Raptis, K. P. Valavanis, and W. A. Moreno, “A novel nonlinear back-step** controller design for helicopters using the rotation matrix,” IEEE Trans. on Control Systems Technology, vol. 19, pp. 465–473, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. K. Yang, Y. Kang, and S. Sukkarieh, “adaptive nonlinear model predictive path-following control for a fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicle,” Int. J. of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 65–74, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. A. R. We and Y. Z. Wang, “Disturbance tolerance and H8 control of port-controlled hamiltonian systems in the presence of actuator saturation,” Int. J. of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 309–315, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Fu, Q. X. Wu, and Z. H. Mao, “Chattering-free SMC with unidirectional auxiliary surfaces for nonlinear system with state constraints,” Int. J. Innov. Comput., Inf. Control, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 4793–4809, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. Xu, B. Jiang, and P. Shi, “Global robust tracking control of non-affine nonlinear systems with application to yaw control of UAV helicopter,” Int. J. of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 957–965, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Liu, X. Cao, and P. Shi, “Fuzzy-model-based fault-tolerant design for nonlinear stochastic systems against simultaneous sensor and actuator faults,” IEEE Trans on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 789–799, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. L. M. Hu, D. Q. Yue, and J. D. Li, “Availability analysis and design optimization for a repairable series-parallel system with failure dependencies,” International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control, vol. 8, no. 10(A), pp. 6693–6705, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Y. Ishida and K. Tanabe, “Dynamics of selfrepairing networks: transient state analysis on several repair types,” International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 389–403, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Liu, X. Cao, and P. Shi, “Fault estimation and tolerant control for fuzzy stochastic systems,” IEEE Trans. on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 221–229, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Liu and P. Shi, “Sensor fault estimation and tolerant control for stochastic systems with simultaneous input and output disturbances,” Automatica, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 1242–1250, 2013.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. T. C. Hsia and L. S. Gao, “Robot manipulator control using decentralized linear time-invariant time-delayed controller,” Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 2070–2075, 1990.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Sami and R. J. Patton, “Active fault tolerant control for nonlinear systems with simultaneous actuator and sensor faults,” Int. J. of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 1149–1161, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. J. Bernat and S. Stepien, “The study on the model reference adaptive control with proportional derivative action,” International Journal of Control, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 765–778, June 2012.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Z. J. Yang, X. H. Qi, and G. L. Shan, “Fault tolerant flight control law design with a modelfollowing sliding mode controller,” Proc. of International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation, vol. 1, pp. 665–668, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  23. D. Wu, K. Chen, and X. Wang, “Tracking control and active disturbance rejection with application to noncircular machining,” International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, vol. 47, no. 15, pp. 2207–2217, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. B. Yan, Z. Tian, S. Shi, and Z. Weng, “Fault diagnosis for a class of nonlinear systems via ESO,” ISA Transactions, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 386–394, October 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. F. Y. Chen, R. Hou, B. Jiang, and G. Tao, “Study on fast terminal sliding mode control for a helicopter via quantum information technique and nonlinear fault observer,” International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 3437–3447, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Y. Kang, D. H. Li, and D. Z. Lao, “Performance robustness comparison of active disturbance rejection control and adaptive backstep** sliding mode control,” Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 324, no. 2, pp. 275–285, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  27. G. Tao, Adaptive Control Design and Analysis, Hoboken & NJ, 2003.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. W. F. Zeng and L. Yan, “The parameter setting and application study of ADRC based on immune genetic algorithm,” Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Intelligent Systems, vol. 2, pp. 183–186, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  29. G. Su, “Fuzzy ADRC controller design for PMSM speed regulation system,” Advanced Materials Research, vol. 201–203, pp. 2405–2408, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. J. Q. Han, “From PID to active disturbance rejection control,” IEEE Trans. on Industrial Electronics, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 900–906, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fuyang Chen.

Additional information

Fuyang Chen received his Ph.D. degree in Automation Engineering from Nan**g University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (NUAA) in 2013. Now he is a professor at NUAA. His research interests include adaptive control, flight control, quantum control and selfrepairing control.

Zheng Wang received her B.E. degree in Aircraft Designing and Engineering from Nan**g University of Aeronautics and Astronautics in 2012. Now she is a master student at the Department of Automation, NUAA. Her research interests include aircraft modeling, adaptive control, failure detection and fault-tolerant control.

Bin Jiang received his Ph.D. degree in Automation Engineering from Northeastern University in 1995. He is currently a professor at Nan**g University of Aeronautics and Astronautics. His research interests include fault diagnosis and fault tolerance control.

Changyun Wen received his Ph.D. degree from University of Newcastle, Australia in 1990. Now he is a professor at Nanyang Technological University. His research interests include adaptive control, intelligent power management system, modeling and control of switching and impulsive systems.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, F., Wang, Z., Jiang, B. et al. An improved nonlinear model for a helicopter and its self-repairing control with multiple faults via quantum information technique. Int. J. Control Autom. Syst. 13, 557–566 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-013-0452-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-013-0452-7

Keywords

Navigation