Log in

The Proposed Geosite of Volano Landslide and a Geomorphological Itinerary Within the Valdelsa Basin (Montespertoli, Tuscany, Italy)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Geoheritage Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The town of Montespertoli (Florence, Italy) is located in the Valdelsa basin, on a NW-SE-oriented ridge, which reaches the maximum altitude of 260 m a.s.l. The inhabited centre develops on Plio-Pleistocene continental, transitional and marine deposits. The study area is affected by a series of gravitational movements mainly induced by the complex geological setting, consisting in the interbedding of pebbly, sandy, silty and clayey deposits. Composite and complex landslides, flows and rotational and translational slides are the salient features of Montespertoli slopes. A detailed 1:10,000 scale geomorphological map has been produced based on field survey analysis coupled with remote multitemporal photointerpretation. Peculiarities and evolution of the main landslides affecting the proposed geosite of Volano have been described, since this area provides wonderful didactic examples of gravitational movements. The geomorphological itinerary is developed not only through the main streets of the town, from east to west, but also along the roads that lead to farms, castles and churches scattered in the neighbouring slopes with the intent of creating a path that combines geology, culture and knowledge of the territory. The aim of this work is to show the geomorphological evidences related to different types of gravitational movements, both actual and ancient, to increase the sensitivity and respect towards the landscape and lay the foundations for a critical analysis of the territory, encouraging the didactic purpose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbazzi L, Benvenuti M, Ceci ME, Esu D, Faranda C, Rook L, Tangocci F (2008) The end of the Lago-Mare time in the SE Valdelsa Basin (Central Italy): interference between local tectonism and regional sea-level rise. Geodiversitas 30:611–639

    Google Scholar 

  • Benvenuti M, Degli Innocenti D (2001) The Pliocene deposits in the Central-Eastern Valdelsa Basin (Florence, Italy), revised through facies analysis and unconformity-bounded stratigraphic units. Paleontol Stratigr 107(2):265–286. https://doi.org/10.13130/2039-4942/5434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benvenuti M, Papini M, Rook L (2001) Mammal biochronology, UBSU and paleoenvironment evolution in a post-collisional basin; evidence from the late Miocene Baccinello Cinigiano Basin in southern Tuscany, Italy. Boll Soc Geol Ital 120:97–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Benvenuti M, Del Conte S, Scarselli N, Dominici S (2014) Hinterland basin development and infilling through tectonic and eustatic processes: latest Messinian-Gelasian Valdelsa Basin, Northern Apennines, Italy. Basin Res 26:387–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollati I, Pelfini M, Pellegrini L (2012) A geomorphosites selection method for educational purposes: a case study in Trebbia Valley (Emilia Romagna, Italy). Geogr Fis Din Quat 35(1):23–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossio A, Costantini A, Lazzarotto A, Liotta D, Mazzanti R, Mazzei R, Salvatorini G, Sandrelli F (1993a) Rassegna delle conoscenze sul neoautoctono toscano. Mem Soc Geol Ital 49:17–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossio A, Mazzei R, Salvatorini G, Sandrelli F (1993b) Nuovi dati sui depositi Mio-Pliocenici del settore meridionale del Bacino del Fiume Elsa. Paleopelagos 3:97–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandolini P, Farabollini P, Motta M, Pambianchi G, Pelfini M, Piccazzo M (2007) La valuta-zione della pericolosità geomorfologica in aree turistiche. In: Piccazzo M, Brandolini P, Pelfini M (eds) Clima e rischio geomorfologico in aree turistiche. Pàtron Editore, Bologna, pp 11–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Calcaterra D, Guida D, Budetta P, De Vita P, Di Martire D, Aloia A (2014) Moving geosites: how landslides can become focal points in Geoparks. In: Abstracts 6th international UNESCO Conference on Global Geoparks, Saint John, Canada, pp 12–13

  • Castiglioni GB (1989) Geomorfologia. Utet, Torino

    Google Scholar 

  • Cayla N, Hobléa F, Reynard E (2014) New digital technologies applied to the management of geoheritage. Geoheritage, Geoheritage. 6:89–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coltorti M, Firuzabadì D (2011) La deformazione gravitativa profonda (DSGM) del versante orientale del monte Amiata: un geosito ed un itinerario geomorfologico in Toscana meridionale. Geologia dell’Ambiente, pp. 104–114

  • Coltorti M, Firuzabadi D, Pieruccini P (2012) Geomorphological map and land units at 1:200,000 scale of the Siena Province (Southern Tuscany, Italy). J Maps 536–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruden DM, Varnes DJ (1996) Landslide types and processes. In: Turner AK, Schuster RL (eds) Landslides: investigation and mitigation. Transportation Research Board, Special Report 247, pp 36–75

  • Dominici S, Mazzanti R, Nencini C (1995) Geologia dei dintorni di San Miniato tra l’Arno, l’Elsa e l’Era. Quad Mus St Nat 14:1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Giardino M, Perotti L, Carletti R, Russo S, Caluso VV (2010) Creation and test of a mobile GIS application to support field data collection and map** activities on geomor-phosites. Regolini-Bissig Géraldine

  • Gray M (2004) Geodiversity: valuing and conserving abiotic nature. Elsevier, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray M (2008) Geodiversity: a new paradigm for valuing and conserving geoheritage. Ser Geosci Can 35(2):51–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray M (2018) Geodiversity: the backbone of geoheritage and geoconservation. Geoheritage, pp. 13–25 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809531-7.00001-0

