Log in

Enhancing Crop Productivity and Profitability of Autumn Sugarcane with Intercrop** of Winter Vegetables in Real Farming Situations of North-Central India

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Sugar Tech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increasing area under food crops is not possible due to limited availability of agricultural land, the world human population stress is growing exponentially and there is need to fulfill its food requirements. Crop diversification with intercrops can go in a long way to solve the problems of low productivity per unit area and enhance the crop productivity of a production system. Intercrop** of short-duration winter vegetables with autumn-planted sugarcane concerning for system yield enhancement and economic return, particularly in north-central India, aims to match efficiently crop demands to the available growth resources and labor. The on-farm field experiment was conducted to enhance the crop productivity and profitability of intercrop** winter vegetables with autumn sugarcane and also to increase the income of farmers during autumn season of 2010–2011, 2011–2012, and 2012–2013 at Dhanuansand village under Mohanlalganj block of Lucknow district in Uttar Pradesh. The experiment with eight treatment was laid out in Randomized Block Design with four replications. Autumn sugarcane was planted by flat method at 90 cm row spacing with three budded setts at the rate of 30 cm in a row length. Intercrops of two and three rows were planted in sugarcane and compared with their sole crops. Intercrop** of potato with autumn-planted sugarcane recorded highest cane equivalent yield (179.44 t/ha) and maximum net return (Rs. 321,282/ha) as compared to other intercrop** system including sole sugarcane (94.5 t/ha and Rs. 133,395/ha, respectively). Intercrop** system was better than sugarcane sole crop. The improvement in sugarcane + potato intercrop in cane yield was 8.3% against sole sugarcane, while sugarcane + cauliflower, sugarcane + cabbage, sugarcane + knol-khol, and sugarcane + turnip were statistically at par among themselves and with the cane yield under sole sugarcane. The reduction in sugarcane yield due to intercrops cauliflower, cabbage, knol-khol and turnip were to the tune of 4.0%, 3.5%, 4.2%, and 4.8%, respectively, than sole sugarcane. Similarly, the winter vegetable such as carrot and radish intercrops with autumn sugarcane decreased the mean cane yield by 9.9 and 11.5% as compared to other vegetables intercrop** system. Sugarcane + potato intercrop** system was found to be the most remunerative and thus gave the highest B:C ratio of 1.97 followed by 1.65, 1.62, 1.58, 1.41, 1.30, and 1.12 under sugarcane + cabbage, sugarcane + knol khol, sugarcane + cauliflower, sugarcane + turnip, sugarcane + carrot, and sugarcane + radish intercrop** system, respectively. The sole sugarcane B:C ratio was 1.10 only and significantly lesser than all intercrop** systems. The cane commercial sugarcane juice per cent were non-significant with the various intercrop** systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alam, Monirul G.M.., M.M. Alam, M.J. Alam, W.A. Zahan, and M.S. Alam. 2007. Profitability of intercrop** with sugarcane in some selected mills zone. Bangladesh Journal of Sugarcane 29: 64–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geetha, P., K. Sivaraman, A.S. Tayade, and R. Dhanpal. 2015. Sugarcane based intercrop** system and in effect on cane yield. Journal of Sugarcane Research 5 (2): 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaybal, V. 1992. Intercrop** studies in sugarcane during eighties in South India. Bhartiya Sugar 17: 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kailasam, C. 1994. Evaluation of nitrogen levels and seed rates for short duration sugarcane (Co 8338) intercropped with three soybean cultivars of varying growth habits. Ph.D. Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore

  • Saini, L.K., M. Singh, and M.L. Kapur. 2003. Relative profitability of intercrop** vegetable crops in autumn planted sugarcane. Sugar Tech 5 (1–2): 95–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, R.R., K.S. Bangar, S.R. Sharma, H.B. Gwal, and O.P. Rathore. 1992. Comparative performance of intercrop** pulses in sugarcane under south western M.P. Indian Journal of Agronomy 37: 95–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singels, A. and M. A. Smit. 2002. The effect of row spacing on an irrigated plant crop of sugarcane variety NCO376. In Proc. 76th South African Sugarcane Techno. Ass., South Africa. pp. 94–105.

  • Singh, A.K., Menhi Lal, and Arun Kumar Singh. 2006. Production potential and economic viability of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids)—based crop diversification options in the North zone of sub-tropical India. Indian Journal of Sugarcane Technology 2 (1&2): 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A.K., Menhi Lal, and M. Singh. 2005. Productivity and profitability of autumn-sugarcane based plant-ratoon system through lentil intercrop**, nitrogen nutrition and biofertilizers. Indian Journal of Sugar Tech 20 (1&2): 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundara, B. 1998. Sugarcane cultivation. New Delhi: Vikas publication Pvt. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D.P., V.B. Jaiswal, H.G. Prakash, and S. Solomon. 2020. Companion crop** of vegetables with ratoon sugarcane: A cane study. Sugar Tech 22 (1): 28–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, G.I., and G.P. Meade. 1955. A manual for cane sugar manufacturers and their chemist. New York: John Willey and Sons. Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, N.P., R.D.N. Verma, R.G. Singh, and S.B. Singh. 2000. Effect of plant geometry and nitrogen level on yield and juice quality of sugarcane. Sugar Tech 2 (1&2): 40–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S.N., and S.P. Rai. 1996. Companion crop** of autumn sugarcane and spices. Indian Sugar 46 (3): 177–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soi, Sangeeta. 2018. Intercrop** in sugarcane. Agripedia. December, 2018.

  • Singh, V., S.K. Kotham, and H.N. Tripathi. 1986. Studies on intercrop** in sugarcane of central Uttar Pradesh. Indian Sugar 35 (10): 559–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma, R.S., M.P. Motiwale, R.S. Chauhan, and R.K. Tewari. 1981. Studies on intercrop** of species and tobacco with autumn sugarcane. Indian Sugar 31 (7): 451–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma, R.S., R. Kumar, and R.L. Yadav. 1984. Status of research on intercrop** with sugarcane. Indian Sugar Crops Journal 10 (2): 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma, R.S., and R.L. Yadav. 1986. Growth and yield of sugarcane + potato in companion system. Journal of Agricultural Science Cambridge 107: 125–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verma, R.S., and R.L. Yadav. 1988. Nitrogen response of autumn planted sugarcane grown with various companion crops. Journal of Agricultural Science Cambridge 111: 115–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willey, R.W. 1979. Intercrop**—its importance and its research needs. Competition and yield advantage. Field Crops Abstracts 31 (1): 1010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, R.L., and S.R. Prasad. 1991. Inter/relay crop** of wheat, potato and sugarcane. Indian Journal of Agronomy. 36 (4): 425–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, R.L., and R.P. Verma. 1984. Transfer of intercrop** technique to sugarcane growers. Indian Sugar Crops Journal 10: 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful for the help rendered by Head, Division of Crop production and the Director, ICAR-Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow (Uttar Pradesh) for providing all facilities including technical and financial support during the course of experimentation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chandra Gupta.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. The authors also declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh, S.N., Gupta, C., Singh, V.K. et al. Enhancing Crop Productivity and Profitability of Autumn Sugarcane with Intercrop** of Winter Vegetables in Real Farming Situations of North-Central India. Sugar Tech 25, 653–659 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-022-01219-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-022-01219-y

Keywords

Navigation