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hose TA (1995) Geotourism – engineering geology and environment, selling the earth to Europe. In: Marinos P, Koukis G, Tsiambcos G Stournas G (eds) Balkema, Roterdam, pp. 2955–2960

  • Martin S (2010) Geoheritage popularisation and cartographic visualisation in the Tsanfleuron-Sanetsch area, Valais Regolini-Bissig Géraldine

  • May V (2015) Coastal cliff conservation and management: the Dorset and East Devon coast world heritage site. J Coast Conserv 19(6):821–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newsome D, Dowling R (eds) (2005) The scope and nature of geotourism, Geotourism. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 3–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Niculiţă M, Mărgărint MC (2018) Landslides and fortified settlements as valuable cultural geomorphosites and geoheritage sites in the Moldavian Plateau, North-eastern Romania. Geoheritage 10(4):613–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-017-0261-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niculiță M, Mărgărint MC, Cristea I (2017) Relict landslides, fluvial landforms and threatened geoheritage–Costești village. In: Proceedings of Romanian Geomorphology Symposium, Romania, Iasi, 1:130–132

  • Panizza M (2001) Geomorphosites: concepts, methods and examples of geomorphological survey. Chin Sci Bull 46(1):4–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panizza M (2009) The geomorphodiversity of the Dolomites (Italy): a key of geoheritage assessment. Geoheritage 1(1):33–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panizza M, Piacente S (2003) Geomorfologia culturale. Pitagora Editrice, Bologna

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascucci V, Merlini S, Martini IP (1999) Seismic stratigraphy of the Miocene-Pleistocene sedimentary basins of the Northern Tyrrhenian Sea and western Tuscany (Italy). Basin Res 11:337–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelfini M, Bollati I (2014) Landforms and geomorphosites ongoing changes: concepts and implications for geoheritage promotion. Quaestiones Geographicae 33(1):131–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelfini M, Brandolini P (2010) Map** geomorphological hazards in relation to geotourism and hiking trails. Regolini-Bissig Géraldine

  • Pena dos Reis R, Henriques MH (2009) Approaching an integrated qualification and evaluation system for geological heritage. Geoheritage 1:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petley DN, Mantovani F, Bulmer MH, Zannoni A (2005) The use of surface monitoring data for the interpretation of landslide movement patterns. Geomorphology 66:133–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.09.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piacente S, Bertacchini M, Coratza P (2001) La cartografia come strumento di percezione e di gestione dinamica dei beni geologici. In: Scanu G (ed) Atti del Convegno Nazionale di cultura cartografica e culture del territorio, Genova, Italy, pp 401–407

  • Pieruccini P, Coltorti M (2010) Il monte Carpegna (Marche settentrionali): un atlante dei grandi movimenti franosi. Geologia dell’Ambiente, pp 239–251

  • Poli G (1999) Geositi. Testimoni del tempo: fondamenti per la conservazione del patrimonio geologico. Pendragon, Bologna

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapidah MS, Mohamed KR, Ali CA, Leman MS, Saidin M (2018) Geotouristic itinerary: a proposal for geotourism and archaeotourism development of Lenggong Valley, Perak, Malaysia. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites 22(2)

  • Reynard E (2009) The assessment of geomorphosites. In: Reynard E, Coratza P, Regolini-Bissig G (eds) Geomorphosites. Assessment, map** and management. Pfeil Verlag, München, pp 63–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynard E, Fontana G, Kozlik L, Scapozza C (2007) A method for assessing scientific and additional value of geomorphosites. Geogr Helv 62(3):148–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynard E, Coratza P, Regolini-Bissig G (eds) (2009) Geomorphosites. Pfeil Verlag, München, pp 63–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues ML, Machado CR, Freire E (2011) Geotourism routes in urban areas: a preliminary approach to the Lisbon geoheritage survey. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites 8(2):281–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Wibledon WAP, Smith-Meyer S (2012) (eds) Geoheritage in Europe and its conservation. ProGEO

  • Wimbledon WAP (1996) Geosites—a new conservation initiative. Episodes 19(3):87–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimbledon WAP (1999) Geosites —an International Union of Geological Sciences initiative to conserve our geological heritage. In: Alexandrowicz Z (ed) Representative geosites of central Europe. Proceedings of the Central Europe Working Group Workshop ProGeo’97, Poland, Krakow, October 14–17, 1997. Polish Geological Institute Special Papers, 2, pp 5–8

  • Wimbledon WAP (2011) Geosites - a mechanism for protection, integrating national and international valuation of heritage sites. Geologia dell’Ambiente Suppl 2:13–25

  • Wimbledon WAP, Ishchenko AA, Gerasimenko NP, Karis LO, Suominen V, Johansson CE, Freden C (2000) Geosites —an IUGS initiative: science supported by conservation. In: Barettino D, Wimbledon WAP, Gallego E (eds) Geological heritage: its conservation and management, Madrid, pp 69–94

Download references

Acknowledgments

This contribution builds on the Author’s PhD thesis project, carried out at the University of Siena and Florence under the cooperative advice of Prof. Mauro Coltorti. The constructive advice of three anonymous reviewers that led to a greatly improved manuscript is here gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sofia Tognaccini.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Geoheritage: the foundation for sustainable geotourism

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tognaccini, S. The Proposed Geosite of Volano Landslide and a Geomorphological Itinerary Within the Valdelsa Basin (Montespertoli, Tuscany, Italy). Geoheritage 11, 1447–1460 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-019-00392-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-019-00392-z

Keywords

Navigation